Transcript Document

Benefits and opportunities for applying
Integrated Management System (IMS)
strategies in the nuclear industry
Kevin Gribbin
Director, Integrated Management Systems
Intergraph – Process, Power and Marine
Thursday, July 16, 2015
Difference Between Winning &
Losing
 “Virtually everything in
business today is an
undifferentiated
commodity except how a
company manages its
information.
How you manage
information determines
whether you win or lose”

PAGE 2
PRESENTATION TITLE
- Bill Gates,
CEO Microsoft
Deliverables

Documents

Many sources – Consortium members, vendors,
partners, suppliers……….

Many formats – some intelligent, some not…..

Drawings

Many sources………..

Fewer formats……..

Data



PAGE 3
PRESENTATION TITLE
Many sources….
One format
Persistent – is not format and version dependent
The ‘Real’ Issues
 Documents and Data
Data Longevity
Data Access
Data Tracking
Data Conversion
Data Integrity
Data Revision
Data Version
Data Integration
Data Status
Data Exchange
Data Transport
Data Management
Data Quality
Data Concurrency
Data Sharing
Data Replication
Data Synchronization
Data Security
Data Archive
Data Retention
Data Disposition... etc.
• Cost of data - known?
• Value of data - often neglected
PAGE 4
PRESENTATION TITLE
Time and Technology
Demand
File
Management
File/Doc/Data
Management
CAD
Intelligent
CAD
Data
Centric
Word
Processing
Document
Processing
Data
Processing
‘70s
PAGE 5
File/Doc
Management
‘80s
PRESENTATION TITLE
‘90s
‘00s
‘01
‘02
‘04
‘06
‘08
...
Why Integration vs Automation
 Guidelines for Specifying Integrated
Computer-Aided Engineering
Applications for Electric Power Plants.
EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute) report NP-5159M,
Research Project 2514-3, May 1987
PAGE 6
PRESENTATION TITLE
Relative Annual Savings From Automation
and Integration at an Average Nuclear
Power Plant
Data set savings
Automation
savings
Integration
savings
Delta x increase in
savings between
automation and
integration
Equipment Tagout
$69,000
$124,000
1.79x
Valve Index
$21,600
$167,600
7.76x
Instrument Identification
$17,800
$135,100
7.59x
Motor Index
$15,200
$123,100
8.09x
Piping Index
$12,000
$84,400
7.03x
Action Request
$12,100
$44,200
3.65x
Commitment Tracking
$5,000
$14,900
2.98x
Circuit Breaker Index
$5,000
$37,700
7.54x
EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute) report NP-5159M, Research Project 2514-3, May 1987
PAGE 7
PRESENTATION TITLE
Affect on RAM (Reliability, Availability
and Maintainability) by re-using the
data more than once in other activities
 example equipment valve specs and associated activities
 [including:- performance monitor, performance
analysis, reliability assurance, reactor safety,
incident investigation, industrial safety assurance
and analysis, valve/valve operator maintenance,
maintenance procedure development, equipment
history analysis, operational procedure
development, emergency operations, operating
experience evaluation]
 yielded an annual cost saving of $8M alone (in 1987!).
EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute) report NP-5159M, Research Project 2514-3, May 1987
PAGE 8
PRESENTATION TITLE
Why Integration vs Automation
 AUTOMATION: computerizing data and
tasks for use within a single activity or
department.
 INTEGRATION: computerizing data
transfer among multiple activities,
departments or companies.
PAGE 9
PRESENTATION TITLE
Point to Point Integration
Application
‘A’
What?
When?
Application
‘B’
Application
‘E’
Application
‘F’
To whom?
 Inconsistent Data Duplication
 Poor Information Integrity
 Complex Change Mgmt
Why?
Application
‘C’
 Incompatible Formats
Application
‘G’
 No Auditability
 who / what / when
Need to know?
Application
‘D’
PAGE 10
PRESENTATION TITLE
Application
‘H’
 Geometric IT Cost Curve
Integrated Management System
 Single Format for Exchange
Application
‘A’
Application
 Single Source of “Truth”
‘E’
 Simpler Change Mgmt
Application
‘B’
IMS
Application  Lower Integration Costs
‘F’
 One-Time Data Entry
 Audit Trail
Application
‘C’
Application
‘G’
 Modular Integration for
Gradual Evolutionary Growth
Application
‘D’
PAGE 11
PRESENTATION TITLE
Application
‘H’
 Lower licensing and training
cost
Engineering data in Operations
spreads across multiple plant
operational systems and time domains
Extended
Supply
Chain
ERP
Supply
Chain
Product / plant
Lifecycle
mgmt
Enterprise
Plant
Production
Unit
Specialty
Quality
Admin
Batch
Mgt
In Process
Testing
SCADA
SPC / Trends
Production
Process
Machine
Data Capture
Control
Logic
EDMS
Process
Automation
Automation
CRM
Financials
Supply
Chain
Plant
Centric
ERP
Product
Specs
Trading
Exchange
Procurement
Chemistry
Mgt
Process
Planning
Optimisation
Data
Historian
MES
FCP
Factory Schedule
LIMS
Reliability monitoring
& optimization
OO
“where time IN market
is imperative”
Machine Process Process Work Order Plant
Production Business Supply Customer
Logic
Operations Schedule Process Chain
Control Mgt
Execution
Original diagram source courtesy: AMR Research
PAGE 12
PRESENTATION TITLE
Benefits for the Plant
Operations and Maintenance
 Facilitate longer production runs
Can you cut Time-to-KW?
The benefit is profit margin on additional production
What is value of larger market share
 Cut plant down-time with IIM and project
management
Cut non-productive time
Opportunity for integration of engineering data with planned
maintenance
PAGE 13
PRESENTATION TITLE
Cost vs. Benefits
 Evolutionary vs. Revolutionary
From Document, to Asset, to Data Centric
Value-add Now vs. Bet your business for future gain
 Base on ROI vs. absolute cost
What is the cost of not doing?
Exercise a “Business Appraisal” to determine Metrics and
Measurement
Generate more KW’s
Make money vs. Save money
PAGE 14
PRESENTATION TITLE
Question/Answer
PAGE 15
PRESENTATION TITLE