The California Integrated Seismic Network: Project Status

Program Management Group Presented to CISN Steering and Advisory Committees at UC Berkeley, 30 August 2006

Quick Review of Technical Status

Statewide Monitoring

Inventory

Urban Strong Motion Broadband + Strong Motion Short Period + Strong Motion Analog Short Period Borehole Geotechnical Arrays Buildings Bridges Dams Others Others

New/Upgraded/Moved in 2006

UCB (USArray) NCSN (SAFOD) SCSN (USArray) CGS (reference/structures) 974 208 77 500 51 22 221 70 26 13 13 3 4 7 18/34

Focused Urban Monitoring

Dual Data Transmission

• CGS CIT – 5 strong motion stations in metropolitan Los Angeles region • UCB CIT – 30 strong motion & broadband stations statewide – Goal to exchange 60 stations

CISN Backbone

• 5 dedicated T1 links • Auto-failover to Internet via IP tunnels • Monitoring/alarming software operational • Networks now exchanging CISN seismic data

Integration and Standardization

• Real and near real-time integration of parametric and waveform data from 13 seismic networks – PG&E as of 8/17/2006 – Calpine soon?

• Developing software to integrate of CGS, CI/USGS, NCSN, and UCB real-time systems

CISN Webpage

Progress toward Statewide Monitoring through CISN Software

•

Same software across CISN means

: – Same configurations, same products – Full parametric exchange – All waveforms used (including NSMP, CGS) – New methods easier to implement – Failover behavior can be modeled and understood •

Melding of many complex systems

– Earthworm front-end – TriNet back-end – NCEDC/SCEDC data archiving – Java, C, C++, Perl, SQL, Fortran, Solaris, Windows, Oracle, etc..

•

Code is now developed by all partners

– An example of how CISN works well – An example of how CISN doesn’t work well

SCSN: RT system

Menlo Park

NC ≠ SC

Berkeley • Network split across the SF Bay – Requirement for robust operation if one half fails • Different systems – Field hardware – Telemetry – Institutions – Software • Cannot compute ML for all quakes

• • • • • • •

Required development for NC implementation

Replaced proprietary messaging software with CMS software Implementation of “location” codes (statewide) Station metadata Proxy waveserver Implementation of Md in Trinet software ML calibration (statewide) Testing, testing, testing

NCSS Software Transition Status

• Post-processing – Prototype functional as of July, 2006 – Md implemented and Q/C’ed – SNC → SNCL ready – Testing and training – 10/15/2006 switch • Real-time processing – After post-processing switch – Conversion of alarming software – New quick-review – Testing – 12/31/2006 switch

CISN: Statewide Version 1.0

• • • • •

Will rely on three real-time services:

– Continuous “reduced” amplitude exchange – “Pick” exchange – Proxy waveserver for post-processing

Real-time alarming

– NC and SC will each alarm for their authoritative box for M<4.0 and statewide for M≥4.0. – The QDM filter will post the first solution, which in some cases may be superseded by the authoritative solution, or possibly NEIC.

Statewide ShakeMap

– Produce statewide ShakeMap at three centers (PAS, MP/BK, and CGS). – Operate one statewide web portal for ShakeMap

Post-Processing and Archiving

– Each center (PAS and MP/BK) will post-process and archive parameters and waveforms in it's region of responsibility. – CGS will post-process and distribute SM data and engineering quick reports.

Timeline: Prototype by 30 June 2007

Budget and Funding

Funding Status (review)

• The CISN Strategic Plan goals were established for the level of funding that we anticipated in 2001. • At its inception in 2001 the CISN asked OES for $6.6M per year. – This funding was cut to and has remained at the $2.4M per year for the last three years. • Full ANSS funding expected in 2001 and subsequent years has not occurred. – level-funding for CIT, UCB, and USGS NCSN/SCSN and NSMP network operations for the last three years

CISN 2005 Funding Overview

• USGS/ANSS $7.7M – NCSN (USGS Menlo Park) – UCB/REDI and UCB/NCEDC – SCSN (Caltech & USGS Pasadena) SCEDC – UCLA (Factor) – UCSD (Anza) – NSMP apportioned • OES $2.4M – Caltech – UCB – CGS • CGS/CSMIP $5.4M – Buildings – Lifelines – Ground response (~1/3 of budget effort) • UC Berkeley $0.5M • SCEC $0.15M • Caltech ~$0.2M • USArray ~$0.2M • NOAA - $0.1M

CISN Funding

CGS $5.4M OES $2.4M

14% 32% 46% USGS $7.7M

UC Berkeley $0.5M

SCEC $0.15M

Caltech $0.2M

USArray $0.2M

NOAA $0.1M

Total ~$16.65M

CISN Expenditures

Expenditures for California Seismic Monitoring

Operate and maintain stations 47% DataCenters 9% 12% Real-time operations and response 15% 7% 10% Management New/Upgraded stations Process improvement new products

New Developments

CISN Display

• V1.3 released 8/29/2006 – “Web services” support – Better GIS layers – Email integration – Scale dependent GIS layers – Sort on magnitude – Events with tsunami info tagged • ~420 users registered • ~75 users connected

Connected Users of CISN Display • abc.com • atsb-malaysia.com.my • BNSF.com

• dot.ca.gov

• calquake.com • cityofalhambra.org

• co.monterey.ca.us • co.sanmateo.ca.us • conservation.ca.gov • dogami.state.or.us

• dot.ca.gov

• emd.wa.gov

• hko.gov.hk

• kmi.com

• lacofd.org • meteorology.gov.mv

• morganhill.ca.gov

• mwdh2o.com

• nbcuni.com

• noaa.gov

• oes.ca.gov

• rdmd.ocgov.com

• redlandspolice.org

• scd.hawaii.gov

• semprautilites.com

• solanocounty.com

• tribune.com

• usace.army.mil

• water.ca.gov

• wsdot.wa.gov

ENS:

Earthquake Notification System • User-configurable E-mail & SMS messages • Adopted by ANSS • 41,000+ users

CISN Alert Map (prototype)

CISN and EarthScope

• USArray – Data Sharing from existing stations – Sharing of technology • SAFOD – Data recording by NCSN – Data archiving at NCEDC • Plate Boundary Observatory – Borehole stations near fault zones – GPS

CISN/USGS/SCEC Collaboration on Earthquake Early Warning

• CISN – Provide waveforms and implement front end processing • Caltech/USGS/ UC Berkeley – Development and testing of individual algorithms • SCEC – Comparison of performance of algorithms – Testing for great earthquakes using synthetics

Conversion of NCSN backbone telemetry

• Data collected at nodes • Analog telemetry precluded upgrades • Mix of satellite, leased land lines, and microwave • 6 year project

NetQuakes

RFP

• USGS SEED funding to develop new SM instrumentation for urban areas • Designed to accelerate rate of new installations • Current bottlenecks – Purchase Cost – Permitting – Installation – Telemetry costs

200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 19 70 19 73 19 76 19 79 19 82 19 85 19 88 19 91 19 94

Time

19 97 20 00 20 03 3600 more stations needed to achieve

Vision 2005

goal of 5500 stations It will take ~70 years at this rate CI BK NC NP CE

NetQuakes hardware

• COTS computer hardware (~$500) – Removable memory cards – Full O/S (Linux?) – Wireless (802.11g) capability – AC power with modest battery backup – No GPS – NTP synchronization (±10 msec accuracy) • ANSS TIC WG-D Class “C-B” hardware (~$300) – Digitizer: ≥ 16bits resolution – Sensor: ≥ 87dB dynamic range over 0.1-35Hz

Functionality

• Triggered only • Data queued until successfully uploaded • Uploaded data used when event is detected by regional seismic network • Periodic SOH messages issued • Periodic queries to check for new software • Periodic NTP synchronization • Ability to add new algorithms

Installation and Servicing

• Volunteer hosts solicited • Technician installs device – Bolt cradle, orient device, configure device, determine GPS coordinates • Hosts swap out batteries and bad units (not technicians)

NetQuakes Status

• Proposals from vendors due 9/6/2006 • Award to be made by 9/26/2006 – At least 3 prototypes – Up to 250 more units • Prototypes due no later than 6/30/2007 • Goal is 100+ new urban SM stations/year