Transcript Evolutionary Algorithms & Protein Folding
Evolutionary Algorithms for the Protein Folding Problem
Giuseppe Nicosia
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science University of Catania 30/04/2020 1 DMI Università di Catania
Talk Outline
1. An overview of Evolutionary Algorithms 2. The Protein Folding Problem 3. Genetic Algorithms for the
ab initio
prediction 30/04/2020 2 DMI Università di Catania
An overview of Evolutionary Algorithms
EAs are optimization methods based on an evolutionary metaphor that showed effective in solving difficult problems.
30/04/2020 3 DMI Università di Catania
Computational Intelligence and EAs
“Evolution is the natural way to program”
DMI Università di Catania Thomas Ray 30/04/2020 4
Evolutionary Algorithms
1. Set of candidate solutions (
individuals
):
Population
.
2. Generating candidates by: – – –
Reproduction
: Copying an individual.
Crossover
: 2 parents 2 children.
Mutation
: 1 parent 1 child.
3. Quality measure of individuals: Fitness function . 4.
Survival-of-the-fittest
principle.
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 5
Main components of EAs
1. Representation of individuals:
Coding
.
2. Evaluation method for individuals:
Fitness
.
3. Initialization procedure for the
1st generation
.
4. Definition of variation operators (
mutation
and
crossover
).
5. Parent (
mating
) selection mechanism.
6. Survivor (
environmental
) selection mechanism.
7.
Technical parameters
(e.g. mutation rates, population size).
30/04/2020 6 DMI Università di Catania
Mutation and Crossover
EAs manipulate partial solutions in their search for the overall optimal solution
. These partial solutions or ` building blocks ' correspond to sub-strings of a trial solution - in our case local sub-structures within the overall conformation. 30/04/2020 7 DMI Università di Catania
`Optimal' Parameter Tuning:
•
Experimental tests.
• Adaptation based on measured quality.
• Self-adaptation based on evolution !
30/04/2020 8 DMI Università di Catania
Constraint handling strategies
[Michalewicz,
Evolutionary Computation
, 4(1), 1996] 1.
Repair strategy : whenever an unfeasible solution is produced "repair" it , i.e. find a feasible solution "close“ to the unfeasible one; 2.
Penalize
strategy :
admit unfeasible individuale them in the population, but penalize adding a suitable term to the energy .
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 9
The evolution Loop
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 10
Algorithm Outline
} procedure EA; { t = 0; initialize population P(t); evaluate P(t); until (done) { t = t + 1; parent_selection P(t); recombine P(t); mutate P(t); evaluate P(t); survive P(t); } DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 11
Example
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 12
Evolutionary Programming
procedure EP; { t = 0; initialize population P(t); evaluate P(t); until (done) { t = t + 1; parent_selection P(t); mutate P(t); evaluate P(t); survive P(t); } • The individuals are real-valued vectors , ordered lists , graphs .
• All
N
individuals are selected to be parents , and then are mutated, producing
N
children. These children are evaluated and
N
survivors are chosen from the
2N
individuals, using a probabilistic function based on fitness (individuals with a greater fitness have a higher chance of survival). • Mutation is based on the representation used, and is often adaptive . For example, when using a real-valued vector, each variable within an individual may have an adaptive mutation rate that is normally distributed.
• No Recombination.
} DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 13
}
Evolution Strategies
procedure ES; { • ES typically use real-valued vector .
t = 0; • Individuals are selected uniformly randomly to be parents . initialize population P(t); evaluate P(t); • Pairs of parents produces children via recombination . The number of children created is greater than N .
until (done) { • Survival is deterministic : t = t + 1; parent_selection P(t); 1.
ES allows the
N
best children to survive, and replaces the parents with these children. recombine P(t) mutate P(t); 2.
ES allows the
N
best children and parents to survive. evaluate P(t); survive P(t); } • Like EP, adapting mutation .
• Unlike EP, recombination does play an important role in ES, especially in adapting mutation.
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 14
Genetic Algorithms
procedure GA; { t = 0; • GAs traditionally use a more domain independent representation , namely, bit-strings . initialize population P(t); evaluate P(t); until (done) { } t = t + 1; parent_selection P(t); recombine P(t) mutate P(t); evaluate P(t); survive P(t); } • Parents are selected according to a probabilistic function based on relative fitness. •
N
children are created via recombination from the
N
parents . • The
N
children are mutated and survive, replacing the
N
parents in the population. • Emphasis on mutation and crossover is opposite to that in EP . • Mutation flips bits with some small probability (background operator). • Recombination , on the other hand, is emphasized as the primary search operator. DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 15
Genetic Programming 1/2
There are 5 major preparatory steps in using GP for a particular problem. 1) selection of the set of terminals (e.g., the actual variables of the problem, zero-argument functions, and random constants, if any) 2) selection of the set of functions 3) identication of the evaluation function 4) selection of parameters of the system for controlling the run 5) selection of the termination condition .
Each tree (program) is composed of functions and terminals appropriate to the particular problem domain; the set of all functions and terminals is selected a priori in such a way that some of the composed trees yield a solution.
The initial pop is composed of such trees. The evaluation function assigns a fitness value which evaluates the performance of a tree. The evaluation is based on a preselected set of test cases ,a fitness cases; in general, the fitness function returns the sum of distances between the correct and 30/04/2020 obtained results on all test cases.
DMI Università di Catania 16
Genetic Programming 2/2
procedure GP; { } t = 0; initialize population P(t); /* randomly create an initial pop of individuals computer program */ evaluate P(t); /* execute each program in the pop and assign it a fitness value */ until (done) { t = t + 1; parent_selection P(t); /* select one or two program(s) with a probability based on fitness (with reselection allowed) */ create P(t); /* create new programs for the pop by applying the following ops with specified probability */ reproduction; /* Copy the selected program to the new pop */ } crossover; /* create new offspring programs for the new pop by recombining randomly chosen parts from 2 selected prgs*/ mutation; /* Create one new offspring program for the new pop by randomly mutating a randomly chosen part of one selected program. */ Architecture-altering
ops; /*
Choose an architecture-altering operation from the available repertoire of such op. and create one new offspring program for the new pop by applying the chosen architecture-altering op. to the one selected prg */ 30/04/2020 DMI Università di Catania 17
Scaling
Suppose one has
two search spaces
. The first is described with a real-valued fitness function
F
. The second search space is described by a fitness function
G
that is equivalent to
F p
, where
p
is some constant. The
relative positions
of peaks and valleys in the two search spaces
correspond
exactly. Only the
relative heights differ
(i.e., the vertical scale is different).
Should our EA search both spaces in the same manner?
30/04/2020 18 DMI Università di Catania
Ranking selection (ES, EP)
If we believe that the EA should
search the two spaces in the same manner
, then selection should only be based on the relative ordering of fitnesses, only the rank of individuals is of importance. • •
ES
Parent selection is performed uniformly randomly, with no regard to fitness . Survival simply saves the
N
best individuals on the relative ordering of fitnesses . , which is only based • •
EP
All individuals are selected to be parents . Each parent is mutated once, producing
N
children.
A probabilistic ranking mechanism chooses the
N
best individuals for survival, from the union of the parents and children . DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 19
Probabilistic selection mechanism GA
• • Many people, in the GA community ,
believe that F and G should be searched differently
. Fitness proportional selection is the probabilistic selection mechanism of the traditional GA. Parent selection is performed based on
how fit an individual is with respect to the population average
. For example, an individual with fitness twice the population average will tend to have twice as many children as average individuals. Survival, though,
is not based on fitness
, since the parents are automatically replaced by the children.
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 20
Lacking the killer instinct
One problem with this latter approach is that, as the search continues, more and more
individuals receive fitnesses with small relative differences
. This lessens the selection pressure,
slowing the progress of the search
. This effect, often referred to as "lacking the killer instinct", can be compensated somewhat by scaling mechanisms , that attempt to magnify relative differences as the search progresses..
30/04/2020 21 DMI Università di Catania
•
Mutation and Adaptation
GAs
typically use
mutation as a simple background operator
very , to ensure that a particular bit value is not lost forever. Mutation in GAs typically flips bits with a
low probability
(e.g., 1 bit out of 1000).
• Mutation is far more
important in ESs
and Instead of a global mutation rate,
mutation EP
.
probability distributions can be maintained for every variable of every individual
. More importantly, ESs and EP encode the probability distributions as extra information within each individual, and allow this information to evolve as well (
self adaptation
of mutation parameters,
while
the space is being searched). DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 22
Recombination and Adaptation
• There are a number of recombination methods for
ESs
, all of which assume that the individuals are composed of real-valued variables.
Either the values are exchanged or they are averaged
. The ES community has also considered
multi-parent versions
of these operators.
• The
GA
community places primary emphasis on crossover. –
One-point recombination
parents (e.g., between the 3rd and 4th variables, or bits). Then the information before the cut-point is swapped between the two parents. inserts a
cut-point
within the two –
Multi-point recombination
is a generalization of this idea, introducing a higher number of cut-points. Information is then swapped between pairs of cut-points. –
Uniform crossover
, however, does not use cut-points, but simply uses a global parameter to indicate the likelihood that each variable should be exchanged between two parents. 30/04/2020 23 DMI Università di Catania
Representation
• Traditionally,
GAs
use
bit strings
. In theory, this representation makes the GA more problem independent. We can also see this as a more
genotypic level of representation
, since the individual is in some sense encoded in the bit string. Recently, however, the GA community has investigated more
phenotypic representations
, including vectors of real values, ordered lists, neural networks. • The
ES
and
EP
communities focus on
real-valued vector
representations, although the EP community has also used
ordered list
and
finite state automata
representations.
• Very little has been done in the way of
adaptive representations.
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 24
Strength of the selection and population’s
carrying capacit
y •
Strong selection
refers to a selection mechanism that concentrates quickly on the best individuals , while
weaker selection mechanisms
allow poor individuals to survive (and produce children) for a longer period of time. • Similarly, the population can be thought of as having a certain
carrying capacity
, which refers to the amount of information that the population can usefully maintain . A
small population
has less carrying capacity, which is usually adequate for simple problems.
Larger populations
, with larger carrying capacities, are often better for more difficult problems. • Perhaps the evolutionary algorithm can adapt both
selection pressure and the population size dynamically
, as it solves problems.
30/04/2020 DMI Università di Catania 25
Accumulated payoff
•
EP
and
ES
usually have
optimization for a goal
. In other words, they are typically most interested in finding the best solution as quickly as possible. • De Jong (1992) reminds us that
GAs are not function optimizers per se
, although they can be used as such. There is very little theory indicating how well GAs will perform optimization tasks. Instead,
theory concentrates on what is referred to as accumulated payoff
. • The difference can be illustrated by considering
financial investment planning over a period of time
(e.g., you play the stock market). Instead of trying to find the
best
stock , you are trying to maximize your returns as the various stocks are sampled . Clearly the two goals are somewhat different, and maximizing the return may or may not also be a good 30/04/2020 heuristic for finding the best stock. 26
•
Fitness correlatio
n
Fitness correlatio
n, which appears to be a measure of EA Hardness that places less emphasis on optimality (Manderick et al., 1991). Fitness correlation
measures the correlation between the fitness of children and their parents
. Manderick et al. found a strong relationship between GA performance and the strength of the correlations. • Another possibility is
problem modality
.
Those problems that have many suboptimal solutions
will, in general, be more difficult to search. • Finally, this issue is also very related to a concern of de Garis, which he refers to as
evolvability
. de Garis notes that often
his systems do not evolve at all
, namely, that fitness does not increase over time. The reasons for this are not clear and remain an important research topic.
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 27
Distributed EAs
Because of the
inherent natural parallelism
within an EA, much recent work has concentrated on the
implementation of EAs on parallel machines
. Typically either one processor holds one individual (in SIMD machines), or a subpopulation (in MIMD machines). Clearly, such implementations hold promise of execution time decreases. More interestingly, are the
evolutionary effects
that can be naturally illustrated with parallel machines, namely,
speciation
,
nicheing
, and
punctuated equilibria
(Belew and Booker,1991).
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 28
Resume
• Selection serves to
focus search into areas
high fitness.
of • Other genetic operators (recombination and mutation) perturb the individuals, providing exploration in nearby areas .
• •
Recombination
and
mutation
provide
different search biases
, which may or may not be appropriate for the task.
The key to more robust EA systems lies in the
adaptive selection of such genetic operators
.
DMI Università di Catania probably 30/04/2020 29
Decimal 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Binary 0000 0001 0010 0011 0100 0101 0110 0111 1000 1001 1010 1011 1100 1101 1110 1111
Hint: Gray Code
Gray 0000 0001 0011 0010 0110 0111 0101 0100 1100 1101 1111 1110 1010 1011 1001 1000
{ } Procedure binaryToGray g 1 =b 1 ;
for
k=2
to
m
do
g k =b k-1 XOR b k ; Gray code is often used in GAs for mapping between a decimal number and a bit string.
Mapping each digit of a decimal number to a string of four bits corresponds to choosing 10 strings from 16 possibilities. In Gray code, neighbouring decimal digits are two always represented by adjacent bit strings that differ by only one bit position .
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 30
Advantages of EAs
•
Widely applicable
, also in cases where no (good) problem specic techniques are available: – Multimodalities, discontinuities, constraints.
– Noisy objective functions.
– Multiple criteria decision making problems.
• •
No presumptions
with respect to the problem space.
Low development costs
; i.e. costs to adapt to new problem spaces.
• The
solutions
of EA's have
straightforward interpretations
.
• They can be run interactively (online parameter adjustment).
30/04/2020 31 DMI Università di Catania
Disadvantages of EAs
•
No guarantee for finding optimal solutions
within a finite amount of time: True for all global optimization methods.
•
No complete theoretical basis
progress is being made.
(yet), but much •
Parameter tuning
is largely based on trial and error (genetic algorithms); solution: Self adaptation (evolution strategies).
• Often computationally expensive:
Parallelism
.
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 32
Applications of EAs
• Optimization and Problem Solving; • NP-Complete Problem ; • Protein Folding ; • Financial Forecasting; • Automated Synthesis of Analog Electrical Circuits; • Evolutionary Robotics; • Evolvable Hardware; • Modelling.
30/04/2020 33 DMI Università di Catania
Turing ‘s vision
DMI Università di Catania July 20, 2001 30/04/2020 34
Turing’s three approaches
for creating intelligent computer program One approach was
logic-driven
while a second was
knowledge-based
. The third approach that Turing specifically identified in 1948 for achieving machine intelligence is
“... the genetical or evolutionary search by which a combination of genes is looked for, the criterion being the survival value”. A. M Turing A. M.,Intelligent machines, Machine Intelligence, 1948.
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 35
In 1950 Turing described how evolution and natural selection might be used to create an intelligent program: “... we cannot expect to find a
good child machine
at first attempt. One must
experiment with teaching
one such machine and see how well it learns. One can then try another and see if it is
better or worse
”.
Turing A. M.,
Computing machinery and intelligence
,Mind,1950.
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 36
Turing’s third approach & EAs
There is an obvious connection between this process and evolution, by identifications: 1.
Structure of the child machine = Hereditary material ; 2.
Changes of the child machine = Mutations ; 3.
Judgment of the experimenter = Natural selection .
The above features of Turing's third approach to machine intelligence are common to the various forms of evolutionary computation developed over the past four decades.
30/04/2020 37 DMI Università di Catania
Genes were easy: The Protein Folding Problem
Genomics
Transcriptomics
Proteomics
30/04/2020 38 DMI Università di Catania
Reductionistic and synthetic approaches
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 39
Basic principles
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 40
Why are computer scientists interested in biology ?
30/04/2020 41 DMI Università di Catania
Scientific answer
• Biology is interesting as a domain for AI research (i.e. drug design) .
• Biology provides a rich set of metaphors for thinking about intelligence : genetic algorithms, neural networks and Darwinian automata are but a few of the computational approaches to behavior based on biological ideas. There will, no doubt, be many more ( Artificial Immune System ).
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 42
• Pragmatic answer “
Gene sequencing’s Industrial Revolution”
[IEEE Spectrum, November 2000]
.
• IBM predicts the IT market for biology will grow from $3.5 billion to more $9 billion by 2003. The volume of life science data doubles every six months .
[IEEE Spectrum, January 2001]
• “Golden rice to Bioinformatics”
[Scientific American 2001]
.
• Bio technology , Bio XML , Bio Perl , Bio Java , Bio inspired models , Biological data analisys … Bio all .
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 43
The building blocks: the 20 natural Amino acids
1. Ala A 2. Arg R 3. Asn N 4. Asp 5. Cys D C 6. Gln 7. Glu 8. Gly 9. His 10. Ile Q E G H I Alanine
H
Arginine
C+
Asparagine
P
Aspartic acid
C-
Cysteine
P
Glutamine
P
Glutamic acid
C-
Glycine
P
Histidine
P, C+
Isoleucine
H
11. Leu 12. Lys 13. Met L K M 14. Phe F Phenylalanine
H
15. Pro P Proline
H
16. Ser 17. Thr 18. Trp 19. Tyr 20. Val S T W Y V Leucine
H
Lysine
C+
Methionine
H
Serine Threonine Tryptophan Tyrosine Valine
P P H P H
3-letter code, single code, name residued,
c
harge,
P
olar,
H
ydrophobic
.
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 44
Proteins are
necklaces
of amino acids
The protein is a linear polymer of the 20 different kinds of amino acids , which are linked by peptide bonds . Protein sequence length: 20 – 4500 aa.
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 45
Hydrophobic
&
hydrophilic
residues
•
Hydrophobic residues
tend to come together to form compact core that exclude water. Because the environment inside cells is
aqueous
(primarily water), these hydrophobic residues will tend to be on the inside of a protein, rather than on its surface.
• Hydrophobicity is one of the key factors that determines how the chain of amino acids will fold up into an active protein (
Hydrophilic:
attracted to water,
Hydrophobic:
repelled by water).
• The
polarity
of a molecule refers to the degree that its electrons are distributed asymmetrically. A
non-polar
molecule has a relatively even distribution of charge. DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 46
Primary structure
•The scaffold is always the same. •The side-chain R determines the amino acid type .
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 47
Grand Challenge Problems in Bioinformatics
[T.Lengauer, Informatics – 10 Years Back, 10 Years Ahed, LNCS 2000] 1. Finding Genes in Genomic Sequences 2.
Protein Folding and Protein Structure Prediction 3. Estimating the Free Energy of Biomolecules and their complexes 4. Simulating a Cell DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 48
The famed Protein Folding problem asks
how the amino-acid sequence of a protein adopts its native three-dimensional structure under natural conditions (e.g. in aqueous solution, with neutral pH at room temperature). DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 49
Sequence
Structure
Function
While the nature of the fold is determined by the sequence, it is encoded in a very complicated manner. Thus, protein folding
can be seen as a connection between the genome ( sequence ) and what the proteins actually do ( their function ).
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 50
Protein Folding process
•Denaturated = Unfolded (Disruption of equilibrium and of the H-bonds)
No biological activity
• Native = Folded = Unique compact structure
Biologically active
Below folding transition temperature, the protein seems to exist under a unique conformation.
Folding time: 10 -2 to 1 s
Folding the smallest protein: a single alpha helix .
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 51
Protein Folding Principles
•
Finding a low-energy shape:
Proteins tend to twist into shapes that achieve a “low energy” state in which amino acids fit comfortably together.
•
Attraction between neighbors:
aa will most strongly attract or repel those closest to themselves. Aa can also interact with each other through “H-bonds”, weak interactions that when multiplied throughout the chain, can hold a protein in a regular shape.
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 52
The Ab initio protein structure prediction problem
Protein folding has to be distinguished from protein structure prediction (PSP).
In the PSP we are not interested in the folding process but just in the final structure attained .
30/04/2020 53 DMI Università di Catania
Why do Proteins “Fold“ ?
In order to carry out their function (e.g. as enzymes or Ab), they must take on a
particular shape
, also known as a
Fold
. Thus, proteins are truly amazing machines: before they do their work, they
assemble themselves!
This self-assembly is called
Folding
.
What happens if protein don’t fold correctly ?
Diseases such as Alzheimer's disease , cystic fibrosis , Mad Cow disease, an inherited form of emphysema , and even many cancers are believed to result from protein misfolding . When proteins misfold , then can clump together (aggregate).
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 54
Computational Tools in Protein Folding
• Molecular Dynamics (MD); • Monte Carlo (MC); • Simulated Annealing (SA); • Evolutionary Algorithms (EA); • Convex Global Underestimator (CGU) [K.A.Dill & H.S.Chan,Nature Struct Biol, 4:10-19,1997] ; • Performance Guaranteed Approximation Algorithms [ W.E. Hart & S. Istrail,RECOMB, ACM SIGACT 1997] ; Search methods Compute native conformation 30/04/2020 55 DMI Università di Catania
Genetic Algorithms for the
ab initio
prediction
Using biologically inspired ideas to compute about biological problems.
30/04/2020 56 DMI Università di Catania
Why Genetic Algorithms for Protein Structure Prediction?
1. PSP is analytically difficult to solve . 2. The number of conformations
N
aa grows exponentially as N of a protein with where is the average number of conformations per residue (typically 10). 3. The PSP problem is NP-hard . 4. The energy landscape ` rugged '. of proteins must be 30/04/2020 57 DMI Università di Catania
The HP protein folding model
[K. A.Dill, Biochemistry, 24:1501, 1985].
• HP models abstract the hydrophobic interaction process in protein folding by reducing of hydrophobicity in the protein.
a protein to a heteropolymer that represents a predetermined pattern • Nonpolar amino acids are classifìed as hydrophobic ( H ) and polar amino acids are classified as hydrophilic ( P ). A sequence is s
{H, P} +
• The HP modei restricts the space of conformations to, self-avoiding paths on a lattice ( square , cubic or triangular ) in which vertices axe labeled by the amino acids.
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 58
The energy potential in the HP model
• The energy potential reflects the fact that hydrophobic amino acids have a propensity to form a hydrophobic core . To capture this feature of protein structures, the HP model adds a value topological contact.
for every pair of hydrophobics that form a • A topological contact is formed by a pair of amino acids that are adjacent on the lattice and not consecutive in the sequence. The value of is typically taken to be -1 .
30/04/2020 59 DMI Università di Catania
HP sequences embedded
Figure shows sequence embedded in the square lattice, with hydrophobic-hydrophobic contacts (HH contacts) highlighted with conformation has an energy of dotted –4 .
lines.
The DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 60
Why HP model for Protein structure prediction ?
• S. Istrail: “
Best Science for Protein Folding
”, [Lipari School on Computational Biology 1999] .
• HP model is powerful enough to capture a variety of properties of actual proteins [Dill
et al.,
Protein Science, 4:561, 1995] .
• The PSP problem for the HP model has been shown to be NP-complete on the square lattice [Crescenzi
et al
., J. Comp. Bio. 5(3), 1998] and cubic lattice 1998] .
[Berger
et al.
, J.Comp. Bio., 5(1), 30/04/2020 61 DMI Università di Catania
Internal coordinates with
Absolute
direction
Individuals are coded with a sequence in
{U,D,L,R,F,B} n-1
: which correspond to up, down, left, right, forward and backward moves in a cubic for a length n protein. 30/04/2020 62 DMI Università di Catania
Representation and Encoding
P seq
{A,R,N,D,C,Q,E,G,H,I,L,K,M,F,P,S,T,W,Y,V} +
P HP
{H, P} +
P conf
{U,D,L,R,F,B} n-1
P conf-abs =RULLURURULU DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 63
Bond directions describing lattice conformations
Direction r U p r z r z +1 L eft r x r x -1 F ront r y r y +1 B ack r y r y -1 R ight r x r x +1 D own r z r z –1 DMI Università di Catania A bond direction corresponds to a change, r , in one of the Cartesian coordinates of the successive monomer, keeping all other coordinates the same as the previous monomer.
30/04/2020 64
The energy function
DMI Università di Catania where, • strength of HH attraction (usually taken as 1).
• 2 energetic penalty parameter for sites containing two monomers.
• 3 energetic penalty parameter for sites containing three or more monomers.
30/04/2020 65
} {
Procedure GA (Protein Sequence)
t := 0; initialize population P(t); /* random pop. of conformations */ evaluate P(t); /* compute energy function */
while not
terminate
do {
/* terminate when free energy reaches equilibrium point*/ parent_selection P(t); crossover P(t); /* 1-point-Crossover acts stochastically with fixed probability P cros */ mutate P(t); /* randomly change the value of bond directions along the string with fixed probability P mut */ evaluate P(t); survive P(t);
} /*
All individuals are replaced except for 10% of the current best conformation elitism strategy
*/ Output
(Protein structure); DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 66
Selection
Selection is linearly proportional to fitness
so that the probability, P
i
, of selecting the i-th conformation, with a fitness value F
i
, to propagate to the next time step is given by:
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 67
Fitness function Probabilities must be positive so a linear mapping with a cut-off value is used to
convert the energy (E) minimization problem to a fitness (F) maximization
:
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 68
Population Free Energy
• Since GAs deal with an ensemble of solutions, a quantity analogous to the statistical mechanical free energy is used. The population free energy ,
F
, is calculated from its partition function ,
Z
: • where the sum is over the total number of conformers in a population and the i-th conformer. Hence, E i is the energy of DMI F = -ln(Z) Università di Catania 30/04/2020 69
Evolution of energy distributions
The GA dynamics converge the population of conformations to an equilibrium distribution. This is characterised by
F
as shown in next slide. Fig. 1 Evolution of a population: plotting the energy distributions at various time steps.
t
is the percentage of the total run-time elapsed . The population converges within 50% of the run time.
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 70
Mean, Minimum & Free Energy of an Evolving Population
The mean energy fluctuates around the equilibrium making it difficult to use as a stop criterion The free energy, which characterises the energy distribution of a population, reaches a convergence, or equilibrium point.
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 71
Compact HP conformation found by GA
This method determines the global minima of HP sequences by constructing conformations with a core of H (hydrophobic) residues that also minimize the surface area of the conformation.
Example of a compact HP conformation, with a hydrophobic core, found by the GA (number of nearest neighbours = 39). Dark=H=hydrophobic, Light=P=polar.
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 72
Sequence
Lowest Energy # Energy eval
643d1 -27 433.533
643d.2 -30 167.017
643d.3 -38 172.192
643d.4 -34 107.143
643d.5 -36 154.168
643d.6 -31 454.727
643d.7 -25 320.396
643d.8 -34 315.036
643d.9 -33 151.705
643d.10 -26 191.019
643d.1 wwbbbbbwwwbbwwwwwbbwwwbwwwwwwbwb wwwbwwbwwbwwwwwbwwwwbbwbbwwbwwbw DMI Università di Catania
Results
Studies were carried out using HP sequences taken from Unger,Moult, J. Molecular Biology, 231,1993
.
30/04/2020 73
Energy Landascapes are Funnels
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 74
Conformational search strategies
DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 75
Conclusions
• The evolutionary algorithms (GA) approach to the protein structure prediction problem offers a
promising potential method of solution
. • GAs are
fast
and
efficient
at searching the
conformational landscapes rugged
presented by protein molecules.
Working in Progress
• Work is under way
to design a EA to optimize real protein structures
(torsion angle space, lattice models). 30/04/2020 76 DMI Università di Catania
References • D. E. Clark (ed.),
Evolutionary Algorithms in Molecular Design
, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2000.
• M. Kanehisa,
Post-Genome Informatics
, Oxford University Press, 2000. (
An overview of the types of data and databases used in bioinformatics).
30/04/2020 77 DMI Università di Catania
Final Remark
“The impact of Bioinformatics research critically depends on an accurate understanding of the biological process under investigation. It is essential to ask the right questions, and often modeling takes priority over optimization. Therefore, we need people that
understand
and
love
both
computer science and biology
forward.” to bring the field Thomas Lengauer Institute of Computer Science - University of Bonn DMI Università di Catania 30/04/2020 78