Transcript Document
Mainstreaming adaptation to climate in the Caribbean MACC Roger S. Pulwarty NOAA University of Colorado [email protected] “If we are not careful we will end up where we are going” Characteristics of small island environments • Ecological/environmental characteristics • Geographical characteristics • Socio-economic characteristics • Historical and political characteristics Caribbean Region Freshwater lens typical of small, low-lying carbonate islands showing disruption of the freshwater/saltwater interface by pumping wells Countries Internal renewable water resources per capita (cubic metres per year), 2000. Belize 69565 Barbados 303 Antigua y Barbuda 770 Domin ica . Grenada . Guyana 281542 Jamaica 3640 Trinidad 3869 Haiti 1,473 World To tal 7,122 Renewable Water Resources in Selected Caribbean States Root causes include: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Limited communication and collaboration between various sectors; fragmented approach to environmental management Weak institutional arrangements Poor-enforcement of existing legislation & regulations Limited understanding of the environmental impacts and economic losses consequent upon improper waste disposal Limited human resource availability Weak agricultural extension: Poor agricultural practices Limited information on alternative practices Limited investments in best practices for waste treatment and disposal Lack of public awareness and education Inefficient water use Lack of knowledge or culture of water conservation Service cost recovery schemes and market practices that do not encourage conservation Population growth, urbanisation Rural/urban economic inequities Inadequate development planning Non-existent, inadequate, or unreliable data Assessment: What do we know and how well do we know it? Sensitivity of bio-geophysical system Degree of social vulnerability • • • • Risk - physical and natural systems TAR Exposure Social and economic drivers and conditioning factors Existing Adjustment/Adaptive Capacity AR4 AR4 The Asipu A group of priests in the Tigris-Euphrates valley 2500-3000 BC • • • • Hazard identification Data collection and analysis Generation of alternatives Report creation Mainstreaming…. • GOAL: to develop usable decision support information and tools to assist civic and business leaders in making critical decisions to mitigate climate hazards in regions of high consequence • OBJECTIVES: to adapt and advance vulnerability assessment methods that explicitly incorporate uncertainty and risk into system performance, technology assessment and investment strategies Integrated approach to climate risk management Resources Vulnerability Capability Physical/material What hazards,skills, productive resources exist? Social/Organizational What are the relations and organizations among people? Behavioral/Incentives How does the community view its ability to create change? Capabilities and vulnerabilities matrix (Anderson and Woodrow, 1989) CARICOM: The recipient as manager • Antigua & Barbuda; The Bahamas; Barbados; Belize; Dominica; DR; Grenada; Guyana; Jamaica; St. Kitts and Nevis; St. Lucia; St. Vincent & the Grenadines; Trinidad & Tobago) • Focus on the integration of climate variability and change concerns into planning and practices of highly vulnerable sectors (tourism, water, fisheries and agriculture) and the line agencies that support them. Disasters Meteorological extreme events • Integrate into existing approaches: IWM, ICZM Elements of adaptive management • Recognition of scientific and management complexity and uncertainty /with practitioners • Directive and/or need for action • Implement management actions to address resource problems as experiments • Monitor and evaluate effects of action/experiments (what works, what does not) • Develop integrated models for watershed interactions, legal and cultural requirements etc. • Develop experiments in a participatory process involving a key parties (transactions costs) Are small states different? Hurricane Andrew vs. Hurricane Gilbert Coun t ry Ag. P ro d. %GDP FPI 1 9 97 % of 1 9 89-9 1 API 1 9 97 % of 8 9-9 1 Fertilizer change f rom av g. 8 0-9 8 I rrig ated % Arabl e Lan d 1 9 97(8 0) Forest Annua l % change 1 9 90-9 5 Tour Resid ratio 1 9 90 Antigu a/Ba rbud a 4 .2 9 8 .1 9 8 .6 . .. 0 .0 3 .6 Bah amas . 1 4 3. 6 1 4 8. 5 0 .2 5 .. -2 .6 5 .6 Ba rbados 5 .8 1 0 5. 7 9 7 .2 0 .5 5 5 .9(5 .9) .. 1 1 .0 Beliz e 2 0 .5 1 6 8. 0 1 5 3. 5 2 .5 3 3 .4(1 .9) -0 .3 Domin ica 1 7 .7 9 7 .5 8 5 .2 1 .0 0 .. 0 .0 0 .9 Gr enad a 1 2 .2 9 2 .7 8 9 .7 . .. 0 .0 1 .2 Guyan a 3 6 .0 1 9 3. 9 1 7 5. 2 2 .4 5 2 6 .2(2 5 .3) .. Jamaica 7 .2 1 1 8. 0 1 1 8. 6 1 .2 5 1 2 .0(1 3 .8) -7 .2 0 .5 St.Kitts/Nevis 5 .9 1 3 2. 2 1 1 8. 6 -0 .1 9 .. 0 .0 0 .2 St. Lucia 1 6 .2 6 0 .5 1 1 3. 1 1 5 .9 1 7 .6(5 .9) -3 .6 1 .7 St.Vincent/Gr en. 1 9 .3 8 2 .2 7 7 .2 0 .7 6 9 .1(1 0 .0) 0 .0 0 .6 Tr inidad /Tobago Car ibbean I sland s 2 .0 1 0 2. 6 8 6 .9 1 .3 4 1 8 .0(1 8 .1) -1 .5 0 .2 1 3 .9 8 0 .7 8 1 .7 0 .5 9 1 8 .2(1 7 .5 -1 .7 Selected trends in agriculture, food production, forestry and tourism in the Caribbean (Data is for 1999 unless noted otherwise) Top 20 countries “vulnerable” to natural hazards depending on index Rank Damage >1%GNP 1970-89 1 Vanuatu 228 2 Nic 207 3 Bfaso 191 4 Domin 119 5 CookI 92 6 Chad 84 7 Boliv 81 8 St. Lucia 67 9 Yemen 67 10 Jam 64 11 Comor 61 12 Ethiop 61 13 El Sal 52 14 Ban 50 15 Tong 50 16 Toke 50 17 Maurita 41 18 Mauriti 41 19 Ant&Bar 38 20 St. V/Gr 36 Population affected% 1970-96 Vanuatu 727 Ban 539 Tong 532 Ind 510 Bah 491 Maurita 487 Ant&Bar 431 Bots 418 Mozam 361 Gamb 339 Swazi 304 Fiji 296 Domin 262 SaoT&P 245 Chad 242 Sen 233 Gren 228 China 223 SolomI 214 Niger 206 Number of disasters relative to land area 1970-96 Tonga 1.00 St,Vin 0.67 Barb 0.46 St.K/N 0.45 Mald 0.44 St.Lucia 0.37 Domin 0.35 Ant&Bar 0.30 Gren 0.29 Mauriti 0.22 Como 0.16 SaoT&P 0.17 CapeV 0.13 Re 0.09 Kiri 0.09 Vanuatu 0.08 Jam 0.06 Fiji 0.06 Gamb 0.05 TnT 0.05 Data from UNDRO 2000 Terminology • Hazard- A potentially damaging physical event, phenomenon and/or human activity which may cause the loss of life, injury, property damage, social and economic disruption and environmental degradation • Vulnerability-Set of conditions and processes resulting from physical, social, economic, environmental factors (and development decisions) which increase the susceptibility of community (or project) to the impact of hazards • Risk-Probability of harmful consequences and expected loss resulting from interaction between natural or human hazards and vulnerable conditions. Risk if a function of hazard and vulnerability Vulnerability ….. f(exposure, sensitivity, adaptive capacity) Risk…………….. f(V,H) Formalizing vulnerability assessment The vulnerability of a sector relying on a particular ecosystem service in an area under a certain scenario at a certain point in time. Potential impacts are a function of exposure and sensitivity (2) Therefore, vulnerability is a function of potential impacts and adaptive capacity(3): V(es, x, s, t) = ƒ( E(es, x, s, t), S(es, x, s, t), AC(es, x, s, t) ) (1) • PI(es, x, s, t) = ƒ( E(es, x, s, t),S(es, x, s, t) ) (2) • V(es, x, s, t) = ƒ( PI(es, x, s, t), AC(es, x, s, t) ) (3) where V = vulnerability, E = exposure, S = sensitivity, AC = adaptive capacity and PI = potential impact, es =ecosystem service, x = a grid cell, s = a scenario, t = a time slice (Sref) is • calculated, giving a stratified value with a 0–1 range for ecosystem service sensitivity in the gri cell: Sstr(es, x, s, t) = S(es, x, s, t) / Sref(es, enc, x, s, t) where Sstr = stratified sensitivity, S = sensitivity Sref = highest achieved ecosystem service value, es = ecosystem service, x = a grid cell, s = a scenario, t = a time slice enc = an environmental class The potential impact index then is: PI(es, x, s, t) = Sstr(es, x, s, t) when vulnerability maps based on this framework depict problematic regions, further attention must be directed to these regions to analyse their adaptive capacity at different scales (e.g.household,municipality, province, country) Dimensions of vulnerability assessment • Physical vulnerability-analyze impacts of events on assets such as building, infrastructure, agriculture • Social Vulnerability- estimate impacts of events on highly vulnerable groups such as the poor, coping capacity, status institutional structure designed to help coping, awareness of risk • Economic vulnerability-potential impacts of hazards on economic assets and processes (business interruption, secondary effects) • Environmental vulnerability-Degraded environmental quality limits the natural resilience to hazard effects and reduces environmental buffering of effects Hazard Information Past incidence:Maps, factors affecting occurrence Element of Concern Critical facilities, natural resources, agriculture, population, development (existing./proposed) Site and Feature Characteristics Specific damage/loss estimate Physical suite characteristics, structural strength, content exposure Hazard Assessment What are the hazards? What severity? What return periods? Who, what are vulnerable Why? Formulation of desired risk reduction strategy From hazards to vulnerability to risk Vulnerability Assessment Risk Assessment What is the expected degree of loss? Economic Analysis Of risk reduction options Identification of risk reduction options Hazard Vulnerability EVENT PREPAREDNESS Socio-economic National and Political Economy International Policy STATUS Return period,Duration Magnitude,Seasonality Uncertainty Hurricanes D I Flood Drought Earthquakes Volcanic Activity Landscape S A S T Disease E R Self protectionIncome Distribution (location, building Livelihood quality Opportunity Generation & allocation surplus Social Protection (Building regulations level of scientific knowledge/use) Social power&control Debt crises Environmental degradation RESILIENCE? Strength of assets GENDER Household Security,Nutrition CULTURE//STATE Income,Assets Institutional Discrimination Support Recovery of livelihood Impacts of previous interventions - Regional - Local Biases, Training HEALTH Social precaution/ Infrastructure, Individual robustness Household activities,Access to reliable potable water, treatment __________________________________________________________________________________________________ Pulwarty and Riebsame, 1997; Blaikie et al 1994 others Robustness Strategies: • Knowledge and information – Scientifically credible – Socially robust • Political legitimacy • Practical utility • Effectiveness • To what extent are probabilistic estimates about the future climate impacts robust? (given inability so far to include ENSO, AMO others) Uncertainties in responding to climate change risks • Uncertainty about cross-scale conditioning factors and impacts – Local-national-regional-global factors – Unpredictable changes in patterns of vulnerability over length of time over which risks are being calculated • Uncertainty about choice, alternatives and pathways for decision making – Economic tradeoffs vs. hedging – Traditional emphases on rapid post-disaster recovery rather than longerterm vulnerability reduction; • Uncertainty related to magnitude, timing, duration, frequency and location of climatic hazards Climate change projections in the Caribbean region Trends • Avg. annual air temp 1 F • Sea level rise 10 cm (3.9 ins) per 100 yrs • Generally drier conditions Scenarios for Future Climate • Drier mid-year, wetter end of year • Ocean surface warming • Salt water intrusion into freshwater • Some models suggest more persistent ENSO-like conditions and less but more intense more intense tropical storms (5-10% windspeed Where does climate variability come from? • NAO • TA • ENSO Non-ENSO or Atlantic multi-decadal mode of global sea surface temperature(SST) 1870-2000. (A) spatial correlations between first EOF and Atlantic SSTs; (B) temporal reconstruction of variability averaged over the rectangle in A Precipitation • Wet (May–Oct) and Dry Season (Nov– April) changes in Caribbean precip. in the last 50 years are generally opposite, particularly in the northern parts of the region. • The changes amount to a ~10–20% increase in the dry season, and about a similar-sized decline in the wet season. • Climate model simulations with a suite of GCM’s run with observed SST broadly show the same pattern of precipitation changes. • Different SST simulations suggest that Atlantic SST variability is as important as changes in the Indo-Pacific to rainfall variability in the GCR • Large decadal variability in SST, in both observed and simulated rainfall, and in the spatial pattern of the rainfall changes may make attribution to anthropogenic climate change difficult. Variability and change: • Events vs. sequences of events, change • Entry-points into existing plans and models • Data reliability and baseline definitions Average annual GDP growth rate after major disasters and average of previous three years Ave rage annual GDP Gr ow th Rate after m ajor disas te rs and ave r age of pr e vious thr e e ye ar s in the Car ibbe an 1970-97 6 5 %GDP growth 4 3 2 1 0 Avg -123 0 1 Year Befor e/Duri ng /After 2 3 Average annual growth in long stay tourist arrivals before, during and after hurricane disasters Caribbean 1970-1997 Average annual grow th in long stay tourist arrivals before during and fter disasters in the Caribbean 1970-97 12 10 8 %b growt h in tourist arrivals 6 4 2 0 Avg-123 0 1 -2 -4 Years before/during/after 2 3 Average annual Trade Balance (%imports) before during and after major disasters1970-1997 Avg-123 0 Trade balance % avg imports -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 Ye ars Be fore/During/Afte r 0 1 2 3 Agricultural GDP Anguilla and Montserrat 1980-97 Agricultural GDP (constant prices) Anguilla and$) Montserrat1980-97 (constant 10 Ang ui lla 9 Montser rat 8 million EC$ 7 6 5 4 3 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 Year 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Environmental Vulnerability Indices for Tobago Trinidad “Agriculture” operations chain Cultivation •Planting schedule •Pesticide and herbicide applications •IPM application •Irrigation timing •Runoff/erosion control •Fire management Harvest operations and transport •Initiation of harvest •Completion of harvest •Selective harvesting •Road repair •Soil compaction and field conditions •Fire management Milling and production Marketing and Shipping •Milling initiation •Product refinement •Likelihood of meeting quota &storage •Shipping timing (delays etc) • storage requirement • Secondary economies impact, minimizing environmental impacts, land-use/settlements Guyana • • • • • • • Sea wall overtopping Flood frequency and design risk Impacts on coastal vegetation Erosion and inundation Land Value and Land use Infrastructure Sanitation and potable water Global Sea-level rise Projections • 2 mm/yr • 5 mm/yr • 9 mm/yr Local Sea-level rise Projections (1990-2020) • ASLR1=213 mm • ASLR2=303 mm • ASLR3=423 mm QuickTime™ and a TIFF (LZW) decompressor are needed to see this picture. QuickTime™ and a TIFF (LZW) decompressor are needed to see this picture. Two concerns • High national adaptive capacity can mask great internal variations in vulnerability • Despite a high adaptive capacity on paper knowledge, technological capacity, expertise, are not always put to use ….viewed from Information chain Improved Decision Process ••Framing the question Climate Network Types Place-based Dialog, ofnot simulations design models two and Distributed ••Synthesis tools & Platforms Scale sector-based monologues scenarios dissemination ••Data assimilation & • User Social Appropriate Temporal oriented trendsmix of • New technologies visualization • Demographics • Scenarios observations • Spatial and •• Complexity models Energy use • probabilistic Quality Performance assurance Interactive •• Scenario Land usedevelopment and metrics outcomes control and testing • Institutions User friendly Synthesis ••Understanding • Policies •methodologies Flexible • Laws ••Place-based Values • Politics Va riable Variable Albouys town, Albuoystown Georgetown Georgetown Informal social s upport Spoke to neighbour t oday Where doe s your closest friend live? Leave doo rs unlo cked whilst going to the shops Share food with neighbou rs Clean d rains with neighbou rs Clean streets with neighbours Shop for neighbou rs Play sports with neighbou rs Loca l g roup membership Religiou s grou p Sports group Com munit y g roup Political pa rty Pa rticipati on in el ections Mos trecentn ational elections Most recent city elections Knowledg e of d isaster p revention Have you ev er att ended a disaster prev enti on meeting? Do you know where your nearest hurricane shelter is? Los The Pine, Los Maguitos Bridge The Pine Manguitos, town SDSanto Barbados Domingo 83% same hous e 48%; neighbour 29% 91% same hous e 36% neighbour 60% 65% same hous e 32%; neighbour 34% 40% 36% 63% 53% 64% 21% 33% 44% NA 66% 44% 39% 61% 35% 29% 24% 33% 23% 60% 6% 5% 18% 46% 2% 24% 39% 48% 7% 11% 29% 81% 79% 70% 63% 80% NA NA 12% 6% NA 43% 61% Create a matrix of functional responsibilities of Waterrelated Ministries and organizations to identify pathways for decision-making • Establishing and consolidate a viable scientific basis for water resources management sector and for (inter)national (water) Policies • Initiating a multi-stakeholder process that builds the knowledge to cope with climate variability and change. • Building and share knowledge and information by bridging climate variability/change and water communities decision calendar • Raising awareness of the issues relating climate and water, and broaden scientific, political and water managers participation in the discussion Potential matrix of responsibilities within agencies, private and community partners Agencies etc. __________________________________________________________________ Tasks Water Met. Agriculture Health Nres Other Sewer Service Agribusiness __________________________________________________________________ Water supply Sanitation Irrigation Flood control Watershed management Ports Quality Groundwater Instream management Other… Simple approaches to climate risk and vulnerability science • “What if”: What would be the impacts if a given scenario occurred at a given time (IPCC CM: scenarios, downscaling)? • Vulnerability Assessment and Sustainable Livelihoods (retrospective analyses, mapping, scenarios, coping strategies) • Stakeholder threats and opportunities (networks and adaptive capacity) • Climate impacts management Decision making and critical risks: who, what where, when, why?, payoff matrices) Steps in a simplified Vulnerability Assessment Step 1. What? Identifying the event and timescales of variability/change • Probability, Magnitude, Frequency, Scope, Duration Step 2. Who? Identifying exposure and capacity to withstand changes • Proximate: Individuals, groups, communities, • Quantifying economic-property risks and opportunities Step 3. Why? Identifying the complex sources of risk – Complexity and interrelatedness of natural, social, and development factors – Why does a particular risk exist? Causal factors: What happened to make vulnerability high/low? – Whose decisions and choices are involved? Who is most affected by the decisions and choices? Step 4. Where and When? Time and space dimensions • Dynamic change: Reversible, irreversible, cumulative or compounding – Interconnected scales, beneficial outcomes Ensuring Coordination of Activities and Participation by Sectors: Public, Private and International Actors • Developing Common Methodologies, Tools and Regional Expertise • Collecting, Mapping and Disseminating Hazard Information • Assessing Vulnerability • Ensuring Safer Construction: Building Codes and Standards • Improving Physical Development Planning • Developing Risk Transfer and Financing Mechanisms Climate and climate impacts University of the West Indies Program in Natural Resources Management • Moving beyond “training” course: Cadre of regional professionals – Professional Master’s Degree (2 year) • World Bank/GEF. CIDA funded • Agency (State, regional), NGO, students then return to agency to complete projects Opportunities for “win-win” situations and rule changes may exist but Changes may be difficult to implement • Criticality • Credibility • Capacity • Communication