DPS Realignment - Detroit Public Schools
Download
Report
Transcript DPS Realignment - Detroit Public Schools
DPS Realignment Plan
Division of Finance
April Royster, CPA
Executive Director Office of Accounting
2
(K – 12)
*
* NOTE: Between 2003-2007 41,576 students were
lost totaling $291,032,000
(Projected)
3
FY07 Personnel Costs
G - Police Officers ,
$3,753,453.04 (0%)
D - Journeypersons ,
$4,158,503.64 (0%)
L - Non-Represented
Employees,
$4,840,994.43 (0%)
J - Site Management ,
$3,190,062.77 (0%)
X - Executive Staff ,
$5,959,513.70 (1%)
S - Noon Hour Aides,
$9,425,853.88 (1%)
O - Forepersons ,
$557,706.85 (0%)
Q - Bus Drivers,
$12,911,977.86 (1%)
H - Broadcast Engineers
, $247,426.47 (0%)
N - NISP ,
$13,448,630.08 (1%)
M - Para Professionals ,
$15,019,146.69 (1%)
Total Cost
$1,104,364,293.11
P - Public Safety
Officers, $17,020,726.79
(2%)
E - Operating Engineers
, $31,595,544.14 (3%)
X & Y - Assistant
Principals & Principals ,
$44,577,963.88 (4%)
A - DFT ,
$769,366,346.95 (70%)
B - LOCAL 345 ,
$71,505,325.76 (6%)
C - OSAS,
$52,183,942.25 (5%)
F - DAEOE ,
4
$44,601,173.91 (4%)
Total Revenue vs Personnel
Costs
FY07
Percent
Revenue
$ 1,355,906,989 100.00%
Personnel Costs
1,104,364,293 81.45%
Funds Available
For other costs $
251,542,696
18.55%
5
Total Revenue vs Personnel
Costs
FY08
Projected
Revenue
FY07
Personnel Costs
Funds Available
For other costs
Percent
$ 1,240,483,052
100.00%
1,104,364,293
89.03%
$
136,118,759
10.97%
6
DPS FY07 – FY08 Comparison
General Fund (11,13,14,22) Appropriations
FY07 Amended
FY08 Projected
Difference
February 28, 2007
Total Available Resources
$1,377,929,682
$1,241,230,200
($136,699,482)
Total Expenditures and Transfers
$1,376,359,916
*$1,359,026,586
($17,333,030)
Revenue for repayment of
uncollectible delinquent taxes
($2,000,000)
($2,000,000)
0
Ending Fund Balance
$1,569,766
($117,796,386)
($119,366,452)
FY08 Expenses Include:
•Decrease in staffing of 333 General Fund Positions amounting to ($28,333,330)
•Decrease in special education supplement of $5 million
•1% Increase in DFT Salaries amounting to $6 million
7
Revenue Expenditure Trends
1.700
1.650
1.600
In Millions of Dollars
1.550
1.500
1.450
1.400
1.350
1.300
1.250
1.200
2002
2003
2004
2005
Total Revenues
2006
Total Expenditures
2007
2008 Projected
8
Fund Balance by Year
120,000,000
103,603,001
100,000,000
74,650,009
80,000,000
60,000,000
46,791,278
40,000,000
22,022,693
20,000,000
1,569,766
0
2007
2008 Projected
0
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
-20,000,000
-40,000,000
-48,687,349
-60,000,000
9
District Realities
Noncompliance with the Deficit
Elimination Plan
$210 million loan immediately becomes
due & payable
A financial manager gets appointed to
the District
10
District Realities
Reduction in Facilities costs
Reduction in programs being offered - i.e.
Fine Arts $14 million, Athletics $3.5 million,
Student Aids/Co-ops $4.8 million, Noonhour aides $9.4 million
Additional lay-offs – Approx. 1,800 persons
11
District Realities (con’t)
Additional concessions and concession
increases required by remaining employees
Reductions in non-instructional personnel, i.e.
security, custodians, etc.
Increase in over class-size pay-outs
Loss of valuable staff, and increased decline in
morale due to the above.
12
District Realities (con’t)
“Nobody’s coming to SAVE US!”
State of Michigan FY 2007 deficit - $920 million
City of Detroit FY 2007 deficit - $163 million
Detroit Public Schools FY 2008 projected
deficit - $118 million
13
DPS Realignment Plan
Division of Business Services
Darrell Rodgers, Ph.D.
Chair DPS Realignment Planning Committee 2007-2008
Chief Of Facilities Maintenance and Auxiliary Services
14
Purpose of the Plan
Preserve Strong Academic
Programs and Support New
and Innovative Programs
Reduce Expenses by
Eliminating Excess Space
15
DPS Financial Condition
IMMEDIATE
&
BOLD ACTION
REQUIRED
16
DPS Facilities/Enrollment
ENROLLMENT
119,893 (PK-12)
CLASSROOMS
VACANT
PROGRAM
CAPACITY
642
180,822
40+
SEATS
AVAILABLE
60,929
BUILDINGS
< 50%
FULL
17
DPS Capacity and Loss of Students
60,000
Empty
Seats
REVENUE TIED
TO
ENROLLMENT
50% BUILDING
OCCUPANCY
= 100% COST
18
Realignment Committee
Committee Formed in October 2006
All DPS Departments
Represented
Stakeholder Outreach Meetings
Held
19
Realignment Committee
Preliminary Realignment Plan
Released, January 5, 2007
Responsibility:
Preserve Strong Academic
Programs and Support New and
Innovative Programs
Develop plan for “rightsizing”
District Facilities with enrollment
20
Objectives
Increase the potential to achieve
educational excellence
Increase enrollment in under
populated schools to maximize the
use of the “better” buildings
21
Objectives
Increase operational efficiency
while keeping students as close
to home as possible and
managing transportation costs
Maximize the use of
operationally efficient facilities
22
Realignment Committee
Considerations For Realignment:
Capacity vs. Enrollment
Enrollment Trends
Academic Achievement
Better Academic Culture/Climate
Building Condition
High Operational Costs
Residential Development
23
Public Engagement
DPS Internal Stakeholders
Principals
Curriculum / Instruction
Facilities Services
School Leadership & Accountability
Other Departments
24
Public Engagement
External Stakeholders
Detroit Federation of Teachers (DFT)
Other Union Leaders
City Officials
Skillman Foundation
New Detroit, Inc.
Others
Community Input Meetings on Realignment
Process
Community Forums on School Realignment
25
Public Engagement
City-Wide Parent Information Meetings
Public Hearings Conducted
Over 60 Written Proposals Reviewed
Site Visits
Realignment Plan Revised
26
Plan Highlights
33 Buildings to close by Fall 2007
Ten (10) conditional closures by Fall 2008
Empty seats decreased by 32,250
Projected annual savings:
Over $16.9 million starting 2008
Opportunity to flatten central office
27
Plan Highlights
Preserve successful schools & programs
Reading First
Schools With Increasing MEAP Scores
Increase Busing & Transportation
Opportunities
Busing Costs Not Impacted Significantly
28
Plan Highlights
Not Just a Closure Plan
Turnaround Plan
Improving Education with focus on
Academic Achievement
Improving School-Based Leadership
Improving Customer Service
Stabilize Enrollment
29
Plan Highlights
New and Expanded Programs
Single Gender 7-12 Grade Academies
23 NEW theme-based schools
Three (3) K-12 neighborhood campuses
Ninth Grade Academy Pilot Program
Expanded Alternative Education Programs
Restore and enhance curriculum to increase student
achievement and performance
30
Plan Benefits
Maximize utilization of better buildings
Concentrate all resources to better
serve students, parents and staff
Mobilize resources to provide safe
learning environments, transportation
offerings and increased security
31
Plan Benefits
Redirect resources for:
Security
Curriculum and Technology
Housekeeping
Maintenance (ex. painting, lighting,
restroom improvements)
Building and grounds improvement
Improve customer service & satisfaction
In our schools
In district offices
In related facilities
32
Plan Benefits
Redesign schools to meet the
academic needs of our students
Flatten central office organization and
create a service-oriented culture that
delivers equitable services to students
and schools
33
Plan Implementation
Challenging Task Ahead
Additional Meetings with School
Staff and School/Community
Stakeholders
Multi-Year Support
34
Plan Implementation
Transition Teams
Open House
events at
receiving schools
Counselor
Social Worker
Public Safety Officer
LSCO Chairs
Curriculum Specialist
Administrator
Teacher Representative
Transition Team
Coordinator
Before school
year ends
During the
summer months.
35
Next Steps
School Board Approves Realignment Plan
Integrated Plan – Changes have a ripple effect
Meetings at closing schools within the next
30 days
Information for Parents/Community
Staff Meetings to discuss process and concerns
Team Building Development
Customer Service Training
Letter(s) to parents impacted with notice of
newly assigned school(s) ~ May, 2007
Telephone Hotline for Realignment Plan Information
36
Next Steps
Coordinate with the Opening of School
Task Force
Logistics and Move Management
Construction Modifications at
Receiving Schools
Close and/or Decommission Buildings
Development of Facilities Master Plan
37
Conclusion
“Realigning DPS for Success”
Stop Spending Money on Empty Spaces
Enhance Academic Performance
Increase Enrollment in Better Buildings
Improve Operational Efficiency
Publicize Competitive Advantages
Stabilize Enrollment
38
District Realities
“Nobody’s coming to SAVE US!”
State of Michigan FY 2007 deficit - $920 million
City of Detroit FY 2007 deficit - $163 million
Detroit Public Schools FY 2008 projected
deficit - $118 million
39
“Realigning DPS for
Success”
40
DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS
REALIGNMENT PLAN
2007-2008
41
42