Transcript All Presentations July 26, 2013

Lillian Williams
Coordinator, Academic Affairs
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6
NEW PROGRAM
MID-SOUTH COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Associate of Applied Science in Digital Media
• Students will gain the skills necessary for entry-level positions
in the advertising, graphic design, computer illustration, web
design, recording, film, television, and radio industry.
• Graduates will be trained to design graphics, create and
maintain websites, and shoot and edit video used in
commercials, and design and create instructional videos.
• The degree builds upon an existing Certificate of Proficiency in
Film and Video Production.
Lillian Williams
Coordinator, Academic Affairs
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7
NEW PROGRAM
MID-SOUTH COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Certificate of Proficiency, Technical Certificate,
and Associate of Applied Science Hospitality Management
• Students will gain the skills and training in hospitality, management,
food service and customer service.
• Graduates can obtain entry level jobs in restaurants as food service
workers; and in lodging in sales and management.
• The program is needed to strengthen the tourism and entertainment
industry in Crittenden County and the greater Memphis area.
Southland Park Gaming & Racing has pledged $1 million dollars over
ten years to support the program.
Lillian Williams
Coordinator, Academic Affairs
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8
NEW PROGRAM
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS-FORT SMITH
Bachelor of Arts in Political Science
• B.A. in Political Science will prepare students to enter careers in
public/government service, international relations, and business.
• The new degree will be housed and supported by the Department
of History, Geography, Political Science, Philosophy, and
Religious Study in the College of Humanities and Social Sciences.
• UAFS currently offers a minor in Political Science. The new
degree will allow UAFS to retain students who wish to pursue this
degree.
Alana Boles
Coordinator, Academic Affairs
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9
ICAC RESOLUTIONS
Institutional Certification Advisory Committee (ICAC)
32 Colleges and Universities
155 Programs
8 New Institutions
Initial Degree Certifications, Distance Technology
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio– 1 Degree
Cox College, Springfield, Missouri – 3 Degrees
George Washington University, Washington, D.C. – 1 Degree
Missouri State University, Springfield, Missouri– 4 Degrees, 1 Certificate
Post University, Waterbury, Connecticut – 8 Degrees, 1 Certificate
Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas – 3 Degrees
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio – 4 Degrees, 1 Certificate
University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota – 2 Degrees
Previously Certified Institutions
Initial Certifications – Distance Technology
• American University, Washington, D.C. – 1 Degree
• Argosy University, Orange, California – 5 Degrees
• Arizona State University, Scottsdale, Arizona – 14 Degrees
• Art Institute of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania – 4 Degrees
• Colorado Technical University, Colorado Springs, Colorado – 1 Degree
• Everest University, Pompano Beach and Tampa Campuses – 4 Degrees
• Franklin University, Columbus, Ohio – 1 Degree
• ITT Technical Institute, Carmel Indiana – Little Rock Campus – 3 Degrees
• Liberty University, Lynchburg, Virginia – 4 Degrees
• National American University, Rapid City, South Dakota– 2 Degrees
• National University, La Jolla, California– 2 Degrees
• South University, Savannah, Georgia– 8 Degrees
• Trident University International, Cypress, California– 5 Degrees
• University of New Haven, West Haven, Connecticut – 1 Degree
• Victory University, Memphis, Tennessee – 3 Degrees
Recertifications
• Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Dayton Beach, Florida–Little Rock Air Force Base Campus – 5 Degrees
• Excelsior College, Albany, New York – 12 Degrees
• Franklin University, Columbus, Ohio – 14 Degrees
• Grand Canyon University, Phoenix, Arizona – 8 Degrees
• ITT-Technical Institute, Carmel, Indiana –Little Rock Campus – 5 Degrees
• Kaplan University, Davenport, Iowa – 5 Degrees
• Regis University, Denver, Colorado – 6 Degrees
• Strayer University, Washington, D.C. – Little Rock Campus, Distance Technology – 3 Degrees
• Ultimate Medical Academy, Tampa Florida – 4 Degrees
• University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California – 1 Degree
• Walden University, Minneapolis, Minnesota – 8 Degrees
Jeanne Jones
Coordinator, Academic Affairs
AGENDA ITEMS NO. 10 & 11
LETTERS OF NOTIFICATION & INTENT
Letters of Notification
Letters of Intent
Letters of Notification
• Programs approved by the ADHE Director
• Programs must be included on the AHECB agenda prior to
initiation
• Programs are reasonable and moderate extensions of existing
certificates and degrees
Letters on Intent
• Notification of institutional plans to offer new programs or
organizational units that require Coordinating Board approval
• Chief academic officers and chief executive officers can
comment on the proposals before consideration by AHECB
AHECB Finance Committee Meeting
July 26, 2013
Tara Smith
Senior Associate Director, Institutional Finance
AGENDA ITEM NO. 12
CERTIFICATION OF
INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETIC
REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
FOR 2013-14
Relevant Information
Athletic Fees Per SSCH
Institution
2012-13 Athletic Fee
2013-14 Athletic Fee
ASUJ
$17.00
$17.00
ATU
$14.00
$14.00
HSU
$13.00
$15.00
SAUM
$14.00
$14.00
UAF
0
0
UAFS
$15.00
$16.00
UALR
$16.10
$16.66
UAM
$13.00
$13.00
UAPB
$15.00
$16.00
UCA
$17.00
$17.00
Intercollegiate Athletic
Report for 2013-14
Inst
ASUJ
Athletic
% of
Other
% of
Generated
Total
Auxiliary
Total
Revenues
Inst Rev
Profits
Inst Rev
$4,756,512
33.6% $2,112,886
% of
Student
% of
Other
% of
Total
Total
Athletic
E&G
Total
Athletic
Total
Athletic
Total
Expected
Budgeted
Fee Per
Transfer
Inst Rev
Fee
Inst Rev
Income
Inst Rev
Inst Rev
Expenditure
SSCH
14.9% $1,214,927
8.6%
$4,500,000
31.8%
$1,577,863
11.1%
$14,162,188
$14,162,188 $17.00
ATU
194,352
4.1%
0
0.0%
1,390,687
29.6%
3,087,840
65.8%
18,378
0.4%
4,691,257
4,691,257
14.00
HSU
24,000
0.7%
807,490
22.7%
1,214,927
34.2%
1,506,892
42.4%
0
0.0%
3,553,309
3,553,309
15.00
SAUM
53,000
2.0%
153,186
5.9%
1,180,687
45.4%
1,214,927
46.7%
0
0.0%
2,601,800
2,601,800
14.00
UAFS
94,600
2.7%
599,892
17.0%
0
0.0%
2,821,824
79.8%
20,000
0.6%
3,536,316
3,536,316
16.00
UALR
1,210,369
16.6%
0
0.0%
988,823
13.6%
4,453,235
61.1%
639,182
8.8%
7,291,609
7,291,609
16.66
36,000
1.1%
1,608,072
47.6%
967,043
28.6%
769,275
22.8%
0
0.0%
3,380,390
3,380,390
13.00
UAPB
2,072,000
32.4%
502,442
7.8%
1,138,234
17.8%
1,265,000
19.8%
1,426,311
22.3%
6,403,987
6,403,987
16.00
UCA
1,000,000
10.2%
5,016,000
51.2%
268,949
2.7%
9,805,789
9,805,789
17.00
66,555 100.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
66,555
66,555
0.00
UAM
1,515,000
15.5%
2,005,840
20.5%
CCCUA
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
MSCC
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
100,000
65.4%
0
0.0%
53,000
34.6%
153,000
153,000
0.00
5,000
1.7%
110,799
38.6%
126,312
44.0%
0
0.0%
44,958
15.7%
287,069
287,069
0.00
16.8% $24,634,993
44.0%
$4,048,641
7.24%
$55,933,269
$55,933,269
0
0.0%
12,941,500
16.0%
80,675,500
80,675,500
6.9% $24,634,993
18.0%
$16,990,141
12.4%
$136,608,769
$136,608,769
NAC
Subtotal
$9,960,833
UAF
67,734,000
Total
$77,694,833
17.81% $7,900,607
84.0%
0
56.9% $7,900,607
14.1% $9,388,195
0.0%
0
5.8% $9,388,195
0.0%
NOTE: Sources of Other Athletic Income are foundations/clubs and other private gifts, miscellaneous income, work study program, etc.
0.00
Relevant Information
Percentages of funds supporting athletic budgets
excluding UAF:
– Athletic generated revenues – 25.1%
• Includes Other Athletic Income
– Other Auxiliary profits – 14.1%
– Educational and General transfer – 16.8%
– Student Athletic fees – 44.0%
Chandra Robinson
Program Coordinator, Institutional Finance
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13:
ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF LOAN FOR
ARKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY JONESBORO
Relevant Information
• College Savings Bond Revolving Loan Fund
• $1 million for 10 years @ a rate not to exceed 1.0%
• Educational and general purposes
• Revenue Funding Source: Tuition and Fee Revenue
• Proceeds will be used for Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA) campus surface improvements including pedestrian
walkways and parking.
Chandra Robinson
Program Coordinator, Institutional Finance
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14:
ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF PRIVATE
LOAN FOR HENDERSON STATE
UNIVERSITY
Relevant Information
• $1.1 million for 20 years @ a rate not to exceed 5.0%
• Auxiliary purposes
• Revenue Funding Source: Food Service Revenue
• Proceeds will be used to repay their food service provider,
Aramark for equipment and renovation of the café portion of
the Garrison Activity and Conference Center
AHECB Meeting
July 26, 2013
Shane Broadway
Interim Director
AGENCY OVERVIEW
ADHE Employee Changes
• Resignations
– Jeanne Toombs
• CPI Program Specialist
– Nancy Sparks
• CPI Program Specialist
Legislative Updates
• As of early July 2013, all institutions have certified
compliance with Act 747 and AHECB policy concerning a
common course numbering system.
• The Department of Higher Education shall file a report with
the General Assembly on the compliance of state-supported
institutions of higher education with this subchapter on
August 15, 2013.
Board of Trustees Conference
• Friday, December 6, 2013
• Pulaski Technical College Main Campus
– Campus Center
– R.J. Wills Lecture Hall
• Second floor
• 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. ~ lunch provided
UTeach
UTeach
Arkansas Research Center
arc.arkansas.gov
Average Wages
36.93%
$52,447
31.25%
$38,887
$27,631
% of Cohort
$23,024
2011 Wages
11.92%
$12,499
12.07%
7.82%
HS or less
Some College
Credential less
than Bach
Bachelors
Beyond Bachelors
Average Wages
Some College
$31,531
$29,932
69.04%
$25,756
$21,057
% of Cohort
2011 Wages
19.10%
15.11%
6.09%
Freshman
Sophomore
Junior
Senior
Average Wages
College Attainment
40.26%
$38,872
$31,531
$29,807
$25,681
$21,057
$29,932
$30,615
$25,756
$21,874
19.46%
% of Cohort
2011 Wages
11.14%
8.30%
4.77%
3.89%
5.28%
3.36%
3.55%
Average Wages
36.93%
$52,447
31.25%
$38,887
$27,631
% of Cohort
$23,024
2011 Wages
11.92%
$12,499
12.07%
7.82%
HS or less
Some College
Credential less
than Bach
Bachelors
Beyond Bachelors
College-Going Rate
AHECB Meeting of July 26, 2013
Rick Jenkins
Associate Director, Planning and Accountability
Third Year of New Methodology
New methodology focuses on students that (1) graduated from an Arkansas public
school district in Academic Year 2011-2012, (2) are first-time entering students in
2012 Fall term, and (3) are Arkansas residents. This new methodology more
closely follows that used by the National Center for Education Statistics (NECS).
However, there are three differences:
1. NCES filters by the age range of 16-24 – ADHE ignores age but focuses on high
school graduates from the previous year as most all high school graduates are
between the ages of 16 and 24;
2. NCES includes GED students as their report is based on a survey. ADHE does not
have data on annual graduating classes of GED students, therefore, GED students are
excluded; and
3. Since the NCES report is a survey, it may include private high schools and home
school students. ADHE has no data on annual graduating classes of private high
schools or home school students. But ADHE does obtain data on graduating classes
of Arkansas public high schools (from the Arkansas Department of Education).
Therefore, the new methodology is a College-Going Rate calculation for
Arkansas public high school graduates only.
Why Did the Methodology Change?
The Old Methodology Did Not
Measure College-Going Rate
The old methodology consisted of the Fall student cohort
including
(1) first-time,
(2) full-time, and
(3) on-campus that attend an Arkansas public
or independent institution after completing high
school or GED.
College-Going Rate Is Up 0.7%
Arkansas Public High School Student College-Going Rate
60.0%
55.0%
51.7%
50.0%
52.2%
52.9%
50.2%
47.8%
45.0%
45.5%
46.9%
46.3%
40.0%
35.0%
30.0%
2005 Fall
2006 Fall
2007 Fall
2008 Fall
2009 Fall
2010 Fall
2011 Fall
2012 Fall
Distribution by Institution Type: 2012 Fall
CGR Student Distribution by Institution Type: 2012 Fall
12,000
10,000
4-Yr. Univ. = 62.5%/33.0%
2-Yr. Coll. = 34.3%/18.2%
Priv./Ind. = 3.2%/1.7%
Total = 100.0%/52.9%
9,546
8,000
6,000
5,246
4,000
2,000
491
0
4-Year Universities
2-Year Colleges
Private/Independent
Distribution by Institution Type: History
CGR Student Distribution by Institution Type (Percent)
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
52.4%
52.3%
52.9%
29.2%
31.5%
32.3%
33.0%
17.3%
17.8%
17.6%
16.7%
18.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
3.3%
1.7%
2007 Fall
2008 Fall
2009 Fall
2010 Fall
2011 Fall
2012 Fall
50.3%
45.8%
46.4%
47.9%
31.2%
31.8%
31.6%
33.0%
14.5%
14.6%
16.2%
0.0%
0.0%
2005 Fall
2006 Fall
46.9%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
Total
4-Year Universities
2-Year Colleges
Private/ Independent
CGR Student Distribution by Institution Type (Numbers)
18,000
16,000
14,000
12,437
12,461
12,804
8,488
8,544
8,462
8,804
8,360
3,949
3,917
4,342
4,622
5,093
0
0
0
0
0
2005 Fall
2006 Fall
2007 Fall
2008 Fall
2009 Fall
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
13,453
13,426
4,000
2,000
15,163
15,118
15,283
9,115
9,340
9,546
5,096
4,835
5,246
952
943
491
2010 Fall
2011 Fall
2012 Fall
0
Total
4-Year Universities
2-Year Colleges
Private/ Independent
Gender and Race/Ethnicity
College-Going Rate by Gender: 2012
Fall
College-Going Rate by Race/Ethnicity: 2012 Fall
70%
66.5%
70%
58.8%
60%
60%
56.4%
50%
50%
52.6%
50.3%
46.8%
42.6%
40%
40%
30%
30%
20%
20%
11.8%
10%
10%
0%
0%
Males
Females
Asian Only
Black Only
Hispanic, Any
American
Hawaiian or
Indian/Alaskan Pacific Islander
Native Only
Only
White Only
4-Year Universities
CGR Student Distribution for 4-Year Universities:
2012 Fall
2,029
2,500
938
1,332
1,500
1,266
1,679
2,000
386
454
601
607
1,000
0
255
500
ASUJ
ATU
HSU
SAUM
UAF
UAFS
UALR
UAM
UAMS
UAPB
UCA
91
63
153
143
117
91
156
274
228
231
200
355
400
UACCM
UACCH
UACCB
SEAC
SAUT
SACC
RMCC
PTC
PCCUA
OZC
157
183
644
770
800
NWACC
NPCC
NAC
MSCC
EACC
CotO
CCCUA
231
300
BRTC
153
ASUN
-
134
61
100
ASUMH
631
700
ASUB
180
200
ANC
2-Year Colleges
CGR Distribution for 2-Year Colleges: 2012 Fall
900
600
500
Private/Independent Institutions
CGR Distribution for Private/Independent Institutions: 2012 Fall
100
90
91
89
81
79
80
71
70
60
53
50
40
30
25
20
10
0
ABC
CBC
CRC
HC
JBU
OBU
UO
NOTE: HU, LC, PSC, and WBC are not shown due to FERPA.
College-Going Rate by County
1 ARKANSAS
60.9% 16 CRAIGHEAD
52.7% 31 HOWARD
58.4% 46 MILLER
36.4% 61 RANDOLPH
55.4%
2 ASHLEY
58.9% 17 CRAWFORD
53.4% 32 INDEPENDENCE
47.0% 47 MISSISSIPPI
56.1% 62 SALINE
60.0%
3 BAXTER
56.2% 18 CRITTENDEN
54.3% 33 IZARD
46.2% 48 MONROE
49.1% 63 SCOTT
91.5%
4 BENTON
46.5% 19 CROSS
45.6% 34 JACKSON
51.9% 49 MONTGOMERY
53.8% 64 SEARCY
32.1%
5 BOONE
56.7% 20 DALLAS
49.3% 35 JEFFERSON
54.0% 50 NEVADA
62.5% 65 SEBASTIAN
51.4%
6 BRADLEY
40.1% 21 DESHA
44.8% 36 JOHNSON
65.6% 51 NEWTON
58.2% 66 SEVIER
58.2%
7 CALHOUN
47.7% 22 DREW
46.5% 37 LAFAYETTE
63.6% 52 OUACHITA
61.9% 67 SHARP
46.6%
8 CARROLL
38.3% 23 FAULKNER
60.4% 38 LAWRENCE
45.3% 53 PERRY
48.7% 68 ST FRANCIS
51.2%
9 CHICOT
41.3% 24 FRANKLIN
60.4% 39 LEE
49.4% 54 PHILLIPS
62.0% 69 STONE
48.5%
10 CLARK
79.7% 25 FULTON
37.9% 40 LINCOLN
43.0% 55 PIKE
33.3% 70 UNION
55.6%
11 CLAY
39.8% 26 GARLAND
61.5% 41 LITTLE RIVER
50.7% 56 POINSETT
43.6% 71 VAN BUREN
50.0%
12 CLEBURNE
57.0% 27 GRANT
54.2% 42 LOGAN
54.5% 57 POLK
52.2% 72 WASHINGTON
44.5%
13 CLEVELAND
50.0% 28 GREENE
48.9% 43 LONOKE
53.7% 58 POPE
59.5% 73 WHITE
48.9%
14 COLUMBIA
56.1% 29 HEMPSTEAD
59.3% 44 MADISON
46.6% 59 PRAIRIE
54.8% 74 WOODRUFF
40.8%
15 CONWAY
56.7% 30 HOT SPRING
53.2% 45 MARION
59.3% 60 PULASKI
60.1% 75 YELL
53.6%
Rates in BOLD are 60.0% or higher.
These include the 13 counties of Scott (91.5%), Clark (79.7%), Johnson, (65.6%), Lafayette (63.6%), Nevada
(62.5%), Phillips (62.0%), Ouachita (61.9%), Garland (61.5%), Arkansas, (60.9%), Faulkner and Franklin (60.4%),
Pulaski (60.1%), and Saline (60.0%).
Delores Logan
Assistant Coordinator, Academic Affairs
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4
REPORT
ANNUAL FACULTY PERFORMANCE REVIEW
Annual Faculty Performance Review
• Arkansas Code Annotated §6-63-104 and AHECB policy 5.5 require
each college and university to conduct an annual performance
review of faculty members.
• ADHE staff is required to monitor faculty evaluation processes
adopted at Arkansas public institutions and report annually to the
AHECB and Legislative Council.
• Faculty performance was assessed using a variety of methods
including assessment by students, classroom visits by
administrators, peer review, and self-evaluation activities.
Cynthia Moten
Associate Director, Academic Affairs
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5
POLICY AMENDMENT
CONCURRENT ENROLLMENT
(AHECB POLICY 5.16)
AHECB Policy Amendment
Concurrent Enrollment
Policy Amendment Clarifies Requirement for –
• MOU between college/university and high school/school district
• Minimum faculty credentials required
• Blended AP/concurrent course delivery
• Minimum Exam Scores
• Concurrent course registration
• Payment of Tuition
• Conflict Resolution Process
Policy Amendment Added –
• Option for AHECB approval of Concurrent Enrollment Program
• One unit of high school credit awarded for each general education
concurrent course and each blended AP/concurrent course
• Up to one unit of high school credit awarded for each career & technical
education (CTE) concurrent course
• Option for high school seniors to enroll in remedial/developmental courses
in English composition, reading, and mathematics
Item for Future Consideration –
• Concurrent Finance Policy development