Transcript FY 2006 Budget Roll Out

FY 2006 Budget Roll Out
February 7, 2005
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field
1
…We Are Guided By the President’s Direction
• Budget maintains resolute focus on exploration priorities and
critical milestones, informed by our science priorities
– First Step –Return Shuttle to flight and complete Space Station
assembly
– Flagship Program –Project Constellation (maintain 2008 CEV flight
demo)
– Technology Base –Critical exploration technologies
– Transforming Technologies –Project Prometheus (flight demo in a
decade)
– Robotic Precursors –Lunar beginning in 2008 & added Mars in 2011
– Shuttle Transition –ISS Cargo/Crew Services, near-term commercial
service
– Scientific Breakthroughs –Exploration of the solar system and
Universe (e.g., Webb in 2011) and the search for earth like planets
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field
2
…We Are Guided By The President’s Direction
(Continued)
• Budget supports critical National needs and
revolutionary technologies
– Aeronautics: Protects Aviation Safety & Security and
Airspace Systems, and restructures Vehicle Systems to
focus on technology breakthroughs and near-term
demonstrations
– Climate Change: Invest in next generation earth observing
satellites
– Education: Continues to inspire the next generation of
explorers with priority programs (e.g., Explorer schools,
scholarship for service)
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field
3
…Supported by a Solid Budget
($ in millions)
2005*
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Science, Aero & Exploration
8,912
9,661
10,550
11,215
12,210
12,796
Science
Exploration Systems
Aeronautics Research
Education
5,364
2,568
813
166
5,476
3,165
852
167
5,960
3,707
728
155
6,503
3,826
731
155
6,853
4,474
728
155
6,798
5,125
718
155
Exploration Capabilities
6,704
6,763
6,379
6,057
5,367
5,194
Space Operations
6,704
6,763
6,379
6,057
5,367
5,194
Inspector General
27
32
34
35
35
37
Unrequested Items
426
16,456
2.4%
16,962
3.1%
17,306
2.0%
17,612
1.8%
18,027
2.4%
TOTAL
-- annual increases
Emergency Hurricane Supplemental
16,070
126
*FY 2005 budget is shown in new budget structure for comparison purposes, and allocation by Mission Directorate does not
include $426m in unrequested items to allow a direct comparison of content included in the President’s request.
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field
4
…Building on Our Scientific Successes
($ in millions)
FY 2006
FY 2007
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
SCIENCE
5,476
5,960
6,503
6,853
6,798
Space System Exploration
The Universe
Earth-Sun System
1,900
1,512
2,064
2,348
1,532
2,081
2,832
1,539
2,132
2,999
1,495
2,359
3,066
1,407
2,325
The FY06 budget request for Science Mission Directorate includes:
• FY06 budget will support 55 missions in orbit, 26 in development, and 34 in
design phase
• $858m, a 17% increase, for Mars/Lunar robotic exploration
• $372m, a 19% increase, to maintain Webb telescope on pace for 2011 launch
• $93m in development funds for Hubble to extend scientific productivity and
initiate a robotic mission to safely deorbit the telescope
• $218m, a 17% increase, to maintain competitive efforts for Explorer Program
• $56m, a 33% increase, for Beyond Einstein program to study the universe
• $234m, a 16% increase, for studying the sun in Living With a Star
• $136m, a 26% increase, for competitive opportunities in Earth System Science
Pathfinder
• $6.8b, a 23% increase in the projected annual budget by 2010, increasing the
Science portion of total Agency budget from 33% in FY 2006 to 38% in 2010
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field
5
…Preparing for Our Exploration Future
($ in millions)
FY 2006
FY 2007
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
EXPLORATION SYSTEMS
3,165
3,707
3,826
4,474
5,125
Constellation Systems
Exploration Systems R&T
Prometheus
Human Systems R&T
1,120
919
320
806
1,580
907
424
797
1,524
989
501
812
1,991
1,050
614
819
2,452
1,078
779
816
The FY06 budget request for Exploration Systems Directorate includes:
• $753m for the Crew Exploration Vehicle, America’s future workhorse for safe
and affordable human exploration, with resources to pursue a timely flight demo
in 2008
• $919m, a 27% increase, for Exploration Systems R&T that will enable a designs
for sustainable exploration, including $44m for a revamped technology transfer
program and $34m for Centennial Challenges prize program
• $320m for Project Prometheus to test of a nuclear reactor in 2008 and fly a
demo mission within a decade, followed later by other demonstrations (e.g., to
Jupiter’s moons)–rephased to reflect development profile and more than
doubling over five years
• $806m for Human Systems R&T, which after a thorough bottom-up review, is
now directly linked to exploration requirements for human missions to the moon
and beyond
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field
6
…Enabling Breakthrough Aeronautics Research
($ in millions)
AERONAUTICS RESEARCH
FY 2006
FY 2007
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
852
728
731
728
718
The FY06 budget request for Aeronautics Directorate includes:
• Maintains top priorities in aeronautics research:
– $193m, a 4% increase, for Aviation Safety & Security
– $200m, a 32% increase, for Airspace Systems
•
Also provides $459m for a restructured and improved Vehicle Systems
program
– Focused on breakthrough research culminating in flight demos
– Pursues high risk, high payoff concepts beyond incremental research of
interest to industry (e.g. eliminates almost all work in conventional subsonic
aircraft)
– Consists of projects in noise reduction, high altitude unmanned vehicles,
and an all-electric airplane
– Includes realignment of workforce and facilities to best implement new
priorities
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field
7
…Meeting Our Obligations
($ in millions)
FY 2006
FY 2007
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
SPACE OPERATIONS
6,763
6,379
6,057
5,367
5,194
Space Shuttle
Space Station
Space Flight Support
4,531
1,857
376
4,172
1,835
371
3,866
1,791
400
2,815
2,152
400
2,419
2,376
399
The FY06 budget request for Space Operations Mission Directorate includes:
• $4.5b to return Shuttle to flight as a top priority and resume flight operations
– Provides $366m more for return to flight and related activities in FY06 to
maintain safe operations in support of five planned flights
– NASA will retire the Space Shuttle in 2010 while working to ensure that the
last flight is as safe as the flights this year
• $1.9b for the International Space Station
– NASA is examining configurations for the Space Station that meet the
needs of both the Space Exploration Vision and our international partners
while using as few Shuttle flights as possible to complete Station assembly
– Assembly sequence and funding support enhanced crew size of up to 6
prior to completion of assembly, enabling important Vision work
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field
8
…Pursuing Competition to Best Meet Requirements
•
Industry, academia, and NASA field centers will have opportunity to compete for
over $10 billion in new opportunities over the next five-years. Examples:
– Exploration Systems --Crew Exploration Vehicle, Crew Launch Vehicle, Project
Prometheus, and exploration research and technology
– Science --Discovery, Explorer, New Frontiers, Mars Scouts, Lunar Robotic Earth
Science Pathfinders, New Millennium, Living with a Star
– Space Operations --Launch services to Station and other users
– Aeronautics --New breakthrough flight demonstration projects$ in billions
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field
9
…And Retooling Our Institution
•
•
The focus of the transformed NASA is on how best to achieve the Vision
and other national priorities assigned to NASA – the Mission is First
– Human Capital – Workforce transformation is growing in importance and will
require workforce adjustments and distribution of needed skills based on
mission and core competency requirements
– Physical Capital – Growing list of underutilized facilities will be assessed to
determine the critical requirements to support the Vision
– Organization – Based on Aldridge Commission recommendations, plan
proposals and legislation to pursue non-governmental organizations to
enhance Center management structures
Transforming NASA field centers for the coming decade through improved
agility and competitiveness
– Vision provides the long-term focus and stability required for sound
business planning and for attracting skills important to the US economy
– Competition will help the Centers to provide the best value and new and
innovative approaches while encouraging partnerships and collaboration
with industry and academia (notable successes this past year)
– Agility, enhanced by new legislative authorities, will enable Centers to
maintain cutting edge capabilities as the Vision progresses and
technologies advance
– Core competencies will be maintained and funded through competition
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field
10
…Maintaining Core Competencies
END-TO-END MISSION SYSTEMS
1. End-to-end mission sys. arch., design, dev & ops -- GSFC, JPL, TBD
2. Large Complex Space Sys Dev & Int (Space Infrast Dev) – MSFC
•
NASA Core Competencies are critical
factors for mission success
– Funds will be provided as a result
of competitive selection decisions
– Competition will enhance
competencies through new
opportunities
•
NASA Core Competencies are
resident at one or more NASA Center
•
NASA Core Competencies will be
periodically reassessed
– Annually to assess desired
capability
– Tri-annually to determine if
reassigned or changed in response
to changing mission requirements,
emerging commercial capabilities
and/or competitive results.
3. Human Mission Planning, Training and Operations -- JSC
SCIENCE AND SCIENCE SUPPORT
1. Astrobiology – ARC
2. Human Health Sciences and Astromaterials Res and Curation -- JSC
3. Observing Systems -- GSFC, JPL
4. Sensors and Instruments -- GSFC, JPL, LaRC
PROPULSION
1. Trans. and Prop. Systems Dev. – MSFC
2. In-Space Propulsion (including Nuclear Systems) – GRC
3. Rocket Propulsion Test (RPT) -- SSC
LAUNCH PROCESSING AND SERVICES
1. End-to-end launch services – KSC
2. Assy, test, integ. & processing of s/c, payloads & flt sci exp – KSC
3. R&D, des, constr & ops of spaceport services on all surfaces -- KSC
AERONAUTICS
1. Aero-propulsion Systems – GRC
2. Aerosciences -- Research for Flight in all Atmospheres – LaRC
3. Atmospheric Flight Research & Test – DFRC
4. Air Transportation Management Systems -- ARC
SYSTEM/SUB-SYSTEM COMPETENCIES
1. Power and Energy Conversion Systems – GRC
2. Communication and Navigation Systems -- GSFC, JPL
3. Entry, Descent, and Landing Systems -- ARC, JPL, LaRC
4. Integrated Next-Generation Computing Systems – ARC
5. Intelligent/Adaptive Systems – ARC
6. Aerospace Materials and Manufacturing -- LaRC, MSFC
7. Systems Analysis/Engineering and Safety (One NASA) -- LaRC
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field
11
…And Reshaping Our Workforce
•
Transforming workforce is a significant issue
– Termination of previous programs, like Space Launch Initiative two years ago,
significantly increased the workforce not supporting a specific program
– As previous work has been completed, and some projects discontinued, the issue
has grown, placing an untenable burden on Center G&A
•
NASA must take necessary action to transform its workforce to ensure
the successful implementation of the Vision
– Centers are restructuring themselves as necessary to ensure successful
competition for new business opportunities
• Pursue new legislation and aggressively evaluate and implement alternative management
structures to enhance agility and enable new opportunities
– Sufficient workforce funding is provided in FY05-06 to provide time for transition
• Compete for new business opportunities
• Pursue expanded buyouts, training, and job fairs
• Seek voluntary reassignments, or directed reassignments if necessary
– Must actively address these initiatives to complete this realignment by FY 2007 to
avoid undesirable consequences
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field
12
…To Enable The New Age of Exploration
•
The torch is being passed from the pioneers, who first took us to
the moon and beyond, to the new generation of explorers who will
take us into deep space to stay
– Sustainable implementation of the Vision will provide the legacy for future
generations
•
The FY06 NASA Budget reaffirms the President’s commitment and
provides us the next step in implementing the Vision
– Returning Shuttle to completing assembly of the Space Station
– Exploring the cosmos with robots and humans
– Transforming to enable the Vision – without change, there is no Vision
“We choose to explore space because doing so improves our lives
and lifts our national spirit. So let us continue the journey.”
--Pres. George W. Bush
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field
13
GRC Budget in NASA's FY2006 Congressional Submission
700
650
600
550
500
450
400
Education
Space Operations
350
Science
Exploration
300
Aeronautics
250
200
150
100
50
0
FY 2005
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field
FY 2006
14
Aeronautics Program Replan
GRC View
•
A reduction of $40M to the Vehicle Systems Program at GRC in
FY 2006; no top line change on Airspace Systems and Aviation Safety
& Security Programs
•
The Vehicle Systems Program will be restructured. It will include four
flight demonstration projects:
– Three related to “Breakthrough in Environment”: 10 dB Noise Reduction,
Sonic Boom and Zero Emissions Aircraft
– One related to “Science and Exploration”: High Altitude Long Endurance
(HALE ROA) Aircraft
•
Majority part of the Program will be competed in different levels (e.g.
flight demonstration, technology demonstration, technology
development)  Process will be developed with Center participation in
Feb/March timeframe.
•
Project Management and Implementation processes will be developed
with Center participation in February and March timeframe.
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field
15
GRC Human Systems Research and
Technology Program
• A loss of $18M to the Human Systems Research & Technology
Program activities at GRC will occur from FY05 to FY06, mostly
due to the flight hardware delivery of the Combustion Integrated
Rack (CIR) and the Fluids Integrated Rack (FIR) to KSC
• The legacy Office of Biological and Physical Research (OBPR)
program has been transformed into the Human Systems
Research and Technology (HSRT) program and is aligned with
the goals and objectives of the Exploration program.
• GRC continues to have a major role in the Human Systems
Research and Technology program, specifically in
–
–
–
–
–
–
Advanced Extra Vehicular Activity
Advanced Life Support
Human Health and Countermeasures
Advanced Environmental Monitoring and Control
Fire Prevention, Detection, and Suppression
Multiphase Flow Technology
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field
16
GRC Human Systems Research and
Technology Program
(continued)
• The GRC Combustion Science program has been transformed
into the Fire Prevention, Detection, and Suppression program
and will be directed towards developing engineering design data
rather than purely basic research.
• The GRC Fluid Physics program has been transformed into
Advanced Life Support and Multiphase Flow Technologies that
will be directed towards developing engineering design data.
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field
17
Prometheus
Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter Mission (JIMO)
–Mission deferred for alternate mission that will both
demonstrate the use of nuclear electric propulsion
and provide a lower risk, science and exploration
relevant mission
– GRC will retain responsibilities independent of
mission destination:
•Electric Propulsion design and technology
•Power conversion & Heat Rejection technology
•Phase B co-design with Northrop Grumman,
Naval Reactors and JPL
•Provide facilities, technicians, and engineering
capabilities to support naval reactors and prime
contractor development and qualification tests
Advanced Systems and Technology
- GRC retains technology development and
management responsibilities in systems analysis,
advanced power and propulsion, nuclear thermal
and surface power
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field
18
Top Level Summary of GRC ICP Results
• Intramural Call for Proposals (ICP) Process
– 135 NOIs Submitted
– 18 Proposals Requested, 17 Proposals Submitted
– 44 Supporting Tasks Submitted as part of other Center Proposals
• ICP Selections (Announced 7/28/04)
– 4 Proposals Selected for GRC Lead Projects ($32.1M Total,$24.7M
GRC))
– 15 Supporting Tasks Selected ($30M)
• Total Capture ICP
– Fluctuation expected due to negotiations and potential selection of
portions of the GRC led proposals
GRC FTEs
GRC Total $M
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field
FY05
17.6
$7.5
FY06
30.5
$17.4
FY07
29.4
$16.9
FY08
24.2
$13.4
Totals
101.7
$55.2
19
BAA Extramural Call for Proposals
Success at GRC
• GRC was partner on 138 of the ~500 total ECP proposals
• On Tuesday, Nov. 16, HQ announced that 70 proposals were
selected with a total value of over $1B
• General Statistics out of 70 Selected Proposals:
– GRC partnerships: 20
– At least one NASA Center partner: 68
– At least one University (or associated institute): 46
– Largest number of Lead Roles: Boeing, 7
– Largest number of Partner Roles: JPL, 28
FY05
FY06
FY07
FY08
FY09
Totals
GRC FTEs
10.1
23.0
20.1
17.4
3.2
73.8
GRC Total $M
$3.2
$8.4
$7.4
$7.0
$1.2
$27.2
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field
20
GRC Workforce
•
As we went through the 2006 budget process, we realized that we had
a Civil Service workforce challenge (reduction) of approximately 500
FTE by 2010
– We proposed handling approx 300 by a series of buyouts over FY 2005-20062007, and another 80 by other normal attrition
– This approach left us with approx 100 FTE that would have been added to our
Center G&A, in anticipation of new work
•
The impacts on GRC of the Agency’s response to the OMB passback
resulted in our workforce challenge increasing to approx 700 FTE by
2007
– The agency is preparing additional options to try to deal with this challenge
• Agency-wide job fair and expanded buyout opportunities in 2005
• Accelerating the analysis of alternative management structures as recommended in the
Aldridge Report
• Consideration of voluntary (and potentially directed/involuntary) inter-center transfers
• As a very last resort, consideration of Reduction in Force procedures
– In addition to these options, at GRC we are also actively pursuing additional
work and reviewing the levels of our on-site support contractors with the
objective of identifying contractor supplied tasks that could more appropriately
be performed by Civil Servants
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field
21
Summary
• The NASA Transformation in support of the President’s
vision is moving forward aggressively
– The ways that we collectively will be moving forward as part of this
transformation are changing rapidly
– We at GRC are committed to supporting the Agency’s transformation
and expect to be a vital contributor to the overall mission of the
Agency
• The rapidity and breadth of the transformation present
some very real and difficult challenges to Glenn and
the other centers
– I am confident that by working together we can successfully address
these challenges
• Questions?
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field
22