Transcript Slide 1
Designing Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tiered (CI3T) Models of Prevention: Building a Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) With an Integrated Focus Kathleen Lynne Lane, Ph.D., BCBA-D University of Kansas Wendy Peia Oakes, Ph.D. Arizona State University Purpose • Describe a comprehensive, integrated, three-tiered (CI3T) model of prevention to meet students’ multiple needs • Describe the three core components: academic (response-to-intervention) behavior (positive behavior interventions and supports) social skills (validated curriculum) • Emphasize the importance of accurate measurement … a new opportunity for systemic change … a data-driven model to prevent the development of and respond effectively to existing learning and behavioral challenges Kathleen Lynne Lane, Ph.D., BCBA-D University of Kansas A Multi-Tiered System of Supports: A Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tiered Model of Prevention Primary Prevention Response: 80% of Students Prevent Harm Tertiary Prevention Response: 1-5% of Students Reduce Harm Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tiered Model of Prevention (Lane, Kalberg, & Menzies, 2009) Goal: Reduce Harm Specialized Individual Systems for Students with High-Risk ≈ Tertiary Prevention (Tier 3) Goal: Reverse Harm Specialized Group Systems for Students At-Risk ≈ Secondary Prevention (Tier 2) PBIS Framework Goal: Prevent Harm School/Classroom-Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Validated Social Skills or Character Education Curricula ≈ Primary Prevention (Tier 1) Academic Behavioral Social LPSD MS HS CI3T Training 2014-2015 -5 Academic Component • Coordinated instruction within and across grade levels • Instruction linked to Common Core, state, or district standards • Benchmarking student progress to inform instruction • Progress monitoring for students identified for secondary (Tier 2) and tertiary (Tier 3) supports 6 Social Component …identifying a validated curriculum • Violence Prevention – Second Step Violence Prevention (Committee for Children, 1992) • Character Education – Positive Action (Positive Action, 2008) – Caring School Community (www.characterplus.org) • Social Skills – Social Skills Improvement System – Classwide Intervention Program (Elliott & Gresham, 2007) 7 Behavioral Component: Positive Behavior Interventions and Support …a framework, not a curriculum • Establish, clarify, and define expectations • Teach all students the expectations, planned and implemented by all adults in the school • Give opportunities to practice • Reinforce students consistently, facilitate success • Consider rules, routines, and physical arrangements • Monitor the plan using school-wide data to identify students who need more support • Monitor student progress 8 ELEMENTARY Settings Classroom Respect Hallway - Follow directions - Use a quiet voice -Use kind words - Walk on the right and actions side of the hallway - Control your - Keep hands to Establish, temperClarify, Define yourself -Expectations Cooperate with others - Use an inside voice Cafeteria Playground Bathroom Bus - Use an inside voice - Use manners - Listen to and follow adult requests - Respect other peoples’ personal space - Follow the rules of the game - Use the restroom and then return to class - Stay in your own bathroom stall - Little talking - Use kind words towards the bus driver and other students - Listen to and follow the bus driver’s instructions Responsibility - Arrive to class on time - Remain in school for the whole day - Bring your required materials - Turn in finished work - Exercise selfcontrol - Keep hands to yourself - Walk in the hallway - Stay in line with your class - Make your choices quickly - Eat your own food - Choose a seat and stick with it - Clean up after yourself - Play approved games - Use equipment appropriately - Return equipment when you are done - Line up when the bell rings - Flush toilet - Wash hands with soap - Throw away any trash properly - Report any problems to your teacher - Talk quietly with others - Listen to and follow the bus driver’s instructions - Remain in seat after you enter the bus - Use self-control Best Effort - Participate in class activities - Complete work with best effort - Ask for help politely - Walk quietly - Walk directly to next location - Use your table manners - Use an inside voice - Include others in your games - Be active - Follow the rules of the game - Take care of your business quickly - Keep bathroom tidy - Listen to and follow the bus driver’s instructions - Keep hands and feet to self Lane, Kalberg, & Menzies (2009) SECONDARY Arrive on time prepared to learn Settings Classroom Hallway Cafeteria - Be seated in assigned - Use a quiet voice - Know your order when seat before tardy bell - Walk on the right walking through lunch - Bring all necessary side of the hallway line materials, including the - Keep hands to - Have money ready school planner yourself - Find a set quickly and - Make up work when stay with it absent - Participate in all activities - Complete all assignments to the best of your ability Bathroom - Use facility quickly and quietly, - Return to class promptly Bus - Be ready when bus arrives - Carry on all personal belongings needed - Take care of your own business - Remain in own stall - Minimize chatting - Keep water in the sink - Share seating on the bus - Listen to and follow the bus driver’s instructions the first time given - Speak in a quiet inside voice - Remain seated after entering the bus Be respectful to - Follow the dress code both peers and - Use kind words adults towards others; avoid gossip - Use appropriate ways to show affection to others - Listen to and follow directions - Be truthful - Keep hands to yourself - Use appropriate ways to show affection to others - Walk in the hallway - Share lunch tables with others - Follow directions first time asked - Keep food on your plate - Eat your own food - Clean up area Show school pride - Respect materials (e.g., posters in the hallways). - Keep the hallways clean - Keep lunch tables clean - Keep bathroom clean - Clear any trash - Throw away any trash - Recycle properly - Keep desk area clean - Use classroom supplies and books appropriately - Keep bus clean - Take off all personal belongings Lane, Kalberg, & Menzies (2009) Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tiered Model of Prevention (Lane, Kalberg, & Menzies, 2009) Goal: Reduce Harm Specialized Individual Systems for Students with High-Risk ≈ Tertiary Prevention (Tier 3) Goal: Reverse Harm Specialized Group Systems for Students At-Risk ≈ Secondary Prevention (Tier 2) PBIS Framework Goal: Prevent Harm School/Classroom-Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Validated Social Skills or Character Education Curricula ≈ Primary Prevention (Tier 1) Academic Behavioral Social LPSD MS HS CI3T Training 2014-2015 - 11 Monitor Importance of Unified Systems of Measurement • Accurate measure of key variables to enable accurate decision making – – – – – office discipline referrals (ODRs) attendance referrals to prereferral teams and special education academic progress (e.g., curriculum-based measurement) behavior screenings • The ability to analyze academic and behavioral data in tandem • Information sharing regarding a) progress for schools as a whole, and b) identification and support of students who require additional supports in the form of secondary (Tier 2) and tertiary (Tier 3) levels of prevention Student Risk Screening Scale Middle School Fall 2004 – Fall 2011 n = 12 Percentage of Students n = 20 n = 507 N=534 N=502 N=454 N=470 N=477 N=476 N=524 N= 539 Fall Screeners Lane, K. L., Oakes, W. P., & Magill, L. (2013). Primary prevention efforts: How do we implemented and monitor the Tier 1 component of our comprehensive, integrated, three-tiered (CI3T) model? Procedures for Monitoring: Assessment Schedule Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May X X X X X X X X X X School Demographics Student Demographics Student Outcome Academic Measures Benchmarking - AIMSweb X X Report Card (course failures) X X X X X Student Outcome Behavior Measures Screener – SRSS-IE X X X Discipline: ODR X X Attendance (tardies/ unexcused absences) X X X X X X X Referrals SPED and Support-TEAM X Program Measures Social Validity (PIRS) Schoolwide Evaluation Tool CI3T Treatment Integrity X X X X X A Multi-Tiered System of Supports: A Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tiered Model of Prevention Primary Prevention Response: 80% of Students Secondary Prevention Response: 10-15% of Students Prevent Harm Reverse Harm Tertiary Prevention Response: 1-5% of Students Reduce Harm Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tiered Model of Prevention (Lane, Kalberg, & Menzies, 2009) Goal: Reduce Harm Specialized Individual Systems for Students with High-Risk ≈ Tertiary Prevention (Tier 3) Goal: Reverse Harm Specialized Group Systems for Students At-Risk ≈ Secondary Prevention (Tier 2) PBIS Framework Goal: Prevent Harm School/Classroom-Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Validated Social Skills or Character Education Curricula ≈ Primary Prevention (Tier 1) Academic Behavioral Social LPSD MS HS CI3T Training 2014-2015 - 16 USING SCHOOL-WIDE DATA TO IDENTIFY STUDENTS FOR TARGETED PREVENTION EFFORTS Sample Secondary Intervention Grid Support Behavior Contract Selfmonitoring Description A written agreement between two parties used to specify the contingent relationship between the completion of a behavior and access to or delivery of a specific reward. Contract may involve administrator, teacher, parent, and student. Schoolwide Data: Entry Criteria Data to Monitor Progress Exit Criteria Behavior: SRSS Work Successful Sample Secondary Intervention Grid mod to high risk completion, completion of Students will monitor and record their academic production (completion/accuracy) and on-task behavior each day. Academic: two or more missing assignments within a grading period Behavior: Students who score in the abnormal range for H and CP on the SDQ Academic: course failure or at risk on CBM or other behavior contract. behavior addressed in contract. Treatment integrity. Social Validity. Work Passing grade on completion report card in the and accuracy academic area of in the concern. academic area of concern; passing grades. Treatment integrity. Validity Lane, Kalberg, & Menzies (2009). pp. 131 - Social 137, Boxes 6.1 - 6.4 A Multi-Tiered System of Supports: A Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tiered Model of Prevention Primary Prevention Response: 80% of Students Prevent Harm Tertiary Prevention Response: 1-5% of Students Reduce Harm Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tiered Model of Prevention (Lane, Kalberg, & Menzies, 2009) Goal: Reduce Harm Specialized Individual Systems for Students with High-Risk ≈ Tertiary Prevention (Tier 3) Goal: Reverse Harm Specialized Group Systems for Students At-Risk ≈ Secondary Prevention (Tier 2) PBIS Framework Goal: Prevent Harm School/Classroom-Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Validated Social Skills or Character Education Curricula ≈ Primary Prevention (Tier 1) Academic Behavioral Social LPSD MS HS CI3T Training 2014-2015 - 20 SAMPLE TERTIARY INTERVENTION GRID Support Description Functional Assessment -Based Intervention Individualized interventions developed by the behavior specialist and PBS team Schoolwide Data: Entry Criteria Data to Monitor Progress Students who: Data will be collected Behavior on both the (a) -scored in the high risk target (problem) category on the Student Risk behavior and (b) Screening Scale (SRSS), or replacement scored in the clinical range on (desirable) one following Strengths and behavior Difficulties Questionnaire identified by the (SDQ) subscales: Emotional team on an onSymptoms, Conduct going basis. Problems, Hyperactivity, or Prosocial Behavior Weekly teacher -earned more than five office report on discipline referrals (ODRs) for academic status major events during a grading period ODR data collected OR weekly Academic identified at highest risk for Treatment Integrity school failure: recommended for retention; or scored far Social Validity below basic on state-wide or State of Tennessee DOE Technical district-wide assessments Assistance Grant IRB # 090935 Exit Criteria The functionbased intervention will be faded once a functional relation is demonstrated using a validated single case methodology design (e.g., withdrawal design) and the behavioral objectives specified in the plan are met. Academic Engagement & Treatment Integrity Intervention Baseline Baseline Intervention Percent Engaged & Implented 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Sessions Academic Engagment - - Benefits of a CI3T Model • Coordinated target areas a) academic content b) social skills c) PBIS • Facilitates transitions and supports – Benefits when rezoning occurs and when families change feeder patterns – Benefits to facilitate implementation of systemwide supports (e.g., behavior specialists, special education services, and transition supports) across the district – Benefits for parents to strengthen homeschool partnerships 23 [email protected] [email protected] QUESTIONS?