Transcript Performance Management and Building QI into Your Culture
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND QI PRINCIPLES AND STRATEGIES
MINNESOTA’S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (MDH) AND COMMUNITY HEALTH BOARDS JANUARY 10, 2011 MarMason Consulting
Marni Mason BSN, MBA
2
More than 30 years in private healthcare and public health as clinician, manager and consultant Consultant in healthcare performance measurement and improvement (20 years) PH performance standards and improvement since 2000 and all 3 Multistate Learning Collaboratives (2005-2010) Consultant for PHAB Standards Development and training of site reviewers (2008-2010) Surveyor for NCQA (13 years) and Senior Examiner for state Baldrige Quality Award MarMason Consulting
QI for Leadership Series
3
Session # 1: Overview of Quality Improvement for Leadership
Quality improvement principles and methods that support performance management in a public health agency ( Jan 10)
Session # 2: Creating a Culture of QI in Your Agency
Building infrastructure and capacity for quality into agency culture (Feb 7 th )
Session # 3: Strategies and Methods for Continuous Quality Improvement
How to conduct/lead quality teams (leadership responsibility in steps to building quality improvement); alignment of strategic plan, health assessment and health improvement plan) (Feb 28 th )
Sessions # 4 & 5: Topics TBD
MarMason Consulting
Today’s Learning Objectives
4
In today’s session the participants will develop a better understanding of: Performance Management and Integration of QI into the Agency Principles of Quality Improvement Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycle for Improvement Root Cause Analysis MarMason Consulting
5
Performance Management
Breakthrough Collaborative
MarMason Consulting
Business Process Analysis QI Methods & Tools
6
Performance Management
Source: Turning Point Performance Management Collaborative, 2003.
MarMason Consulting
Performance Standards
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Establish performance standards Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB) standards National Public Health Performance Standards (CDC) Establish and define outcomes and indicators Process outcomes Health outcomes
Performance Measurement
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT Monitoring of Performance
• Review of performance (Accreditation/Self Assessment) results • Program evaluation results
Monitoring of Indicators and Outcomes
• Process and short-term outcomes • Health indicators and outcomes
Definition of Quality Improvement
A management process and set of disciplines that are coordinated to ensure that the organization consistently meets and exceeds customer requirements.
QI
Top management philosophy resulting in complete organizational involvement
qi
Conduct of improving a process at the microsystem level Bill Riley and Russell Brewer, Review and Analysis of QI Techniques in Police Departments, JPHMP Mar/April 2009
Quality Improvement Process
Establish QI structure and capacity in agency Establishing QI councils and plans Conducting QI teams Quality improvement methods and tools Plan-Do-Check/Study-Act cycle Rapid Cycle Improvement (RCI) Improvement collaboratives Lean Six Sigma Adapting or adopting model practices
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROCESS
Reporting Progress
REPORT PROGRESS
Performance in standards Indicators and outcomes Health indicators Program evaluation data Regular data tracking, analysis and review Basis for QI efforts
12
Integration of QI into Agency Culture
MarMason Consulting
Multilevel Model of Integration*
13
Spread can be defined as moving from common practices to best practices Diffusion is the rate at which innovation is adopted within an organization or industry * Bill Riley and Russell Brewer, Review and Analysis of QI Techniques in Police Departments, JPHMP Mar/April 2009 MarMason Consulting
14
Levels of QI Integration
100 75 50 25 0
MarMason Consulting
Level 1- No interest or activities Level 2 Awareness, interest and one-time projects Level 3- Multiple teams and QI tools, but no repetition or saturation Level 4- Speciic QI model integrated into agency management structure with continuous improvement
JPHMP Article Recommendations
15
Implement QI as a comprehensive management philosophy rather than a project-by-project approach Top officials must set a vision for the agency and exhibit constant leadership, focus continuously on mission Use the lessons/proven methods from others [general healthcare, police, etc.] to overcome barriers Find creative ways to secure resources for QI Build on existing PH tools and capabilities Conduct a self-assessment for QI readiness in your agency Bill Riley and Russell Brewer MarMason Consulting
Poll Question
How would you describe level of quality improvement integration in your organization? A. Level 1: No interest or activity B. Level 2: Awareness, interest, one time projects C. Level 3: Multiple teams and QI tools but no repetition or saturation D. Level 4: Specific QI model integrated throughout organization
17
Let’s Discuss!
What is your experience with the four components of performance management in your Health Department?
MarMason Consulting
18
QI Principles and Strategies
MarMason Consulting
The Quality Environment
19
Agency-wide commitment to assessing and continuously improving quality over time?
Decisions based on data?
Agency achieving goals?
Use data to decide on improvement initiatives and to know if the improvements are successful?
MarMason Consulting
20
Principles of Quality Management
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Know your stakeholders and what they need Focus on processes Use data for making decisions Use teamwork to improve work Make quality improvement continuous Demonstrate leadership commitment MarMason Consulting
1. Know Your Stakeholders
21
Identify stakeholders and their needs Sector Mapping Community Assessment Advisory Council Input Survey Data & Focus Groups Force Field Analysis Set goals based on stakeholder needs MarMason Consulting
22
Public Sector Map
National Institute of Health Office of the Insurance Commissioner Dept. of Social & Human Services
•Aging & Adult Services •Med. Asst. Admin •Division of Developmental Disabilities.
•Mental Health Division
Public Hospital Districts
Department of Health
•Chronic Disease & Risk Reduction •Diabetes Prevention & Control •Community & Rural Health •Community & Family Health •Maternal Support Srvcs •Women, Infants & Children •Licensing Boards
Head Start Programs
Department of Defense
•Tri-Care •Prime
Governor / Legislature
Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction Employment Security Department
•Worksource
Department of Veterans Affairs
School Boards •Public schools •BIA schools •Charter schools •Private faith based schools
Dept. of Corrections
•Prisons
Department of Labor & Industries Health Care Authority
•Public Employees Benefit Board •Basic Health Plan
State Board of Health
Local Health Jurisdictions Local Governments Public Library System
These are examples of partners in the public health system:
Bold
= Large agency or organization,
Italics
= Type of organization, not a specific entity, Regular= Specific organization or entity MarMason Consulting
2. Focus on Work Process
23
85% of poor quality is a result of poor work processes, not of staff doing a bad job Processes often “go wrong” at the point of the “handoff” Attend to improving the overall process, not just one part—some of the most complex processes are the result of creating a “work around” MarMason Consulting
Measure processes that are:
Important and relevant to population Control vs. Influence High-risk Health Alerts, Drinking Water, CD Investigations High-volume WIC, Food Safety, OSS, Immunizations Problem-prone Emergency Preparedness
Tools to Link Work and Outcomes
Logic models and work flow charts Customer-supplier relationships Client flow, information flow Data and analysis tools Root cause tools: fishbone diagram, Pareto chart Force field analysis Interrelationship digraph Note: See PH Memory Joggers at GOAL/QPC or QI tools at ASQ
The Logic of Public Health
26
We inspect restaurants
So that # of inspections
MarMason Consulting Conditions in the restaurant don’t create unsafe food
# of critical violations So that
Public is sold food that is safe to eat
% of critical violations corrected within 24 hours So that
There are fewer incidents of foodborne illness
rate of foodborne illness
28
3. Use Data to Make Decisions
Use performance assessment data to target improvement Use data analysis tools to develop information Analyze data to identify root cause Use data to monitor performance outcomes MarMason Consulting
Poll Question
How frequently do you/your organization use data to target improvement efforts? A. Rarely B. Sometimes C. Often D. Always
30
Use Data to Make Decisions
Conceptual Tools
Affinity Diagram Brainstorming Process Flow Chart Cause and Effect Diagram (Fishbone) Five Why’s Matrix Diagram MarMason Consulting
Numerical Tools
Check Sheet Bar Chart Histogram Pareto Chart Control Chart Run Chart
[See Goal/QPC PH Memory Joggers]
Power of Root Cause Analysis
31
W. Edwards Deming transformed quality control processes by applying his beliefs Measuring outputs/outcomes at the end ignores root cause and ensuing poor results.
Addressing root causes through ongoing evaluation and quality improvement avoids problems and improves quality.
Ongoing measurement with feedback loops helps processes.
* The Public Health Quality Improvement Handbook, page 22 MarMason Consulting
Root Cause Analysis
32
Goal: To find the real cause of a problem or issue Understand the impact to the organization Resolve it with a permanent fix We need to determine: what happened?
why it happened?
where it happened?
how to eliminate it? MarMason Consulting
Cause and Effect Diagram
Test Location Client Inconvenient Too Public Don’t see benefit Fearful Don’t Want Test Poor HIV Testing Not Client Centered Not Offered Not Respectful Poor Experience Counseling Staff
34
Example of Fishbone
WIC Client Redemption of Farmer’s Market Coupons
People
Knowledge Deficit Client has more distractions in the summer Language Variety/Selection Preferences Personal Cultural Customer Service
Access
Limited WIC Providers Locations Hours
WIC clients do not redeem all of the farmer’s market coupons
Distribution Frequency Staff explanations of Farmer’s Market option Timing
Methods
Limited supply Small dollar value
Materials
No change is given Page 1 MarMason Consulting
4. Use Teamwork
35
QI efforts need buy-in from all stakeholders Creative ideas are needed Division of labor is needed Process often crosses functions Solution generally affects many MarMason Consulting
Tips for Effective QI Teams
36
Teams should develop a clear charge and support resources Teams should adopt working agreements (cell phone etiquette to decision procedures) Teams should assign roles of facilitators and recorders Team process has predictable stages that are useful to keep in mind: Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing MarMason Consulting
Affinity Diagram*
37
Why use it?
To allow a QI team to creatively generate a large number of ideas/issues and organize in natural groupings to understand the problem and potential solutions.
What does it do??
Encourages creativity by everyone on team Breaks down communication barriers Encourages non-traditional connections among ideas/issues Allows breakthroughs to emerge naturally Encourages ownership of results Overcomes “team paralysis”
*PH Memory Jogger page 12
MarMason Consulting
38
Uptake of Vaccines Example (Kittitas, WA)
MarMason Consulting
5. Make QI Continuous
39
QI is a system-wide approach to assessing and continuously improving quality of the processes and services over time See inter-relationships, not parts Understand the flow of work, not the one-time snapshot Detail the work processes Determine cause and effect relationships Identify points of highest leverage Improve and innovate, not just change for change’s sake MarMason Consulting
Improvement Model - PDSA Cycle
40
The Plan Do Check/Study Act Cycle is a trial-and learning method to discover what is an effective and efficient way to design or change a process The “check” or “study” part of the cycle may require some clarification; after all, we are used to planning, doing/acting. It compels the team to learn from the data collected, its effects on other parts of the system, and under different conditions, such as different communities MarMason Consulting
PDSA Improvement Cycle
Act
• What changes are to be made?
• Next cycle?
Plan
• Objective • Questions and predictions • Plan to carry out the cycle (who, what, where, when) • Plan for data collection
DOCUMENTATION OF CHANGE - MINUTES REVISE LOGIC MODEL REVISE LOGIC MODEL 41
Study
•Complete the data analysis •Compare data to predictions •Summarize lessons
DATA REPORT
MarMason Consulting
Do
• Carry out the plan • Document problems and unexpected observations • Begin analysis of the data
WORK PLAN
Poll Question
Do you use the PDSA cycle in your organization? A. Not familiar with the PDSA cycle B. Familiar with PDSA cycle but don't use C. Familiar with cycle and use occasionally D. Knowledgeable about the cycle and use consistently
Make QI Continuous
43
Use conclusions from data analysis to identify areas for improvement Charge QI team and provide support Provide QI training Develop AIM statement Use tools to understand root causes Use data for baseline and analysis Design process improvement to address root causes Train staff on the process improvement MarMason Consulting
Adopt or Adapt Model Practices
44
Use data to identify need for improvement Identify exemplary practices in: Other local and state health departments, CDC and other national organizations, www.naccho.org/topics/modelpractices Other industries Describe your process (Logic Model or Flow Chart) Study the exemplary practice process Adopt or adapt as appropriate MarMason Consulting
45
6. Demonstrate Leadership Commitment
Build a QI culture in your agency Connect the organization’s strategic plan to performance improvement Know and use quality principles Initiate and support QI teams Encourage all staff to use quality improvement in daily work Reward improvements Assure adequate QI infrastructure for quality assessment and improvement activities MarMason Consulting
QI Culture and QI Council
46
Critical to make data/reporting meaningful to staff Performance measures: More is not better Resource level declines after the first data reporting period Staff need lots of practice/training to develop good performance measures RCI/QI projects: Quality planning is more appropriate than QI for some projects with long-term outcomes MarMason Consulting
Agency Level Performance Measures
Measure Indicator
Improve immunization rates Reduce tobacco use Reduce overweight & obese populations Increase healthy physical activity Increase the percentage of kindergarten enrollees that are up to date on their immunizations upon school entry from 86% to 92% by 2014.
Decrease the percentage of adult smokers to 16% by 2014.
Reduce the rate of increase for adult obesity to 0% by 2014.
Increase the percent of youth who are physically active for at least 60 minutes per day from 16.8% to 18.5% by 2014.
Reduce substance abuse Increase responsible sexual behavior Increase the number of adults receiving opiate treatment service by 23% by 2014, to 800 patients.
Increase the percentage of sexual partners treated for sexually transmitted diseases by 10% by 2014.
Responsibility
48
MarMason Consulting
Change vs. Improvement
49
W. Edwards Deming stated “Of all changes I’ve observed, about 5% were improvements, the rest, at best, were illusions of progress.” We must become masters of improvement We must learn how to improve rapidly We must learn to discern the difference between improvement and illusions of progress MarMason Consulting
Some QI References
Embracing Quality in Local Public Health: Michigan’s Quality Improvement Guidebook, 2008, www.accreditation.localhealth.net
Public Health Memory Jogger, GOAL/QPC, 2007, www.goalqpc.com
Breakthrough Method and Rapid Cycle Improvement www.ihi.org
Bialek R, Duffy DL, Moran JW. The Public Health Quality Improvement Handbook. Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press; 2009 Guidebook for Performance Measurement, Turning Point Performance Management National Excellence Collaborative, 2004, http://www.phf.org/pmc_guidebook.pdf
Mason M, Schmidt R, Gizzi C, Ramsey S. Taking Improvement Action Based on Performance Results: Washington State’s Experience. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. Jan/Feb 2010; 16(1): 24-31
51
What questions do you have?
MarMason Consulting