Transcript PPP: New Possibilities

2013.05.24
Public Private Partnership:
New Possibilities
Evaldas Bruze
PPP refers to arrangements, typically medium to long term, between the public
and private sectors whereby part of the services or works that fall under the
responsibilities of the public sector are provided by the private sector, with clear
agreement on shared objectives for delivery of public infrastructure and/ or public
services.
Usage of PPP
Hard & Soft Industries
 Financial Instrument;
 Hard: typically infrastructure
related, ref. to energy,
transportation, consutructions
 Bundling of Resources;
 Performance Excelence;
 Soft: intangible infrastructure /
services typically ref. to education,
healtht, public welfare.
 Strategic Focus;
PPP Overview
Models
Major Risks
 O&M: Operation and maintenance;
 Increasing cost of service in PPP;
 DBFO: Design/Build/Finance/Operate;
 Social fears of change;
 BOO: Build/Own/Operate;
 PPP will limit the service to the
agreement, nothing more;
 BOOT: Build/Own/Operate/Transfer;
 BBO: Buy/Biuld/Operate;
 Operation License
 Finance Only;
 No sufficient regulations;
 Unpredictable contingencies;
International Best Practices (EU PPP)
Individual
EC
EU E- Government Platform
E - SENS
PPP
National and Businesses Service Implementations
PPP
Services Directive Implementation on EU Level
SPOCS
(eBusiness)
STORK
(eID)
PEPOL
(eProcurement)
epSOS
(eHealth)
e-CODEX
(eJustice)
LT practicies (1)
App Camp Labs Example
Science
•Vilnius University
•Kaunas Technology
University
•Klaipedos National
College
•Vilnius Gediminas
Technical University
Parrtial
PPP
Business
•TeliaSonera Group
•Omnitel (Lietuva)
•Microsoft
•Nokia
•Sony
•Samsung
•Huawei
LT practicies (2)
Center of Cybercrime, Cybersecurity Research and Investigation Example
Science
•Mykolas Romeris
University
Parrtial
PPP
Public
•Ministry of Internal
Affairs
Why complete PPP doesn’t work in LT
• Private business perspective:
•
•
•
•
•
Absence of clear long-term governmental strategy;
No clear government commitment to the investment in long-term;
Missing initiative owners;
No governing bodies;
Not clear legal regulations;
• Governmental institutions perspective:
•
•
•
•
•
•
No support from strategic management authorities;
Fogy procurement regulations;
High danger for the personal carrier;
Annual budgeting framework;
Do not have the budget for investments;
Paranoid on business making profits;
• Academia perspective:
•
•
Happy with most of the initiatives;
Competing with research and scientific funding programmes on resources;
PPP development in Lithuania
What must be done first
Individ.
Risk Assessment and Management
Risk
Prevention
Summary
Mitigation
Lithuanian Critical Infrastructure Identification
Hazard ID
Criticality
Vulnerability
Escalation
Energy
Health
Food
Govermental
Services
ICT
Finance
Transport
Security & safety
Services
PPP
PPP
Prevention and Mitigation Solutions Implementation
LT Gov
International Best Practices (EU PPP)
Resilience
Action plan
2013.06
2013
Dedicated entity responsible for CI management
2013.10
CI identification
2013.11
2014.03
Appointment of governing body
CI risk assessment
2015 – PPP
agreement