Transcript Slide 1
Polarized Antiprotons – the Quest for a Missing Tool Erhard Steffens Physikalisches Institut, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg [email protected] •Motivation •History •FAIR and PAX •Recent Workshops - Workshop at Cockcroft Institute (August 2007) - Heraeus Seminar at Physik Haus (June 2008) •New results on depolarization study at COSY •Conclusions SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 1 Motivation Our Knowledge about pp interaction is limited: lack of polarization data! Restricted to single-spin (A0n00, A000n) data. Attempts at LEAR (1983-1996) to produce polarized stored p ' s were unsuccessful! FAIR project: Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research. New chance after the LEAR program to study antiproton physics in a broad energy range from traps to Super-LEAR (= HESR). Revival of ideas about stored polarized antiprotons: PAX experiment at FAIR. Outstanding physics case – see PAX proposal, and talks at this meeting (e.g. Anselmino on Tue.). SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 2 History of Polarized Anti-Protons* Early 1980‘s: CERN S pp S collider and its powerful p -source. Enabled a low-energy program at LEAR (stretcher and storage ring). First ideas by Kilian and Möhl on polarizing p ' s by Spin Filtering. Spin filtering was proposed by Shapiro in 1966 to polarize thermal neutrons by spin-dependent attenuation in a polarized hydrogen target. now standard method in neutron physics using polarized 3He gas cells First successful test reported at the Madison conference (1970): intense neutron beam from a nuclear underground explosion polarized by means of a DNP proton target. *) see Proc. of the Workshop on Polarized Antiprotons Beams –How? – AIP Conf. Proc. 1008 (2008) p.1 SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 3 Spin Filtering B.C. Diven: Nuclear Explosions as a Nuclear Physics Tool. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 20 (1970) 79. Tower above the line of sight to a nuclear explosion, housing the different experiments Five neutron beams were extracted from the nuclear explosion and utilized. The tower on rails could be withdrawn within a few minutes after the explosion from the expected region of ground collapse. In such a tower, the first Spin Filtering experiment has been performed at the end of the 1960‘s. SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 4 Workshop at Bodega Bay* List of topics discussed at the workshop: 1. Polarized antiprotons from the decay in flight of antihyperons 2. Spin filtering of antiprotons by a polarized hydrogen target in a storage ring 3. Stochastic techniques à la ‘Stochastic Cooling’ 4. DNP in flight using polarized electrons and microwave radiation 5. Spontaneous Spin-Flip synchrotron radiation 6. Spin-Flip synchrotron radiation induced by X-ray laser 7. Polarization by scattering 8. Repeated Stern-Gerlach deflection 9. Polarized antiprotons via the formation of antihydrogen and application of the ABS method 10. Polarizing during storage in a Penning trap 11. Polarizing by Channeling 12. Polarizing through interaction with polarized X-rays from a diamond crystal *) Proc. Workshop on Polarized Antiprotons, Bodega Bay, CA, 1985. A.D. Krisch, A.M.T. Lin, O. Chamberlain (Edts.), AIP Conf. Proc. 145 (1986) 207 SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 5 FILTEX CERN proposal CERN/PSCC/85-80 (Nov. 5, 1985) E. St. et al, Proc. 3rd LEAR workshop Tignes 1985, p. 245: „Proposal for measurement of spin dependence of the pp interaction at low momenta“ •Spin Filtering test experiment prepared for the Heidelberg TSR by the FILTEX collaboration (Heidelberg-Karlsruhe-MadisonMainz-Rutgers-München). •Polarized hydrogen Filter target of unprecedented density (1014 atoms/cm3) to be developed. •1992 proof-of-principle: build-up of polarization of stored 23MeV protons observed! SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 6 FILTEX test experiment at TSR (Heidelberg) • Principle of SpinFiltering • Polarized hydrogen target and detectors at the TSR • Target chamber and cooled storage cell • Result on polarization build-up (the only experimental result so far) SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 7 FILTEX test experiment at TSR (Heidelberg) • Result on polarization build-up (the only experimental result so far) • Build-up rate was ≈ 1/2 of the naive expectation (nuclear interaction only) • Quantitative explanation by H.O. Meyer and C.J. Horowitz [e.g. PRL 72 (1994) 3981]. Two more contributions introduced: from polarized electrons, and by scattering into acceptance of the storage ring • New Proposal by PAX collaboration [F. Rathmann et al, PRL 94 (2005) 014801], solely based on spin-transfer from polarized (bound) electrons: calculable interaction! more efficient! • New Proposal by Mainz group (Th. Walcher, H. Arenhövel, K. Aulenbacher et al) to utilize Spin-transfer from free positrons to co-moving antiprotons at low relative velocity [e.g. Eur. Phys. J. A34 (2007) 447] – no losses! SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 8 FAIR and PAX • FAIR: Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research – first beams in 2013(?) • Antiproton source: SIS100, production target, collector (CR) and accumulator (RESR) rings • HESR: 15GeV/c antiproton storage ring (PANDA and possibly PAX) APR • APR: Antiproton Polarizer Ring for spin filtering of antiprotons • PAX: Direct measurement of transversity in double polarized Drell-Yan (see talk Anselmino) SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 9 FILTEX test experiment at TSR (Heidelberg) •Result on polarization build-up (the only experimental result so far) • Build-up rate was ≈ 1/2 of the naive expectation (nuclear interaction only) • Quantitative explanation by H.O. Meyer and C.J. Horowitz [e.g. PRL 72 (1994) 3981]. Two more contributions introduced: from polarized electrons, and by scattering into acceptance of the storage ring •New Proposal by PAX collaboration [F. Rathmann et al, PRL 94 (2005) 014801], solely based on spin-transfer from polarized (bound) electrons: calculable interaction! more efficient! • New Proposal by Mainz group (Th. Walcher, H. Arenhövel, K. Aulenbacher et al) to utilize Spin-transfer from free positrons to co-moving antiprotons at low relative velocity [e.g. Eur. Phys. J. A34 (2007) 447] – no losses! SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 10 Polarizing Mechanisms • Trivial non-selective losses occur at gas target: single-scattering Coulomb losses. to be minimized! • Protons scattered off free electrons stay within acceptance! I/I0 a lot of open questions! 0.8 P 0.6 spin-transfer by free electrons: no losses! 0.4 0.2 0 SPIN 2008 2 4 6 t/tbeam E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 11 Recent Workshops August 29-31, 2007 – Cockcoft Institute, Daresbury (UK) Polarized Antiproton Beams – How? S. Chattopadhyay, D.P. Barber, N. Buttimore, G. Court, E. St. (Organizers) AIP Conf. Proc. 1008 (2008) June 23-25, 2008 – Physik Haus, Bad Honnef (GER) 409. WE-Heraeus-Seminar: Polarized Antiprotons P. Lenisa & F. Rathmann; talks online at http://www.fe.infn.it/heraeus/program.html SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 12 Polarized Antiproton Beams – How? Key issues • How to understand the FILTEX result? • Discussion of alternative methods. - Hosted by the Cockcroft Insitute (Daresbury Campus, Warrington, UK) - S. Chattopadhyay (Liverpool and CI) - About 30 participants and speakers S. Chattopadhyay, D.P. Barber, N. Buttimore, G. Court, E. St. (Edts.) AIP Conf. Proc. 1008 (2008) SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 13 How to explain the FILTEX results? • Clarification of possible mechanisms N. Buttimore (Dublin): Analysis of Channelling, and of polarization transfer by polarized leptons D. O‘Brien (Dublin): Analysis of spin filtering, evolution equation • Analytical calculations based on NN and el.-magn. interaction V. Strakhovenko (Novosibirsk) • Analysis of el.-magn. spin-flip amplitude K. Nikolenko (FZ Jülich - talk presented by F. Rathmann) → exact cancellation of spin-flip and ‚scattering into acceptance‘ which would eleminate Meyer‘s 1994 re-analysis of the FILEX result SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 14 Spin transfer by free polarized electron • New method proposed by T. Walcher, H. Arenhoevel et al (Mainz): Eur. Phys. J. A34 (2007) 447. • Huge spin transfer cross section (H. Arenhoevel 2007) in attractive systems like e p or e p predicted: 1013 barn at low relative velocities! • Does not contradict slow polarization build-up with polarized electrons of the H target at rest and 23MeV protons. • Would enable fast loss-free build-up of polarization! → found during the workshop: different 3-spin quantity to be calculated instead of the 2-spin quantity considered SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 15 Alternative methods Spin Splitter: separation of stored particles in opposite spin states by the repeated Stern-Gerlach effect (discussed already at Bodega Bay) D. Barber (DESY and CI): no experimental evidence yet. ‚Proofs‘ by means of simulations should be taken with great care due to the smallness of the underlying SG effect. DNP in Flight: Spin transfer between co-moving antiprotons and electrons induced by rf, analoguous to DNP. A. Krisch (Michigan): sketched a possible test set-up based on the ideas discussed at Bodega Bay (C. Jeffries). Not clear whether the conditions could be met. SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 16 Alternative methods Polarizing by Channelling through bent crystals: Idea is that due to continuous scattering to one side, a polarization of the projecnothing in common with tile is accumulated . old channelling results discussed in the past examples which M. Ukhanov (Protvino): presented numerical (M. Kaminsky 1969) would lead to high polarization – based on completely modeldependent assumptions. Experiments required! M. Fiorini (Ferrara): Experimental studies of channelling, in particular by bent crystals used for the deflection of multi-TeV ion beams (halo clearing at the LHC?). → Channelling through bent crystals works (polarization to be measured) SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 17 Cockcroft workshop: Conclusions H.-O. Meyer (Indiana) in his summary talk: Scientists have produced a large variety of polarized beams (p, n, d, 3He, 6Li, 7Li, 23Na and targets incl. 3He and Holmium! Even if polarized antiprotons offer so much resistance, we should not give up! Without empirical back-up it is equally difficult to dismiss a subject or to accept it! The only option is to improve the theoretical basis, until a supporting or refuting measurement can be identified. At present, the best bet seem to be methods involving a storage ring and an internal target. SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 18 409. WE-Heraeus-Seminar Polarized Antiprotons June 23-25, 2008 Conveners: P. Lenisa (Ferrara) and F. Rathmann (FZ Jülich) • Present understanding of Spin Filtering - Rith, Strakovenko, Walcher, Haidenbauer • Spin filtering experiments - Nekipelov, Oellers, Nass, Prasuhn, Aulenbacher, Schleichert, Belochitsky • Physics with polarized antiprotons - Koop, Ratcliffe, Melis, Tomasi-Gustafson, Kroll • Spin physics experiments - Meyer, Contalbrigo, Bradamante, Schäfer, Metz, Cisbani, Maas • Other antiproton physics topics - Knie, Shevchenko, Oelert, Lehrach, St. & Stroeher (Summary) SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 19 Heraeus Seminar: News New calculation of the relevant spin transfer cross section by Arenhoevel. Same order of magnitude found: 1013 barn = 10-11 cm2 ! • Is the numerics stable at these low relative velocities? Note that experience with electron cooling tells us that at vrel = 0 depolarization is very low! • How can a process based on dipole-dipole interaction reach out as far as rint ≈ 18nm? SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 20 Heraeus Seminar: News D. Oellers (Jülich): Measurement of the depolarizing p-e cross section using co-moving electrons (see talk F. Rathmann Tue.) • Idea: Electrons at the appropriate vrel should depolarize circulating protons at a comparable rate! • Use Cooler electrons detuned to the right vrel to check the Arenhoevel prediction. SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 21 taken from talk F. Rathmann Depolarization Studies at COSY: Idea • Use proton beam and co-moving electrons • Turn experiment around: p e p into p e p i.e. observe depolarization of a polarized proton beam COSY electron Velocity cooler (detuned) mismatch SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 22 taken from talk F. Rathmann Depolarization Studies at COSY: Results Nominal proton energy in electron rest frame (keV) 0 1 2 3 depol (barn) 4107 2107 0 -2107 -4107 0 110-3 210-3 310-3 |Relative velocity of electrons in proton rest frame| (c) No effect observed measured cross section at least 6 orders-of-magnitude smaller than predicted 1013 b Heraeus Seminar: News D. Oellers (Jülich): Measurement of the depolarizing p-e cross section using co-moving electrons (see talk F. Rathmann Tue.) •Electrons at the appropriate vrel should depolarize circulating protons at a comparable rate! • Use Cooler electrons detuned to the right vrel to check the Arenhoevel prediction. • Present results indicate that Spin Transfer from polarized free electrons to co-moving protons has a cross section of at most 107 barn. • Note that analytical calculations by the Novosibirsk group exist: effect should be negligible (see Proc. Cockcroft workshop) → Loss-free polarization build-up of protons (antiprotons) by free polarized electrons (positrons) is not an option! SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 24 Present picture • Spin Filtering of protons is solely based on NN interaction! • The build-up of ‚high‘ polarization in the order of ≥ 0.2 requires a low-beta section (b ≤ 0.3m) in order to minimize the Coulomb losses → Experimental demonstration with protons at COSY. SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 25 taken from talk F. Rathmann Spin-filtering at COSY: Optimize, understand FILTEX p pp = 0.3… GeV/c Superconducting quadrupole (new) Need a „low-ß section“ in COSY ABS + storage cell, Si-tracking det´s (HERMES) Present picture •Spin Filtering of protons is solely based on NN interaction! • The build-up of ‚high‘ polarization in the order of ≥ 0.2 requires a low-beta section (b ≤ 0.3m) in order to minimize the Coulomb losses → Experimental demonstration with protons at COSY. • The layout of an antiproton polarizer ring (APR) requires to study spin filtering of antiprotons. • The Antiproton Deccelerator ring at CERN is the only option for the near future – ongoing collaboration of PAX with AD machine physicists to work out a realistic plan. SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 27 Outlook Spin filtering studies at COSY (FZ Jülich) with protons: • determine & optimize beam lifetime: required for long filtering times (next beam time in Nov. 2008); • set up HERMES-ABS and recoil detectors (ready in 2009); • implement set-up in ring (2010-11), perform measurements. Spin filtering studies at AD (CERN) with antiprotons: • full proposal worked out and submitted to CERN, • move equipment, repeat experiments with antiprotons (≈ 2011-12): By 2012/13 we know how best to do spin-filtering with p ! • Design the APR: ready for PAX at FAIR! Let us work together in order to add a missing, very powerful instrument to our tool box! SPIN 2008 E. Steffens - Polarized Antiprotons 28