Transcript Document

ACRP 07-09:
Apron Planning and Design
Guidebook
ACRP 07-09: Apron Planning and
Design Guidebook
Research Team:
• Ricondo & Associates, Inc.
• Airport Development Group, Inc.
• Aviation Safety and Security Education Training, LLC
• Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
• Two Hundred, Inc.
ACRP 07-09 Project Panel
Jorge E. Panteli, McFarland-Johnson, Inc. (Chair)
Mark B. Gibbs, City and County of Denver
Stacy L. Jansen, PE, LEED, Burns & McDonnell Engineering Co.
James McCluskie, Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority
Kiran Merchant, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
Kenneth P. Stevens, University of Westminster
Michael A Meyers, PE, FAA Liaison
Stephen F. Maher, PE, TRB Liaison
Agenda
•
•
•
•
Introduction and Research Purpose
Planning and Design Process
Understanding the Apron
Apron and Planning Design Guidance
Introduction
•
Aprons are among the most congested areas at an airport:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Aircraft movements
Passengers and cargo
Ground service equipment
Airline/supplier personnel
CHALLENGE: Lack of comprehensive and complete
guidance in a readily accessible form
OPPORTUNITY: Consolidate guidance without presenting a
prescriptive approach
Research Objectives
•
Develop a guidebook to describe best practices for
comprehensive apron planning and design that enhances
operational efficiency and safety
•
•
•
The Guidebook is intended to assist planners, designers, airport
operators and other stakeholders in enhancing the operational
efficiency, safety, and flexibility of aprons
It does not relieve the user of the need to thoroughly understand
the specific operating environment at the project area
Provide a conduit to other apron planning and design information
Research Approach
•
•
•
Conducted literature search to identify existing apron
planning and design guidance
Evaluated literature to identify limitations and
enhancements of existing guidance and to inform site
visits
Performed apron observations at a variety of airports to
explore best practices for planning and operating apron
facilities
+
Observations
&
Research
=
Guidebook Organization
•
•
•
•
Chapter 1, Introduction
Presents background on the research project.
Chapter 2, Apron Planning and Design Process
Describes the general apron planning and design process
including stakeholder and agency involvement.
Chapter 3, Understanding the Apron Environment
Summarizes the different types of aprons, activities (aircraft,
passengers, employees, vehicles) that occur in apron
environments, and GSE used to support these activities.
Chapter 4, Apron Planning and Design
Provides detailed guidance on various apron planning
considerations, design implications, and related
regulations/guidance.
Apron Planning and Design
Process
•
Level of planning detail
will influence which steps
are completed
•
•
Master planning requires
conceptual planning
Development program
and design projects
require very detailed
planning
Stakeholder & Agency
Involvement
•
Stakeholder and agency involvement helps ensure the needs
and requirements of these parties are considered throughout
the planning process
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Provides broader perspective and informs planners and
designers of relevant operational, environmental, and design
factors
Enhances support for an apron project
Airport Tenants
Airport Management and Staff
Third-party Service Providers
FAA
TSA
U.S CBP
Local Police and Fire
•
•
•
•
Air Quality
State Wildlife
Historical Agencies
Wastewater/Water
Quality/Wetlands
Understanding the Apron
Environment
•
Critical to responsive and effective planning and design
•
•
•
It is the responsibility of the planner or designer to
understand the physical and operational environment of the
specific airport apron area before
Engage stakeholders in understanding the environment
The Guidebook provides information on the activities,
vehicles, and equipment utilized on the different apron
types:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Terminal
Deicing
Cargo
Maintenance
Remote
General Aviation
Helipads
Planning Considerations
•
Functional Apron Capacity
•
•
Operational Efficiency
•
•
•
Accommodate anticipated demand, irregular operations, new
users or tenants, and/or future aviation demand
A measure of how an apron supports dayto-day operations
Minimize dependencies in operations,
aircraft parking, taxi flows, aircraft servicing
Flexibility
•
•
Accommodate diverse fleets, changing
operating characteristics, and irregular
operations
Plan aprons for multiple purposes (e.g.,
single apron for deicing, remote overnight
parking, aircraft holding)
Planning Considerations
•
Operational Factors
•
•
•
Reflect unique characteristics of airport
Consider types of operations (cargo, deicing, general
aviation), aircraft turn times, fleets, lease types, airline
operation (hubbing/origin-destination, international/domestic)
Site Constraints
•
•
Understand specific site constraints
Consider both physical and operational (aircraft ground
flows, aeronautical surfaces, clearance areas, tower line of
sight, and environmental considerations)
Determining Apron Demand
•
Methodology depends on type of apron project
•
•
Defining apron requirements to support master planning is
different from forecasting demand for reconfiguration of an
existing apron.
Sources
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Direction from airport operator, tenant or lessee
Historical relationships
FAA or national forecasts
Aircraft fleet orders
Planned developments/leases
Based/itinerant aircraft
Air service marketing
Fleet Evolution
•
Changes in fleet may require changes to physical layout
and operational needs
•
•
•
•
•
Wingtip devices
New large aircraft (A380, 747-8)
Trend of increasing wingspans
Equipment needs
• Increased ground power unit capacity
• Data / internet connections
Phasing out of models or sizes of aircraft
Aircraft Clearances
•
•
•
FAA provides guidance on nose-to-building clearances,
but not on wingtip clearances in apron areas
ICAO provides planning criteria for wingtip clearances
Wingtip clearances usually determined by airport or apron
lessee
•
•
•
In some cases reduced horizontal wingtip clearance or
vertical clearance may be allowed during a gate entry/exit
maneuver
Airport may set clearance standards on all aircraft parking
positions or, at a minimum, between leaseholds
Allow space for maneuvering of GSE and emergency vehicle
access and servicing aircraft
Apron Markings
•
Apron-related Airfield Marking
•
•
•
Taxiways, taxilanes, holding positions, non-movement area
boundaries, and roadways
Standards established by FAA
Apron Markings
•
•
•
•
No guidance currently published by FAA
Industry guidance is available and summarized in Guidebook
Markings vary among airports and aprons, influenced by
operation and size of apron
Determined by airport operators and/or apron lessees
Apron Configuration
•
•
•
•
•
Ensure that aprons comply with aeronautical surfaces and
runway/taxiway areas
Incorporation of pushback areas may reduce taxi congestion
Vehicle service roads can be placed in front of (head-of-stand)
or behind (tail stand) aircraft
Ensure there is sufficient space for GSE storage and staging,
either locally or remotely
Aprons may need to be visible from ATCT or ramp towers
Technology/Planning Tools
•
•
Computer-aided design (CAD) allows for analysis of
different apron configurations
Add-on programs allow for simulation of aircraft and
vehicle movements and aircraft servicing
•
•
•
•
•
Path tracking
Jet blast velocity tracking
Aircraft servicing layouts
Passenger loading bridge analysis
Pavement strength software
•
FAARFIELD (FAA) assists with
designing new and modifying airfield
pavements
Design Implications
•
•
•
•
•
•
Consider benefits of different pavement types
Drainage: follow regulations and consider long-term
expansion potentials
Construction impacts: pavement replacement may require
operational plans to route aircraft around construction and
accommodate weather-related limitations
Hydrant fueling systems: need to follow NFPA
requirements and consider aircraft parking positions and
loading bridge operational ranges
Paint and reflective materials vary and selection should
consider durability, weather conditions, and cost.
Lighting should follow Illuminating Engineering Society
guidelines.
Management/Operational
Policies
•
•
Airports use management and operational policies to
enhance safety and manage the utilization of aprons.
Examples:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Lease stipulations requiring minimum utilization of aprons
Require vehicle and aircraft parking and flow plans
Varying lease types (exclusive, preferential, common use)
Establishing wingtip clearances between parking positions or
between leaseholds
Enforce required aircraft parking apron for apron to building
or lease area
Deicing and fueling consortiums
Related Regulations/
Guidance/References
•
FAA
•
•
SMS
•
•
NEPA process and state environmental planning requirements
NFPA
•
•
Provides funding for electrification projects to improve air quality
Environmental Regulations
•
•
Initiatives can be incorporated that support airport operator goals
VALE Program
•
•
May become part of apron planning process as guidance matures
Sustainability
•
•
Advisory circulars and orders provide guidance
Published codes and standard to minimize the risk of fires in the apron
environment
ICAO
•
As the FAA increases harmonization with ICAO guidance, it is anticipated to be
increasingly reflected in apron facilities
Additional Information
ACRP Report 96
Apron Planning and Design Guidebook
http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/acrp/acrp_rpt_096.pdf