Title Goes Here - University of Oxford
Download
Report
Transcript Title Goes Here - University of Oxford
Maryland Regional Workforce Housing Fund
Leadership Forum
June 7, 2006
PRESENTATION AGENDA
MARYLAND REGIONAL WORKFORCE HOUSING FUND
(“MRWH”)
1.
Enterprise: Background and Expertise
2.
MRWH Fund: Opportunity and Need
3.
MRWH Fund: Investment
4.
MRWH Fund: Investment Process
5.
MRWH Fund: Investment Benefits
6.
MRWH Fund: Management Team
7.
Next Steps
8.
Example of an “Award Winning Community”
9.
Contact Information
ENTERPRISE: BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE
Chosen by the 9 funders of the Phase I Market Assessment to oversee the
creation and implementation of the Fund
Headquartered in Maryland, with extensive investment, development, and
lending expertise in the local region
Products and services that address all needs related to affordable housing and
community development
capital and funding
• tax-credit equity
• senior debt
• mezzanine debt
• grants
programmatic models and expertise
Works closely with local, state and federal elected officials and policymakers
ENTERPRISE: BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE
One of the leading advocates for policy in support of affordable and
workforce housing and community development
Will ensure:
continued community input
deal outreach/sourcing in Fund’s footprint
necessary “tools” for challenging deals
Investing in communities at the rate of approximately $1 billion a year
$6 billion invested in communities over the past 23 years, yielding more than
175,000 affordable homes
Catalyst for LIHTC legislation - the public-private model for affordable
housing financing that is responsible for virtually all affordable multifamily
housing being created today
Created/presently developing more than 4,500 homeownership and rental
residences for individuals and families of diverse income, age and culture
FUND OPPORTUNITY AND NEED
2003, Governor Ehrlich created the Governor’s Commission on Housing Policy
to address housing issues
shortage of workforce housing
need for initiatives to create sustainable communities
2004, Final report supported the creation of an equity Family of Funds
workforce housing for people who cannot afford to live in the cities and
counties in which they work
community revitalization initiatives to address the overwhelming need in
Maryland, Washington, D.C. and Northern Virginia
Low levels of supply and high levels of demand for new housing affordable to
“working families”
households earning 80% to 120% of the AMI
high project costs faced by developers
growing population
upward pressure on housing prices and rents
lack of innovative financing sources for developers
FUND OPPORTUNITY AND NEED
Maryland ranks second nationally in commuting times
More than one million new Marylanders are expected in the next 25 years
From 2000 to 2005:
median home price in Maryland increased 102% to $363,125
median household income for four person families increased 17% to $77,938
From 1998 to 2005:
MD average weekly earnings increased 4.1% annually (U.S. average - 3.9%)
MD average house price increased 23.8% annually (U.S. average - 14.1%)
Maryland needs to increase net supply of housing by at least 27,500 units by 2010
to cover shortage in housing units projected
Statistics cited from: “Why Housing May Replace Healthcare as Our Region’s Leading Affordability Issue,”
Anirban Basu, Sage Policy Group, Inc., March 15, 2006 and the U.S. Census Bureau website,
http://www.census.gov/hhes/income/4person.html
THE INVESTMENT
Developments that achieve double bottom line objectives:
risk-adjusted market rates-of-return for investors (the first bottom line)
measurable job and wealth creation, and community revitalization for
community stakeholders (the second bottom line)
Fund Size:
$100 million
Individual Investment:
$2 million to $20 million
Total Development Cost:
$10 million to $50 million
Development Type:
For-sale and rental housing targeted at working residents
Household incomes in the 80%-120% range of AMI
• single family homes
• condominiums
• town homes
• live/work lofts
• apartments
New construction, rehabilitation, and adaptive reuse
THE INVESTMENT
Location:
Low-moderate and mixed-income communities
Urban, suburban, and rural areas
Maryland, Washington D.C. and Northern Virginia
Structure:
Equity, preferred equity, and mezzanine debt
Targeted internal rate of return in the mid-teens
Preferred distributions to Investors
Significant percentage of the “at risk” capital required in qualifying
developments
Projected term of 3 to 5 years
INVESTMENT PROCESS
Investment Sourcing:
Enterprise offices in Baltimore, Columbia and Washington, D.C.
Substantial Developer Relationships
Vast Lender Network
Industry Association Memberships
Investor Referrals
Rigorous Investment Underwriting:
Executive Summary
Economic/Social Impact Analysis
Development Feasibility/Risk Analysis
Market and Demographic Analysis
Key Party Analysis – Credit and Experience
Consistency with Fund Underwriting Guidelines
Conclusions/Recommendations
INVESTMENT PROCESS
Investment Approval and Performance Monitoring
Committee comprised of 6 Enterprise senior executives:
Development Feasibility
Consistency with Fund Mission
Minimum Yield Thresholds
Community Impact
LMI Investment Area
Community Support
Exception Approval and Performance Review
Committee comprised of investors holding $10 million or greater:
Compliance with Overall Fund Parameters
Compliance with Investment Parameter Targets
Periodic Reporting and Review
INVESTMENT BENEFITS
Economic Benefits
Deliver market rates of return in the mid-teens
Priority return to investors
Diversified portfolio within a well-capitalized fund
Partnerships with experienced real estate underwriters and developers
Social Benefits
Foster vibrant and healthy communities by increasing the jobs/workforce
housing balance
Effectuate economically viable developments to address the
overwhelming need for workforce housing and bolster community
revitalization and stabilization
Encourage the integration of mixed-income and mixed-use
neighborhoods
Positive Public Relations
Public recognition of participation in prominent regional investment
vehicle
Maximize the use of existing resources and reduce development pressure
on less urbanized areas
Significant public-private partnerships
Positive Community Reinvestment Act consideration
ENTERPRISE FUND MANAGEMENT TEAM
Charlie Werhane, Vice Chairman and Chief Operations Officer
Enterprise Community Investment
Capital Raising, Fund Oversight
Chickie Grayson, President
Enterprise Homes, Inc.
Capital Raising, Development Expertise
Joe Wesolowski, Senior Vice President
Enterprise Community Investment
Capital Raising, Asset Management, Operations
Christine Madigan, Vice President
Enterprise Homes, Inc.
Capital Raising, Fund Strategy, Deal Structuring, Oversight
Edie Loughlin, Director
Enterprise Community Investment
Deal Sourcing, Deal Structuring, Deal Closing
NEXT STEPS
Finalize MRWH Fund legal documents
Finalize MRWH Fund marketing materials
Develop investment pipeline
Obtain investor commitments
First close of MRWH Fund
Close of initial workforce housing development investments
AWARD WINNING COMMUNITY EXAMPLE
WATERVIEW
Developed by a partnership between Enterprise
Homes, Inc. and a private, local builder
Located in Middle River, Baltimore County, MD,
on a 63 acre site that was a former failed FHA
apartment project razed by the County
New urbanist street plan; 175 detached,
homeownership units; 100,000 sf. community
shopping center, community green space
$48 million Total Development Cost
Equity/Mezzanine: $1 million
Greater than 15% ROE realized to date
The Results:
Recognized by Baltimore Magazine as one
of the “Best Places To Live” in 2005
Homebuilders Association of Maryland,
Award of Excellence, Project of the Year
(2003)
Strong catalyst for redevelopment in the
area
Homeownership for the County’s
Workforce offering units affordable to those
in the 80% - 150% AMI range, with the
majority in the 80% - 115% range.
THANK YOU
Christine Madigan
Vice President
Enterprise
410-332-7400
[email protected]
Joe Wesolowski
Senior Vice President
Enterprise
410-772-2512
[email protected]