Transcript Slide 1
Direct Acting Antivirals: What are they? What is their place in HCV management? Mark Sulkowski, MD Associate Professor of Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Limitations of PegIFN + Ribavirin (with or without protease inhibitors) • Antiviral activity is host + virus genotype dependent – IL28B CC genotype > TC and TT • Safety and tolerability risk outweighs treatment benefit for some individuals – “IFN unwilling and/or unable” • Finite number of expert healthcare providers • Cost Therapeutic Targets for DAAs • Prevent viral entry – – • Prevent translation of viral RNA – • NS3/4 protease inhibitors Inhibit HCV-RNA polymerase – – – – • Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies SRB1 receptor blockers Nucleoside analogue NS5B polymerase inhibitors Non-nucleoside analogue NS5B polymerase inhibitors NS5A inhibitor Cyclophilin B inhibitors Viral assembly/release Pereira AA, et al. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6:403-411. Direct Acting Antivirals for Hepatitis C Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 10, 93-94 (February 2011) | doi:10.1038/nrd3361 New Targets • • • • • • Peginterferon lambda (PegIL-29) Protease inhibitors Polymerase inhibitors NS5A inhibitors Cyclophilin inhibitors DAA Combinations Peginterferon lambda + RBV Virologic response by IL28B Genotype in patients with HCV Genotypes 1, 4 Solid bars: CC Hatched bars: CT/TT Percentage of patients ± 95% CI RVR cEVR 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 120 μg n = 19 46 180 μg PegIFN-λ 22 38 Zeuzem et al. EASL 2011 240 μg 17 40 180 μg PegIFN-α-2a 18 57 120 μg 180 μg PegIFN-λ 240 μg 19 22 17 46 38 40 180 μg PegIFN-α-2a 18 57 Platelets (GI/L) Total Neutrophils (GI/L) Hemoglobin (g/L) Changes in Hematologic Parameters Over Time and Hematology-associated PegIFN and RBV Dose Reductions PegIFN-λ 120 µg PegIFN-λ 240 µg 150 PegIFN-λ 180 µg PegIFN-α-2a PegIFN α-2a PegIFN-λ 140 120 µg 180 µg 240 µg 180 µg 130 120 0 2 4 6 8 10 5 4 3 2 1 LLN 12 LLN 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 10 LLN 12 300 250 200 150 0 2 4 6 8 Study Week Zeuzem et al EASL 2011 Lab Toxicity, % Hemoglobin low RBV dose reduction, % (due to Hb abnormality) Neutrophils Low Platelets Low PegIFN dose reduction, % (due to hematologic abnormality) (N=128) (N=131) (N=134) (N=133) 20.5 15.4 12.9 43.9 2.3 1.5 0.7 12.8 0 0 0.8 0 0 0 15.2 14.4 0 0 0 17.3 New Targets • • • • • • Peginterferon lambda (PegIL-29) Protease inhibitors Polymerase inhibitors NS5A inhibitors Cyclophilin inhibitors DAA Combinations PILLAR Study: TMC435 + PegIFN/RBV PILLAR Week 24 Analysis: Proportion of Patients Achieving Virologic Response at Weeks 4 and 12 Week 4 *** 100 10 80 *** 20 *** 16 Week 12 *** *** 2 17 *** 1 *** 3 *** 11 60 40 77 68 76 91 79 96 94 97 58 20 11 5 0 TMC 12/ TMC 24/ TMC 12/ TMC 24/ PR24 PR24 PR24 PR24 75 mg 75 mg 150 mg 150 mg (n=77) (n=75) (n=76) (n=75) <25 IU/mL undetectable Pbo 24/ PR48 (n=75) TMC 12/ TMC 24/ TMC 12/ TMC 24/ PR24 PR24 PR24 PR24 75 mg 75 mg 150 mg 150 mg (n=78) (n=73) (n=77) (n=77) <25 IU/mL detectable Fried et al. AASLD 2010 Fried MW, et al. 61st AASLD; Boston, MA; October 29 – November 2, 2010; Abst. LB-5. >25 IU/ml Pbo 24/ PR48 (n=74) PILLAR Study: Role of IL28B Genotype Mean(+/- SE) Change in Plasma HCV RNA (log10 IU/mL) from Baseline PILLAR Week 24 Analysis: Mean Change in HCV RNA from Baseline According to IL28B Genotype* Placebo 0 -2 CC CT TT -4 -6 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 Week All TMC 435 (75 mg) 0 -2 -2 -4 -4 -6 -6 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 Week Fried et al. AASLD 2010 Fried MW, et al. 61st AASLD; Boston, MA; October 29 – November 2, 2010; Abst. LB-5. All TMC 435 (150 mg) 0 0 4 8 12 Week 16 20 24 SILEN-C1: BI-1335 + PegIFN/RBV with or without 3-day lead-in 100 88 83 80 78 80 71 73 55 60 40 24 20 15 9 15 8 0 eRVR PR BI1335 120 mg LI Sulkowski et al. EASL 2011 SVR BI1335 240 mg LI Relapse BI1335 240 mg No LI New Targets • • • • • • Peginterferon lambda (PegIL-29) Protease inhibitors Polymerase inhibitors NS5A inhibitors Cyclophilin inhibitors DAA Combinations Mericitabine + PegIFN/RBV for HCV genotype 1 patients A: 500mg BID+ P/R 12 wk (n=80) B: 1000mg BID+ P/R 8 wk (n=81) C: 1000mg BID+ P/R 12 wk (n=82) % Patients with virologic response (<15IUmL)* D: 1000mg BID+ P/R 12 wk (n=81) E: P/R 48 wk (n=84) 100% 88% 83% 80% 68% 62% 62% 62% 80% 60% 49% 39% 40% 18% 20% 0% 0 0 *Roche COBAS® HCV Test; LLOD = 15 IU/mL ITT population, n=408 2 4 6 Study Week Jensen DM, et al. 61st AASLD; Boston, MA; October 29 – November 2, 2010; Abst. 81. 8 10 12 PSI-7977 Phase 2b Study GT-1 treatment-naïve Weeks 24 12 0 N=50 PSI-7977 200 mg QD + PEG-IFN -2a + RBV PEG-IFN -2a + RBV N=50 RG7128 400 mg QD + PEG-IFN -2a + RBV PEG-IFN -2a + RBV STOP Non-RVR PEG-IFN -2a + RBV STOP Non-RVR PEG-IFN -2a + RBV PEG-IFN -2a + RBV N=25 GT-2/3 treatment-naïve open-label N=25 PSI-7977 400 mg QD + PEG-IFN -2a + RBV SVR Follow-Up • 150 patients GT-1, 2 & 3, treatment-naïve – Response-guided – IL28B stratified (GT-1, 125 patients) • Primary efficacy endpoint : Safety and tolerability Lalezari et al. EASL 2011 72 48 “12+0” SVR Follow-Up PSI-7977 + PegIFN + RBV • 121 patients with HCV genotype 1 – 41% IL28B CC • No viral breakthrough observed • No safety signal detected Week 4 100 98 80 60 40 20 19 0 PSI7977 200 or 400 mg/P/R PR New Targets • • • • • • Peginterferon lambda (PegIL-29) Protease inhibitors Polymerase inhibitors NS5A inhibitors Cyclophilin inhibitors DAA Combinations BMS-790052 Replication Complex Inhibitor: Change in HCV RNA after administration of single dose M Gao et al. Nature 000, 1-5 (2010) doi:10.1038/nature08960 NS5A replication complex inhibitor + PegIFN/RBV SVR 100 92 83 80 60 42 40 25 20 0 PR (n=12) Pol et al. EASL 2011 NS5A 1 mg (n=12) NS5A 10 mg (n=12) NS5A 60 mg (n=12) New Targets • • • • • • Peginterferon lambda (PegIL-29) Protease inhibitors Polymerase inhibitors NS5A inhibitors Cyclophilin inhibitors DAA Combinations Alisporivir (DEB025): Oral cyclophilin B inhibitor • Synthesized from cyclosporin A – No immunosuppressive activity; Potent Cyp inhibition • Active all HCV genotypes • In vitro resistance in the NS5A region • Also active against HIV Flisiak et al. Hepatology. 2009 May;49(5):1460-8. Alisporivir + PegIFN/RBV in HCV genotype 1, treatment naïve patients SVR 76 80 69 60 55 53 40 20 0 PR Flisiak R et al. EASL 2011 APV 48 wks APV 24 wks RGT New Targets • • • • • • Peginterferon lambda (PegIL-29) Protease inhibitors Polymerase inhibitors NS5A inhibitors Cyclophilin inhibitors DAA Combinations INFORM-1: RG7128 + RG7227 • 1st clinical trial to investigate the combination of DAA in the absence of interferon and ribavirin • • Assessed safety and antiviral activity of RG7128 + RG7227 x13d Rx-naïve, null and relapser GT-1 HCV patients (N ~90) • No evidence of resistance breakthrough in any cohort Gane et al. The Lancet 15 Oct 2010 Telaprevir + VX-222 with or with PegIFN/RBV RVR Breakthrough 100 86 87 40 31 80 59 60 20 17 40 20 17 0 0 TLV + TLV + QUAD 222 low 222 high low QUAD high 0 TLV + TLV + QUAD 222 low 222 high low 0 QUAD high SOUND C-1: PI (1335) + nonnucleoside polymerase (7127) + RBV Day 8 Day 15 Day 22 Day 29 27% 40% 67% 73% 18% 82% 100% 100% Group 1: 7127 (400 mg TID) + 1335 + RBV (N=15) Group 2: 7127 (600 mg TID) + 1335 + RBV (N=17) HCV RNA < 25 IU/mL, undetectable Two genotype 1a patients in the low dose group had viral rebound during treatment Zeuzem S., et al. 61st AASLD; Boston, MA; October 29 – November 2, 2010; Abst. LB-7. PI + NS5A inhibitor ± PegIFN/RBV in prior null responder Group A: No PegIFN/RBV, n = 11 Group B: PegIFN/RBV, n =10 8 8 ↓ Indicates Initiation of PegIFN/RBV ↓ 7 7 6 6 5 Log10 HCV RNA Log10 HCV RNA ↓ ↓ 4 3 2 LOQ LOD LOQ 26 IU/mL LOD < 10 IU/mL 1 0 5 4 LOQ 26 IU/mL LOD < 10 IU/mL 3 2 LOQ LOD 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Week Lok AS, et al. 61st AASLD; Boston, MA; October 29 – November 2, 2010; Abst. LB-8. 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Week 7 8 9 10 11 12 PI + NS5A inhibitor ± PegIFN/RBV in prior null responder • No PegIFN/RBV – 4/11 patients had SVR-12 with no PegIFN/RBV • 1a, 2/3 SVR with 1 relapse; 1b; 2/2 – 6/11 patients had breakthrough with PegIFN/RBV added 4 achieve undetectable HCV RNA (treatment ongoing) • QUAD therapy (PegIFN/RBV) – 10/10 patients had SVR-12 Lok AS, et al. EASL; Berlin, Germany 2011 Future HCV therapies • Multiple agents in phase 2 or later development – Effective across viral genotypes and subtypes – Different resistant variants – Improved safety and tolerability – Oral (with the exception of IFN λ) – Less frequent dosing • Increase HCV treatment rates with IFN alfa free regimens