Transcript Tolerances Design

GATEWAY
Tolerance Design
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #1
GATEWAY
Design Specifications and Tolerance

Develop from quest for production quality and
efficiency

Early tolerances support design’s basic
function

Mass production brought interchangeability

Integrate design and mfg tolerances
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #2
GATEWAY
Definition
“The total amount by which a given
dimension may vary, or the difference
between the limits”
- ANSI Y14.5M-1982(R1988) Standard [R1.4]
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #3
Source: Tolerance Design, p 10
GATEWAY
Affected Areas
Engineering
Tolerance
Product Design
Quality Control
Manufacturing
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #4
GATEWAY
Questions

“Can customer tolerances be
accommodated by product?”

“Can product tolerances be
accommodated by the process?”
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #5
GATEWAY
Tolerance vs. Manufacturing Process

Nominal tolerances for
steel

Tighter tolerances =>
increase cost $
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #6
GATEWAY
Geometric Dimensions

Accurately communicates the function of part

Provides uniform clarity in drawing delineation
and interpretation

Provides maximum production tolerance
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #7
GATEWAY
Tolerance Types




Size
Form
Location
Orientation
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #8
GATEWAY
Size Tolerances
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #9
GATEWAY
Form Tolerances
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #10
GATEWAY
Location Tolerances
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #11
GATEWAY
Orientation Tolerances
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #12
GATEWAY
Tolerance Buildup
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #13
GATEWAY
Statistical Principles

Measurement of central tendency
 Mean
 Median
 mode

Measurement of variations
 Range
 Variance
 Standard deviation
LSL
USL
X
3s
tolerance
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #14
GATEWAY
Probability

Probability
 Likelihood of occurrence

Capability
 Relate the mean and variability of the
process or machine to the permissible
range of dimensions allowed by the
specification or tolerance.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #15
GATEWAY
Tolerance SPC Charting
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #16
Figure Source: Tolerance Design, p 125
GATEWAY
Tolerance Analysis Methods



Worst-Case analysis
Root Sum of Squares
Taguchi tolerance design
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #17
GATEWAY
Initial Tolerance Design
Initial
Tolerance
Design
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #18
Figure Source: Tolerance Design, p 93
GATEWAY
References



Handbook of Product Design for Manufacturing: A Practical Guide to
Low-Cost Production, James C. Bralla, Ed. in Chief; McGraw-Hill, 1986
Manufacturing Processes Reference Guide, R.H. Todd, D.K. Allen & L.
Alting; Industrial Press Inc., 1994
Standard tolerances for mfg processes




Machinery’s Handbook; Industrial Press
Standard Handbook of Machine Design; McGraw-Hill
Standard Handbook of Mechanical Engineers; McGraw-Hill
Design of Machine Elements; Spotts, Prentic Hall
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #19
Figure Source: Tolerance Design, p 92-93
GATEWAY
Worst-Case Methodology

Extreme or most liberal condition of tolerance
buildup

“…tolerances must be assigned to the
component parts of the mechanism in such a
manner that the probability that a mechanism
will not function is zero…”
- Evans (1974)
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #20
GATEWAY
Worst-Case Analysis
m
WC max   N p i  Tp i 
i1
m
WC min  N p i  Tp i 
i1

Ne + Te => Maximum assembly envelope
 Ne - Te => Minimum assembly envelope

Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #21
Source: “Six sigma mechanical design tolerancing”, p 13-14.
GATEWAY
Assembly gaps
m
Gmax  N e  Te   N p i  Tp i 
i1
m
Gmin  N e  Te  N p i  Tp i 

i1
m
Gnom  N e  N p i 

i1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #22
GATEWAY
Worst Case Scenario Example
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #23
Source: Tolerance Design, pp 109-111
GATEWAY
Worst Case Scenario Example
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #24
Source: Tolerance Design, pp 109-111
GATEWAY
Worst Case Scenario Example
• Largest => 0.05 + 0.093 = 0.143
• Smallest => 0.05 - 0.093 = -0.043
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #25
Source: Tolerance Design, pp 109-111
GATEWAY
Non-Linear Tolerances
y  f (x1, x 2 , x 3,...x n )
f
f
f
f
Toly 
tol1 
tol2 
tol3  ...
toln
x1
x 2
x 3
x n

f
f
f
f
Nomy 
x1 
x2 
x 3  ...
xn
x1
x 2
x 3
x n
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #26
Wource: “Six sigma mechanical design tolerancing”, p 104
GATEWAY
Root Sum-of-Square


RSS
Assumes normal distribution behavior
1
(1/ 2)[x  )/s ]2
f (x) 
e
s 2

Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #27
Wource: “Six sigma mechanical design tolerancing”, p 16
GATEWAY
RSS method

Assembly tolerance stack equation
f (x)  T  T  T  ...T
2
1
2
2
2
3
2
n
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #28
Wource: “Six sigma mechanical design tolerancing”, p 128
GATEWAY
Pool Variance in RSS
s adjusted
 s

Tol

3Cp
gap
2
 Tpi 
 Te 
 

  
3Cp  i1 3Cpi 
2
m
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #29
Wource: “Six sigma mechanical design tolerancing”, p 128
GATEWAY
Probability
ZQ 

ZQ 
Q  Gnom
s gap
m


Q  N e   N pi 


i1
2


 Te 
Tpi


  
3Cp  i1 3Cpi 
2
m
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #30
Wource: “Six sigma mechanical design tolerancing”, p 128
GATEWAY
Probability for Limits
ZG min 

ZG max 
Gmin  Gnom
2
 Te 2 m  Tpi 


  
3Cp  i1 3Cpi 
Gmax  Gnom
2
 Te 2 m  Tpi 


  
3Cp  i1 3Cpi 
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #31
Wource: “Six sigma mechanical design tolerancing”, p 128
GATEWAY
Dynamic RSS
ZG min 

ZG max 
Gmin  Gnom
2
 Te 2 m  Tpi 


  
3Cpk  i1 3Cpki 
Gmax  Gnom
2
 Te 2 m  Tpi 


  
3Cpk  i1 3Cpki 
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
 Sl. #32
Wource: “Six sigma mechanical design tolerancing”, p 128
GATEWAY
Nonlinear RSS
2
2
2
2
f  2 f  2 f  2
 f 
Toly    tol1    tol2    tol3  ...   toln
x1 
x 2 
x 3 
x n 
s adjusted
Toli

3Cpki
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University

Sl. #33
Wource: “Six sigma mechanical design tolerancing”, p 128
GATEWAY
RSS Example
• Largest => 0.05 + 0.051 = 0.101
• Smallest => 0.05 - 0.051 = -0.001
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #34
Wource: “Six sigma mechanical design tolerancing”, p 128
GATEWAY
Taguchi Method
Input from the voice of the customer and QFD processes
Select proper quality-loss function for the design
Determine customer tolerance values for terms
in Quality Loss Function
Determine cost to business to adjust
Calculate Manufacturing Tolerance
Proceed to tolerance design
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #35
Wource: “Six sigma mechanical design tolerancing”, p 21
GATEWAY
Taguchi



Voice of customer
Quality function deployment
Inputs from parameter design
 Optimum control-factor set points
 Tolerance estimates
 Initial material grades
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #36
Wource: “Six sigma mechanical design tolerancing”, p 22
GATEWAY
Quality Loss Function


Identify customer costs for intolerable performance
Quadratic quality loss function
Ao
L(y)  k(y  m) 
(y  m) 2
o
2

Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #37
Wource: “Six sigma mechanical design tolerancing”, p 208
GATEWAY
Cost of Off Target and Sensitivity


Cost to business to adjust off target
performance
Sensitivity, b

Ao
A
Ao
2
A  [b (x  m)]



Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #38
Wource: “Six sigma mechanical design tolerancing”, p 226-227
GATEWAY
Manufacturing Tolerance


Sl. #39
Ao  o 
 
A  b 
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
GATEWAY
Summary


Importance of effective tolerances
Tolerance Design Approaches
 Worst-Case analysis
 Root Sum of Squares
 Taguchi tolerance method


Continual process
Involvement of multi-disciplines
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #40
GATEWAY
Credits

This module is intended as a supplement to design classes in
mechanical engineering. It was developed at The Ohio State
University under the NSF sponsored Gateway Coalition (grant
EEC-9109794). Contributing members include:

Gary Kinzel…………………………………. Project supervisor
Phuong Pham.……………. ………………... Primary author

Reference:
“Six Sigma Mechanical Design Tolerancing”, Harry, Mikel J. and Reigle
Stewart, Motorola Inc. , 1988.
Creveling, C.M., Tolerance Design, Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1997.
Wade, Oliver R., Tolerance Control in Design and Manufacturing,
Industrial Press Inc., New York, 1967.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #41
GATEWAY
Disclaimer
This information is provided “as is” for general educational purposes;
it can change over time and should be interpreted with regards to this
particular circumstance. While much effort is made to provide
complete information, Ohio State University and Gateway do not
guarantee the accuracy and reliability of any information contained or
displayed in the presentation. We disclaim any warranty, expressed or
implied, including the warranties of fitness for a particular purpose.
We do not assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy,
completeness, reliability, timeliness or usefulness of any information,
or processes disclosed. Nor will Ohio State University or Gateway be
held liable for any improper or incorrect use of the information
described and/or contain herein and assumes no responsibility for
anyone’s use of the information. Reference to any specific commercial
product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacture, or
otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Sl. #42