Transcript Slide 1
Terrestrial Carbon Sequestration Adrian Martin Global terrestrial C budgets Historical C emissions from land use change Global potential for LULUCF sequestration Reforestation Managing agricultural lands Institutional framework: Kyoto and CDM Social issues IIED (2002) Carbon cycling on land 270 PgC/yr dissolved in leaf water ~ 1/3 atmospheric C >½ directly released to atmosphere 120PgC/yr fixed through Photosynthesis = Gross Primary Productivity 60Pg/yr Respired by plants 60Pg/yr plant growth = Net Primary Productivity 60Pg/yr Net Primary Productivity Heterotrophic respiration Bacteria, fungi Herbivores Net Ecosystem Productivity Releases through fire, harvests, soil erosion, … Net Biome Production Net Ecosystem Productivity Tropical Forests: 0.7- 5.9 MgC/ha/yr Temperate forests: 0.8 – 7.0 MgC/ha/yr Boreal forests: (<0?) – 2.5 MgC/ha/yr (IPCC 2001) Global C02 Budgets (PgC/yr) 1980s 1990s Atmosphere Increase 3.3 ± 0.1 3.2 ± 0.1 Emissions (fossil fuel, cement) 5.4 ± 0.3 6.3 ± 0.4 Ocean-atmosphere flux - 1.9 ± 0.6 -1.7 ± 0.5 Land-atmosphere flux (net biome production) -0.2 ± 0.7 -1.4 ±0.7 - Land use change 1.7 - Residual terrestrial sink -1.9 Historical Losses of Terrestrial Carbon through Land Use Change Houghton (1990) estimates 121PgC lost 1850 – 1990 De Fries et al (1999) further 60PgC lost prior to 1850 Total 180PgC (280 from fossil fuels) Approx 40% of this in atmosphere Substantial (but ultimately limited) opportunities for modifying above and below ground carbon storage Deforestation (cont.) Deforestation responsible for estimated 90% of land use change emissions since 1850 FAO (2001) Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000: Gross annual loss 1990-2000: 14.6 million ha. Net annual loss 1990-2000: 9.4million ha. Forest Area Changes 1990-2000 Tropical Natural Forest (Million Ha) Non-tropical 1990 2000 1990 2000 1945 1803 1863 1879 68 107 119 Plantation Forest 48 (Million Ha) Source: FAO 2001 Main cause of loss in tropical areas: conversion to agriculture Global Potential: LULUCF IPCC (1996 SAR) slowing deforestation and promoting reforestation could increase carbon stocks by 60-87PgC 19952050 IPCC (2000 SRLULUCF) various management options could lead to global land-atmosphere flux of -1.3PgC/yr in 2010 and -2.5PgC/yr in 2040 Plantations: Coniferous AUS & NZ: Coniferous EUR & US: Canada and former SU: Tropical: 10 t/ha/yr 1.5 - 4.5 t/ha/yr 0.9 –1.2 t/ha/yr 6.4 – 10 t/ha/yr Biomass Above Ground Litter/woody debris Below Ground Short Term Long Term Soil Organic Matter Wood Products & Landfill Cultivated land→ Forest ↑ ↑ - ↑ ↑ ↑ Non-cultivated land→ Forest ↑ ↑ - ↑ ? ↑ IPCC 2000 SRLULUCF, Table 3-6 Repositories for extra carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems Repository Fraction Examples Mean Residence Time (MRT) Biomass Woody Tree boles Decades to centuries Non-woody Crops/leaves Months to years Litter Surface litter, crop residues Months to years Active Partially decomposed litter; Years to decades carbon in macro-aggregates Soil organic matter Stable Products Wood Paper, cloth grains waste Stabilised by clay; chemically recalcitrant carbon; charcoal Centuries to millennium Structural, furniture Paper products, clothing Food and feed grain landfill Decades to centuries Months to decades Weeks to years Months to decades Predicted responses to different pools of soil organic matter for agricultural land converted to forest in northeastern United States of America (Gaudinski et al. 2000, in SRLULUCF) Carbon sequestration through reforestation in the tropics 80 year average: 2.36Mg/ha/yr First 20 years: 6.17 Mg/ha/yr Silver et al (2000) 100 year average: 0.41 Mg/ha/yr First 20 years: 1.30 Mg/ha/yr Silver et al (2000) Silver et al (2000) Can sequestration continue beyond 80 years? One way is to harvest biomass for energy The other is to ensure wood products have a long residence time Paper products like packaging, newspapers, magazines 0.5 Paper products like books 15 Fruewald & Scharai-Rad (2000) Furniture 20 Fences, garden products etc 20 NB The fate of stored carbon in wood products is poorly known Railway sleepers, transmission poles 40 Timber in buildings 75 Average estimated lifetime of wooden products [Germany] Changing agricultural practices for below ground carbon storage Historical loss of soil C through oxidation~ 50 PgC (Ingram & Fernandes, 2001) Average loss of carbon from top 100 cm of soil following conversion to agriculture = 15-40% Restoration possible through land use change and land management Global potential for C sequestration in agricultural soils 20-30 PgC over 50100 years. (Paustian et al, 1997, cited in Ingram & Fernandes) Global sequestration from improved management of degraded lands 0.6 – 2 PgC/yr (Batjes, 1999, cited in Olsson & Ardo, 2002) Carbon sequestration situation against soil organic carbon level. Source: Ingram & Fernandes (2001) Main Issues Soil erosion (especially loss of clay content) Oxidation of carbon Tillage Temperature (e.g. reduced canopy) Removal of organic residues Drainage (aeration) Management Options No tillage Change of crops (raise NPP) Fertiliser Land use change – agroforestry, grassland Fallow with grasses/legumes Grazing of rangelands (see Schuman et al, 2002) Olsson & Ardo (2002) case study from Sudan Modelling of 6 different management systems in Sudanese cropland System Soil carbon in 2100 (gC m-2) No change 70 5:6 crop: fallow 115 5:10 crop: fallow 128 5:15 crop: fallow 163 5:20 crop: fallow 170 Grazing only 245 Institutional Basis Kyoto article 3 “removals by sinks resulting from direct human-induced land-use change and forestry activities, limited to afforestation, reforestation and deforestation since 1990, measured as verifiable changes in carbon stocks in each commitment period, shall be used to meet the commitments under this Article….” Other sinks (such as agricultural soils may be included in the future) 6th COP (resumed July 2001) agreement that reforestation and afforestation allowed under Clean Development Mechanism. CDM – allows developed countries to meet their own commitments by funding emission reduction or carbon sequestration projects in developing countries. Limited to 1% of a country’s baseline emissions (i.e. can meet about 20% of their reduction through CDM forestry projects). Eligible Land Use Activities in the CDM. Source: IIED 2002 Sequestration: a few concerns Verification issues and transaction costs What kind of forestry? Large-scale? Monocultures Fast-growing exotics? Whose development priorities? Will sinks solve the problem? Global feedbacks FAO (2001) Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000, www.fao.org/forestry/fo/fra/main/index.jsp Fruehwald, A. & Scharai-Rad (2000) Wood products as carbon sinks: a methodological approach,www.bib.fsagx.ac.be/coste21/ftp/2001-04-26/sharai-rad-sum.pdf IPCC (2001) Climate Change 2001: the scientific basis. www.grida.no/climate/ipcc IPCC (2000) Special Report on Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry IPCC (2001) Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Section 4. Technological and Economic Potential of Options to Enhance, Maintain, and Manage Biological Carbon Reservoirs and Geo-engineering. IIED (2002) Laying the Foundations for Clean Development: preparing the land use sector: a quick guide to the Clean Development Mechanism, London: International Institute for Environment and Development, www.cdmcapacity.org Ingram, J. & Fernandes, E. (2001) Managing carbon sequestration in soils: concepts and terminology, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 87, 111-117. Schuman, G., Janzen, H. & Herrick, J. (2002) Soil carbon dynamics and potential carbon sequestration by rangelands, Environmental Pollution, 116, 391-396 Silver, W., Ostertag, R. & Lugo, A. (2000) The potential for carbon sequestration through reforestation of abandoned tropical agricultural and pasture lands, restoration Ecology, 8 (4), 394-407. Olsson, L. & Ardo, J. (2002) Soil carbon sequestration in degraded semiarid agro-ecosystems – perils and potentials, Ambio 30 (6), 471-477. Seely, B., Welham, C., Kimmins, H. (2002) ‘Carbon sequestration in a boreal forest ecosystem: results from the ecosystem simulation model, FORECAST’, Forest Ecology and Management 169, 123-135 Ridgwell, A., Maslin, M. & Watson, A. (2002) Reduced effectiveness of terrestrial carbon sequestration due to an antagonistic response of ocean productivity, Geophysical Research Letters, 29 (6), 19