Transcript No Slide Title

Headquarters U.S. Air Force
Integrity - Service - Excellence
Joint Basing Overview
Lt Col Balzano
AF/A7CIB
25 Feb 10
1
Roadmap

BRAC

Joint Basing Overview

Guidance/Framework

Joint Management Oversight Structure

Installation Support Functions

Supplemental Guidance for Facilities
Integrity - Service - Excellence
2
BRAC & Joint Basing

Pre BRAC - Separate Military Departments providing similar
installation support at bases in close proximity

BRAC Recommendation 146


Realign 26 bases into 12 joint bases with one Military
Department assigned as the lead for installation support at
each location
Legal requirement to implement Joint Basing no later than
September 15, 2011
Integrity - Service - Excellence
3
BRAC 2005 - Joint Basing




Requires realignment of 26 installations to establish 12 Joint Bases
by 2011
 “Realign (base A) by relocating the installation management
functions to (base B), establishing Joint Base (A-B) …” -- HQ &
Support Activities Joint Cross-Service Group
SecDef Justification recommends transfer of functions to Lead
 “… the Department anticipates transferring responsibility for all
other Base Operating Support (BOS) functions and the
Operations and Maintenance (O&M) portion of Sustainment,
Restoration, and Modernization (SRM), to the designated
receiving location.”
Supports the need for common definitions and standards for
delivery of Installation Services
Requires flexibility in implementation guidance for local
requirements
 Ensure the current guidance will not impact command
imperatives of our warfighting capabilities
 “…the Department requires flexibility to tailor implementation to
the unique requirements at each location.” -- HQ & Support
Activities Joint Cross-Service Group
Integrity - Service - Excellence
4
Joint Basing Overview


Preserve and Enhance Warfighting Capabilities
Optimal Delivery of Installation Support
 Partnership
 Business transformation
 Joint Base Commander (JBC) responsible for delivery
of all installation support
 Authority, personnel, funding, and real property aligned
 Joint Management Oversight Structure provides oversight
 Joint Base Partnership Council
 Intermediate Command Summit
 Senior Installation Management Group
 Installations Capability Council
 Common Framework
 Implementation Guidance
 Common Output Level Standards
 Cost and Performance Visibility Framework
Integrity - Service - Excellence
5
Joint Basing Implementation
Guidance (JBIG)

Signed Jan 22, 2008 by DEPSECDEF

FOC accomplished when TOA, real property accountability, &
personnel transferred to the lead Military Department
(Supporting Component)

2-phased approach

Defines 49 installation support functions that will transfer
–
Uses 267 Common Output Level Standards (COLS) as
performance standards for installation support functions
Phase II
Phase I
Event
No Later Than
Memorandum of Agreements (MOAs) signed
Completed
Initial Operational Capability (IOC)
Completed
Full Operational Capability (FOC)
Completed
Memorandum of Agreements (MOAs) signed
Completed
Initial Operational Capability (IOC)
Completed
Full Operational Capability (FOC)
Integrity - Service - Excellence
Oct 1, 2010
6
Joint Basing Implementation
Guidance (JBIG)

Joint Basing Implementation Guidance defines/directs:
 Transfer of installation support functions
 Transfer of installation support civilian personnel to the Lead
 Establishment of a Joint Base Commander
 Use of common output level standards (COLS)
 Real property transfer
 Total obligation authority (TOA) resource transfer
 Management oversight structure

Sub-working Groups (incl. HAF Functional SMEs) developed
supplemental guidance and COLS
Integrity - Service - Excellence
7
Joint Basing
PHASE 1
Navy AFB + NAF Washington = Joint Base Andrews-Naval Air Facility Washington
Andrews
McGuire
Lead AFB + Ft Dix + NAES Lakehurst = Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst
NAB Little Creek + Ft Story = Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Story
Naval Base Guam + Andersen AFB = Joint Region Marianas
Army
Ft Myer + Henderson Hall = Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Lead
PHASE 2
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Charleston AFB + NWS Charleston = Joint Base Charleston
Elmendorf AFB + Ft Richardson = Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson
Lackland AFB + Randolph AFB + Ft Sam Houston = Joint Base San Antonio
Langley AFB + Ft Eustis = Joint Base Langley-Eustis
Anacostia Annex + Bolling AFB = Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling
NS Pearl Harbor + Hickam AFB = Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam
Ft Lewis + McChord AFB = Joint Base Lewis-McChord
Lead Component will be responsible for providing Installation
Support for the entire Joint Base or Region
Integrity - Service - Excellence
8
Joint Basing Installation
Support Functions
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Airfield Ops
Child & Youth Services
Command Management
Installation Public Affairs
Legal Support
Financial Management
Management Analysis
Procurement Operations
Installation Safety
Installation Chaplain Ministries
Installation History & Museums
Custodial Services
Emergency Management
Environmental Compliance
Environmental Conservation
Environmental P2
Environmental Restoration
Facilities Demolition
Facilities New Footprint
Facilities Restoration & Modernization
Facilities Sustainment
Family Housing Services
Fire Protection & Emergency Services
Grounds Maintenance & Landscaping
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Info Technology Services Management
Lodging
Military Personnel Services
Morale, Welfare & Recreation
Base Support Vehicles & Equipment
Installation Movement
Unaccompanied Personnel Housing Services
Utilities
Warfighter & Family Services
Pavement Clearance Services
Pest Control Services
Port Services
Readiness Engineering Services
Real Property Management & Engineering Services
Real Property Leases
Refuse Collection & Disposal
Installation Law Enforcement Ops
Installation Physical Security Protect & Services
Installation Protection Support
Small Arms Range Management
Supply Storage & Dist (Munitions)
Supply Storage & Dist (Non-Munitions)
Laundry & Dry Cleaning
Food Services
Integrity - Service - Excellence
9
Joint Basing Definitions for
Supporting, Supported, & Tenant
Supporting
(Lead Component)
BRAC decision
Supported
(All other MilDep Components)
Tenants
•
•
•
•
•
•
Non-DoD organizations
DoD Agencies
DoD Activities
Army National Guard
Air National Guard
Working Capital Fund
organizations
Any Military Department organization previously treated as a tenant
will be classified as part of the supporting or supported Component
Integrity - Service - Excellence
10
Joint Basing Definitions
TOA and Real Property Transfer
Supported
Total Obligation
Authority
(All other MilDep
Components)
Real Property
Accountability
Supporting
(Lead Component)
Tenants
Reimbursement
Transfer of real property and total obligation authority from
supported Components to the supporting Component to occur
prior to full operational capability
Integrity - Service - Excellence
11
Supplemental Guidance
for Facilities

Facilities Investment Supplemental Guidance

Provides guidance for TOA transfer and defines
responsibilities for SRM and new construction

Sustainment – TOA transfer equals the percentage of the
requirement generated by the current version of the DoD
Facilities Sustainment Model (FSM) established by DoD
programming Guidance

Current guidance is to fund sustainment at 90% of the
requirement generated by the model
Integrity - Service - Excellence
12
Supplemental Guidance
for Facilities

Restoration & Modernization – No consistently applied
methodology used by the various components;


Supporting component is responsible for all installation
support facilities and common infrastructure…for all other
facilities, the component generating the modernization
requirement is responsible for modernization
MILCON – The Supporting Component’s design and construction
agent shall be used for all military construction at the Joint Base
Integrity - Service - Excellence
13
Questions?
Integrity - Service - Excellence
14