Fundacja Watch Health Care

Download Report

Transcript Fundacja Watch Health Care

30.04.2020

Krzysztof Landa, M.D.

Additional Health Insurance Business Opportunities in the Polish Healthcare System

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

1

Total expenditure on health per capita (USD due to purchasing power parity

)

Source: OECD Health Data 2006, (*) OECD Health Data 2008

Total expenditures on healh (private and public) per capita (2007, USD due to PPP)

Source: OECD Health Data 2009

Basic Benefit Package

  The most important changes in regulations were introduced in second half of 2009 – law on BBP.  This insurance-budgetary model of healthcare funding is regulated by the law on Basic Benefit Package (BBP). It means that this new law is not mature and there is still a lot of imperfection, divergence, ambiguity what requires constant improvement.

30.04.2020

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

4

Drugs Reimbursement List Ambulat ory Care Higly Specialized Procedures

Poland

Hospital catalogue Therapeutic Programms Chemothera py regimens catalogue Dentistr y care Primary Care Prevention Programms Vaccination catalouge Drugs Reimburseme nt List – A, B, C, D Secondary and Tertiary Care Higly Specialized Procedures Dentistry catalouge

Serbia

Prevention Programms Primary Care

Hospital treatment

There are three ways of finansing:

 DRG system  Therapeutic programs  Services contracted separately 30.04.2020

Historical budget

Limits on health services

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

6

What does a decision-maker want to know?

1.

2.

3.

4.

Is this technology of proven efficacy (health benefit and its safety profile)?

What is the strength of intervention in comparison to optional ones? (which is the most efficacious option and what are the differences) Which is the most cost-effective option and what are the differences?

Is coverage of the intervention possible with respect to available resources? What changes should we expect if the technology gets a privileged market position?

The most important requirements of the EU Transparency Directive (89/105/EEC from December, 21 st , 1988) 1.

2.

3.

Supervision of the court over decisions concerning reimbursement and pricing – i.e. a possibility to appeal from the DECISION Supervision of the court is possible only if appellations to the court are considered according to transparent criteria ensuring high reproducibility!

“Each decision on exclusion of a certain category of medicinal products from the national health insurance system must embrase justification based on objective and verifiable criteria and must be published in an appropriate publication.”

The course of decision and appellation – decisions within 90 days following submission of the application (in case of a large number of applications additional 60 days – the applicant must be informed) and within another 90 days following appellation

Main advantages of the new law on drug reimbursement in Poland

30.04.2020

• Economic Committee • Doubled Transparency Committee • Transparent reimbursement criteria • RSS (risk sharing schemes, patient access schemes) WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

9

Evidence based coverage decision-making – general process

Pricing Agency Negotiations

New price

or risk sharing Rejection

Initial price

by manufacturer in dossier and HTA report REIMBURSEMENT GOES FIRST IN UTYLITARIAN APPROACH

B

1/ willingness to cover

C A Rwanda Cambodia Switzerland UK Hungary Serbia

Cost per QUALY / cost per LYG

Total expenditure on health in Poland [bn, 2007-2011]

Public expenditure Private expenditure Total expenditure 30.04.2020

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

Source: ppt Jakub Gierczyński 2010

13

Private expenditure on health care

• Fees for medical examination • Fees for drugs • Additional health insurance (lisence fees) • Medical subscriptions (co-payment) • Bribes to get better or quicker access or any access at all 30.04.2020

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

14

30.04.2020

Private health expenditure

In 2009 - 28 bn PLN per year

30%

of total medical market in Poland

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

15

Out of pocket payments

Apart of mandatory health premium Poles spend 30 bn for treatment Including 15 bn PLN for drugs 30.04.2020

its two times more than in 2007 WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

16

Supplementary insurance in Poland attain less than PLN 2.5 billion per year , while the complementary insurance market may reach 15 - 30 billion PLN per year

Additional Public Substitutional Supplying Insuring

Supplementary (alternative) Complementary

Protective Allows for leaving the public system Benefits are granted faster, outside the queue, in a higher standard Benefits which are not covered by public insurance or co-payment Financed directly from taxes, depending on income Financed from contributions, depending on risks Dotations, donations, indirect taxes and other

Source: Classification based on a presentation by Xenia Kruszewska, 2010

30.04.2020

The DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

The Directive on the application of patients' rights in cross-border healthcare

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

18

Council adopts its position on patient's rights in cross-border healthcare The key provisions

As a general rule, patients will be allowed to receive healthcare in another member state and be reimbursed up to the level of reimbursement applicable for the same or similar treatment in their national health system if the patients are entitled to this treatment in their country of affiliation.

30.04.2020

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

19

The key provisions

In case of overriding reasons of general interest (such as the risk of seriously undermining the financial balance of a social security system) a member state of affiliation may limit the application of the rules on reimbursement for cross-border healthcare; member states may manage the outgoing flows of patients also by asking a prior authorisation for certain healthcare (those which involve overnight hospital accommodation, require a highly specialised and cost intensive medical infrastructure or which raise concerns with regard to the quality or safety of the care) or via the application of the "gate-keeping principle", for example by the attending physician.

30.04.2020

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

20

A cost of an exemplary health service

30.04.2020

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

21

Pricing – the most important regulatory mechanism of HI

„Partially guaranteed” = partially covered BP >120%

BBP

100% out of pocket payments or aHI ( „not guaranteed”) (theoretically 1-99% co-payment or a HI trully 20-80% copayment or aHI)

„THE MOONS”: Deimos and Phobos

FIELD A

BASIC BENEFIT PACKAGE

contribution (health premium), tax cheap 30.04.2020

A + B = ACTUAL NEGATIVE BP

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

FIELD B expensive 23

Quality of healthcare in Poland

„On a national level, there are some countries where

citizens are consistently negative about the

available healthcare. They feel harm from hospital or non-hospital care is likely, feel at risk of

experiencing adverse events and rate the quality of

their national healthcare poorly and worse than

other Member States. These countries are

Greece,Bulgaria, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania and

Poland

”.

Report: Patient safety and quality of healthcare, TNS Opinion & Social, European Comission , April 2010

30.04.2020

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

24

Quality of healthcare in Poland

30.04.2020

Report: Patient safety and quality of healthcare, TNS Opinion & Social, European

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

25

HIGHER demand than supply

–> QUEUES/ state control

HIGHER demand than supply

-> corruption and bribery

HIGHER demand than supply -> PRIVILEGE (using connections)

THE BBP CAN BE PUMPED UP TOO MUCH BUT THE BUDGET IS NOT MADE of RABBER

• The greater the discrepancy, the more severe pathologies in health care Removal of the causes of the disease, eliminates the symptoms

BBP MONEY Form PUBLIC HEALTH PREMIUM

„THE MOONS”: Deimos and phobos

Organized patients

FIELD A FIELD B

$ cheap 30.04.2020

They suffer in silence – they are not organized

AS SEEN BY THE PATIENT

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

expensive 30

Access limitations to health care benefits and medical procedures in field A are mainly caused by:

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Watiting lits Limits / limiting the size of contract concluded with the payer (NHF) → increasing queues and patient selection Lowered (incorrect) price estimations = benefits are not cost effective for clinic → patient selection stage character of treatment (GP → specialist → diagnostic test → therapy → control visit) Red tape Narrowed/ limited inclusion criteria, e.g. For therapeutic programs Copayment Lack of procedure standard 31 30.04.2020

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

How the financial resorces from health premium and BBP can be balanced?

• Icrease health premium or/and higher co-payment • Remove from BBP expensive and not cost-effective health services • Enforce additive health insurance (complementary and suplementary insurance) 30.04.2020

www.korektorzdrowia.pl 32

Co-payment

„Trifles”: 3 pln to a visit 10 pln to hospital addmission HIGH POLITICAL RISK BUT NO CURE FOR THE SYSTEM 30.04.2020

Deductibles (Udział własny) WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

High co-payments 33

30.04.2020

34

The project on „100 conferences”

„Innovative health technologies in …(specific medical field)…. – assessment of accessibility in Poland”

 Presentation of therapeutic and diagnostic innovations remining out of BBP in Poland  Cooperation with National Consultants and Associations of Specialists E.g. oncology: chemiotherapy (15-16.04.2011), vaccination (May), hematooncology (June)  Participants: MDs, Health Insurance, patients’ organizations, media – debates with MoH, NHF, AOTM (AHTAPol) - free participation / www.korektorzdrowia.pl

or www.watchhealthcare.eu

30.04.2020

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

35

SOCIAL AWARENESS CAMPAIGN "INNOVATIONS IN ONCOLOGICAL PHARMACOTHERAPY - HOPES FOR PATIENTS, SOLUTIONS FOR THE SYSTEM"

15-16.04.2011

• • • •

PARTNERS:

Polish Oncology Union (PUO) www.puo.pl

Watch Health Care Foundation (WHC) www.krektorzdrowia.pl

Business Centre Club (BCC) www.bcc.org.pl

GREEN PR Agency www.greenpr.pl

30.04.2020

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

36

30.04.2020

11.00-11.15

Przedstawienie Komitetu Naukowego kampanii oraz uczestników debaty – moderator spotkania,

red. Krzysztof Michalski 11.15-11.30

Otwarcie debaty przez Minister Zdrowia,

Ewę Kopacz 11.30-11.45

Wystąpienie Prezesa Honorowego PUO,

prof. Marka Belki 11.45-12.00

Wystąpienie Szefa Zespołu Doradców Strategicznych Prezesa Rady Ministrów

dr Michała Boniego 12.00-12.15

Wystąpienie Podsekretarza Stanu Ministerstwa Zdrowia,

dr Andrzeja Witolda Włodarczyka 12.15-12.30

Wystąpienie przedstawiciela NFZ

12.30-12.40

Wystąpienie Konsultanta Krajowego w Dziedzinie Onkologii Klinicznej,

prof. Macieja Krzakowskiego 12.40-12.50

Wystąpienie Prezesa Fundacji WHC,

dr. Krzysztofa Łandy 12.50-13.00

Wystąpienie Prezesa PUO

dr. Janusza Medera

,

13.00-13.10

Wystąpienie Prezesa AOTM

dr Wojciecha Matusewicza 13.10-13.20

Wystąpienie przedstawiciela BCC,

Wojciecha Bociańskiego 13.20-13.35

Podsumowanie wystąpień i zaproszenie do dyskusji,

dr Krzysztof Łanda 13.35-14.35

Dyskusja z udziałem: pracowników naukowych, etyków, prawników, przedstawicieli branży ubezpieczeniowej, organizacji biznesowych, pacjentów i dziennikarzy.

14.35-15.35

Poczęstunek, czas na rozmowy nieformalne

15.35

Transfer uczestników seminarium do hotelu Fort Piontek w Jabłonnie

19.00

Uroczysta kolacja w Pałacu PAN w Jabłonnie pod Warszawą WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

37

30.04.2020

10.00-10.30

Powitanie uczestników i przedstawienie założeń kampanii społeczno-edukacyjnej „Liczymy się z naszym zdrowiem” w kontekście innowacyjnych rozwiązań diagnostyczno-terapeutycznych dla onkologii,

prof. Tadeusz Pieńkowski

(PTBRP),

dr Krzysztof Łanda

(WHC) i

dr Janusz Meder

(PUO)

10.30-10.45

Wykład inaugurujący sesje medyczne,

prof. Wiesław Jędrzejczak

Konsultant Krajowy w Dziedzinie Hematologii

10.45-11.15

Przerwa kawowa

11.15-14.30

Sesje sponsorowane

14.30-14.50

Jędrzejczak

Podsumowanie przedstawionych prezentacji,

prof. Wiesław 14.50-15.00

Zamknięcie seminarium,

dr Krzysztof Łanda, dr Janusz Meder

(PUO)

15.00

Lunch

16.00

Transfer na Dworzec Centralny w Warszawie WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

38

Partially guaranteed benefits

30.04.2020

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

39

30.04.2020

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

40

30.04.2020

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

41

30.04.2020

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

42

30.04.2020

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

43

30.04.2020

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

44

30.04.2020

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

45

Partners of the Foundation

30.04.2020

www.korektorzdrowia.pl 47

Supporting Institutions

30.04.2020

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

48

[email protected]

THANK YOU!

30.04.2020

WWW.WATCHHEALTHCARE.EU

49