Transcript スライド 1
TCTF General Assembly Meeting
Chair’s Report
November 2010, Pattaya, Thailand
Mizuhiko HOSOKAWA, TCTF Chair
[email protected]
1. Structure of TCTF (since Nov. 2008)
· Chair: M. HOSOKAWA
Technical secretary: Y. KOYAMA (NICT)
· WG on MRA (Mutual Recognition Arrangement)
Coordinator: H. ITO (NICT)
· WG on GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System)
Coordinator: B. WARRINGTON (NMIA)
Sub-coordinator: Y. FUJII (NMIJ)
Remote calibration: M. Imae
· WG on TWSTFT (Two-Way Satellite Time and
Frequency Transfer)
Coordinator: H. MAENO (NICT)
· WG on OFM (Optical Frequency Metrology)
Coordinator: F. L. HONG (NMIJ)
(i) Review of CMCs from APMP member NMIs
· APMP.TF.8.2010
November 4, 2009 for the CMC from VMI
Intra-regional review completed on Jan. 15, 2010
Reviewed comments were received from SIM, AFRIMETS
and EURAMET in April 2010. Posted revised CMCs on
June 9, 2010.
Published the BIPM KCDB on July 20 2010.
· APMP.TF.9.2010
April 15, 2010 for the CMC from NPLI
Intra-regional review is completed on Oct. 18, 2010.
· APMP.TF.10.2010
April 15, 2010 for the CMC from A-Star
Intra-regional review is going on
2.2 WG on TWSTFT
2.3 WG on OFM
3. Conferences in the T&F research field
1) CPEM 2010 held in Korea.
2) AP-RASC’10 held for 5 days from September 22, 2010 at
Toyama International Conference Center, Toyama, Japan
Five sessions as the joint sessions of ATF2010 (Asia Pacific
Time and Frequency Workshop).
About 580 researchers participated from 29 economies in
total. Within the 519 total number of submitted papers, 46
papers related with the time and frequency metrology were
presented.
1.
TCC meeting, July 2010, Manila
Implementation of CIPM MRA
Peer reviewers to be instructed by the APMP guidelines to
include existing CMCs in the reviews.
In the case that an NMI des not submit any CMCs for 5 year,
the issue is handled through the QS review mechanism.
2.
Strategic Directions for APMP
The main focus of APMP should gradually shift towards
supporting research, developing of new technologies and new
services for industry.
Support of DEC activities
TC chairs recognise the differences in the development
status of APMP's developing economy NMIs (DENs) and try
to account for it when developing its activities.
3.
Effectiveness of APMP Meetings
Mid-year meetings :worth while to have mid-year TCCs
meeting.
On-site peer review / assessment
NMI: TC / TCQS delegate
if necessary
5 Reply
QS-1 with Evidence
CMCs with Evidence
4,11 Review results
5,12 Revision
CMC
Reviewers
2 Review
Request
7,13 Posting CMCs
Completed CMCs
RMOs
8,14 Review
Request
9,15 Review
Results
Recommended period for efficient publication
1~4:
5, 6 :
7 ~ 10 :
11, 12 :
13 ~ 17 :
Two months after CMC submission
Dependent on NMI reaction
Two months after NMI revision
Dependent on NMI reaction
One month after NMI revision
1 CMC
Submission
TC
Chair
3 Review
Results
APMP
Secretary
7
QS-7
2 Review
Request
TCQS
Chair
6 QS Approval
Notice
10 Review
Results
16 CMC Approval
Notice
4 Additional
information/questions
3 Review
Results
QS
Reviewers
QS-3
QS-7
CMC Submission
NMI action
TC Chair action
TCQS Chair action
JCRB
CMC website
JCRB
17
JCRB
MRA Appendix C – BIPM Database
APMP Secretary
action
Reviewer action
JCRB action
RMOs to/from NMI
or TC Chair
Peer Review / Assessment Team
3 On-site peer review / assessment
NMI: TC / TCQS delegate
1 Request for approval
of technical reviewers
7,14 Review
results
8,15 Revision
2 Approval of
technical reviewers
QS-1 with Evidence
CMCs with Evidence
TCQS
Chair
21 Confirmation of
CMC publication
CMC
Reviewers
5 Review
Request
10,16 Posting CMCs
Completed CMCs
11,17 Review
Request
RMOs
12,18 Review
Results
13 Review
Results
19 CMC Approval
Notice
JCRB
CMC website
5 Review
Request
6 Review
Results
QS
Reviewers
QS-3
QS-7
TC
Chair
6 Review
Results
7 Additional
information/questions
8 Reply
4 CMC Submission
9 QS Approval
Notice
APMP
Secretary
10
QS-3, QS-7
JCRB
20
JCRB
MRA Appendix C – BIPM Database
NMI action
TC Chair action
TCQS Chair action
APMP Secretary
action
Reviewer action
JCRB action
RMOs to/from NMI
or TC Chair
(if necessary)
Matters to be discussed
* CMC template
for the correct and easy estimation of uncertainties
* Peer Reviewer
Selection and Training
•Supporting research, developing of new technlogy
Workshop, communications, researcher exchange
•DEC support
What can we do?
•Supporting research, developing of new technology
Workshop, communications, researcher exchange
URSI meeting (Aug.2011), FCS/EFTF (May 2011)
•DEC support
What can we do?
training, researcher exchange,
Next TCTF chair? 2+2 -> 3+1?
•Peer Reviewer
Selection and Training
Concentration on a few person
Register potential reviewer(s) from each NMI
CMC review, contribution to CMC templates
by the person. -> proof of the review ability
Occasions for training or discussion
Request, Institute basis, not person basis
Exhibit the name of the reviewer officially ?