CMS and PET Where are we headed?
Download
Report
Transcript CMS and PET Where are we headed?
The Latest Federal Initiatives
in Evidence-Based Medicine
Barry M. Straube, M.D.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Citizen’s Council on Health Care
November 10, 2005
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS)
Provides health benefits for over 76 million
Americans
Medicare
Medicaid
State Children's Health Insurance Program
(SCHIP)
Spends over $600 billion annually for health
care services in CMS programs
2
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS)
Healthcare Benefits Administration
Establish payment methodology for providers
Conduct research on financing, treatment & management
Assure that contractors & state agencies run CMS programs
correctly
Identify fraud & abuse, take appropriate action
Beneficiary Focused Activities
Benefits and health education
Healthcare data for choice
Advocacy: Appeals, Grievances, patient rights
Preventive services
3
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS)
Quality-Focused Activities
Laboratory Testing (CLIA)
Survey & Certification of Health Care Facilities (LTC, SNF,
HHA, Hospitals)
End-Stage Renal Disease Networks
Organ Procurement Organizations
Quality Improvement Organizations
Multiple Demonstration Projects
Health Information Technology promotion/adoption
Pay-for-Performance, Paying for Quality, Value-Based Purchasing
Healthcare data, public reporting
Evidence-Based Medicine, Technology & Innovation
4
A Variation Problem
Dartmouth Atlas of Healthcare
CMS Quality Roadmap
VISION: The right care for every person
every time
Make
care:
Safe
Effective
Efficient
Patient-centered
Timely
Equitable
10
CMS Quality Roadmap:
Strategies
1.
2.
3.
Work through partnerships to achieve specific
quality goals
Publish quality measurements and information
as a basis for supporting more effective quality
improvement efforts
Pay in a way that expresses our commitment to
quality, and that helps providers and patients to
take steps to improve health and avoid
unnecessary costs
11
CMS Quality Roadmap:
Strategies for QI
4.
5.
Assist practitioners in making care more
effective and less costly, especially by
promoting the adoption of HIT
Bring effective new treatments to patients
more rapidly and help develop better
evidence so that doctors and patients can
use medical technologies and treatments
more effectively
12
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
(CMS)
CMS as a Public Health Agency
Using
CMS influence and financial leverage to
transform American healthcare system
Quality, Value, Efficiency, Cost-effectiveness
Assisting patients and providers in receiving
evidence-based, technologically-advanced care
13
Evidence-Based Medicine
“Evidence-based medicine is
the conscientious, explicit,
and judicious use of current
best evidence in making
decisions about the care of
individual patients.”
D.L. Sackett et al: BMJ 312, no.7023
(1996):71-72
14
Evidence-Based Medicine
“The practice of evidence-based
medicine means integrating
individual clinical expertise
with the best available external
clinical evidence from
systematic research and our
patient’s unique value and
circumstances.”
D.L. Sacket et al, BMJ 312, no.7023
(1996): 71-72
15
Evidence-Based Medicine
Evidence-Based Guidelines (EBGs)
Different methods for designing guidelines
Global subjective judgment
Consensus-based
Evidence-based
Outcomes-based
Preference-based
Guidelines should be based on evidence, not subjective
judgment or opinion
“Evidence-based”: coverage, performance measures,
medical necessity, benefit design, disease management,
quality improvement, regulations, & public policies
16
Features of EBGs
Work of analyzing evidence and developing a
guideline or policy is done by a small group of
experts, usually sponsored by an organization
Utilization of an explicit, rigorous process
End “product” is generic, applying to a class or
group of patients, not individual patients
Effects on care are indirect
Enable, motivate or (sometimes) force providers to
deliver certain types of care to groups of people,
NOT to a particular patient
17
Evidence-Based Medicine
Evidence-Based Individual Decision Making (EBID)
Focus on educating clinicians to help them bring more
research and evidence into individual decisions about
individual patients
Integrating EBGs with EBID
EBM should not just focus on individual physicians and
their decisions
EBM is a set of principles and methods intended to
ensure that to the greatest extent possible, medical
decisions, guidelines, and other types of policies are
based on and consistent with good evidence of
effectiveness and benefit.
18
CMS Evidence-Based Initiatives
National Coverage Decisions
Medicare Benefit Categories and specific benefits
Preventive Care Services
Technology & Innovation Assessments
Coverage with Evidence Development
Medical Devices
Therapeutics
Diagnostics
Health Information Technology
Data collection via EHRs, registries, eprescribing, etc.
Clinical Decision Support
19
CMS Evidence-Based Initiatives
Quality & Efficiency Measure development
Quality Alliances
National Quality Forum
Constant reassessment
Drug Formulary for Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit
Pay-for-Performance Initiatives
Hospital
Physician
Home Health, Skilled Nursing Facilities, ESRD
facilities
20
CMS EBM Initiatives
QIO and ESRD Network Quality Improvement
Activities
CMS Breakthrough Initiatives
Fistula First
Surgical Care Improvement Program (SCIP)
Nursing Home Initiatives
Restraint reduction
Pressure ulcers reduction
Pain control
Staff turnover rate reduction
21
Steps to Coverage
Determination and Payment
Outside of CMS:
Congress determines benefit categories
FDA approves drugs/devices for market
Within CMS:
Benefit Category Determination
Coverage Decision
Coding Assignment
Payment Determination
22
National Coverage Determinations
(NCDs)
Evidence-based decisions on whether to add or
revise coverage for an item or service under
Medicare Part A or B
Must meet statutory “reasonable and necessary”
standard
Juxtaposed to FDA “safe and effective” standards
Binding on all contractors (supersedes any local
coverage policies)
23
Most Coverage is Local
National
10%
Local
National
Local
90%
24
What prompts NCDs?
Internal (20%) or external (80%) requests
May involve:
New technology or treatment not addressed in
past
Reconsideration of a prior non-coverage (or
limited coverage) decision
Response to significant variation in local coverage
policies
25
Key Factors Considered in National
Coverage Determinations
•
•
•
•
•
Must be potentially a benefit of Medicare
Evidence of improved health outcomes
Appropriate for Medicare population
Replicable in provider community
Costs not a primary factor historically
26
Recent NCD Guidance Documents
CMS requested public comment on factors to consider
in:
Evidence development methods
Process for study design and implementation
Registries
Clinical trials
Other methods
27
Coverage with Evidence
Development (CED)
Used for promising innovations with insufficient
evidence for individual patients or the Medicare
population
Also used when conclusive evidence is not
available, but existing evidence strongly suggests
probable benefit
Offers prompt coverage linked with more
evidence development
Speeds access, safeguards patients, improves
evidence for better decisions
28
Coverage With Evidence Development =
an alternative to non-coverage
Coverage
Yes
Is existing
evidence
sufficient
to support
Medicare
coverage?
Coverage with
Evidence
Development
No
Non-coverage
29
Flexible Coverage Processes
Examples
Prophylactic implantable cardioverter
defibrillator (ICD)
Data
submitted to national registries, at low cost
for participating hospitals all over the country
Otherwise would have more limited coverage
Expanded coverage to reach more patients
30
Flexible Coverage Processes
Examples
Additional off-label uses of cancer drugs
No FDA-approved results, and no studies covered in
medical references
Previously would not have been nationally covered
Evidence developed through clinical trials
FDG-PET scanning
For dementia and neurodegenerative disorders
For cancer diagnosis, staging, monitoring
Evidence developed through clinical trials
31
Coverage with Evidence
Development NCDs
PET for AD
Sep 04
CRC NCI Trials
Jan 05
ICDs
Jan 05
PET 6 Cancers
Jan 05
Cochlear Implant
Apr 05
US Fracture Healing
Apr 05
32
Technical Assessments (TAs)
Health tech assessment to meet policy or clinical
objectives
Technology performance characteristics assessed
Safety
Efficacy
Effectiveness
Outcomes
Appropriateness
Economic impacts
33
Technical Assessments (TAs)
Components
Identifying & prioritizing technologies for assessment
Collecting & analyzing data
Synthesizing & grading evidence
Disseminating findings & recommendations
Criteria for commissioning a TA
Body of evidence extensive & timeframes in jeopardy
Complexity of medical & scientific literature is great
Significant differences of opinion exist
Technical/clinical expertise or analytic methods great
34
TA Options
Medicare Coverage Advisory Committee
External TA
AHRQ
Evidence-Based Practice Center (EPC)
Other qualified entity
For more information:
www.cms.hhs.gov/coverage
35
FDA Parallel Review
2005 HHS Medical Innovation Task Force
report: “Moving Medical Innovations
Forward—New Initiatives from HHS”
Recommended increased collaboration between
CMS and FDA in four areas
Parallel review
Post-marketing surveillance
Humanitarian Device Exemptions (HDEs)
Summaries of safety and effectiveness (SSEs)
36
FDA Parallel Review
CMS & FDA currently discussing simultaneous
evaluation of FDA-regulated medical products when
the product sponsor and both CMS & FDA agree to
such parallel review
Several post-marketing surveillance projects in
development
Federal Register notice expected soon for public comment
Pilot project being defined
Provide FDA with access to claims data for monitoring safety
or effectiveness of Part B devices, drugs, biologicals
Part D expansion when data available
HDEs and SSEs not being discussed yet
37
AHRQ EBM Activities
Evidence-Based Practice Centers (EPCs)
1997: AHRQ established 12 EPCs to promote EB practice in
everyday care
Review relevant scientific literature on clinical, behavioral, and
organization and financing topics to produce evidence reports &
technology assessments
Reports utilization:
Informing and developing coverage decisions
Quality measures
Educational materials and tools
Guidelines
Research agendas
38
AHRQ EBM Activities
Effective Health Care Program
Medicare Modernization Act (MMA) Section 1013
Authorizes AHRQ to support and conduct research with a focus on
outcomes, comparative clinical effectiveness, and appropriateness
of pharmaceuticals, devices and health care services
Research determined by needs of Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP
programs
Approaches
Synthesize knowledge: EPCs
Generate knowledge: DEcIDE Research Network
Translate knowledge: Clinical Decisions & Communications
Science Center
39
AHRQ Effective Health Care
Topics
Arthritis and non-traumatic joint disorders
Cancer
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma
Dementia including Alzheimer's disease
Depression and other mood disorders
Diabetes mellitus
Ischemic heart disease
Peptic ulcer disease and dyspepsia
Pneumonia
Stroke and hypertension
40
AHRQ & NIH EBM Activities
National Guideline Clearinghouse
Partnering with CMS, NIH, FDA and other federal
agencies to utilize EBM principles in quality and research
activities
NIH
Partnership between AHRQ, AMA, AHIP
Guidelines compendium, comparison, syntheses
Translational and applied research
HRSA
Organ Donation Breakthrough Initiative
41
Contact Information
Barry M. Straube, M.D.
Acting Chief Medical Officer
Acting Director, Office of Clinical Standards & Quality
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
7500 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, MD 21244
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (410) 786-6841
42