Transcript Document
UNDPKO Civilian Police Division
Draft Training Module, June 2005
Community
Conflict
Resolution
Structure of Presentation
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Understanding Societal Conflict
and Community Conflict
Resolution
Communication in context of UN
Peace Operations
Interpersonal Mediation
Dealing with Prejudice
Community Peacebuilding
Inter-Group Conflict Resolution
Session 1
Understanding Societal
Conflict and Community
Conflict Resolution
in the UN Peace Operations
Context
Session 1 Structure
i.
ii.
iii.
Orientation and trust building
Risk factors in societal conflict
Approaches to conflict
management and
peacebuilding
i. Orientation and trust building
Objectives
Ground
rules
Cases
Trust
building to promote
collaborative problem solving
Overall Objectives of CCR Training
Understand
risk factors for escalating
violence
Understand approaches for managing
conflict locally, especially needs-based
approaches
Develop practical skills for engaging
parties to a conflict to de-escalate
tensions and promote problem solving
Develop skills in mediating interpersonal, community and local intergroup conflicts
ii. Risk Factors for Societal Violence
1. Group incentives for collective action:
threat to human needs for:
a) security;
b) identity/respect;
c) distributive justice/effective participation
2. Strength of separate group identity
3. Group capacity for collective action
4. Domestic opportunity factors for collective
action
5. International opportunity factors for
collective action
iii. Approaches to Conflict
Management and Peacebuilding
Four
approaches
Conventional model
Dual concern model
Needs based approach: 4 phases
Four Approaches to Local Conflict
Management and Peacebuilding
Power-based
Rights-based
Needs-based
Experiential
Strong, realist,
hard bargaining, hawk
Compromise
Deferential,
Idealist, soft, dove
Conflict Management Strategies
Assertive: High concern for own outcomes
competitive,
adversarial
collaborative,
integrative
o
o
Less concern for
Affirming: High concern
compromising
relationship/other
for relationship/other
o
o
avoiding,
withdrawal
accommodating,
yielding
Less concern for own outcomes
Session 1 Summary
i.
ii.
iii.
Objectives – roles for UN police in
sustaining peace?
Risk factors and needs in societal
conflict?
Use constructive approaches for
community conflict management and
peacebuilding as needed
Questions?
Session 2
Communications
in the UN
Peace Operations
Context
Session 2 Structure
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
Attitudinal prism
Giving the message – non-violent
communication
Getting the message – active
listening techniques
Engaging the stakeholders – multitrack diplomacy and dealing with
difficult people (ex)
i. Attitudinal Prism
Conflict
= situation + behaviour +
attitudes
Attitudes are based on selective
perceptions, beliefs, stereotypes and
communications – all affect how we
interpret what we see and hear
Most open to change are
communications and stereotypes
ii. Non-Violent Communication
Impact
of culture, emotions etc.
Respect cultural differences: not a
question of right or wrong
Inform and empower the listener
Avoid negative attributions (“You…”)
Focus on 1. what I have observed, 2.
what I feel, 3. value and 4. request
Be aware of body language
iii. Active Listening
Pay
attention, minimize distractions
Check the body language
Elicitive questions (“Can you say more
about that? How would that work?”)
Avoid advising, comparing, cutting in.
Reflecting back (“So what I’m hearing
is… In other words, you want…”)
iv. Engaging the stakeholders
Problem
oriented policing
Multi-track diplomacy: needs-based,
inclusive, joint problem solving
Build trust, capacity, consensus and
commitment
Dealing with difficult people situations
(emotional, negative attitudes,
coercive, distrustful, dirty tricks etc.)
(ex)
Summary Session 2
Why are communication & conflict
resolution skills necessary?
How best to change negative attitudes in
conflict?
What is non-violent communication?
What is active listening?
Role of multi-track diplomacy?
Principles for dealing with difficult people
Cross-cultural communication
Questions?
Session 3
Interpersonal
Mediation in
UN Peace Operations
Session 3 Structure
Roles
of third parties
Mediation process: opening,
discussion, closing
Role play exercise (case 1)
Qualities of a good mediator
Roles of Third Parties
Force
(power orientation—conflict
suppression or containment);
Adjudication (rights orientation—formal
conflict management);
Arbitration (rights—conflict management,
parties choose arbitrator not outcome);
Power mediation (mixed orientation);
Mediation (needs orientation—integrative
dispute resolution, parties decide outcome);
Facilitation (needs orientation—informal
integrative conflict transformation,
Mediation Process
Opening
Mediated
Closing
the mediation
(explanation)
discussion
Opening the Mediation
Welcome, introductions, seating (circular)
Explain the mediator’s role (facilitating the
process, neutral on the outcome)
Explain the mediation procedure
Explain confidentiality
Confirm parties know what they are here to
discuss, and have power to settle
Agree on ground rules (no violence or threats +
as preferred)
Questions (ensure process understood)
Ensure comfort (explain breaks)
Mediation Discussion
Opening
statements by each party in
turn (invite the aggrieved party first)
Parties free exchange (mediator
facilitates)
Mediator restates: clarify issues, needs
Breaks, side meetings if needed
Brainstorm options for meeting needs
Evaluate options, get to agreement
Clarify and review agreement, next
steps (implementation, accountability)
Closing the mediation
Summarize & next steps
Adoption/signing of agreement
Thank and congratulate parties
Next meeting (open door, follow
up)
Destroy confidential notes
Submit report as required
Qualities of a Good Mediator
Respected
and trusted by the parties,
not anxious for recognition
Impartial: able to focus on process, put
aside own opinions on outcome
Strong “people skills”—active listener,
patient, empathic, nonviolent
communicator, able to be directive on
process, ok with parties’ high emotions
Imaginative in helping parties to find
their own ideas to solve their problems
Expert in mediation process, not
necessarily on the issues in dispute
Session 3 Summary
Third
party roles
Mediation process: 3 stages
Use common sense and apply
guidelines as appropriate to your
situation
Qualities of a good mediator
Session 4
Dealing with
Stereotypes
Session 4 Structure
Inter-cultural
communication,
body language
Stereotypes, blaming,
victimhood and prejudice
reduction
Mirror, mirror exercise
Hot buttons
Session 5-6
Community
Peacebuilding in UN
Peace Operations
Context
Session 5-6 Structure
Building
on indigenous strengths
12
methods for community
peacebuilding
Ho’oponopono
Brainstorming
(role play: case 2)
and consensus
CYCLES OF ESCALATION & TRANSFORMATION
Reconciliation
Negotiating
solutions, joint
planning
Envisioning
restorative &
social justice
Aggression
Act of “justified”
aggression
Creating myths, heroes
& the “right” history
Choice to forgive
Injury, pain,
shock, denial
Realization of loss
Desire for
justice/revenge
Suppression Mourning,
of grief/fears expressing grief,
Anger:
accepting loss
“Why me?”
Acknowledging wrongdoing,
apologies, truth-telling,
Facing fears
Identifying needs:
re-writing history
“Why them?”
Re-humanizing the “other”
Community Peacebuilding Methods
A: Focused on healing –
1. Exculpatory (going beyond blaming)
2. Reparation/restitution (restorative justice)
3. Apology/forgiveness (best if transactional)
4. Penitence (prayer, meditation or confession
to restore integrity – inner focus)
5. Punishment (retributive justice—juridical
accountability)
6. Shared karma (shared responsibility for
creating our situation—also helps with B)
Community Peacebuilding Methods
B: Focused on closure and starting afresh –
7. Truth (history gathering—for transparency
of understanding)
8. Theater (reliving—for opening and release
of emotions, so ready to move on)
9. Joint sorrow (integrate community by
empathy, support)
10. Joint reconstruction (recreate the past as
positive – how we might have done better)
11. Joint conflict resolution (to create a
positive future)
12. Ho’oponopono (can include all the above)
Ho’oponopono
5
stages:
1st round: Gathering perspectives on
the crisis and defining problem
2nd round: Reflective phase
3rd round, integrative phase:
brainstorming
4th, consensus building, action
planning and implementation
Closing, according to local custom
Session 5-6 Summary
Build
on indigenous strengths
12 approaches: which ones work
here?
Ho’oponopono: adapt to culture
Principles for brainstorming
Minimum level of consensus?
Questions?
Session 7-8
Inter-Group
Conflict Resolution
In UN Peace
Operations Context
Session 7-8 Structure
The
ARIA process
ARIA Adversarial phase: what?
ARIA Reflective phase: why?
ARIA Integrative phase: how?
ARIA Action phase: implement
Role play exercise – case 3
Evaluation
ARIA Adversarial Phase
Entry
phase: what is the conflict
about?
Parties advocate, argue positions
Clarifies the issues and shows
where the parties are firm
Demonstrates limits of adversarial
style
Role reversal to deepen
understanding
ARIA Reflective Phase
Reframing
to understand why?
From positions on the issues to
underlying interests, fears, needs
Small groups, active listening
Report to plenary
List (flipcharts) and compare needs
and concerns of each party
ARIA Integrative Phase
Inventing
options to address needs
Focus is on how to resolve the conflict
Brainstorm first: creative idea
generation (bridging, compensating,
expanding the pie etc.)
Then evaluate: which ideas might be
adapted as part of a consensus?
Small groups refine each theme basket
Plenary decides by consensus
ARIA Action Phase
Action
planning: who does what
when and how?
Verifiable commitments
Monitoring and sustained follow-up
Multi-track networking
Prepare for re-entry
Session 7-8 Summary
Value
of citizen and police involvement
in peacebuilding – from power to needs
Model for inclusive democratic culture
Integrative, needs based approach:
parties acting voluntarily for own good
Work with internal as well as intergroup differences
Conflict motivates constructive change
Long-term process > sustainable peace
Questions?