Using the KDQOL - Mizzou

Download Report

Transcript Using the KDQOL - Mizzou

Using the KDQOL-36 to Improve Patient Care

Beth Witten, MSW, ACSW, LSCSW

Resource & Policy Associate Medical Education Institute, Inc.

1

Objectives

At the conclusion of this lesson you’ll be able to:  State what health-related quality of life

isn’t

— and is  Explain why and how we measure HRQOL  Describe the KDQOL-36 survey  Report how facilities should use the KDQOL-36 for patient plan of care & facility quality improvement 2

Medical Education Institute

 MEI Mission:

Help people with chronic disease learn to manage and improve their health

 MEI has developed or worked on: 3

What HRQOL Isn’t

4

HRQOL: What it

Isn’t

Quality of Life

5

Health-Related QOL: What it Is

  Patient’s

perceived mental health

Patient’s

perceived physical health

 How a chronic disease

interferes with day-to-day life

1 1 CDC -

www.cdc.gov/hrqol/index.htm

6

How Not to Measure HRQOL:

Karnofsky Scale Staff-assessed Patient QOL 100

-

Normal, no evidence of disease 90 80 70

Normal ADLs, minor symptoms Normal activity with effort, symptoms Cares for self, nothing beyond

60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -

Requires occasional help; cares for self Considerable help & frequent care Disabled; needs special care/assistance Severely disabled, hospitalized Very sick, hospitalized, needs treatment Moribund

Dead

7

How to Measure HRQOL

 Ask patients about their lives  Use a valid, reliable tool (paper & pencil) 8

Why Do We Measure HRQOL?

 Unique outcome in its own right  Independently predicts morbidity & mortality in ESRD —at least as strongly as Kt/V or serum albumin 9

Why Do We Measure HRQOL (cont.) ?

“ 60% of those on dialysis can return to work but require retraining, and most of the remaining 40% require no retraining whatsoever. These are people who can be active and productive, but only if they have the life-saving treatment they need so badly.” Sen. Hartke Testimony: 1972 10

Job Loss is the Rule in ESRD

Patients Age 18 - 55, May 1995 - June 2001 250,000 200,000 78,347 15,330 7,059 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 138,821 64% US Census in thousands Working Data Source: USRDS Special Data Request 2003 87,149 60,713 37% 6 Mo. Prior Not Working Loss of 22,457 jobs or 37% of prior workers 117,877 38,256 23% At Initiation Missing Data

11

Job Loss/Disability Can Impoverish ESRD Families

70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 Mean Family Income Private Disability (60%) SSDI (35%) SSI (Couple; 16%)

12

Effect of Job Loss on Patients

“Hi my name is X, i’ve been on dialysis for 3 years and im only 36 years old. i got it from high blood pressure. well now i have no friends and im depressed and my life sucks. im a single person with no job and no life. dialysis sucks and i should just die.”

Actual quote from the dialysis_support listserv March, 2006

13

Adjusted Annual Mortality Rate

Dialysis: 1996 - 2005 25 20 15 10 Network Core Indicator Project DOQI Guidelines Are we missing something?

5 CPMs Project

%

0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

USRDS 2007 Annual Data Report, Table H4 Period prevalent patients by age, gender, race, ethnicity, primary diagnosis, vintage 14

ESRD Clinical Performance Measures (CPMs) Before 2008

 Adequacy of dialysis (toxins from blood)  Access to blood (vascular or PD)  Anemia (red cells in blood)  Pressure (of blood)  Electrolytes (in blood)

New ESRD CPM as of 4/1/08

 Earliest data collection (CROWNWeb) - 2010  Percent of patients given the KDQOL-36 at least once per year  Exclusions: 

A Kidney-Specific HRQOL Survey Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL)

 Developed by RAND in 1995  SF-36 as generic core + 98 kidney-specific Qs 17

MOS SF Survey Domains

Physical Component Summary (PCS) Mental Component Summary (MCS) • Physical Functioning • Role-Physical • Bodily Pain • General Health • Vitality • Social Functioning • Role-emotional • Mental Health

18

KDQOL-36: Burden of Kidney Disease

    Interference with daily life Time to deal with kidney disease Frustration Feeling like a burden 19

KDQOL-36: Symptoms/Problems

      General health Activity limits Ability to accomplish desired tasks Depression/anxiety Energy level Social activities 20

KDQOL-36: Effects of Kidney Disease on Daily Life

      Impact of fluid & diet limits Ability to work around the house/travel Feeling depending on medical team Stress or worries Sex life Personal appearance 21

Sample KDQOL-36 Items

 Too much of my time is spent dealing with my kidney disease (T/F)   I feel like a burden on my family (T/F) During the

past 4 weeks

, to what extent were you bothered by itchy skin?  How much does kidney disease

bother

you in the area of fluid restriction?

22

Plan of Care: Psychosocial Status

Interpretive Guidance at V552 states:

The social worker must have a system for routine use of the assessment survey, evaluation of the results, and incorporation of the survey results into the development and updating of the psychosocial portion of the plan of care.

23

Framing the KDQOL-36 (From the CNSW Listserv)

"The governing body that licenses and evaluates dialysis clinics has changed the rules for the betterment of patient care. I am very excited about the changes and look forward to working with you under these new rules. We are going to be taking a more complete look at patients from a holistic point of view. Each of the staff who work with you will be concerned with your mind, body, and spirit. We want you to have the very best quality of life possible. I will be talking to you about some issues or concerns you may have and asking you a lot more questions. Anything you don't want to answer is fine. Shall we begin?"

- Mary Calzada, MSW, LCSW, posted 11/25/08 24

Administering the KDQOL-36

 Obtain consent (each survey or in “blanket” consent)  Ask patients to self-administer while on dialysis  If patient can’t self-administer  Ask for the first answer that comes to mind  Beware of pleas to help answer questions  Review scores with patients as soon as possible  Brainstorm factors contributing to low scores  Develop plan of care with IDT addressing medical, nursing, nutrition & psychosocial needs 25

Scoring the KDQOL-36

 Scoring: higher score = better health  Each question has a max of 100 points  Average items in each scale together  If item is skipped: •

Numerator

= sum of points of all answered responses in scale •

Denominator

= maximum points per question multiplied by questions answered in scale •

Result

= score for that scale 26

PCS & MCS Scores Predict

Morbidity & Mortality

1

1 Point

  

in PCS RR mortality

RR hosp.

2% 2% 1 Point

  

in MCS RR mortality

RR hosp.

1% 2%

1 Lowrie EG et al. Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36: A consistent and powerful predictor of morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients.

Am J Kidney Dis

41(6):1286-1292, 2003.

27

Bell Shaped Curve

1 SD Below Mean 1 SD Above Higher Risk 16% of patients “Unstable” Average Risk 68% of patients Lower Risk 16% of patients

28

Trending Scores

 Trend individual patient scores over time  10-point change significantly increases risk of hospitalization & death (p <0.001) 1  10-point decrease should alert staff to consider whether patient is unstable & perform assessment & interdisciplinary plan of care  Trend facility-level scores for QAPI  What elements in population contribute to low scores  What can staff do to improve scores  What interventions improve outcomes 1 Mapes et al., Health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality and hospitalization: The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS),

Kidney Int.

44:339-349, 2003.

29

KDQOL-36 Free Scoring Template KDQOL Working Group website http://gim.med.ucla.edu/kdqol (register for downloads)

30

Gender/Age KDQOL Norms KDQOL Working Group website http://gim.med.ucla.edu/kdqol (register for downloads)

31

New Fee Based Tool for Clinics

www.kdqol-complete-org

32

KDQOL COMPLETE Reports

33

Using the KDQOL-36

 Enter scores into the Excel workbook or KDQOL COMPLETE    Review scores of hospitalized or deceased patients Track & trend looking for patterns for QAPI Incorporate scores & survey responses into patients’ plans of care  Identify interventions and apply them 34

Measuring HRQOL in Patients Excluded from the KDQOL-36

 Patients under age 18  PedsQL is only kidney-specific HRQOL survey  Other pediatric HRQOL surveys:

www.proqolid.org

 Non-English speakers/readers  Spanish will be included & other translations will be added to KDQOL COMPLETE  Currently 18 translations of KDQOL-36 or KDQOL-SF 1.3 can be converted to KDQOL-36 by deleting certain questions, see KDQOL Working Group “downloads” website:

http://gim.med.ucla.edu/kdqol

35

Interdisciplinary Interventions That Improved Outcomes in Randomized Control Clinical Trials

The KDQOL Is Not Just About Psychosocial Interventions (or It Takes a Team) 36

Healthy Kidneys Work 24/7

Weekly substance concentrations in routine HD Standard in-center hemodialysis for 3 - 4 hours on M, W, F: NO normal levels

of fluid or wastes

Physiologic range Homeostasis Physiologic range Mon 45 hours Tues Weds 45 hours Thurs Fri Time 68 hours Sat Sun

37

More Dialysis Is More Like Having Healthy Kidneys

Weekly substance concentrations in daily HD PD or longer/more frequent HD: Normal range

of fluid and wastes

Physiologic range Homeostasis Physiologic range 21 hrs Mon 21 hrs Tues 21 hrs Weds 21 hrs Thurs Fri 21 hrs Sat Time 45 hrs Sun

38

Peritoneal Dialysis

 

APD vs. CAPD

– 6 month study. Gave patients more time to have a life 1

Icodextrin PD fluid

– 13 week study. Caused fewer symptoms than glucose-based fluid 2 1 Bro S et al.

Perit Dial Int

. 1999 Nov-Dec;19(6):526-33 2 Guo A et al.

Kidney Int Suppl

. 2002 Oct;(81):S72-9 39

More Hemodialysis

 Short daily or nocturnal HD reduced cramps, headaches, hypotension, shortness of breath, and other symptoms, and improved HRQOL vs. standard HD.

3,4 3 Heidenheim AP et al. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003 Jul;42(1 Suppl):36-41. 4 Ting GO et al

. Am J Kidney Dis

. 2003 Nov;42(5):1020-35.

40

Reaching Ideal Dry Weight

 Using echocardiograms to adjust dry weight by measuring the inferior vena cava improved HRQOL vs. usual care.

5 5 Chang ST et al

. Nephron Clin Pract

. 2004;97(3):c90-7 41

Treating Anemia with Iron & ESAs

 Compared to oral iron, IV iron significantly increased hemoglobin levels and KDQOL scores.

13 Use of ESAs to treat anemia was associated with increased HRQOL.

14 13 Agarwal R et al.

Am J Nephrol

. 2006;26(5):445-54. 14 Beusterien KM et al.

J Am Soc Nephrol.

1996 May;7(5):763-73 42

Maintaining Bone Mineral Balance

 Use of cinacalcet to reduce PTH significantly reduced parathyroidectomies, cardiac hospitalizations, and fractures — and improved HRQOL.

15 15 Cunningham J et al.

Kidney Int

. 2005 Oct;68(4):1793-800

Exercise Training

 Improves depression, HRQOL, and stamina 8,9,10,11,12 8 Levendoglu F et al

. J Nephrol

. 2004 Nov-Dec;17(6):826-32 9 Painter P et al.

Am J Kidney Dis

. 2002 Feb;39(2):257-65 10 Painter P et al

. Am J Kidney Dis

. 2000 Sep;36(3):600-8 11 Tawney KW et al.

Am J Kidney Dis

. 2000 Sep;36(3):581-91 12 Molsted S et al.

Nephron Clin Pract

. 2004;96(3):c76-81 44

Adaptation Training

6

Group Counseling

7

&

 Helping patients cope with the stresses of ESRD improved HRQOL over usual care 6 Tsay SL et al

. J Adv Nurs

. 2005 Apr;50(1):39-46 7 Lii YC et al.

J Clin Nurs

. 2007 Nov;16(11C):268-75 45

Using the KDQOL in Rehabilitation Planning

 Review scores & responses with patients soon after survey is completed  Focus on areas where things are going well  Focus on areas where scores & responses could improve  Ask the patient to choose an area of most concern from below average score areas 46

Using a Solution-Oriented Approach to Intervening

 “What would you like to see different in this area a few months from now?”  “How would your day-to-day life be different if this were better? What would you be doing?”  “What steps are needed to get you to where you want to go?”  “How might we partner together to reach your goal?” 47

Case Example

I Want a Transplant”  Mr. Smith 62-year old diabetic male on dialysis two years  History of missing 4 - 5 treatments/month  Felt disempowered  Reported no pleasure in life  Wanted to live 48

Mr. Smith’s Personal Steps to Success

   Understand missing treatments is barrier to transplant Recognize “why” I miss treatments Make a commitment to not miss any treatment for 30 days & see what happens  Enroll in Transplant class to learn more to address fears of transplant  Talk to my doctor & other patients about living with a transplant 49

Follow up 45 Days Later…

   Signed up for Transplant class Missed NO treatments for 30 days KDQOL-36 scores were significantly improved on the re-measurement

“The process allowed me time to reflect, understand, and gain hope. The partnership with my social worker was key — her encouragement motivated me to take steps forward toward better managing my health.”

- Mr. Smith 50

Documenting Surveys

 Facility policy determines where to file survey (chart or file)  Chart notes should indicate:  Scores & how they compare to mean (average)  Level of risk for hospital/death  Patient-reported factors contributing to low scores  Patient & team goals  Plan of care, including team roles  QAPI notes should  Track & trend facility-level scores, contributing elements, success of interventions 51

KDQOL Resources for Social Workers Available to all:

 Improving Dialysis Patient Health Related Quality of Life (Webinar)  KDQOL Questions and Answers Both available at:

www.kidney.org/professionals/CNSW/conditions.cfm

Members only:

 CNSW Listserv & CNSW Listserv archive

www.kidney.org/PROFESSIONALS/cnsw/listserv.cfm

http://listserv.kidney.org/scripts/wa.exe?A0=CNSW

52

Resources for Social Workers To Provide Psychosocial Services

CNSW Quality of Life Assessment Tools www.kidney.org/professionals/CNSW/pdf/QOL_AssessmentTools.

pdf

CNSW Standards of Practice www.kidney.org/professionals/CNSW/form_standards.cfm

CNSW’s Outcomes Training Program (interventions) www.kidney.org/professionals/cnsw/otp.cfm

Journal of Nephrology Social Workers (for current & archived issues, members) www.kidney.org/professionals/CNSW/JNSWonline/index.cfm

53

Still More Resources

NKF’s KDOQI CKD Guideline 12 (functioning & well-being) www.kidney.org/professionals/Kdoqi/guidelines_ckd/p6_comp_g12.

htm

Wellness Programming article (Nephrology News & Issues) www.kidney.org/about/central/pdf/wellnessProgramming.pdf

54

Health-related Quality of Life is:

A.

Not my problem – we just remove urea B.

Too complicated for ordinary humans C.

A Lexus for every patient D.

Patients’ perceived physical & mental function, and impact of a chronic disease on day-to-day life 55

We Measure HRQOL Because:

A.

CMS tells us to B.

It predicts morbidity & mortality in ESRD C.

Patients are more than their blood D.

All of the above 56

Which Intervention Improved HRQOL in Controlled Trials?

A.

Skipping meals B.

C.

Moping about life on dialysis Longer and/or more frequent hemodialysis D.

Entering the couch potato Olympics 57

Which Is a Solution-oriented Approach?

A.

“I know

just

what you should do!” B.

“What could you do to improve only one area on your KDQOL survey a little and how will your life look then?

C.

“Look, you’re on dialysis. What do you expect?” D.

“Oh my God, have you

seen

my caseload? We can talk about this in…2011.” 58

Conclusion

HRQOL is:   Patient-perceived physical & mental functioning A predictor of morbidity & mortality in ESRD   A measure of psychosocial instability Easy to measure using valid, reliable tools  Actionable in the dialysis setting 59

Using the KDQOL-36 to Improve Patient Care

Questions?

60