CAS Internship Standards
Download
Report
Transcript CAS Internship Standards
CAS Internship Standards
Council for the Advancement of
Standards in Higher Education
About CAS
(Council for the Advancement of Standards in
Higher Education)
Founded
in 1979
Consortium of 36 professional orgs
Consensus-oriented, collaborative
Mission: Promote improvement of
programs and services to enhance
quality of student learning and
development
CAS Purpose
Beliefs
about excellence require that
all programs and services in
institutions of higher ed function at
optimum levels
Beliefs about collaboration require
that all programs and services be
accomplished in concert by students
& educators
CAS Purpose (2)
Beliefs about ethics require that all programs
& services be carried out in an environment
of integrity & high ideals
Beliefs about student development require
that the student be considered a whole
person in the context of a diverse population
and a diversity of institutions, that outcomes
of education be comprehensive and that the
total environment be structured to create
opportunities for student involvement and
learning
CAS Purpose (3)
Beliefs about responsibility require
that the institution recognize the
rights and responsibilities of students
as its citizens and that it provide an
array of resources and learning
opportunities that enable students to
exercise their responsibility to take
full advantage of them.
CAS Approach to Self-Regulation
and Self- Assessment
Institutional culture that values involvement of all
its members in decision-making
Quality indicators that are determined by the
institution
Use of standards and guidelines in quality
assurance
Collection and analysis of data on institutional
performance
Commitment to continuing improvement that
presupposes freedom to explore and develop
alternative future directions
CAS Member Associations
Amer Assoc for Collegiate Independent Study (AACIS)
Amer Assoc for Employment in Education (AAEE)
Amer Clg Counseling Assoc (ACCA)
Amer Clg Health Assoc (ACHA)
Amer Clg Personnel Assoc (ACPA)
Amer Counseling Assoc (ACA)
Assoc of Clg & Univ Housing Ofcrs – Int’l (ACUHO-I)
Assoc of Clg Unions Int’l (ACUI)
Assoc of Clg’t Conf & Events Directors – Int’l (ACCED-I)
Assoc of Fraternity Advisors (AFA)
Assoc for Student Judicial Affairs (ASJA)
Assoc on Higher Ed & Disability (AHEAD)
Canadian Assoc of Clg & Univ Student Svcs) CACUSS)
CAS Member Assoc’s (2)
Clg Reading & Learning Assoc (CRLA)
Clgt Info & Visitor Svcs Assoc (CIVSA)
Council for Opportunity in Ed (COE)
NAFSA – Assoc of Int’l Educators (NAFSA-AIE)
Nat’l Acad Advising Assoc (NACADA)
Nat’l Assoc for Campus Activities (NACA)
Nat’l Assoc for Clg Admission Cnslng (NACAC)
Nat’l Assoc for Dvlpmntl Ed (NADE)
Nat’l Assoc of Clg Aux Svcs (NACAS)
Nat’l Assoc of Clgs & Employers (NACE)
Nat’l Assoc fo Student Fin Aid Admins (NASFAA)
Nat’l Assoc of Student Personnel Admins (NASPA)
Nat’l Clearinghouse for Commuter Progs (NCCP)
Nat’l Consort of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Resources
in Higher Ed
CAS Members (3)
National Cncl on Student Dvlpmt (NCSD)
Nat’l Intramural and Recreational Sports Assoc (NIRSA)
Nat’l Orientation Dir’s Assoc (NODA)
Nat’l Soc for Exp Ed (NSEE)
The Network: Addressing Clg’t Alcohol & Other Drug Issues (The
Network)
Southern Assoc for Clg Student Afrs (SACSA)
What is experiential education?
A systematic approach to applied learning
whereby a student engages in professional,
productive learning activities
A process through which a learner constructs
knowledge
Learning by doing
Incorporated strategy to increase understanding
Formal integration of a student’s academic study
Direct hands-on experience
Active engagement in an experience expected to
provide real learning consequences
Provides for career and educational development
Exp Ed Standardization
Advancements in the U.S.
1998
– NSEE Standards of Good
Practice
2005 – CAS Standards for Service
Learning
2006 – CAS Standards for Internship
Programs
2007 – CAS Standards for U’Grad
Research (new edition 09/09)
NSEE’s 8 Principles
Intention
Preparedness & Planning
Authenticity
Reflection
Orientation & Training
Monitoring & Continuous Improvement
Assessment & Evaluation
Acknowledgement
Is there even a need
for IP standards?
What
impact can standards and
adherence to standards have on the
actual experiential education learning
experience?
Are there standards that can impact
the quality of the institution/office
delivering the experience?
CAS IP Mission
Primary mission of Internship
Programs (IP) is to engage students
in planned, educationally-related
work and learning experiences that
integrate knowledge and theory with
practical application and skill
development in a professional
setting.
IP Mission (cont’d)
IP must incorporate student learning and
development in its mission. IP must
enhance overall educational experiences.
IP must develop, record, disseminate,
implement and regularly review its
mission and goals. Mission statements
must be consistent with the mission and
goals of the institution and with the
standards in this document. IP must
operate as an integral part of the
institution’s overall mission.
Purpose of Standards
Determine
quality
Determine whether activity is
academic credit-worthy
To protect the student
To protect the faculty or staff
member
To protect the institution
To protect the employer/site sponsor
What does that mean?
Determine program quality
– Set benchmarks to ensure program effectiveness
Determine activity’s academic credit-worthiness
- Aligned w/ institutional mission?
Protect the student
– Does program enhance overall educational experience?
– Assess risk mgmt and safety of students
Protect the faculty or staff member
- Due diligence in effective IP management
Protect the institution
– Preparation for accreditation
Protect the employer/site sponsor
– Credibility & accountability
CAS Standards
CAS Standards represent best
practices as formulated by
representatives of multiple
professional associations concerned
with student learning and
development in higher education
CAS Principles:
Students & Their Institutions
Student is considered a unique, whole
person
Institutional environments shape learning
Responsibility for learning rests with the
student
Institutions provide opportunities for
learning
Institutions reflect society & its diversity
CAS Principles:
Diversity & Multiculturalism
Institutions
embrace diversity and
eliminate barriers that impede
student learning
Justice and respect for differences
bond individuals to community
CAS Principles: Organization,
Leadership & Human Resources
Leadership
is essential for
institutional success
Institutional success is related to
clarity of mission
Qualifications of staff members is
tied directly to quality of educational
programs and services
Leaders possess sound educational
preparation and experience
CAS Principles: Health
Engendering Environments
Educational programs and services
prosper in benevolent environments
that provide students with
appropriate levels of challenge and
support.
CAS Principles: Ethics
Educational service providers provide
impeccable ethical behavior in their
professional and personal lives.
Implementing the
Self-Assessment Process
Establish and prepare the self-study team
Conduct the self-study
Identify and summarize evidence
Identify discrepancies
Determine appropriate corrective action
Recommend action for program
enhancement
Prepare an action plan
Thirteen areas of assessment
Mission
Program
Leadership
Organization and
Management
Financial Resources
Facilities,
Technology and
Equipment
Legal
Responsibilities
Equity and Access
Campus and
External Relations
Diversity
Ethics
Assessment and
Evaluation
The Assessment Process
A) Establish & Prepare Review Team
– Size of team
– Identify individual who will coordinate/lead
self-assessment process
– Team composition (staff, faculty,
students/internal-external)
– Establish ground rules
– Review and discuss meaning of each standard
before beginning
“Interpret”
standards for purpose of this assessment
Assessment Process (2)
–
–
–
–
A cont’d
How to initiate the rating process
Select optimal rating strategy
Encourage discussion/expect
disagreements/commit to consensual
resolution of differences before proceeding
– B: Understanding Standards & Gdlns
– Standards = Best practices
– Guidelines are suggestions for practice
Assessment Process (3)
C.
D.
Compile and review documentary
evidence
Judging performance
A. 4-point rating scale
ND Not Done 1 Not Met 2 Minimally met
3 Well Met
4 Fully met NR Not Rated
Assessment Process (4)
E.
Complete the assessment process
2-tiered judgment approach
1) self-assessment team and individual functional area staff
members should rate each criterion
2) follow up with a collective
review and analysis of the
individual ratings
Understand
the importance of
assessing and reporting input data as
well as student learning and
development outcomes as strategies
for improving learning and program
quality
Summary of assessment process
Answer evaluation/assessment questions
Identify areas of program strength
Identify areas of program weakness
Describe practices requiring follow-up
Summarize actions required for the
program to meet CAS standards
Summarize program enhancement actions
Write program action plan
CAS Internship Standards
Arleen Anderson
Director, Internships & Employer Relations
University of New Haven
Ph: 203-932-7491
[email protected]