Transcript No Slide Title

Fourth Meeting
Flight Operations and Air Traffic
Managment Component
of the
North Asia Regional Aviation Safety Team
(NARAST)
RNP Implementation Issues
Dave Nakamura
Technical Fellow – CNS Technical Standards
Airplane Systems
Boeing Commercial Airplanes
TOPICS
RNP Implementation Issues
•General Assessment
•Aircraft & Infrastructure
•Airspace & Application
•Procedures
•Operational Implementation
•Operational Approval
•Summary
The Boeing Company
W100.2
RNP Implementation
What’s the Problem, Issues & Solutions?
Operational Requirement:
Determine & assess how RNP operation overcomes limitations and provides benefits
General Assessment:
Airplane Performance, navigation infrastructure, Procedure Design Criteria,
Topography Data Sources, ATC Local Flows, Weather, FAR & FAA Orders
Aircraft & Infrastructure:
Nav integrity/availability e.g. PRAIM, A/C Systems & Equipage,
capability, limitations
Airspace Assessment:
Terrain, airport restrictions, usage limitations, environmental,
Application Assessment:
Geodetic Systems & Calculations, waypoint issues, aircraft performance &
flyability demonstration (normal & failures), ALPA, NATCA, Simulation
Procedure Implementation:
Construction, Obstacle Clearance Assessment, Charting, ARINC 424 &
Navigation database,
Operational Implementation:
Contingency Ops, Training (Crew, ATC, Dispatch, etc), AIM, ATC Ops
Integration, Continuing airworthiness, FAA ATC and Flt Stds Processes, Flt
Publications
Operational Approval:
The Boeing Company
Ops Authorization, Ops Specifications or equivalent
W100.3
General Assessment
Factors vary & depend on
operation or aircraft,
environment, conditions,
Services, infrastructure
Airspace Configuration
- SUA
- Topography, Terrain
- Traffic Flow Patterns
- Route Complexity
- Severe Weather
Traffic Character
- Schedule
- Speed Mix/Envelope
- Altitude Mix
- Climb/Descent Performance
Throughput
Nav/Guidance Performance
- Accuracy
- Availability/Coverage
- Integrity
- GNE Rate
Airplane Performance
- Arrival: Speed Schedule, descent path
- Departure: Speed schedule, climb path,
engine out
The Boeing Company
Control Performance
- Decision Support
- Proficiency
- Sequencing Efficiency
- Separation Precision
- Runway Load Balancing
Monitoring Performance
- Availability/Coverage
- Integrity
- Accuracy; Latency
Comm Performance
- Availability/Coverage
- Integrity
- Message Delivery
Performance
W100.4
RNP Implementation
What’s the Problem, Issues & Solutions?
Operational Requirement:
Determine & assess how RNP operation overcomes limitations and provides benefits
General Assessment:
Airplane Performance, navigation infrastructure, Procedure Design Criteria,
Topography Data Sources, ATC Local Flows, Weather, FAR & FAA Orders
Aircraft & Infrastructure:
Nav integrity/availability e.g. PRAIM, A/C Systems & Equipage,
capability, limitations
Airspace Assessment:
Terrain, airport restrictions, usage limitations, environmental,
Application Assessment:
Geodetic Systems & Calculations, waypoint issues, aircraft performance &
flyability demonstration (normal & failures), ALPA, NATCA, Simulation
Procedure Implementation:
Construction, Obstacle Clearance Assessment, Charting, ARINC 424 &
Navigation database,
Operational Implementation:
Contingency Ops, Training (Crew, ATC, Dispatch, etc), AIM, ATC Ops
Integration, Continuing airworthiness, FAA ATC and Flt Stds Processes, Flt
Publications
Operational Approval:
The Boeing Company
Ops Authorization, Ops Specifications or equivalent
W100.5
Aircraft and Infrastructure
To meet demand, world fleet must double by 2020
40,000
Large airframes
Source: Boeing Current Market Outlook 2002
32,495
30,000
17,224
growth
airplanes
20,000
15,271
23,929
6,705
replacements
10,000
8,566
retained fleet
0
2001
The Boeing Company
2021
W100.6
Aircraft and Infrastructure
Aircraft Decisions follow a complex formula
Manufacturer
Airlines
Maintenance
Lifecycle
Costs
Training
New
Airplane
Wt./Fuel
Eng.
Retrofit
Test & Cert
Supplier
Mfg.
Services
Labor
Prerequisites
Implement
Costs
Spares
Airline
Bus. Case*
Revenues
Profit
Costs
Rec.
Kitting
Eng.
Mfg.
Training
Downtime
Revs 
NR
Market
Price
 AP
Sales
Operator
Value
Supplier
Pmts.
Industry
Development
 AP Sale
Revs
Supplier
Procedures
Standards
Regulation
Costs 
The Boeing Company
Efficiency 
Regulatory
Mandate
W100.7
Aircraft and Infrastructure
Aircraft Compatible with Infrastructure
2000
En route
Approach/l
anding/
departure/
A-SMGCS
The Boeing Company
2005
2010
2015
NDB
VOR
DME
GPS
SBAS
GBAS
NDB
VOR
DME
Basic GNSS
ILS Cat I
ILS Cat II/III
MLS Cat III
SBAS Cat I
GBAS Cat I/II/III
Cat I
W100.8
Aircraft and Infrastructure
More to readiness than aircraft and systems:
Airplane Flight Manual, Ops Manual, Maintenance Planning Data,
Equipment List, RNP Capability documentation, etc appropriate to
the operation and RNP
Low Gain
Satellite
Antenna
GPS
Antennas
Displays
TCAS II
High Gain
Satellite
Antenna
Mode S
Amplifier
Flt Deck
Displays/
Alerting
Satellite
Data Unit
HFTransceiver
MMR
ILS
GPS
Flight
Management
System
Autopilot/
Flight
Director
Systems
TCAS II
The Boeing Company
HF
Antenna
Monitoring
Alerting
System
Flight
Management
System
ACARS
Management
Unit
Audio
Control
Panel
VOR
VOR
DME
Radio Tuning
Panel
IRS
DME
VHF Transceiver
Mode S
VOR
ILS
TCAS II Mode S DME
Antennas Antenna Antenna Antennas Antennas
VHF
Antenna
W100.9
Aircraft and Infrastructure
Differences in delivered capability
Example
•At least half the “modern” fleet
delivered prior to full CNS/ATM
equipage being available
• Large retrofit issue – hard to
know the aircraft retrofit status
513
782
681
1982
737-300/-400/-500
1985
777s
1995
747-400s
185 747-400s
747-400
757/767
The Boeing Company
GBAS: Yes, SBAS: No
777
498
1989
GPS basic
757s
767s
1988
737-3/4/5
345
259
2587
757s
767s
737-6/7/8/9
W100.10
Aircraft and Infrastructure
Consistency in Aircraft Performance and Level of
Capability is Essential e.g. RF Leg
10%
22%
All Supported
All But RF Supported
Still being researched
68%
Note: Percentages based on number of respondents and may not
reflect Industry as a whole.
Courtesy of
The Boeing Company
W100.11
Aircraft and Infrastructure
B737 Aircraft Example
-900
-800
-500
-400
All Dual FMC (e.g., Smiths 10.4A)
All Dual GPS
All Dual FMC (e.g., Smiths 10.4A)
All Dual GPS
All Dual FMC (e.g., Smiths 10.4A)
All Dual GPS
All Single FMC (e.g., Smiths 10.4A)
No GPS
Half Single/Half Dual FMC (e.g., Smiths, U5.0)
Half Dual/Half No GPS
All Single FMC (e.g., Smiths 10.4A, U 1.6)
No GPS
-200 All Single FMC, (e.g., Marconi)
10% GPS
Courtesy of
The Boeing Company
W100.12
RNP Implementation
What’s the Problem, Issues & Solutions?
Operational Requirement:
Determine & assess how RNP operation overcomes limitations and provides benefits
General Assessment:
Airplane Performance, navigation infrastructure, Procedure Design Criteria,
Topography Data Sources, ATC Local Flows, Weather, FAR & FAA Orders
Aircraft & Infrastructure:
Nav integrity/availability e.g. PRAIM, A/C Systems & Equipage,
capability, limitations
Airspace Assessment:
Terrain, airport restrictions, usage limitations, environmental,
Application Assessment:
Geodetic Systems & Calculations, waypoint issues, aircraft performance &
flyability demonstration (normal & failures), ALPA, NATCA, Simulation
Procedure Implementation:
Construction, Obstacle Clearance Assessment, Charting, ARINC 424 &
Navigation database,
Operational Implementation:
Contingency Ops, Training (Crew, ATC, Dispatch, etc), AIM, ATC Ops
Integration, Continuing airworthiness, FAA ATC and Flt Stds Processes, Flt
Publications
Operational Approval:
The Boeing Company
Ops Authorization, Ops Specifications or equivalent
W100.13
Airspace and Application
Performance based Navigation Roadmap - USA
The Boeing Company
W100.14
Airspace and Application
EUROCONTROL Operations Roadmap
2004 ‘05
Near Term
‘10
Mid Term
‘15
Far Term
‘20
ConventionalSIDs/STARs
BRNAV SIDs/STARs
BRNAV Enroute
PRNAV SIDs/STARs Ltd
PRNAV SIDs/STARs
PRNAV Enroute Ltd
PRNAV Enroute
RNPRNAVSIDs/STARs
RNPRNAV 4D Enroute
NPA - Conventional
NPA - RNAV, RNPRNAV
APV – RNAV Baro- VNAV, RNPRNAVBaro-VNAV
APV I/II
Cat I/II/III Ops & Guided TO
- ILS
Cat I/II/III Ops & Guided TO
- MLS
Cat I Ops– GLS-SBAS
Cat I Ops & Guided TO– GLS-GBAS
Cat II/III Ops–GLS-GBAS
The Boeing Company
W100.15
Airspace & Application
Flyability,
Aircraft Performance,
Airport Restrictions,
Missed Approach Path
Environmental
Waypoint Specification
Terrain, EGPWS
WGS-84
The Boeing Company
W100.16
RNP Implementation
What’s the Problem, Issues & Solutions?
Operational Requirement:
Determine & assess how RNP operation overcomes limitations and provides benefits
General Assessment:
Airplane Performance, navigation infrastructure, Procedure Design Criteria,
Topography Data Sources, ATC Local Flows, Weather, FAR & FAA Orders
Aircraft & Infrastructure:
Nav integrity/availability e.g. PRAIM, A/C Systems & Equipage,
capability, limitations
Airspace Assessment:
Terrain, airport restrictions, usage limitations, environmental,
Application Assessment:
Geodetic Systems & Calculations, waypoint issues, aircraft performance &
flyability demonstration (normal & failures), ALPA, NATCA, Simulation
Procedure Implementation:
Construction, Obstacle Clearance Assessment, Charting, ARINC 424 &
Navigation database,
Operational Implementation:
Contingency Ops, Training (Crew, ATC, Dispatch, etc), AIM, ATC Ops
Integration, Continuing airworthiness, FAA ATC and Flt Stds Processes, Flt
Publications
Operational Approval:
The Boeing Company
Ops Authorization, Ops Specifications or equivalent
W100.17
Procedures
USA/FAA AC’s and Notices
• Notice 8000.287
– Procedure design, aircraft qualification & Ops approval
criteria, extended one year, maximum allowed
• Public RNP SAAAR – in progress
– Order (8260.52) procedure design criteria
– AC90-RNPSAAAR - aircraft and OPS approval
• RNP “Specials”
– AC120-29A, RAPT prioritization based upon 8260.43A
ICAO PANS-Ops
• Doc 8168
– Update in progress, for RNP < 0.3 NM, harmonized to FAA
Order 8260.52. Estimated completion, 2006
The Boeing Company
W100.18
Procedures
Alternatives Impact
RNP
Specials
SAAAR
AC120-29A
N8000.287
Public SAAAR
PANS-OPs
AC90-RNPSAAAR
8260.52
Doc 8168
Application
Customization
Less
More
The Boeing Company
Max%
Operations
W100.19
Procedures
Alternatives Impact
RNP
Specials
SAAAR
Public SAAAR
PANS-OPs
More
Less
The Boeing Company
RNP Decision Factors
W100.20
RNP
Specials
The Boeing Company
SAAAR
Public SAAAR
PANS-OPs
W100.21
SAAAR – N8000.287
RNP Approaches
SAAAR Benefits
SAAAR Features
• Better access to runways with
terrain/airspace conflicts
• Reduced RNP
 RNP 0.3 to 0.1
• De-conflicting traffic flows (e.g.,
converging runways, adjacent
procedures)
• No secondary obstacle
clearance areas
• Improving safety by eliminating
circling maneuvers
• Simplifying training by eliminating
NPAs without sacrificing access
• To solve problems not solvable
with other approach surfaces
The Boeing Company
• Tailored & guided missed
approaches
• Curved paths (RF)
• Reduced vertical
obstacle surfaces (VEB)
W100.22
SAAAR – Functional Requirements
Appendix 4, Sections 3-6
• Accuracy: 0.1 – 0.3 NM, 95%
• GNSS, IRU, VOR*, & DME*
• 10-6 -10-7 accident rate objective
• CDI or Navigation Map, & display
resolution of 0.1 nm
• A/C position & desired path,
verification by 2nd pilot
• Vertical Path, angles/altitudes
• Baro Altimetry Information
• Navigation Database, integrity, &
validity indication
• Procedures from database
• Active navigation sensor
• ID, bearing, distance, GS, time to
waypoint
The Boeing Company
• Direct to, fly-over, fly-by capability
• IF, RF, TF, CF, DF plus VM
recommended
• System Failure
• Autoreversion to secondary sensor
W100.23
SAAAR – Appendix 5
Approach Segment Width
RNP Level
MAXIMUM MINIMUM
Segment
Feeder/Initial
1.0
0.10
Intermediate
1.0
0.10
Final
0.50
0.10*
Missed
Approach
1.0
0.10*
* Can be lower than 0.10 with AFS-400 approval
Missed Approach Segment
RNP 0.3
The Boeing Company
Final
Intermediate Segment
Segment
RNP 0.3
with RF
RNP 0.10
Initial Segment
RNP 1.0
W100.24
SAAAR, Appendix 5
Obstacle Clearance
Vertical Error Budget (VEB) Alternative
FAF
500’ ROC
VEB OCS
1
20.71
3,580.07
The Boeing Company
W100.25
SAAAR, Appendix 5
Obstacle Clearance
Linear criteria for missed approach
RNP .1
RNP .15
RNP .2
RNP .3
RNP
+ 1xRNP
NM
0
The Boeing Company
6.6
10
13
20
W100.26
SAAAR, Appendix 5
Obstacle Clearance
Allows for performance based Missed Approach
CG = 6076.11548
slope
FAS DA
Slope = 6076.11548
CG
50
Approach Surface Base Line
The Boeing Company
W100.27
SAAAR – Operational Applications
Applications with RNP SAAAR where benefits
assessments are being performed and priorities derived
Parallel with
Parallel
with Parallel
Parallelwithout
without Simultaneous
Simultaneous
Visual Transition
Converging
Visual
Transition Transition
Transition
Converging
2400’- <4300’
9
750’- <4300’
De-confliction ofof Runway
De-confliction
RunwayAccess
Access&and
Adjacent Airports
Adjacent
Airports Risk
RiskManagement
Management
Airport #1
RNP SAAAR
Conventional
36
36
36
Airport #2
The Boeing Company
W100.28
RNP
Specials
The Boeing Company
SAAAR
Public SAAAR
PANS-OPs
W100.29
Public RNP SAAAR
Public RNP SAAAR key attributes:
– Path construction:
– RNP 0.3 approach typical, as low as RNP 0.1
– RNP 1 missed approach typical, as low as RNP 0.1
– RF path type where necessary, fixes the ground track in a turn
– Obstacle Assessment:
– Lateral OCS equal to 2xRNP either side of track center
– Vertical OCS a distance equal to the vertical error budget (VEB)
below descent path (aircraft specific)
– Missed approach OCS from VEB value at DA rising at a slope
equal to engine out climb performance (aircraft specific)
– Ability to lower DA if MA OCS clears controlling obstacle
– FAS RNP carried into the MAS
Public SAAAR aims for much broader participation of RNP capable aircraft
The Boeing Company
W100.30
Public RNP SAAAR
Approach Segment Width
RNP Level
Basic
Segment
Feeder/Initial
1.0
Intermediate
1.0
Final
0.30
Missed
Approach
1.0
* Can be lower than 0.10 with AFS-400 approval
Missed Approach Segment
RNP 1.0
The Boeing Company
Intermediate Segment
Final
RNP 1.0
Segment
RNP 0.30
Initial Segment
RNP 1.0
W100.31
Public RNP SAAAR
Obstacle Clearance
Vertical Error Budget
Note: BG is based upon straight in approach only, and
therefore less than the BG for N8000.287 SAAAR
FAF
500’ ROC
1
VEB OCS
20.71
3,559.42
The Boeing Company
W100.32
Public RNP SAAAR
Standardize as much as possible, eliminate variability
Missed Approach
• Base climb gradient 200’/NM with adjustments,
425’/NM max to clear obstacles
• Fixed assessment of IRS/non-IRS
• Turns with standardized RF before DER
• Rejected landing as Ops evaluation
Approach
•Fixed VEB variables
Operational
•Equipment
•Crew Procedures
•Training
•Monitoring Program
FAS DA
50
Approach Surface Base Line
The Boeing Company
W100.33
Public RNP SAAAR – Functional Requirements
AC90-RNP SAAAR DRAFT
Operational Considerations:
• Accuracy: 0.3 NM, 95%
xGNSS or GNSS/IRU
x10-7 Airspace Containment
xEGPWS & TAWS Crosscheck
xRNP MEL & Crew Equipment List
• CDI or Navigation Map, & display
resolution of 0.1 nm
• A/C position & desired path,
verification by 2nd pilot
• Vertical Path, angles/altitudes
• Baro Altimetry Information
• Navigation Database, integrity, &
validity indication
• Procedures from database
• Active navigation sensor
• ID, bearing, distance, GS, time to
waypoint
The Boeing Company
• Direct to, fly-over, fly-by capability
• IF, RF, TF, CF, DF plus VM
recommended
• System Failure
• Autoreversion to secondary sensor
W100.34
RNP Solutions
Notice vs Public Criteria at Tier 1 Airports
Data from PARC
500
Median Achieved HAT - feet
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
The Boeing Company
N 0.30
C
JA
SF
O
PI
T
C
LE
P 0.2
TU
S
N 0.20
LG
B
M
D
W
IA
H
P 0.1
K
PH
L
PD
X
N 0.10
JF
LG
A
EW
R
D
TW
FW
D
D
O
R
SE
A
AT
L
0
P 0.3
W100.35
RNP
Specials
The Boeing Company
SAAAR
Public SAAAR
PANS-OPs
W100.36
ICAO
Confusion between RNP concept and designations
RNP Concept
1999
RNP with
Containment
RNP with
Containment
Integrity/Continuity
RNP
RNP
RNP 10, RNP 4
The Boeing Company
7030 exception
B-RNAV, P-RNAV
RNP-x
RNP 2, RNP 1,
RNP 0.3
RNP-x/y
RNP 0.3/125
W100.37
ICAO
Concept evolution, recognizes value and benefit of RNAV,
and added value and benefits of RNP.
Performance based
Navigation Concept
2005
Navigation Applications
without Containment
Integrity/Continuity
Navigation Applications
with Containment
Integrity/Continuity
RNAV
RNP
Legacy
RNP 10, RNP 4
B-RNAV, P-RNAV
The Boeing Company
New
RNAV 2, RNAV 1,
etc
RNP-x
RNP 2, RNP 1,
RNP 0.3
RNP-x/y
RNP 0.3/125
W100.38
ICAO PANS-Ops
RNP Criteria Evolution
Default Criteria for broad and quick application
Scalable Criteria to address special conditions, requirements, and
benefits
MAP
FAF
FixA
Scalable
Default with
limited
scalability
The Boeing Company
W100.39
ICAO PANS-Ops
RNP
Specials
SAAAR
Public SAAAR
PANS-OPs
More
Less
The Boeing Company
RNP Decision Factors
W100.40
The Boeing Company
W100.41
RNP Implementation
What’s the Problem, Issues & Solutions?
Operational Requirement:
Determine & assess how RNP operation overcomes limitations and provides benefits
General Assessment:
Airplane Performance, navigation infrastructure, Procedure Design Criteria,
Topography Data Sources, ATC Local Flows, Weather, FAR & FAA Orders
Aircraft & Infrastructure:
Nav integrity/availability e.g. PRAIM, A/C Systems & Equipage,
capability, limitations
Airspace Assessment:
Terrain, airport restrictions, usage limitations, environmental,
Application Assessment:
Geodetic Systems & Calculations, waypoint issues, aircraft performance &
flyability demonstration (normal & failures), ALPA, NATCA, Simulation
Procedure Implementation:
Construction, Obstacle Clearance Assessment, Charting, ARINC 424 &
Navigation database,
Operational Implementation:
Contingency Ops, Training (Crew, ATC, Dispatch, etc), AIM, ATC Ops
Integration, Continuing airworthiness, FAA ATC and Flt Stds Processes, Flt
Publications
Operational Approval:
The Boeing Company
Ops Authorization, Ops Specifications or equivalent
W100.42
Operational Implementation
Operational Considerations:
• Autopilot requirements,
dispatch, maintenance
• NAVAID Exclusion
• Track Deviation Monitoring
• Predictive Capability
• MEL
• Contingency Procedures:
- Loss of RNP system
- Loss of sensors
- Loss of GPS signal
- IRU Coasting
• ATC Procedures/Phraseology
• Aeronautical Data and Database Processes
• Training and Manuals for RNAV/RNP
The Boeing Company
W100.43
Operational Implementation
RNP and Global Interoperability
Different Regional Requirements and Infrastructure Basis
RNP 10 -> 4
INS -> GPS
MNPS-> RNP4 BRNAV -> PRNAV
RNP 2, 1, 0.3 INS -> GPS VOR/DME -> DME/DME
RNP 10 -> 4 DME, GPS
RNP 4
GPS
GPS
VOR/DME
INS -> GPS
RNP 4
GPS
The Boeing Company
RNP 10 -> 4
INS -> GPS
W100.44
Operational Implementation
Navigation is just one element that must be considered
Current
Feature
Airspace
Design
The Boeing Company
Integrated Sectors
RTSP & Revised
Separation
standards
Trajectory-based Air Traffic
Management
Decision Support
Tools (w/ “Intent”)
Short-term
Air Traffic Control
Communication
Services
Surveillance
Services
Global Vision
Un-integrated
Sectors and
Procedures/
Criteria
Air Traffic
Management
Navigation
Services
Transition steps
Multiple
Narrowband
Air- Gnd Comms Oceanic Satcom
Ground Based
Navaids
GPS IIF Regional WAAS, MSAS
GLONASS
EGNOS, GAGAN
Multiple
Air-Gnd Comms
Reduced GroundBased Navaids
GPS III/Galileo
Global
GLONASS SBAS/GBAS
Space Relay
ADS
ADS-A/B
Ground Based
“Local Area”
Radars
Air & Ground ADS
Ubiquitous Global
Wide- & Narrowband Satcom
Ground Based
Radars
ADS (A/B)
Ubiquitous
ADS
W100.45
Operational Implementation
Balancing Operational Requirements with CNS/ATM
The Boeing Company
W100.46
Operational Implementation
USA
RNP and Global Interoperability
RNAV 2:
RNAV 2:
NPA 20-8
AMC 20-4
PRNAV:
RNAV:
RNP< 0.3:
Cat II/III:
TGL 10
AMC 20-XX
AMC 20-XZ
CS-AWO
JAR-Ops1
RNAV:
RNP≤ 0.3:
Doc 8168
Doc 8168, 2006?
RNP 10:
BRNAV:
RNAV 4:
RNAV 2:
RNAV:
RNP≤ 0.3:
TGL 10
AMC 20-XX
AMC 20-XZ
RNP 10:
BRNAV:
RNAV:
RNP≤ 0.3:
Doc 8168
Doc 8168,2006?
RNP Separation:
RNAV 1:
RNP 0.3
RNP< 0.3:
Europe PRNAV:
ICAO
N8400.12A
AC90-96A
N8400.XX
AC90-100
N8400.71
AC90-100
N8400.71
AC90-100
N8400.71
AC90-100
N8400.71
8260.52/51
N8000.287
AC20-153
AC120-29A
RNAV 1:
?
RNAV 1:
RNP 0.3
RNP< 0.3:
AC90-100
N8400.71
AC90-100
N8400.71
8260.52/51
N8000.287
AC20-153
AC120-29A
RNP4-12...
RNP2
RNP.3 RNP.5
Low Visibility
Takeoff
The Boeing Company
RNP1
RNP2
RNP1
FAF
RNP.5 RNP.3
RNP.1 Cat II
Landing Cat III
Cat I 100’
200’
W100.47
Operational Implementation
RNP and Global Interoperability
- Alignment of Operations to Criteria and Schedules needed
Q1
2004
Q2 Q3
2005
Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1
AC20-153, Data LOA
AC90-100, USRNAV
2006
Q2 Q3
Q4
Q1
2007
Q2 Q3
Q4
AMC 20-XX
AC90-RNPSAAAR
AMC 20-XZ
N8000.287, RNP SAAAR
8260.52, Public SAAAR
RNP IAP Apps/Priorities
PANS-ATM?
PANS-Ops?
Annex 6?
The Boeing Company
W100.48
RNP Implementation
What’s the Problem, Issues & Solutions?
Operational Requirement:
Determine & assess how RNP operation overcomes limitations and provides benefits
General Assessment:
Airplane Performance, navigation infrastructure, Procedure Design Criteria,
Topography Data Sources, ATC Local Flows, Weather, FAR & FAA Orders
Aircraft & Infrastructure:
Nav integrity/availability e.g. PRAIM, A/C Systems & Equipage,
capability, limitations
Airspace Assessment:
Terrain, airport restrictions, usage limitations, environmental,
Application Assessment:
Geodetic Systems & Calculations, waypoint issues, aircraft performance &
flyability demonstration (normal & failures), ALPA, NATCA, Simulation
Procedure Implementation:
Construction, Obstacle Clearance Assessment, Charting, ARINC 424 &
Navigation database,
Operational Implementation:
Contingency Ops, Training (Crew, ATC, Dispatch, etc), AIM, ATC Ops
Integration, Continuing airworthiness, FAA ATC and Flt Stds Processes, Flt
Publications
Operational Approval:
The Boeing Company
Ops Authorization, Ops Specifications or equivalent
W100.49
Operational Approval
Aircraft Evaluation
Type of Equipment
Documentation of performance and functionality
Operation Qualification
Crew Qualification and Training
Ops Procedures
Manuals, Checklist, QRH, Operational Considerations including
Autopilot, navaid selection, performance monitoring, predictive
capability, failure monitoring, inertial coasting
Continued Airworthiness
Database
Maintenance Training
Dispatch
MEL
Validation
The Boeing Company
W100.50
Summary
Implementation Issues Exist in All Areas
Operational Requirement:
Determine & assess how RNP operation overcomes limitations and provides benefits
General Assessment:
Airplane Performance, navigation infrastructure, Procedure Design Criteria,
Topography Data Sources, ATC Local Flows, Weather, FAR & FAA Orders
Aircraft & Infrastructure:
Nav integrity/availability e.g. PRAIM, A/C Systems & Equipage,
capability, limitations
Airspace Assessment:
Terrain, airport restrictions, usage limitations, environmental,
Application Assessment:
Geodetic Systems & Calculations, waypoint issues, aircraft performance &
flyability demonstration (normal & failures), ALPA, NATCA, Simulation
Procedure Implementation:
Construction, Obstacle Clearance Assessment, Charting, ARINC 424 &
Navigation database,
Operational Implementation:
Contingency Ops, Training (Crew, ATC, Dispatch, etc), AIM, ATC Ops
Integration, Continuing airworthiness, FAA ATC and Flt Stds Processes, Flt
Publications
Operational Approval:
The Boeing Company
Ops Authorization, Ops Specifications or equivalent
W100.51
Questions?
The Boeing Company
W100.52