Transcript Results From The Navy Technology Validation (Techval) Program

Utilizing Alternative Heat Source / Sinks to
Heat / Cool Navy Facilities
IGHSPA Conference, Nashville, TN
October 2, 2008
Bryan Long EIT, CGD-IT
NAVFAC ESC
Port Hueneme CA
805-982-5177
[email protected]
Presentation Outline
•Energy efficiency / renewable energy drivers for Federal
Government
•Existing challenges with implementing traditional GSHP
technology in certain locations
•Alternative options to implement high efficient HVAC
technology
•Navy projects constructed and proposed
–Dam Neck HRSD Loop
2
Federal Requirements for Energy Efficiency / Renewable
Energy
• EPACT 05
- Reduce energy expenditures by 2% per year from 2003 baseline for the measurement of energy
savings
–“… to the extent economically feasible and technically practical, the following (electrical energy
consumption) shall be renewable:”
• a) > 3% in FY 2007 - 2009
• b) > 5% in FY 2010 - 2012
• c) > 7.5% in FY 2013 and thereafter
• EO 13423
–(i) ½ renewable energy consumed in an FY comes from “new” renewable sources,
–(ii) to the extent feasible, implement renewable energy generation on agency property
–Improve energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions
• 3 percent annually through the end of fiscal year 2015
• or 30 percent by the end of fiscal year 2015
• EISA 2007
–Sec. 433 Federal Building Energy Efficiency Performance Standards
• Reduce Fossil Fuel Use
–built/renovated in 2010 must cut fossil-fuel dependency by 55%
–Eliminate use of fossil fuel energy for new/renovated buildings by 2030
• NDAA 2007 sets a goal of 25% energy produced on site at DOD facilities by renewables by 2025
• FEMP guidance for EPACT 05 and EO13423 (guidance not yet available for EISA 07):
–http://www1.eere.energy.gov/temp/renewable_energy/renewable_fedrequire.html
3
Challenges with incorporating traditional GSHP technologies
•Land restrictions can make it difficult to install well fields in
densely populated areas
–Coastal areas of the country often populated, space a premium
•Poor soil thermal conductivity making traditional GSHP too cost
prohibitive
•Certain areas of the country still do not have strong GSHP
industry driving up the install cost (western states)
•In certain locations, alternative heat source / sinks exist making
them the best / most cost effective option
4
Alternative Heat Source / Sink Options
•Sea / Lake Water heat source / sink
–Renewable, very efficient cooling technology
–Reduce energy consumption to generate chilled water
–No cooling tower (eliminate fresh water use for evaporative
cooling)
•Water / Wastewater Discharge heat source / sink
–Navy DamNeck HRSD loop
•Municipal Water Supply heat source / sink??
5
Alternative Heat Source / Sink Options
Sea/Lake Water Source System
Sea/Lake Water Intake
and Return (open loop)
Central Heat Exchange
and Pumping Facility
Chilled Water Distribution
and Building Systems
Source: Makai Ocean Engineering, Inc.
6
Technology Maturity
Purdy’s Wharf Halifax, Canada
•Single Building Application
–Seawater provides all cooling for about
10 months per year
–Reduced operation/ maintenance costs
–Savings of $117,000/year
–Simple payback of 2.3 years
Source: http://www.ecbcs.org/docs/annex_28_case_study_buildings.pdf
7
Technology Maturity
Lake Source Cooling - Cornell university
•District Cooling Application
–Reduces the campus energy use for cooling by 80%
–Designed to last over 75 to 100 years, over twice the
typical life of chillers
Source: http://www.utilities.cornell.edu/utl_ldlsc.html
8
US NAVY DAM NECK ANNEX HRSD LOOP SYSTEM
9
Dam Neck Annex Project History
10
•
DOE authorization to Trane in Dec 2004
•
Request for proposal to Trane in Jan 2006
•
Building proposals submitted and approved in May-June
2006
•
HRSD Water Reuse MOA signed in Aug 2006
•
Final proposal from Trane in Aug 2006
•
Navy review of final proposal in Sep 2006
•
Congressional notification of proposed project in Sep 2006
•
Contract award in Dec 2006
•
Contract construction completion in Sep 2008
•
Ribbon cutting ceremony on October 9, 2008
Dam Neck Annex Project Site
HRSD Atlantic
Treatment Plant
Heat Exchanger
Plant
HRSD
Effluent Line
Atlantic Ocean
11
Condenser Cooling
Water Loop (Typ.)
Ground Source Heat Pump Energy
Conservation Measure
•
•
•
•
•
•
12
10 Buildings (487,231 SF)
451 Tons of HVAC (89 GSHP Units)
411 Tons of HVAC on the HRSD Condenser Loop
Bldg 448 - 40 Tons of HVAC using Vertical Drilling GHP
Technology
Well field Sizing: 326 ft/ton in 40 wells
GSHP’s are classified as a Renewable Energy Source
Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning
Energy Conservation Measure
•
•
•
•
•
•
13
HVAC Improvements in 14 Buildings (1,624,269 SF)
Condenser Cooling Water Loop (Cooled by HRSD effluent)
provided to 15 Buildings (1,530,155 SF)
2,142 Tons of New-Installed HVAC on Condenser Cooling
Water Loop
1,400+ Tons of Existing HVAC on Condenser Cooling Water
Loop
10 miles of Condenser Distribution Loop Piping in Sizes
from 2” to 36” diameter
0.5 miles of HRSD/Heat Exchange Plant Piping, 36” diameter
HRSD Effluent Heat Exchange System
•
•
Existing HRSD Atlantic Treatment Plant Effluent Line runs
through Dam Neck Annex (HRSD easement)
Project Uses 14MGD as heat sink for Condenser Loop
• Water is used to cool condenser water loop water
• Effluent water and condenser cooling water do not mix
• Qualifies as a renewable energy source
•
•
•
•
14
HRSD Constructed, Own, and Operate Tapping Sleeves and
Valves
Project Paid HRSD for Tapping Sleeves and Valves
No Cost for Water – only a small annual administration fee.
MOA in effect until 2027 (HRSD easement expires)
Heat Exchanger/HRSD Effluent
System
Condenser Cooling Water Loop
Building
(GSHP)
Typ.
Heat
Exchangers
Building
(GSHP)
Typ.
Building
(Chiller)
Typ.
HRSD Effluent Line
Building
(Chiller)
Typ.
HRSD Atlantic
Treatment Plant
Atlantic Ocean
15
Tapping Sleeves and Valves
16
Tapping Sleeves and Valves (cont’d)
17
Heat Exchanger Plant
18
Condenser Cooling Water Loop
19
HRSD Effluent/GSHP Comparison
•
GHP Drilling Costs and HRSD Effluent/Condenser Cooling Water
Loop Costs approximately equal
•
Effluent Water is a more efficient source than GSHP (Winter &
Summer)
•
No issues related to building up ground temperatures over time
•
Effluent and GSHP Systems equal life expectancy
•
HRSD Effluent System allows use on existing chillers – Greater Use
of the Navy investment
•
Many existing exterior cooling towers eliminated
•
HRSD Effluent/Condenser Cooling Water Loop has large growth
potential at minimal cost
Greater Use, More Efficient – Costs the Same
20
Dam Neck ESPC
Project Benefits and Attributes
 Project Savings pay for All Project Costs
 Trane Manufactured Products Warranted for Project Term
(17 years)
 Service and Preventative Maintenance provided by Trane
for the Project Term (17 years)
 Non-Trane Installed Equipment Repair and Replacement
Escrow Fund documented with Project Savings (17 years)
 Annual Measurement and Verification of Project Savings
(17 years)
 HRSD Effluent Heat Exchange System Expandable at
minimal cost
 Equipment protected from corrosive environment (new
equipment either underground or in buildings)
 Energy Efficient Equipment Infrastructure Improvements
21
Project Financial Statistics
Project Cost
$32,885,728
Annual Savings (FY06 Baseline)
$2,828,636
Simple Payback:
11.6 years
Energy Savings
Steam
Electricity
$ 383,770
Natural Gas
($ 556,189)
Fuel Oil
$
Water /Chilled Water
$ 200,249
Sewer
$ 131,851
Operations and Maintenance Savings
22
$2,299,364
$2,133,361
6,322
$ 529,272
Service
$ 304,221
PM
$ 225,051
Additional Navy Alternative GSHP projects Underway
•WSHPs to be installed in berthing barges in the Puget Sound,
WA
–Barges used to house sailors that work on ships
–Currently barges tie into base’s utilities including steam and
electricity to provide heating / cooling for the barges
–WSHPs tied directly to the Puget Sound will allow for more efficient
heating / cooling of barges
•Conducting feasibility studies on:
–SeaWater Cooling in Yokosuka, JP
–Utilizing waste heat from a computer datacenter to heat exterior of
building in Monterey, CA
–Utilizing water from a remediation site to cool a large maintenance
center in Barstow, CA
23
Key Partners – Dam Neck HRSD Project Presentation
Acknowledgements
•NAVFAC
–Sean Foley, Contracting
Officer
–Robert Harvey, Project
Facilitator
–Andrew Porter, Navy
Technical Representative
–ENS. Michelle Caponigro,
Construction Manager
•Trane
–David Hayden, Federal
Account Executive
24
–Jody Wilkins, Federal Sector
Project Developer
–Roger Shull, Norfolk Sales
District
–Don Delegrange,
Construction Project
Manager
•Hampton Roads Sanitation
District
–Ted Henifin, HRSD Director
–Karen Harr, Chief of Water
Reuse
–John (J) Dano, Project
Manager
QUESTIONS??
Bryan Long, EIT, CGD-IT
NAVFAC ESC
Port Hueneme CA
805-982-5177
[email protected]
“All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.”
-Gandalf, Lord of The Rings,
The Fellowship of the Ring
25