Transcript CBE Communications March 2004

Council for Built
Environment
22November 2013
Presented by Gugu Mazibuko
Email: [email protected]
1
For a better built environment
BACKGROUND TO THE CBE
The CBE is a statutory Entity established by Council for the Built
Environment Act 43 of 2000
The Act mandates the CBE to oversee and coordinate the activities
of the six professional councils regulating professions namely;
engineering, architecture, quantity surveying, project and
construction management, property valuers and landscape
architecture
The CBE started its operations in 2002
The CBE is governed by a 20 member Council/Board appointed by
Minister of Public Works & has 26 staff members & 4 divisions –
Skills, Research & Policy, Corporate Services, Legal
In terms of section 55 of the PFMA the Council is the Accounting
Authority directly accountable to the Executive Authority (Minister of
Public Works)
2
For a better built environment
Functions and powers of the CBE
The CBE and Professional Councils have 13 concurrent functions
delegated to them by the Act, and these are:













Identification of Work
Guideline Professional Fees
Continuous Professional Development
Accreditation of Built Environment Programmes
Code of Conduct for the Professions
Professional Registration
Recognition of Voluntary Associations
Recognition of New Professions
International Agreements
Recognition of Prior Learning
Standard Generating
Appeals and Tribunals
Competency Standards for Registrations
To ensure consistency in application of these functions and related
policies across the six Councils, the CBE develops Policy Frameworks on
these functions
3
For a better built environment
The South African Development Context and Environment –
drivers of infrastructure demand & built environment skills
6 Metros
18% backlogs,
23% poverty
Drivers for
infrastructure
investments
Infrastructure
investment needs
Main delivery
channels
Constraints
Secondary municipalities –
119
Under resourced
municipalities – 159
32% backlogs,
41% poverty
50% backlogs,
67% poverty
Poverty 40%, Backlogs 22%, Unemployment approx. 20%
Social transformation
infrastructure:
Enabling
infrastructure:
Economic
infrastructure:
Housing, Education
Health, Municipal
Transport, water, energy,
communications
Agric, Tourism,
Entrep. Mining, Manufacturing
Municipalities &
DPW
SOEs
Private Sector
Government / DFIs
Market failure / weaknesses:
Funding gap / availability of
finance
Institutional failure / weaknesses:
Capacity and skills
11
Absorption capacity - Revenue
11
Source: DBSA
4
For a better built environment
Public and Private sector average building and
construction investment per decade and per year for
2010 and 2011
1960-1969 1970-1979 1980-1989 1990-1999 2000-2009
2010
2011
Public sector building
and construction
investment (real 2005
prices)
57%
65%
54%
43%
52%
61%
62%
Private sector building
and construction
investment (real 2005
prices)
43%
35%
46%
57%
48%
39%
38%
Source: SARB online data series
5
For a better built environment
ISSUES THAT ARE CURRENTLY SHAPING THE COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES OF CONTRACTORS
Source: Rust and Koen (2011)
6
For a better built environment
Planned infrastructure drive of government
Government has budget R3,2 trillion in planned infrastructure investment to the year
2020, with R844,5 billion to be spent in the current MTEF period to 2014/15 and
R622,8 billion having already been spent in the current MTEF to 2010.
Planned investment will be clustered around 18 Strategic Investment Plans (SIPs)
under the co-ordination of the Presidential Investment Coordination Commission
(PICC) headed by the President and comprising Provincial Premiers and Local
Government Mayors to fast-track and co-ordinate the planned infrastructure projects
in 5 to 10 year project pipelines and therefore smooth out construction industry
cyclicality.
Asset type
Electricity
Transport
Liquid fuels
Education
Health
Housing
Water
Telecoms
TOTAL
7
Planned
expenditure
(R billion)
R1, 945
R583
R213
R185
R110
R78
R74
R15
R3, 204
Percentage of
total planned
expenditure
60,1 %
18,2%
6,6%
5,8%
3,4%
2,4%
2,3%
0,4%
100%
Used
(R billion)
Planned
(R billion)
R348,6
R78,6
R0
R125
R31
R5
R32,8
R1,8
R622,8
R1, 076
R504,4
R213
R60
R79
R73
R41,2
R13,2
R2,581
For a better built environment
KEY BE DESIGN PROFESSIONS AND THE STAGES OF THE
CONSTRUCTION PROCESS
STAGE 2
• Project
concept and
viability
8
BE Professional
Consulting Services
Companies
Architect
Quantity Surveyor
Structural Engineer
Civil Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
Electrical Engineer
Project Manager
STAGE 3
PROJECT DESIGN
CONCEPTUALISATION
STAGE 1
• Project
design
development
STAGE 4
• Project
documentati
on and
procurement
BE Professional
Consulting Services
Companies
Architect
Landscape Architect
Quantity Surveyor
Project Manager
Structural Engineer
Civil Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
• Construction
STAGE 6
• Project
close-out
STAGE 5
Contractors
CONSTRUCTION
• Project
inception
CIDB policy space,
regulate contractors
who build
infrastructure to
protect the public
Project Manager
Construction Manager
Architect
Landscape Architect
Quantity Surveyor
Project Manager
Structural Engineer
Civil Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
OPERATIONS AND MAINTANANCE – CBE AND CIDP POLICY SPACE
CBE policy space, regulate BEPs who conceptualise and
design infrastructure to protect the public
For a better built environment
.
Percentage number of registered Professionals by race and gender
ECSA
Gender
ECSA BY RACE & Gender
A
M
3457
I
20402
C
1502
T
511
Gender
25872
A
W
I
% GENDER
C
M
13%
79%
6%
2%
T
95%
F
649
518
138
31
1336
F
49%
39%
10%
2%
5%
T
4106
20920
1640
542
27208
T
15%
77%
6%
2%
100%
SACAP
SACAP BY RACE & Gender
Gender
A
M
.
W
ECSA BY RACE & Gender %
F
T
W
I
C
T
Gender
926
4539
462
508
6435
M
81
1116
82
61
1340
F
1007
5655
544
569
7775
T
SACLAP
SACLAP BY RACE & Gender
Gender
A
M
SACAP BY RACE & Gender
W
1
I
82
A
W
I
% GENDER
C
71%
7%
8%
70%
6%
83%
6%
5%
30%
13%
73%
7%
7%
SACLAP BY RACE & Gender
C
0
T
0
F
0
73
2
1
T
1
155
2
1
Gender
83
76
T
14%
A
W
I
100%
% GENDER
C
T
M
1%
99%
0%
0%
52%
F
0%
96%
3%
1%
48%
T
1%
97%
1%
1%
100%
159
SACPCMP
SACPCMP BY RACE & Gender
Gender
A
M
W
I
SACPCMP BY RACE & Gender
C
T
Gender
A
W
I
% GENDER
C
T
216
1593
88
54
1951
M
11%
82%
5%
3%
98%
F
14
23
5
3
45
F
31%
51%
11%
7%
2%
T
230
1616
93
57
1996
T
12%
81%
5%
3%
100%
SACPVP
SACPVP BY RACE & Gender
Gender
A
M
F
T
W
I
SACPVP BY RACE & Gender
C
T
Gender
106
978
41
33
1158
50
160
12
11
233
F
157
1138
53
44
1392
T
SACQSP
SACQP BY RACE & Gender
Gender
A
W
I
A
M
W
I
% GENDER
C
9%
84%
4%
3%
83%
21%
69%
5%
5%
17%
11%
82%
4%
3%
SACQP BY RACE & Gender
C
T
Gender
T
A
W
I
100%
% GENDER
C
T
1523
M
223
1142
124
34
M
15%
75%
8%
2%
83%
F
27%
65%
7%
1%
17%
T
17%
73%
8%
2%
100%
T
12%
80%
5%
3%
100%
303
F
82
198
20
3
T
305
1340
144
37
5807
30824
2476
1250
1826
Overall Total
40356
Source: Professional councils quarterly reports, second quarter 2013/2014
9
For a better built environment
.
Percentage number of registered Candidates by race and gender
ECSA
Gender
M
F
T
SACAP
Gender
M
F
T
SACLAP
Gender
M
F
T
SACPCMP
Gender
M
F
T
SACPVP
Gender
M
F
T
SACQSP
Gender
M
F
T
Overall Total
.
10
ECSA BY RACE & Gender
A
W
I
C
6392
4577
1319
341
2340
741
385
92
8732
5318
1704
433
SACAP BY RACE & Gender
A
W
I
C
446
702
94
72
91
412
48
21
537
1114
142
93
SACLAP BY RACE & Gender
A
W
I
C
6
16
0
0
2
21
0
3
8
37
0
3
SACPCMP BY RACE & Gender
A
W
I
C
566
221
39
39
236
14
2
3
802
235
41
42
SACPVP BY RACE & Gender
A
W
I
C
198
317
30
5
144
101
10
51
342
418
40
56
SACQP BY RACE & Gender
A
W
I
C
376
459
127
43
294
53
11
8
670
512
138
51
11091
7634
2065
678
T
12629
3558
16187
T
1314
572
1886
T
22
26
48
T
865
255
1120
T
550
305
856
T
1005
366
1371
21467
ECSA BY RACE & Gender %
% GENDER
Gender
A
W
I
C
T
M
51%
36%
10%
3%
78%
F
66%
21%
11%
3%
22%
T
54%
33%
11%
2%
100%
SACAP BY RACE & Gender
% GENDER
Gender
A
W
I
C
T
M
34%
53%
7%
6%
70%
F
16%
72%
8%
4%
30%
T
28%
59%
8%
5%
100%
SACLAP BY RACE & Gender
% GENDER
Gender
A
W
I
C
T
M
27%
73%
0%
0%
46%
F
8%
81%
0%
11%
54%
T
17%
77%
0%
6%
100%
SACPCMP BY RACE & Gender
% GENDER
Gender
A
W
I
C
T
M
65%
25%
5%
5%
77%
F
93%
5%
1%
1%
23%
T
72%
20%
4%
4%
100%
SACPVP BY RACE & Gender
% GENDER
Gender
A
W
I
C
T
M
36%
58%
5%
1%
64%
F
47%
33%
3%
17%
36%
T
40%
49%
5%
6%
100%
SACQP BY RACE & Gender
% GENDER
Gender
A
W
I
C
T
M
37%
46%
13%
4%
73%
F
80%
15%
3%
2%
27%
T
49%
37%
10%
4%
100%
T
56%
38%
10%
2%
100%
For a better built environment
CBE’s Skills Pipeline Intervention Proposal
• Government
• Parastatals
• Private Sector
27 yrs
24 yrs
18 yrs
15 yrs
Push Strategy
School
System
Matriculate
Intermediate Strategy Pull Strategy
Graduate
Candidacy
Professional Life
• CBE
• 6 Councils in BE
Exit
Exit
Exit
Exit
11
For a better built environment
SKILLS DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES - CBE
1. School Level Initiatives
•Career Awareness Initiatives – videos to increase footprint & reach
•Maths & Science support to schools – partnering with already successful entities
•GirlEng – excellence in Maths & Science – already supporting
2. Tertiary Level
•Bursary scheme–centralised & formulating comprehensive student support program
• Interaction with Academic Institutions : Research Partnerships programmes & input to
curriculum(labour intensive construction; health & safety; green agenda)
3. Recent Graduates/Candidates
•Formulated a Workplace Training structured Candidacy Programme with quality
assurance guidelines, to enable relevant workplace training & accelerate professional
registration.
4. CPD Programmes
• Driven by 6 Professional Councils and Voluntary Associations.
5. Public Sector Technical Skills Development Initiatives
•DPW internal technical skills development initiatives – national & provincial
•MISA (Municipal Infrastructure Support Agency) technical skills dev initiatives
•Participation in Skills Plan-Presidential Infrastructure Projects – skills plan
12
For a better built environment
Proposed solutions regards professional
registration
1.
A workplace training programme that links to professional registration.
2.
A framework to understand and monitor what happens at the workplace – no information on
every graduate or candidate regarding where they are doing in the workplace; including
proper training plans, host workplace checklists, mentors training and agreements and
rotation of candidate to cover core areas.
A quality assured, transparent candidacy programme and an unbiased and uniform
assessment process of candidates at each professional council.
3.
4.
5.
Packaging incentives for employers who take on candidates and trainees.
Educating the unregistered BE graduates on the importance of registration.
6.
7.
Transformation Implementation model to address skills development based interventions.
Workplace Training Implementation model to address quality assured workplace training that
is linked to professional registration – starting with the BE graduates in the public sector and
unemployed graduates.
13
For a better built environment
TRANSFORMATION IMPLEMENTATION MODEL FOR THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT PROFESSIONS
Proposals from the Draft Transformation Implementation Model :
Proposed Structure
Establishment of a Non-Profit Organisation comprising of a Board of Trustees from CBE, DPW, Dept of Higher Education and Training,
Infrastructure Departments,Construction SETA, representatives of the 6 Professional Councils and the Private Sector.
Proposed Key Programmes and Proposed Funding Mechanisms
1. Education Upliftment Programme
Maths and Science Grade 8 to 12 upliftment program
Maths and Science Teacher support programme
Career Awareness
Proposed Funding: The National Skills Fund.
2. Bursary Fund Scheme and University Capacity Programme
Central Bursary Scheme
University student support program
Retention of built environment lecturers and programmes
Lecturer support programmes
Built Environment Research Fund with partners Academic Institutions, NRF and Industry
Proposed Funding: Board of Trustees raises 50% of funding and 50% from National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS), SETAs,
Employer bodies, DHET, etc.
3. Workplace Learning Support Programme
Structured Candidacy
Workplace training that enables professional registration
Work integrated learning opportunities for University of Technology or Comprehensive University national diploma students
Proposed Funding: Board of Trustees approach SETAs, employer bodies, DHET (NSF), etc, for funding.
4. Registered Professionals Support Programme
Retention program for built environment professionals
Proposed Funding: Employer bodies.
5. Public Sector Professionals Support Programme
Program for built environment professionals in the public sector including municipalities
Proposed Funding: Departmental Budgets, SETAs, DHET (NSF), Treasury
Thank you
15
For a better built environment