Transcript Presentation title

Dentons Canada LLP
Due Diligence:
Lessons for Employers from
the Cases
Adrian Miedema, Partner
Dentons Canada LLP, Toronto
Tel: (416) 863-4678
Email: [email protected]
05 November 2014
Agenda
• I.
Three types of offences
• II.
Case examples
• III.
How to build a due diligence file for court
• IV.
Recommendations
• V.
Q&A
Duration: 60 minutes
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
I.
Three Types of Offences
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Three types of Offences
1. Criminal: guilty mind (e.g. Bill C-45)
2. Strict liability (almost all OHS offences)
3. Absolute liability
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Three types of Offences
Strict liability:
“Offences in which there is no necessity for the prosecution to prove the
existence of mens rea; the doing of the prohibited act prima facie imports
the offence, leaving it open to the accused to avoid liability by proving that
he took all reasonable care. This involves consideration of what a
reasonable man would have done in the circumstances. The defence will
be available if the accused reasonably believed in a mistaken set of facts
which, if true, would render the act or omission innocent, or if he took all
reasonable steps to avoid the particular event. These offences may
properly be called offences of strict liability.”
Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. Sault Ste. Marie (1978)
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Three types of Offences
• Two ways to prove due diligence:
• took every precaution reasonable in the circumstances
• reasonably believed in a mistaken version of the facts which, if true, would
render his or her conduct innocent
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Mens rea offence: example
Criminal Code
s. 219. (1) Every one is criminally negligent who
(a) in doing anything, or
(b) in omitting to do anything that it is his duty to do,
shows wanton or reckless disregard for the lives or safety of other
persons. [underlining added]
Note: s. 217.1 Every one who undertakes, or has the authority, to direct
how another person does work or performs a task is under a legal duty to
take reasonable steps to prevent bodily harm to that person, or any other
person, arising from that work or task.
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Strict liability offence: example
Ontario OHSA
S. 25. (1) An employer shall ensure that,
...
(c) the measures and procedures prescribed are
carried out in the workplace; [underlining added]
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Absolute liability: example
Ontario Highway Traffic Act
S. 84.1 (1) Where a wheel becomes detached from a commercial motor
vehicle, or from a vehicle being drawn by a commercial motor vehicle,
while the commercial motor vehicle is on a highway, the operator of the
commercial motor vehicle and the owner of the vehicle from which the
wheel became detached are guilty of an offence.
Absolute liability offence
(5) It is not a defence to a charge under subsection (1) that the person
exercised due diligence to avoid or prevent the detaching of the wheel.
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Why care about due diligence?
1. Avoid criminal charges by ensuring employees buy into culture and
are trained
2. Raise due diligence defence if charged with strict liability
3. Avoid events (e.g. wheel falling off) that cause absolute liability
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
II.
Case Examples
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Mistaken belief must be objectively reasonable
• Ontario v. London Excavators & Trucking Ltd., [1998] O.J. No. 6437
• Excavation, struck concrete
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Not required to take each and every precaution that
would be reasonable
• R. v. Thomas Fuller and Sons Ltd., 2012 ONCJ 731
• “As a matter of law, though, the phrase ‘all reasonable care’ cannot and
is not understood to require the accused to take each and every
precaution that would be reasonable to take in the circumstances.”
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Supervision must be sufficient
• R. v. Murray Group Ltd., 2011 ONCJ 896
• Supervisor visited project once per week
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Set clear instructions / boundaries for workers
• Ontario Ministry of Labour v. 679052 Ontario Ltd. 2012 ONCJ 747
• Car washer drove washed car after specifically instructed not to do so
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Fix unsafe practices immediately
• Ontario Ministry of Labour v. Reid & DeLeye Contractors Ltd. 2011
ONCJ 472
• Contractor had policy but never ensured it was followed, and was aware
that at times it was not being followed.
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Not enough to simply provide PPE
• Ontario Ministry of Labour v. Lockyer, 2009 ONCJ 73
• Employer must insure that PPE is used
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Properly supervise subcontractors
• R. v. Aecon Construction Group Inc., 2013 ONCJ 318
• Constructor had identified safety concerns, monitored compliance of its
contractors, took remedial action for breaches.
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
“Everyone just knew” is not defence
• Ontario (Ministry of Labour) v. Anray Limited, 2014 ONCJ 203
• Employer argued “everyone just knew” who was permitted to drive
excavator
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Post-accident safety fixes not relevant to due
diligence
• R. v. Reliable Wood Shavings Inc., 2013 ONCJ 518
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Identify all hazards
• R. v. XI Technologies Inc., 2013 ABCA 282
• Calf-roping machine case
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Inherently dangerous workplaces held to high
standard
• R. v. Sunrise Propane Energy Group Inc., 2013 ONCJ 358
• Series of massive propane explosions
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Reasonable to rely on professionals
• Her Majesty the Queen v. Corporation of the City of Guelph, Ontario
Court of Justice, February 2, 2012 (Epstein J.)
• It was reasonable for the City to rely on the stamped drawing of the
architect and engineer.
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Don’t need to train employees in tasks they will not
do
• R. v. West Parry Sound Health Centre, 2012 CarswellOnt 7703 (Ont.
C.J.)
• Medical manager used extension ladder to access roof to inspect HVAC
unit
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
III. How to build a due
diligence file for court
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Building a due diligence file for court
• How often does a due diligence defence succeed in court?
• What are the characteristics of successful due diligence defences?
• What are the characteristics of unsuccessful due diligence defences?
• What criticisms have courts had for employers’ due diligence programs?
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Figure 1. Results of Occupational Health and Safety Act Charges
(Combined for Corporations and Individuals)
Figure 1
Withdrawn-other party
convicted
22%
Charges stayed
1%
Withdrawn-no other party
convicted
10%
Pleaded guilty and let the
court decide the amount of
the fine
6%
Convicted after trial
4%
Pleaded guilty and negotiated
fine with MOL
55%
Acquitted after trial
2%
Dentons Canada LLP
Figure 2. Corporations: Results of Occupational Health and Safety Act
Charges
Figure 2
Withdrawn-other party
convicted
17%
Pleaded guilty and let the
court decide the amount of
fine
6%
Withdrawn-no other party
convicted
9%
Pleaded guilty and negotiated
fine with MOL
62%
Convicted after trial
4%
Acquitted after trial
2%
Dentons Canada LLP
Figure 3. Supervisors and Workers: Results of
Occupational Health and Safety Act Charges
Figure 3
Pleaded guilty and let the
court decide the amount of
the fine
6%
Withdrawn-other party
convicted
43%
Pleaded guilty and negotiated
fine with MOL
30%
Acquitted after trial
4%
Convicted after trial
4%
Withdrawn-no other party
convicted
13%
Dentons Canada LLP
III. How to Build a Due
Diligence File for Court
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Building a due diligence file for court
• As much paper as possible
• Make it easy for supervisors: apps, etc.
• Employee signatures on all training meeting minutes
• Keep all training materials
• Safety awards
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Due Diligence Documentation
• The more due diligence paper the better!
• Site specific safety orientation records
• Minutes of safety meetings and safety talks
• Completed hazard analysis forms
• Safety sign-in sheets
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Due Diligence Documentation
• Continued:
• Training records
• Subcontractor safety guidelines
• Records of site safety inspections
• Disciplinary notes regarding training
• Violation tickets and memoranda
• Notes of any safety instructions provided
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
IV. Recommendations
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Recommendations
• Educate – everyone should know OHS laws
• Educate your employees – provide proper training, instruction and
supervision
• Discipline workers who fail to comply with safety policies or expected
procedures
• Document, document, document
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Recommendations
• Regularly complete hazard analysis to demonstrate that you know
the hazards / dangers in the work your employees are doing
• Regularly remind employees of hazards
• Regularly ask, “What could go wrong?
• Conduct regular audits of the workplace
• Periodically use external auditors
• Keep good notes of any safety instructions provided or any safety
concerns raised – and what action was taken in response
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
V. Brief Q&A
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP
Questions?
Adrian Miedema, Lawyer
Dentons Canada LLP, Toronto
Tel: (416) 863-4678
Email: [email protected]
05 November 2014
Dentons Canada LLP