Transcript Slide 1
Increase Shareholder Value: International Tax Planning And Structuring For Clean Tech Companies Tom Phalen, Former VP Tax at First Solar Sang Kim, International Tax Partner at DLA Piper Mark Radcliffe, Corporate and IP Partner at DLA Piper “This material is provided for informational purposes only, and the content should not be construed as legal advice on any matter.” Tax Analytical Framework In the US Transfer pricing - including valuation and compensation for IP and know-how Deferral from US taxation Direct US taxation Repatriation Note: Also need to consider impact of Obama/Treasury international tax reform proposals Outside the US Transfer pricing Management and control Permanent establishment Tax rulings/incentives 7/16/2015 2 US – Transfer Pricing Focus on IP – Typical Models US owns IP and licenses to foreign affiliate(s) for royalties US and non-US affiliate jointly fund (and bear risk) of development (i.e., R&D cost-sharing arrangement) IP Definition – What is “IP”? IRS wants to define broadly to include goodwill, going concern and workforce in place Current “IP” includes patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, knowhow, among others IP Valuation - Methodologies IRS prefers methods that allocate most income to early R&D performed solely by US company (regardless of the actual facts!) Issued new R&D cost-sharing regulations in January 2009 to eliminate methodology preferred by taxpayers, namely “residual profits split method” The new regulations did provide grandfathering for pre-existing cost-sharing arrangements, subject to certain conditions 7/16/2015 3 US – Deferral from US Taxation Subpart F – Anti-Deferral Regime Applicable rule within Subpart F regime depends on type of income generated offshore – most common are: Sales Royalties Services Many companies have multiple types of revenues (e.g., sale of tangible products as well as services) Product sales – Deferral possible if a foreign affiliate is a manufacturer (subject to additional testing and income allocation to such manufacturing affiliate) Services – Deferral possible if theUS parent is not overly involved in delivery or performance of the services Royalties – Deferral possible if there is active R&D or active marketing by the foreign affiliate outside the US Note: Interest income on low-taxed earnings is generally not eligible for deferral unless the amount is de minimis 7/16/2015 4 US – Direct US Taxation Effectively Connected Income (ECI) of Foreign Affiliate Derives from US sourcing rules Effective US tax for ECI may be almost 55% (US corporate tax + branch profits tax) Generally “all or nothing” rule – a blunt instrument US-sourced income of foreign affiliate will generally be subject to US tax (foreign affiliate must file a US tax return) Foreign-sourced income of foreign affiliate may be ECI (and taxable in the US), but there are exceptions Sale of tangible products – not ECI if foreign affiliate materially participates in the solicitation, negotiation and other relevant activities leading up to a PO from a customer Royalties – not ECI if US parent is not a material factor in securing the PO from a customer Services – not ECI if services are performed outside the US Tax Treaty Override Bilateral tax treaties may mitigate ECI risk as tax treaties may limit amount of income allocable to US assistance or involvement in sales 7/16/2015 5 US – Repatriation Generally - Dividend to US Parent Taxable income to the US parent at normal rate of 35% US Receivables Repayment of payables of foreign affiliate to US parent is not income in the US Bona fide indebtedness – intercompany debt must meet the criteria as legitimate debt instrument May be created as consideration for (1) access to IP owned by US parent; (2) acquisition of other foreign affiliates as part of creating a holding company structure; (3) post-acquisition integration Section 965 one time “special” dividend in 2004/2005 was an exception 1032 Equity Compensation Equity compensation of foreign employees in the form of shares or options of US parent Vested restricted stock, ESPP and option exercises RSUs not eligible 7/16/2015 6 US – Key Obama/Treasury Proposals Tighten “check the box” rules for entity classification Planning and structuring could become more challenging/rigid Will be difficult to use tax havens such as Cayman, Bermuda Defer US deduction to the extent income deferred from US taxation May have minimal impact for high-operating-margin tech-driven companies For others, may significantly impair benefits of income deferral outside the US Expansive definition of IP Codify the definition to include goodwill, going concern and workforce in place Would provide IRS further ammo and will make it more tax expensive for companies to do planning involving IP May be used by foreign-based companies to further erode tax base in the US (thus making the US-based companies even less competitive) 7/16/2015 7 Outside the US – Transfer Pricing Most countries around the world have some form of transfer pricing and/or arm’s length standard Transfer pricing seen as tool of choice to defend tax base Level of sophistication increasing as well as enforcement (e.g., HK) Recent OECD Business Restructuring draft a example of the trend to impute additional business value, resulting in potential exit tax if certain functions move or business model changes in a given jurisdiction Bilateral transfer pricing disputes are getting more difficult to resolve through competent authority mechanisms provided in tax treaties Consider Advanced Pricing Agreements to address transfer pricing issues up front Consider jurisdictions that are more flexible with transfer pricing (e.g., Ireland, Netherlands) 7/16/2015 8 Outside the US – Management/Control & PE Residency-based taxation While corporate domicile tends to be the default rule, residency is critical to which jurisdiction has the upper hand to tax an entity For example, a German company with management in Belgium may be taxable in Belgium (potentially lower tax) and not Germany (potentially higher tax) Permanent Establishment (PE) Where one entity in a given country X has a taxable presence or PE in another country Y, country Y may argue that some of the income of the entity should be taxable in Y PE may be created by (1) direct presence in Y through employees or office; or (2) engaging an agent in Y that is given the authority to conclude contracts on behalf of the principal in X Key is to minimize PE risk in a third country for a foreign affiliate in low tax jurisdiction with significant income or income potential 7/16/2015 9 Outside the US – Tax Rulings/Incentives Various jurisdictions provide favorable tax treatment with certainty for a defined period of time, as long as various substantive milestones are met Tax rates can be as low as zero for 10 to 15 years Some key jurisdictions include: Switzerland Singapore Malaysia China and India also provide tax incentives, but, due to difficulties in accessing earnings, they are not typically considered as a primary jurisdiction for deferral planning 7/16/2015 10 Case Study: Evolution of a Solar Company 7/16/2015 11 Formation Stage – Overview 1. Capital intensive 2. R&D 3. R&D test manufacturing facility 4. Establish replication team 7/16/2015 12 Formation Stage – Overview Funding – support: Equipment purchases R&D Working capital 7/16/2015 13 Formation Stage - R&D Manufacturing R&D – small projects, incremental steps to improve product efficiency and yields NREL funding important R&D tax credit – Document projects, costs and NREL funding 7/16/2015 14 Formation Stage R&D Test Manufacturing Facility Choose your location wisely because many states grant: Sales and use tax exemptions on manufacturing equipment R&D tax credits Property tax exemptions Training grants Loans Base for domestic expansion 7/16/2015 15 Formation Stage – Establish Test Manufacturing Facility Document all processes such as manufacturing, procurement, testing, quality control, audit, cleaning, plant layout, square footage. Establish a site selection manual that covers all disciplines 7/16/2015 16 The Leap Overseas – Overview 1. Document IP 2. Determine whether to sell IP (with cost-sharing arrangement) or license IP 3. Manufacturing locations outside the US 4. Business model 7/16/2015 17 The Leap Overseas - Document IP Obtain a robust valuation of existing IP (product and manufacturing) Has company paid royalties? Purchased IP? Know if unrelated entities license IP? 7/16/2015 18 The Leap Overseas – Sell or License IP Determine whether to sell IP (with cost-sharing arrangement) or license IP – consider: High-tax-rate foreign country v. low-tax-rate foreign country Foreign withholding tax US foreign tax credit position 7/16/2015 19 The Leap Overseas – Foreign Manufacturing Locations East Germany Close to EU markets Good workforce – engineers, logistics, accounting, etc. Low interest loans, no incentives, tax rate approximately 25% Good treaty structure Debt-to-equity limitations Form a distribution subsidiary and file consolidated German tax return Check the Box via Switzerland or Netherlands Far East (Malaysia and Singapore) Tax holidays - 10 to 15 years Training grants and R&D reimbursement with limits Withholding tax on royalties, service fees, etc. Supply chain longer and costlier Check the Box via Netherlands or Singapore for Malaysia Mexico No tax holiday and alternative minimum tax Cash grants, facilities, training grants, etc. Close to US market Withholding tax on dividends, royalties, etc. 7/16/2015 20 The Leap Overseas - Business Model Provider of solar panels through long term supply agreements Provider of solar energy through partnerships utilizing energy credits and bonus depreciation 7/16/2015 21