Transcript Slide 1
Global Health Decisions:
a web tool for HIV decision-making
Mohsen Malekinejad MD DrPH 1
Elliot Marseille DrPH, MPP 2
James G. Kahn MD, MPH1 (PI)
1 - Philip R Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies
University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
2 - Health Strategies International, Oakland, CA
2
Overview
First section (~20 min)
• Background
• Methods
• GHD website conceptual model
Q&A (10 min)
Second section (~15 min)
• GHD live website tour
• Case study: Ghana
• Next steps
3
Background: Policy-making in HIV
global settings – Challenges
Efficacy (risk reduction in ideal setting) essential
but insufficient alone
Evidence on intervention effectiveness often
scarce - reliance on research from less-relevant
settings
Complexity and inconsistency of data reported in
scientific journals is daunting
Policy-makers often lack advanced
epidemiological or cost-effectiveness training
4
GHD – Goal
To Provide health policymakers around
the globe with an evidence-based and
easy-to-use web application that
translates scientific data into the likely
costs and health benefits of prevention
and treatment portfolios.
5
GHD: Specific Aims
1.
2.
3.
4.
Assess evidence of effectiveness (vs. Efficacy) of
HIV prevention and treatment: How well does the
intervention evidence base reflect real-world
practice?
Translate the effect of specified interventions
implemented at large scale into reduced
population-level disease burden measured in
DALYs
Calculate the cost-effectiveness of sets of
interventions, incorporating effectiveness, burden
reduction, and cost
Make findings easily accessible to decisionmakers and other technical and non-technical end
users thorough a web-based resource
6
Methods – Overview
Studies search & screening: systematic review of
selected HIV prevention and treatment interventions
Data Extraction: relevant HIV outcome and cost data
Data analysis: translate outcome data into a
standard metric of RRR and conduct meta-analysis
Assess internal validity: rate scientific quality of
evidence
Assess external validity: rate relevance of evidence
to a specific target setting
Epi model: develop parsimonious model to evaluate
intervention effects
Cost-effectiveness model: calculate incremental costeffectiveness ratio
7
Methods – Search & Screening
Search: conduct searches of systematic reviews in major
biomedical and public health databases
• Interventions: HIV testing and counseling, needle and syringe
exchange program, opioid substitution treatment, sex worker
programs, prevention of mother to child transition, antiretroviral
treatment.
Screening: dual independent screening based on pre-defined
inclusion and exclusion criteria in three levels:
1. Systematic reviews: stepwise (Title & Abstract, Full text)
2. hand search references of SRs to extract individual studies
3. Individual studies: stepwise (Title, Abstract, Full text)
Expert consultation. contact topic experts for studies or
documents potentially missed by search process.
8
Methods – IOPT Extraction
extract all relevant data points at the level of
Intervention, Outcome, Population Trio (IOPT)
different than conventional systematic reviews with narrow
scope
Why IOPT? Studies report >1 useful data point share
some overall aspects of the study (e.g., settings,
investigators, etc.), but vary in respect to other aspects:
1. Intervention: subjects may receive different
intervention due to variations in dose, frequency,
and content of interventions.
2. Outcomes: different time-interval, or type (e.g.,
morbidity, mortality, behavioral)
3. Population: sub-analysis of findings by severity of
underlying diseases (e.g., HIV serostatus)
9
Methods – Data Analysis
Studies report data in various type (RR, OR, pre-post
prevalence)
transformed all data type to standardized outcome
metric of “relative risk reduction” - RRR
RRR: the proportionate reduction in risk of negative
health outcomes associated with the intervention – e.g.:
RRR = control event rate (CER) – experimental event rate
(EER) control event rate (CER)
RRR = 1- RR
RRR facilitates comparison across studies and
intervention types with varying levels of baseline risk
Meta-analysis: random effect model using inverse of
variance to calculate summary effect measure and 95%
CI
10
GHD Internal Validity (GIV)
Scoring System
Objective: To assess and translates
methodological aspects underlying data points into
a simple, transparent, and intuitively meaningful
ordinal score (1 – 6)
Modified version and hybrid product of two
existing tools EPHPP and Cochrane GRADE
GIV score generated at IOPT level in three steps:
1. Assign an initial score based on study design (1–5)
2. Rate the potential risks of bias to adjust initial
score
3. Assign an overall GIV score (0 – 6)
11
GIV - Domains
Study design (used to assign the initial score)
Comparability of study arms
Performance of intervention provider
Performance of outcome assessor
Performance of participants
Accuracy of measurement tools
Withdrawal and differential drop-out
Intervention contamination
Conflict of interest
12
GIV - Advantages
Four important features representing
improvement over earlier efforts:
1. More precise capture of differences in study
design and risk of bias
2. Assessment of the risk of bias at the level of
an intervention-outcome pair
3. Relatively easy to implement by research
staff
4. Sophisticated algorithm to automate
calculation of internal validity score
Methods – GHD External
Validity (GEV)
Objective: Allow user to consider external
validity in assessing body of effectiveness
evidence.
Definition: Set of indicators that describe
how likely it is that the results found in a
study will be replicated in a target setting.
Methods – GEV
Indicators. Reflect geography, population,
implementation details, ability to scale and legal and
cultural context.
Indicator weights. Assigned weights to reflect relative
importance of each indicator.
• Delphi two rounds
• Principle component analysis (PCA)
• Meta-regression
Scoring. GEV instrument generates a score for each IOPT
and for intervention as a whole.
Methods – Epidemiologic Model
Parsimonious models that relate epidemiology, RRR and
coverage, to change in disease burden for each
intervention; integrated with other intervention models.
Inputs
Epidemiologic data – population by risk group, prevalence
and incidence.
Estimates of RRR for different outcomes.
Outputs
Estimate key health outcomes, e.g., averted infections,
deaths, morbidity, DALYs.
Calibrated parsimonious models for each intervention against
full, validated models.
Methods – Cost
GHD developed a methodology for rating published costing
studies, and used that data in a costing tool that generates
costs in US $ today, adjusted from other years, other
currencies, and across geographic locations.
Costs of components (e.g., personnel, goods and
services) were identified and adjusted using a hierarchy
of sources.
GHD generated costs of interventions
• By units (per person served)
• By duration (per person year of service)
• By method of intervention delivery
Methods – Cost-Effectiveness
Determining CE involves:
Summing cost across time and interventions;
Calculating averted disease burden;
Comparing across intervention sets (e.g. current vs
proposed); and
Calculating Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio
(ICER).
18
GHD – Web Conceptual Model
19
Q&A
20
Detour – GHD LIVE
www.globalhealthdecisions.org
21
What’s Next for GHD?
To complete data extraction and analysis (RRR,
GIV, GEV) for 3-4 more interventions
NIDA proposal – focusing on integration of
HIV,HCV, TB, and drug abuse services for
injection drug users
NIMH proposal – expand data extraction for more
HIV interventions and other disease areas
Field test GHD with policy-makers in Africa to
assess usability and uptake
22
GHD Team
Investigators:
James G. Khan MD, MPH (PI)
Mohsen Malekinejad MD, DrPH
Elliot A. Marseille DrPH MPP
Jonathan Showstack PhD MPH
Ali Mirzazadeh MD PhD
Senior researchers:
Sabina S. Alistar PhD MS
Stephane Verguet MS PhD MPP
Research support:
Devon McCabe MA
Alex J. Goodell
Pam DeCarlo BA
Erin Barker MLIS
Justina Wu MPH
Jeff Loi MS
Leon Traister BS
Grant Storey
Lena Libatique
23
Thank You
GlobalHealthDecisions.org