THERMAL PROCESSES
Download
Report
Transcript THERMAL PROCESSES
Fick’s Laws
Combining the continuity equation with the first
law, we obtain Fick’s second law:
c
c
D 2
t
x
2
Solutions to Fick’s Laws depend on the
boundary conditions.
Assumptions
– D is independent of concentration
– Semiconductor is a semi-infinite slab with either
Continuous supply of impurities that can move into
wafer
Fixed supply of impurities that can be depleted
Solutions To Fick’s Second Law
The simplest solution is
at steady state and there
is no variation of the
concentration with time
– Concentration of diffusing
impurities is linear over
distance
This was the solution for
the flow of oxygen from
the surface to the Si/SiO2
interface in the last
chapter
c
D 2 0
x
2
c( x) a bx
Solutions To Fick’s Second Law
For a semi-infinite slab with a constant
(infinite) supply of atoms at the surface
x
c( x, t ) co erfc
2 Dt
The dose is
Q cx, t dx 2c0 Dt
0
Solutions To Fick’s Second Law
Complimentary error function (erfc) is
defined as erfc(x) = 1 - erf(x)
The error function is defined as
erf ( z )
2
exp d
z
2
0
– This is a tabulated function. There are
several approximations. It can be found as a
built-in function in MatLab, MathCad, and
Mathematica
Solutions To Fick’s Second Law
This solution models short diffusions from
a gas-phase or liquid phase source
Typical solutions have the following shape
Impurity concentration, c(x)
c0
c ( x, t )
D3t3 > D2t2 > D1t1
1
2
cB
Distance from surface, x
3
Solutions To Fick’s Second Law
Constant source diffusion
has a solution of the form
Here, Q is the does or the
total number of dopant
atoms diffused into the Si
Q
c( x, t )
e
Dt
Q c ( x, t )dx
0
The surface concentration
is given by:
Q
c(0, t )
Dt
x2
4 Dt
Solutions To Fick’s Second Law
Limited source diffusion looks like
Impurity concentration, c(x)
c01
c ( x, t )
c02
D3t3 > D2t2 > D1t1
c03
1
2
cB
Distance from surface, x
3
Comparison of limited source
and constant source models
1
10-1
_
exp(-x 2 )
Value of functions
10-2
_
erfc( x)
10-3
10-4
10-5
10-6
0
0.5
1
_ 1.5_
Normalized distance from surface, x x
2 x
2 Dt
2.5
3
3.5
Predep and Drive
Predeposition
– Usually a short diffusion using a constant
source
Drive
– A limited source diffusion
The diffusion dose is generally the dopants
introduced into the semiconductor during the
predep
A Dteff is not used in this case.
Diffusion Coefficient
Probability of a jump is
Pj Pv Pm
e
E f kT
e Em
kT
Diffusion coefficient is proportional to jump
probability
D D0e
E D kT
Diffusion Coefficient
Typical diffusion coefficients in silicon
Element Do (cm2/s) ED (eV)
B
10.5
3.69
Al
8.00
3.47
Ga
3.60
3.51
In
16.5
3.90
P
10.5
3.69
As
0.32
3.56
Sb
5.60
3.95
Diffusion Of Impurities In Silicon
Arrhenius plots of diffusion in silicon
Temperature (o C)
10-9
1400 1300 1200 1100
Temperature (o C)
1000
1200 1100 1000 900
10-4
800
700
10-10
Diffusion coefficient, D (cm2/sec)
Diffusion coefficient, D (cm2/sec)
10-5
10-11
10-12
Al
10-13
In
0.7
10-7
10-8
0.6
As
0.65
Cu
Ga
Sb
0.6
Fe
Au
B,P
10-14
Li
10-6
0.75
0.7
0.8
0.9
Temperature, 1000/T
0.8
Temperature, 1000/T (K-1)
0.85
1.0
(K-1)
1.1
Diffusion Of Impurities In Silicon
The intrinsic carrier concentration in Si is
about 7 x 1018/cm3 at 1000 oC
– If NA and ND are <ni, the material will behave
as if it were intrinsic; there are many practical
situations where this is a good assumption
Diffusion Of Impurities In Silicon
Dopants cluster into “fast” diffusers (P, B,
In) and “slow” diffusers (As, Sb)
– As we develop shallow junction devices, slow
diffusers are becoming very important
– B is the only p-type dopant that has a high
solubility; therefore, it is very hard to make
shallow p-type junctions with this fast diffuser
Limitations of Theory
Theories given here break down at high
concentrations of dopants
– ND or NA >> ni at diffusion temperature
If there are different species of the same atom
diffuse into the semiconductor
– Multiple diffusion fronts
Example: P in Si
– Diffusion mechanism are different
Example: Zn in GaAs
– Surface pile-up vs. segregation
B and P in Si
Successive Diffusions
To create devices, successive diffusions of nand p-type dopants
– Impurities will move as succeeding dopant or
oxidation steps are performed
The effective Dt product is
( Dt)eff D1 (t1 t2 ) D1t1 D1t2
– No difference between diffusion in one step or in
several steps at the same temperature
If diffusions are done at different
temperatures
( Dt)eff D1t1 D2t2
Successive Diffusions
The effective Dt product is given by
Dteff Di ti
i
Di and ti are the diffusion coefficient and time
for ith step
– Assuming that the diffusion constant is only a
function of temperature.
– The same type of diffusion is conducted (constant
or limited source)
Junction Formation
When diffuse n- and p-type materials, we
create a pn junction
– When ND = NA , the semiconductor material is
compensated and we create a metallurgical
junction
– At metallurgical junction the material behaves
intrinsic
– Calculate the position of the metallurgical
junction for those systems for which our
analytical model is a good fit
Junction Formation
Formation of a pn junction by diffusion
Impurity
Net impurity
concentration
|N(x) - NB |
concentration
N(x)
N0
(log scale)
N0 - NB
p-type Gaussian diffusion
(boron)
n-type silicon
(log scale)
p-type
region
background
NB
n-type region
xj
Distance from surface, x
xj
Distance from surface, x
Junction Formation
The position of the junction for a limited
source diffused impurity in a constant
background is given by
x j 2 Dt ln N 0 N
B
The position of the junction for a
continuous source diffused impurity is
given by
1 N
x j 2 Dt erfc
B
N0
Junction Formation
Junction Depth
Lateral Diffusion
Design and Evaluation
There are three parameters that define a
diffused region
– The surface concentration
– The junction depth
– The sheet resistance
These parameters are not independent
Irvin developed a relationship that describes
1
these parameters S 1
x
xj
q n( x) N B n( x)dx
j
0
Irvin’s Curves
In designing processes, we need to use all
available data
– We need to determine if one of the analytic
solutions applies
For example,
– If the surface concentration is near the solubility limit,
the continuous (erf) solution may be applied
– If we have a low surface concentration, the limited
source (Gaussian) solution may be applied
Irvin’s Curves
If we describe the dopant profile by either the
Gaussian or the erf model
– The surface concentration becomes a parameter in
this integration
– By rearranging the variables, we find that the surface
concentration and the product of sheet resistance and
the junction depth are related by the definite integral
of the profile
There are four separate curves to be evaluated
– one pair using either the Gaussian or the erf
function, and the other pair for n- or p-type materials
because the mobility is different for electrons and
holes
Irvin’s Curves
Irvin’s Curves
An alternative way of presenting the data
may be found if we set eff=1/sxj