Transcript Slide 1

Decade of Hypernuclear Physics
at JLAB and Future Prospective
in 12 GeV Era
Liguang Tang
Department of Physics, Hampton University
&
Jefferson National Laboratory (JLAB)
August 8 - 11, 2011, Hadron Physics 2011, Shandong University
Introduction – Hypernuclei
• Baryonic interactions are important nuclear physics
issues to extend the QCD descriptions of single
nucleon (its form factors, etc…) to strongly
interactive nuclear many body system
• A nucleus with one or more nucleons replaced by
hyperon, such as , , …  a Hypernucleus
• Hypernucleus is a unique tool and a rich laboratory
to study YN and YY interactions  baryonic
interactions beyond NN
• Study  hypernuclei is an important gate way to the
  interaction
Unique Features of -Hypernuclei
• Long lifetime: -hypernucleus in ground state decays only weakly
via    N or N NN, thus mass spectroscopy features with
narrow states (< few to 100 keV)
• Description of a -hypernucleus within two-body frame work –
Nuclear Core (Particle hole)   (particle):
VΛN(r) = Vc(r) + Vs(r)(SΛ*SN) + VΛ(r)(LΛN*SΛ) + VN(r)(LΛ*SN) + VT(r)S12
• Absence of OPE force in N: Study short range interactions
•  is a “distinguish particle” to N (i.e. no Bauli Blocking): a unique
probe to study nuclear structure
• Trace the single  particle nature in heavy hypernuclei allows to
study the nuclear mean field
Hypernuclear physics is an important
component in nuclear physics
Advantage of Electro-production Hypernuclei
e
(e, e’K) Reaction
e’

K+
p

- Strong spin flip amplitudes
- Highest possible spin
A
A
• New spin structure due to photon
absorption and large momentum
transfer
• Neutron rich hypernuclei (N-N coupling)
• High resolution
1.5 MeV (hadronic production)  <500keV
Low-lying states
 Lowest few and most stable core
states (particle hole states)
 Narrow hypernuclear states with
 coupled at different shell levels
 Non-spin flip (natural parity) states
or spin flip (unnatural parity) states
 These states are most studied
• High accuracy
B  50keV is possible
• Technical challenges
– Require small forward angles
– High particle singles rates
– Accidental coincidence rate
– Challenging optics and kinematics calibration
Hall A Technique
• Two Septum magnets
-
Independent two arms
No problem for post beam
Low e’ singles rate
Low accidental background
• Difficulties
- High hadron momentum which
which is resolved by RICH detector
- High luminosity but low yield rate
(long spectrometers and small
acceptances)
K+
Septum
e
e’
Hall C Technique
Common Splitter Magnet
Side View
+
K
_
D
K
Target
D Q
Top View
_
D
D
+
Phase I
K+
Q
Electron
Beam
(1.645 GeV)
Target
e’
Focal Plane
( SSD + Hodoscope )
Beam Dump
Phase II
0 1m
 Zero degree e’ tagging
 New HKS spectrometer  large 
 High e’ single rate
 Low beam luminosity
 Tilted Enge spectrometer  Reduce e’
single rate by a factor of 10-5
 High accidental rate
 High beam luminosity
 Low yield rate
 Accidental rate improves 4 times
 A first important milestone for
hypernuclear physics with electroproduction
 High yield rate
 First possible study beyond p shell
Hall C Technique – Cont.
Common Splitter Magnet
e’
Phase III
 New HES spectrometer  larger 
 Same Tilt Method
 High beam luminosity
 Further improves accidental rate
K+
Beam
2.34 GeV
 Further improves resolution and
accuracy
 High yield rate
e

 First possible study for A > 50
Results on H target – The p(e,e’K+) Cross Section (Hall A)
p(e,e'K+) Production run
(Waterfall target)

p(e,e'K+) Calibration run
(LH2 Cryo Target)
Expected data from E07-012, study the
angular dependence of p(e,e’K+) and
16O(e,e’K+)16N at low Q2


o
• None of the models is able to describe the data
over the entire range
• New data is electro-production – could longitudinal
amplitudes dominate?
10/13/09
JLab E01-011 (HKS, Hall C)
First reliable observation of 7He
-6.730.02 0.2 MeV
from a  n n
Test of Charge Symmetry Breaking Effect.
A Naïve theory does not explain the experimental result.
Jlab E05-115
-B (MeV)
A Naïve calculation on CSB
effect, which explains 4H –
4 He and available s, p-shell

hypernuclear data , gives
opposite shifts to A=7 ,T=1 isotriplet  Hypernuclei.
Hall A Result on
Spectroscopy is still under study and
not yet published.
9
Li
Spectroscopy
The 12B Spectroscopy (Hall A & C)
E94-107 in Hall A (2003 & 04)
Phase I in Hall C (E89-009)
~800 keV
E89-009
FWHM
12
ΛB
s
HNSS in 2000
spectrum
~635 keV
FWHM
s
p
p
(2-/1-)
K+
(3 /2+’s)
+
Core Ex. States
K+ 1.2GeV/c
_
D
Local Beam Dump
 HKS 2005 has incorrect optics optics
tune – affecting the line shape
 The source is found from Phase III
2009 HKS-HES experiment and the
correct method is developed
 2005 optics tune and kinematics
calibration is under redoing together
with the 2009 data
 The goals are
 Precise binding energy
 High resolution
 Resolve doublet separations
Red line: Fit to the data
Phase II in Hall C (E01-011)
HKS in 2005
~500 keV
FWHM
Blue line: Theoretical curve: Sagay Saclay-Lyon (SLA)
used for the elementary K-Λ electroproduction on
proton. (Hypernuclear wave function obtained by
M.Sotona and J.Millener)
M.Iodice et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.
E052501, 99 (2007)
The Expected 12B Spectroscopy
P
P3/2
7Li
+ a (8.665)
8.559
5/2-
7.978
3/2+
6.743
1/2+
6.793
7/2-
5.021
3/2-
4.445
5/2-
S1/2
S1/2
3/2-
0.0
11B
3+
2+
1+
2+
11.05
10.98
10.52
10.48
12-
5.85
5.74
S1/2
2-
S1/2
0-
S1/2
1-
2.67
21-
0.14
0.0
1/2-
2.1248
13.05
12.95
P3/2
P1/2
P
P3/2
(3/2, 5/2)+
7.286
1+
2+
 Threshold
S1/2
S1/2
 F. AJZENBERG-SELOVE and C. L. BUSCH, Nuclear Phystcs A336 (1980) 1-154.
g D.J. Millener, Nuclear Phystcs A691 (2001) 93c. P means a mixing of 1/2 and 3/2 states.
12
B
Theoryg
Results on 16O target – Spectroscopy of 16 N (Hall A)
F. Cusanno et al, PRL 103 (2009)
Fit 4 regions with 4 Voigt
functions
c2/ndf = 1.19
Binding Energy BL=13.76±0.16 MeV
Measured for the first time with this
level of accuracy
(ambiguous interpretation from emulsion
data; interaction involving L production
on n more difficult to normalize)
Within errors, the binding energy and
the excited levels of the mirror
hypernuclei 16O
and 16N (this
experiment) are in agreement, giving
no strong evidence of charge-dependent
effects
0.0/13.760.16
28
Al
Spectroscopy of
28Si(e,
HKS
HKS (Hall C) 2005
JLAB
Counts (150 keV/bin)
s
st observation of 28 Al
•
1
Al


28
e’K+)28Al
Wider
• ~400 keV FWHM resol.
• Clean observation of the
shell structures
d
p
(Hall C)
Narrower
Peak B(MeV) Ex(MeV) Errors (St. Sys.)
#1
#2
#3
KEK E140a
SKS
28Si(+,K+)28
Accidentals
B (MeV)
Si
-17.820
-6.912
1.360
0.0
10.910
19.180
± 0.027 ± 0.135
± 0.033 ± 0.113
± 0.042 ± 0.105
Additional Data By HKS-HES (Hall C, 2009)
• 2009 data analysis is ongoing
• Current analysis: kinematics calibration and
spectrometer optics optimization
• Additional data for existing spectroscopy
7
9
He,

Li,
and 12B (more statistics and better precision)
• New data:
–
–
10
Be (puzzle of gamma spectroscopy)
52
V (further extend beyond p shell)
New Concept in 12 GeV Era:
Study of Light -Hypernuclei by Spectroscopy
of Two Body Weak Decay Pions
Fragmentation of Hypernuclei
and
Mesonic Decay inside Nucleus
Free:
2-B:
 p +  A Z  A(Z + 1) +  
Decay Pion Spectroscopy to Study -Hypernuclei
Example:
Direct Production
e’
12
*
e
K+
C
Ground state doublet of
Precise B
Jp and 
p

12

B

E.M.
21-
Hypernuclear States:
s (or p) coupled to
low lying core nucleus

C
12
12
B
~150 keV
0.0
Weak mesonic two body decay
12

Bg.s.
Decay Pion Spectroscopy for Light and Exotic -Hypernuclei
Fragmentation Process
Example: e’
K+
12
e
C
*
12

B
p

*
Fragmentation
(<10-16s)
s
4


Highly Excited
Hypernuclear States:
s coupled to HighLying core nucleus, i.e.
particle hole at s orbit
a
H

4

Hg.s.

a
4
He
Access to variety of light
and exotic hypernuclei,
some of which cannot be
produced or measured
precisely by other means
Weak mesonic two body
decay (~10-10s)
Study of Light Hypernuclei by Pionic Decay at Jlab
Technique and Precision
• High yield of hypernuclei (bound or unbound in continuum) makes high yield
of hyper-fragments, i.e. light hypernuclei which stop primarily in thin target
foil
• High momentum transfer in the primary production sends most of the
background particles forward
• Precision does not depend on the precisions of beam energy and tagged
kaons
• The momentum resolution can be at level of ~170keV/c FWHM, powerful in
resolving close-by states and different hypernuclei
• B can be determined with precision at a level of 20keV
• The experiment can be carried out in parasitic mode with high precision
hypernuclear mass spectroscopy experiment which measures the level
structures of hypernuclei
• Physics analysis is more complicated while achieving high resolution is rather
simple
Study of Light Hypernuclei by Pionic Decay at Jlab
Major Physics Objectives
• Precisely determine the single  binding energy B for the ground state of
variety of light hypernuclei: 3H,4H, ..., 11Be, 11B and 12B , i.e. A = 3 – 12 (few
body to p shell)
• Determine the spin-parity Jp of the ground state of light hypernuclei
• Measure CSB’s from multiple pairs of mirror hypernuclei such as:
6
He
and 6Li, 8Li and 8Be, 10Be and 10B.
• CSB can also be determined by combining with the existing emulsion result for
hypernuclei not measured in this experiment
• Search for the neutron drip line limit hypernuclei such as: 6H, 7H and 8H
which have high Isospin and significant - coupling
• May also extract B(E2) and B(M1) electromagnetic branching ratios through
observation of the isomeric low lying states and their lifetimes.
The high precision makes these above into a set of crucial and extremely
valuable physics variables which are longed for determination of the
correct models needed in description of the Y-N and Y-Nucleus
interactions.
Study of Light Hypernuclei by Pionic Decay at Jlab
Illustration on the Main Features
Comparison of Spectroscopic and Background - Production
SPECTROSCOPY
BACKGROUND
e
e
e
*
*
-
K+

p
A1
VS
Z
 1 stop
A2
K+
p(n)
AZ
A
(Z-1)
e
AZ
Z2
A1(
-
,(-)
N
(A-1)
Z’
Z1+1)
(Z-1) = Z1+Z2; A=A1+A2
Light Hypernuclei to Be Investigated
p
Previously measured
6
Mirror pairs
(b)
5
7
4
6
3B background
Li
3/2+
0
3
1
2
He
1/2+
2
1
8
Li
1- ?
3
8
B
3/2+ 
9 Li
8

Be
Jp=?
1/2+
6
Ex
1
6
7
Li
He
0
8 5/2+
Li
Li
17HeEx
8
He
0
H
3
4
H
4
5
H
5
6
H
6
7
H
7
8
9
1-
B
9 8 Li

Be
9
2- 
Li
10
B
10
Be
10
Li
12 9
11
Additions
from
B  Li and its
B
continuum
11
Be
(Phase II: 79Be
H target)
0 19He Ex
2 Ex
H
8
9
10
11
12
A
Illustration of Decay Pion Spectroscopy
(c)
1-
Additions from 12B and its
continuum
12 B

(Phase III:
9 Be

11 B

Jp=?
10 B

10
9 He

11 Be

Li
5/2+
(b)
6
3B background
Li
8
1-
He
9
Li
Li
1- ?
5/2+
3/2+
0
1
Ex
0
1
Ex
and its continuum
target)
0
1- ?
6
3
He
H
7
1/2+
7 He

0
110.0
2
0 1
E
2 x
Ex
0+
4
6
H
H
5
H
Ex
0
120.0
- Momentum (MeV/c)
H
2-
3/2+ 5/2+
PMin
100.0
(Phase II: 9Be target)
Li
1/2+
3B background
90.0
8
1/2+
(a)2-B decay from 7 He

(Phase I:
H
Additions from 9Li and its
continuum
3/2+
1/2+
7
8
3B background
8 B

7Li
target)
10 Be

8 Be

9 B

12C
130.0
2
PMax
Ex
140.0
Experimental Layout (Hall A) in 12GeV Era
64mg/cm2
22mg/cm2
K+
HRS - Electron
-
HES - Pions
HKS - Kaons
Trigger I: HRS(K) & Enge() for Decay Pion Spectroscopy Experiment
Trigger II: HRS(K) & HRS(e’) for Mass Spectroscopy Experiment
A
E89-009, E01-011, E05-115(Hall C)
1 E94-107(Hall A)
20
50
7
10
16
52
H, Future
Li, 9Be,
B, 12C,
O, 28Si,
Cr
mass
spectroscopy
Elementary Process
Strangeness electro-production
Light Hypernuclei (s,p shell)
200
1057
Neutron/Hyperon star,
Strangeness matter
Hyperonization 
Softening of EOS ?
Fine structure
Baryon-baryon interaction in SU(3)
 coupling in large isospin hypernuclei
Cluster structure
Decay Pion Spectroscopy
(Light Hypernuclei)
Precise B of ground state
CSB
Spin-parity Jp of ground state
Extreme isospin
N system
…
Medium/heavy Hypernuclei
Single particle potential
Distinguish ability of a  hyperon
Uo(r), m*(r), VNN, …
Summary
• High quality and high intensity CW CEBAF beam at JLAB
made high precision hypernuclear programs possible.
Programs in 6GeV era were successful.
• Together with J-PARC’s new programs, as well as those at
other facilities around world, the hypernuclear physics will
have great achievement in the next couple of decades.
• The mass spectroscopy program will continue in 12 GeV era
with further optimized design
• The new decay pion spectroscopy program will start a new
frontier