Transcript Document

Clinico-pathology conference
KFMSR
An interesting case of paranasal tumor
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head &
neck Surgery
Dr. Vijay R , Asst Prof, ENT
History
• Mrs.XX 37 Yrs working as a tobacco binder
presenting with
• Left eye purulent discharge - 6months
• Ext DCR(Dacryocystorhinostomy) was done at an
outside hospital -5months
• Recurrence of symptoms within – 4 months
• Left sided cheek swelling – 4months
• Left sided hypoaethesia - 3 ½ months
• Left nose block – 3months
• Epistaxis – 1months
Clinical Findings
Clinical examination
• O/E
• ECOG – 0 to 1, KS >80<100
• AR – soft bulge within left
nostril
– DNS to right
•
•
•
•
•
Oral SMF , Gr II trismus
No palpable neck nodes
No bony tenderness
Sys exam – WNL
Ophthal W/U – B/E aquity
6/6
ECOG – Eastern cooperative oncological grading
KS – Karnofsky score
Imaging
• Partially enhancing soft
tissue density
– Left maxilla
– Anterior ethmoids
– Extending into nasal cavity
proper with partial erosion roof
maxilla and erosion of anterior
wall but posterior wall of maxilla
is preserved
– Obliterated Nasolacrimal duct
pathway
– Obliterated infraorbitalforamen
Biopsy from left maxilla
GROSS: Multiple pale white tissue bits measuring
1x0.5 cm(AE)
MICROSCOPY:
Infiltrating tumour composed of cells arranged in nests, singly
scattered and focal alveolar pattern.
Round to spindle cells with scant to moderate amount of
eosinophilic cytoplasm and hyperchromatic nuclei few
showing prominent nucleoli. Some areas showed nuclear
moulding.
No mitosis/necrosis/lymphovascular invasion
Probable Diagnosis ?
MALIGNANT SMALL ROUND CELL TUMOUR
Differential Diagnosis:
Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma
Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma
Malignant melanoma
Olfactory neuroblastoma
Malignant PECOMA
Olfactory Neuroblastoma
Small cell neuro endocrine carcinoma
Rhadomyosarcoma
Malignant Pecoma
Maxillectomy Specimen
• Specimen sent in 3
parts
• Largest one measuring
6x4.5x4 cm
• Smallest measuring
3x3x1 cm
Microscopy
Sinunasal Mucosal Malignant Melanoma
MALIGNANT MELANOMA
MELANIN DEPOSIT
Malignant Melanoma
• Approximately 1% of all malignant melanomas
occur in the nasal cavity and paranasal
sinuses.
• Paranasal sinuses- antrum(80%) followed by
ethmoid
Malignant Melanoma
• Prognosis: Poor with a 5 year survival rate of
15 to 30%
• Pathology (Diagnostic
Nasal Endoscopy &
Biopsy)
Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma
Small cell neuroendocrine
carcinoma
Malignant melanoma
• Total maxillectomy
Sinunasal mucosal melanoma
Surgery - Procedure
Maxillary sinus tumors
• Most common site (60-70%)
• Squamous cell carcinoma- MC (80%)
• Multi factorial – mustard gas, nickel dust (AC),
thorotrast, isopropyl oil, chromium,DDS &
wood dust(SSC – t21)
• Furniture, leather & textile industry
• HPV, EBV – Inverted papilloma
• Malignant melanoma -very rare <1%
– irritants and carcinogens , such as tobacco smoke,
implicated in the development of this malignancy
Epiphora
Chemosis
Extra axial/eccentric
proptosis
Retro orbital pain
Diplopia
blindness
Trismus
Neuralgic pain
Pterygoid involvement
Extension intracranially
Through natural foramens
SOM
Ca maxilla
Cross road
tumors
Malocclusion
Loosening of teeth
halitosis
Palatal erosion
Oro antral fistula
Cheek mass
Hypoaesthesia
Anaesthesia rarely
NLD involvement
(<1%)
Peau de orange
LN +
Maxillary sinus tumor
Approaches
•
•
•
•
Endoscopic modified Denker s procedure
Moure Lateral rhinotomy approach
Classical Weber Ferguson approach
Modified transconjunctival approach
• Intracranial extension
• Orbital exenteration
• Skull base involvement (Craniofacial resection planned)
Reconstruction
• Immediate–GP/patty mix with
initial obturatorwith or without skin
grafting
• Intermediate–temporary obturator
made from initial obturator
• Permanent–when the treatment
modalities are complete and no
more shrinkage is expected
-permanent obturator
-bone graft with dental implants
• Ocular support/titanium mesh–if
whitnalls/ltcanthalligament is
transected
Complications
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Cornea injury – tarsoraphy/sheilding
Bleeding – III internal max artery
CSF leak – CFR, high osteotomy
Orbital injury – periorbital injury
Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) - Temp
Eustachian tube injury - scarring
Epiphora – NLD injury
Infection, flap necrosis, prosthetic disturbance
Trismus, discosmesis, persisting VPI (very rare)
Maxillary sinus tumor
• Though postoperative ChemoRT has no
proven increased survival rate, still it is
internationally accepted as an adjunct
• Adjunct only not mainstay in treating maxillary
tumors unlike laryngeal tumors.
• Even if periorbita is involved exenteration is a
standard procedure rather than subjecting the
patient to ChemoRT which would anyway
destroy patients vision.
Team work, works