Transcript Document

After inflation: preheating and
non-gaussianities
Kari Enqvist
University of Helsinki
Bielefeld 16.5.06
• End of inflation  hot universe
– But thermalization dynamics leave no signature
• Preheating: ”non-perturbative reheating”
– Certain types (”narrow resonance”) may give rise
to observable non-gaussianity in CMB
inflation = superluminal expansion of the universe
de Sitter universe:
cosmological constant 
inflation
R  R0 e
8 / 3 M P2 t
with a scale invariant spectrum
of perturbations: n=1
t→ t + t makes no difference
V
WMAP: n = 0.948 ± 0.018
inflaton
slow roll ends
H = H(t)
slow roll: ,  << 1
m  H

HOW TO REHEAT THE UNIVERSE
WITH SM and CDM DOFs?
classical field
..
.
  3H (t )   m   0
2
average over 1 oscillation period:
 p   (t)  m    0
1
2
Equation of state: effectively
pressureless matter
2
1
2
2
2
H  3 / 2t
V=½m22
[1/m]
assume Yukawa:
g
One-loop corrections to EOM:
 /    J
Abbott, Farhi, Wise, ’82

Im m = Im
0
0
= /2
condensate decays with a single particle rate
2
g m

8
when
H
..
  [3H (t )  ]  m   0
i.e. at
2
tr  2 /(3)
3 M
 (t r ) 
 g* (Tr )Tr4
8
2
with
.
2
P
instant thermalization
Tr  0.2 M P  10 GeV
9
g  106 , m  1014 GeV
• weak Yukawas → low reheat temperature
• ’inefficient reheating’
• decay to scalars:  → 
– large  density → backreaction
– potentially explosive particle production
preheating
Kofman, Linde, Starobinsky
PREHEATING
- oscillating inflaton condensate → source for quantum field 
V  V (   g  
1
2
(k=0)
(k=0)
2
2
2
k
when V() = 0, → non-adiabatic
excitation of quanta
-k (field fluctuations)
effective mass2 = g22
- initial 2 body PS distribution → subsequent thermalization
… but does not yet tell how to get SM dofs
V m  g  
2
1
2
example:
 (t , x)   d k ak k (t )e
3
 ikx
2
1
2
 a  (t )e

k
*
k
2
ikx
2
2

2
 2
k
2 2
  t  3H t  2  g   k  0
a (t )


if expansion ignored: H=0, a=1
- inflaton oscillations start when m ~ H
→ many oscillations in one Hubble time
initial conditions
- amplitude  = (H)
Mathieu equation:
k” + [ Ak - 2q sin(2z) ] k = 0
z = mt
Ak = 2q + k2/m2
q = g22/4m2
HO with time-dependent
frequency k
Instability bands on (k,q) plane: k grows
↔ nk() grows exponentially (within 1 Hubble time)
’parametric resonance’
q
q << 1 ↔ m >> g
narrow resonance
inflaton decays into -particles
all the time – but resonance
may be washed out by expansion
q >> 1 ↔ m << g
broad resonance
bursts of -production as
k-modes drift through the
instability bands
expansion
fixed k
k
Expansion of universe:
Mathieu eq OK if drift
adiabatic
narrow resonance
=
q ~ 0.1
=2/m
broad resonance
q ~ 2  102
growth of nk() → backreaction → end of preheating
k
(k=0)
highly non-perturbative
-k
(k=0)
k ~ exp(mt)
’Floquet index’
tend ~ ln(m/g)/m
PREHEATING
AND
CURVATURE PERTURBATION
field perturbations → metric perturbations
ds  a( ) (dt  dx )
2
2

2
2
 a( )  (1  2 )dt  (1  2 )dx
2
(1)
2
(1)
2

x
inflation ends
t1/2
frozen
horizon
almost scale
invariant
spectrum
eHt
t
1/H
H2 ~ 

local Minkowski
t
Statistics?
At lowest order, perturbations are gaussian:
kl   
(1) (1)
k
l
  
(1) (1) (1)
k
l
m
 P (k ) kl
 0 etc
metric perturbations  density perturbations
 photon temperature perturbations
dominantly gaussian
… but non-gaussianities are generated at second order
    f NL ( )
(1)
(1) 2
2 : non-Gaussian
Gaussian
~ (10-5)1/2
~ 10-5
  f NL    
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
 f NL  
(1)
(1) 2
~ 10-10
small effect if fNL << 105
gauge invariant curvature perturbations
technical problem: non-gaussianities require 2nd order formalism
-comoving curvature perturbation R
-uniform density curvature perturbation 
1st order: agree at large scales
2nd order: 2(LR) = 2(MW) + 212
R2 has spurious time evolution ~ ’, ’ Vernizzi
preheating: look for large non-gaussianities
→ O(1) differences irrelevant
WMAP3 limits:
-54 < fNL < 134 95% CL
- single field inflation:
fNL ~ slow roll parameters ,  << 1
-multifield inflation:
max(fNL) ~ O(1)
How to get large non-gaussianities?
curvature perturbation ’  
Langlois,
Vernizzi
’non-adiabatic pressure’ = isocurvature
need 2nd field
large fNL → large 2 / (1)2
need: 1st order curvature perturbation does not grow
2nd order curvature perturbation grows
Preheating and non-gaussianities
g2
REQUIRE:
- interactions violating slow roll
- isocurvature fluctuations that can source
adiabatic perturbations after inflation
can be large:

-2nd order effects become significant (backreaction)
-small scales couple to large scales (initial conditions
extend over 1/H)
-enhancement of pre-existing perturbations
Example: enhancing non-gaussianity
with NARROW RESONANCE
KE, Jokinen, Mazumdar,
Multamäki, Väihkönen
V  m  g  
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
inflation ends when  ~ MP
g 2 2
 1
resonance narrow ifq 
2
4m
or
g < H/MP << 1
H < m → can neglect expansion
Narrow resonance
H
5
q 1 g 
 10
MP
mass of  during inflation
m  g  10 M P  H
5
 effectively massless
subject to inflationary fluctuations
field perturbations:
 = 0 + 1 + ½2
 = 1 + ½2
<> = 0
(helps with analytic approximations)
metric perturbations:
g00 = -a2 (1 +21 + 2)
etc
1st order from inflaton alone:
1 ~ 1
<> = 0: 1 isocurvature fluctuation
Evolution of 2
sources: , 1, 
D2 = J() + J(rest)
J() ~ (1)2 + (1’)2
→ <1k * 1k-q> + < * >
source is convolution in
Fourier space
EOM for the 1st order perturbation:
(D(H) +
g 2 02)
1 = 0
narrow resonance, many
oscillations in 1 Hubble
time → ignore expansion
ESTIMATE: 1 ~ A exp (2qeff m t)
in the resonance,
= 0 elsewhere
A(k) = amplitude at the end of inflation = H/(2k3)½ …
q ~ 2 < 1 given by the inflaton amplitude
qeff = ½qmax ↔ width of the resonance
slowly changing A(k) →
[ k-, k+ ]
k± = ½m(1 ± q/2)
Jk→0 ~ < * > ~  dk k2 (1k)2 + …
~ amplitude   dk k2
= stuff  exp(qmt/2)
source for 2 generated by 1st order local
perturbations in the interval [ k-, k+ ]
Back to the metric perturbation:
D2 = stuff  exp(…t) + rest
→ 2 ~ exp(qmt/2)
fNL() ~ 2k / <1 * 1>k ~ exp(Nq/2)
N = # oscillations during preheating
Example: chaotic inflation
backreaction kicks in after N=10-30 osc
→ take N =10, q = 0.8
fNL() ~ e4 = 55
2nd order metric perturbation:
 '
q
qm t / 2
  2 2k 
[1  ]  Be
 nonexp
2

MP
16
''
2k
2m2 q
''
0
'
0
q  m

B
8  2



3
 H 2  k 
 3 

 2k  aH 
approximation:
3 2
  9 / 4  g 202 / H 2

 m

''
0
'
0
exponentially growing solution
massless case:
V = ¼4 + ½ g222
exactly solvable, expansion can be
transformed away
EOM:
Lame eq.
X” + f() X = 0
Jokinen,
Mazumdar
X = scaled  pert.
Jacobian elliptic function
-J & M average over oscillations
-non-local terms vanish at large scales (spatial gradients neglected)
→ follow the evolution of 2 and fNL numerically
y = g2/
y=1.875
y=1.5
y=1.2
3 inflaton oscillations
y=1.875: fNL = -1380
WMAP: massless preheating ruled out for 1 < y < 3
SUMMARY
• preheating: large fluctuations → large 2nd
order effect
• fNL ~ O(1000) possible
• future limits fNL ~ O(1) →potentially
significant constraints
• model-dependent; e.g. instant preheating
not constrained
• backreaction suppresses? (e.g. Nambu, Araki)