Current Management of Alzheimer’s Disease

Download Report

Transcript Current Management of Alzheimer’s Disease

Alzheimer’s Disease The Cholinesterase Inhibitor Medications

Diagnosed Dementia Patients

2.5

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0 1995 PCPs 1996 Neurologists 1997 1998 Psychiatrists 1999 All others 11/99 to 10/2000

Source: National Disease and Therapuetic Index (Diagnosis codes: 3310, 2900, 2901, 2902, 2903, 2904).

Cholinergic Hypothesis

  

Role

Acetylcholine (ACh) is an important neurotransmitter in brain regions involved in memory Impact

Loss of ACh in AD correlates with impairment of memory Treatment approach

Enhancement of cholinergic function may stabilize or improve cognitive function and may affect behavior and daily functioning

Mayeux R et al.

N Engl J Med.

1999;341:1670-1679.

Cholinergic Hypothesis

• Cholinergic deficiency contributes to cognitive decline in AD • It may contribute to behavioral symptoms of AD – Psychosis-agitation – Apathy-indifference – Disinhibition – Aberrant motor behavior

Cholinergic Hypothesis (cont’d)

   

Atrophy of the nucleus basalis of Meynert, the source of choline acetyltransferase, causes deficit Other neurochemical and neurohistologic abnormalities contribute to the psychopathology of AD Cholinergic therapy may partially improve behavioral symptoms of AD Cholinergic therapy does not interrupt the disease process

Current Medications Used to Treat AD

*Paxil 3% *Zyprexa 3% *Zoloft 3% Vitamin E 3% *Ativan 4% *Haldol 6% Other 25% Aricept 44% *Risperdal 9%

*These uses are investigational.

Source: National Disease and Therapeutic Index, 1998.

Cholinesterase Inhibitors

• • • • • FDA-approved agents: tacrine, donepezil, rivastigmine Doses – Tacrine: 80 to 160 mg/d – Donepezil: 5 and 10 mg/d – Rivastigmine: 6 to 12 mg/d – Galantamine: 20 to 50 mg/d Efficacy in mild/moderate AD Limited information on long-term treatment and in late-stage disease May be helpful in Lewy body disease Krall WJ, Sramek JJ, Cutler NR. Ann Pharmacother. 1999.

Cholinesterase Inhibitors (cont’d)

Side-effect profiles are similar

Tacrine: liver toxicity, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea

Donepezil: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, muscle cramps

— —

Rivastigmine: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, dizziness Galantamine: nausea, vomiting, agitation, sleep disturbances

Hypothesized Treatment Effect in Alzheimer’s Disease

Untreated Cholinesterase Inhibitor (CI)

6 – 4 – 2 – 0 – -2 – -4 – -6 – -8 – -10 – -12 – -14 – -16 – 1 year 2 years

Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitor Development

1993 tacrine (Cognex ® ) 1994 1995 1996 1997 donepezil (Aricept ® ) 1998 1999 2000 2001 rivastigmine (Exelon ® ) galantamine (Reminyl ® )

Characteristics of Cholinesterase Inhibitors

Drug tacrine (Cognex ® ) donepezil (Aricept ® ) rivastigmine (Exelon ® ) Binding Noncompetitive, reversible Noncompetitive, reversible Noncompetitive reversible Dose escalation Dosing 6-week steps qid 4-6-week step 2-week steps qd bid

Davis KL, Powchik P.

Lancet

. 1995;345:625-630.

Aricept ® package insert.

Exelon ® package insert.

Tacrine (Cognex

®

)

Half-life of 3 –5 hours (variable, affected by food intake)

4-times-daily dosing of 10 to 40 mg (40 to 160 mg/day)

Metabolized by the cytochrome P450 isoenzyme CYP1A2

Associated with hepatotoxicity (monthly liver testing suggested)

Davis KL, Powchik P.

Lancet

. 1995;345:625-630.

Crimson ML.

Pharmacotherapy

1998;18(2 pt 2):47S-54S.

Donepezil (Aricept

®

)

The first second-generation cholinesterase inhibitor

Half-life of 70 hours

Once-a-day dosing of 5 to 10 mg

Metabolized by cytochrome P450 isoenzymes CYP3A and CYP2D6

Higher doses associated with cholinergic side effects, but generally well tolerated

Bryson HM, Benfield P.

Drugs Aging

. 1997;10:234-239.

Aricept ® package insert.

Rivastigmine (Exelon

®

)

Newer second-generation cholinesterase inhibitor

Half-life of 1.5 hours

Dosing (bid) of 3 to 12 mg/day

Metabolism is almost totally independent of the hepatic cytochrome P450 system

Gastrointestinal adverse events are common, including weight loss

Exelon ® package insert.

Outcome Scales Used in Phase III Trials of AD Drugs

Cognition Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog) Global change Clinician Interview-Based Impression of Change plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC-plus) Activities of daily living (ADL) Behavioral disturbances Interview for Deterioration in Daily Living Activities in Dementia (IDDD) Progressive Deterioration Scale (PDS) Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)

Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog)

Primary outcome measure

A validated, sensitive, and psychometric measure

Contains 11 items that measure cognitive change

Scoring range is 0 –70; higher scores = greater cognitive impairment

Efficacy is measured as mean change from baseline

Rosen WG et al.

Am J Psychiatry

. 1984;141:1356-1364.

Clinician Interview-Based Impression of Change plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC-plus)

Evaluates 4 areas: cognition, behavior, daily functioning, general psychiatric symptoms

Scores range from 1 (markedly improved) to 7 (markedly worse)

Schneider LS et al.

Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord

. 1997;11(suppl 2):S22-32.

Tacrine Safety

Adverse gastrointestinal effects (somewhat alleviated by concomitant food intake)

Elevated liver transaminase levels (ALT)

25% –30% of patients with ALT > 3 times the upper limit of normal

Monitoring of liver function required

Farlow M et al.

JAMA

. 1992;268:2523-2529.

Knapp MJ et al.

JAMA.

1994;271:985-991.

Donepezil: Percentage of Patients With Improvement in ADAS-cog (Rogers) Treatment group Placebo Donepezil 5 mg/day Donepezil 10 mg/day Change in ADAS-cog (LOCF*)

7

4

0 † 7.8% 15.4% 25.2% 26.8% 37.8% 53.5% 57.7% 78.7% 81.1% * Last observation carried forward.

† Includes patients who did not improve or decline.

Rogers SL et al.

Neurology

. 1998;50:136-145.

Donepezil Safety

Individual adverse events that occurred significantly more frequently with donepezil 10 mg than with placebo:

Nausea (17%)

Diarrhea (17%)

Vomiting (10%)

Fatigue (8%)

Muscle cramps (8%)

Rogers SL et al.

Neurology

. 1998;50:136-145.

Donepezil Safety (cont)

In the largest trial (N = 818), digestive system and nervous system adverse events occurred more frequently with donepezil 5 mg and 10 mg than with placebo

Digestive system = 36% vs 24%

Nervous system = 38% vs 29%

Burns A et al.

Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord

. 1999;10:237-244.

Donepezil Summary

Donepezil (5* and 10 mg) improves cognition and global function in patients with mild-to-moderate AD

Long-term efficacy is maintained for up to 50 weeks

ADL may be partially maintained by donepezil

Donepezil is generally safe and well tolerated * In the largest trial, donepezil 5 mg was significantly better than placebo using the ADAS-cog scale, but scores worsened from baseline.

Rivastigmine Safety

During the maintenance phase, adverse events with rivastigmine 6 –12 mg (1 –4 mg)* compared with placebo were:

Dizziness, 14% (8%) vs 4%

Nausea, 20% (8%) vs 3%

Vomiting, 16% (5%) vs 2%

Dyspepsia, 5% (6%) vs 1%

Sinusitis, 4% (1%) vs 1% * p < 0.05 vs placebo for all events except rivastigmine 1 –4 mg for dizziness and sinusitis (not different from placebo).

Corey-Bloom J et al.

Int J Geriatr Psychopharmacol

. 1998;1:55-65.

Rivastigmine Safety (cont)

Rivastigmine was generally safe and well tolerated

There was no evidence of hepatotoxicity

Fewer adverse events were observed with concomitant food administration versus administration without food

In addition to nausea and vomiting, rivastigmine was associated with significant weight loss

Exelon  [package insert]. East Hanover, NJ: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp; 2000.

Rivastigmine Summary

Rivastigmine (6 –12 mg) improves cognition and global function in patients with mild-to-moderate AD

Positive effects on ADL have been observed in some studies

Rivastigmine is generally safe and well tolerated, although cholinergic side effects occur at high doses

Galantamine (Reminyl

®

)

Galantamine has a dual mechanism of action

Competitive inhibition of acetylcholinesterase 1

Allosteric modulation of presynaptic and postsynaptic nicotinic receptors 2

Galantamine improves major aspects of AD (eg, cognition, behavior, function) 1

Galantamine is generally safe and well tolerated 1

1. Tariot PN et al.

Neurology.

2000;54:2269-2276.

2. Maelicke A, Albuquerque EX.

Eur J Pharmacol

. 2000;393:165-170.

Dual Mechanism of Action

Presynaptic nerve terminal N = nicotinic M = muscarinic ACh = acetylcholine M receptor N receptor ACh Postsynaptic nerve terminal Galantamine

• •

Choline Acetic acid

Galantamine ACh and other neurotransmitters M receptor N receptor

Maelicke A, Albuquerque EX.

Eur J Pharmacol

. 2000;393:165-170. Tariot PN et al.

Neurology.

2000;54:2269-2276.

Galantamine: Potential Advantages of Nicotinic Receptor Modulation

May increase release of ACh

Release of other neurotransmitters also increases

May have a neuroprotective effect

Maelicke A, Albuquerque EX.

Eur J Pharmacol

. 2000;393:165-170.

Galantamine Safety (cont)

Adverse events* Nausea Vomiting Anorexia Agitation Diarrhea Placebo (n = 286) (%) 4.5

1.4

3.1

9.4

5.9

Galantamine 16 mg/day (n = 279) (%) Galantamine 24 mg/day (n = 273) (%) 13.3

6.1

6.5

10.0

12.2

16.5

9.9

8.8

8.1

5.5

*

5% of patients receiving galantamine and more often than in patients receiving placebo.

Tariot PN et al.

Neurology.

2000;54:2269-2276.

GI Adverse Events

 

Nausea: incidence related to treatment initiation and dose escalation

Typically transient, resolving within 1 week

Rarely severe Weight loss: reported as an adverse event in

5% of patients, with none discontinuing treatment

Reminyl ® package insert.

Comedication

Minimal potential for clinically relevant drug interactions

No effect on kinetics of digoxin or warfarin

As with other cholinergics, galantamine should be used with caution in patients with heart block or sick sinus syndrome

Agents in Development

Memantine –NMDA receptor antagonist

Improvement in patients with severe AD and VaD 1

Recent phase III trials indicate significant improvement compared with placebo in CIBIC-plus scores 2

Patients with moderately severe and severe AD benefited the most

1. Winblad B, Portis N.

Int J Geriat Psychiatry

. 1999;14:135-146. 2. Reisberg B. World Alzheimer Congress, 2000.

Agents in Development (cont)

     

Immunization against

b

-amyloid 1 Huprine X —acetylcholinesterase inhibitor 2 Xanomeline patch —m1/m4 muscarinic receptor agonist 3 AIT-082 (purine hypoxanthine derivative) — increases neurotransmission 4 COX 2 inhibitors —neuroinflammation therapy 5 Protease inhibitors —target

g

-secretases to prevent amyloid formation 6

1. Schenk DB et al.

Nature.

1999;400:173-177.

2. Camps P et al.

Mol Pharmacol

. 2000;57:409-417.

3. Shannon HE et al.

Schizophr Res

. 2000;42:249-259.

4. Lahiri DK et al.

Ann NY Acad Sci

. 2000;903:387-393.

5. O’Banion K. World Alzheimer Congress, 2000.

6. Dovey HF et al.

J Neurochem

. 2001;76:173-181.

Current Treatment Summary

Cholinergic agents initially improve and transiently maintain cognitive abilities in patients with mild-to-moderate AD

Cognitive abilities worsen over time, indicating treatment does not stop (but may delay) the progression of AD

New treatments that maintain cognitive ability and stop the progression of AD are needed

Referrals

SHANDS at UF Geriatric Psychiatry Inpatient Unit Intake and Referral Line 352-265-5411 UF Psychiatry Clinical Trials Program 1-877-STUDY94