Transcript Document
Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Training and Technical Assistance April 12-13, 2011 Stephen K. Valle, Sc.D., M.B.A., Licensed Psychologist, LADC I, CADAC This project was supported by grant No. 2010-RT-BX-K001 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, the SMART Office, and the Office for Victims of Crime. Point of view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do not represent the official position or policies of the United States Department of Justice. Evidence-Based Integrated Modified Therapeutic Community Model Correctional Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Programs PURPOSE: • TO ENSURE THE MOST EFFECTIVE APPROACH IS UTILIZED TO PROVIDE THE MOST SUCCESSFUL OUTCOME FOR OFFENDERS BY INTEGRATING THE HIGHLY EFFECTIVE EVIDENCED BASE TREATMENT APPROACH WITH OTHER OEVIDENCED BASED TECHNIQUES. PRINICIPLES AND STANDARDS Evidence-Based Programs in Corrections 13 Principles of Drug Abuse Treatment for Criminal Justice Populations Drug addiction is a brain disease that affects behavior. 1.Recovery from drug addiction requires effective treatment, followed by management of the problem over time. 2.Treatment must last long enough to produce stable behavioral changes. 3.Assessment is the first step in treatment. 4.Tailoring services to fit the needs of the individual is an important part of effective drug abuse treatment for criminal justice populations. National Institute on Drug Addiction March 2011 www.drugabuse.gov 13 Principles of Drug Abuse Treatment for Criminal Justice Populations -continued 6. Drug use during treatment should be carefully monitored. 7. Treatment should target factors that are associated with criminal behavior. 8. Criminal justice supervision should incorporate treatment planning for drug abusing offenders, and treatment providers should be aware of correctional supervision requirements. 9. Continuity of care is essential for drug abusers re-entering the community. National Institute on Drug Addiction March 2011 www.drugabuse.gov 13 Principles of Drug Abuse Treatment for Criminal Justice Populations -continued 10. A balance of rewards and sanctions encourages pro-social behavior and treatment participation. 11. Offenders with co-occurring drug abuse and mental health problems often require an integrated treatment approach. 12. Medications are an important part of treatment for many drug abusing offenders. 13. Treatment planning for drug abusing offenders who are living in or re-entering the community should include strategies to prevent and treat. National Institute on Drug Addiction March 2011 www.drugabuse.gov Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment: A Research Based Guide Principles of Effective Treatment 1. Addiction is a complex but treatable disease that affects brain function and behavior. 2. No single treatment is appropriate for everyone. 3. Treatment needs to be readily available. 4. Effective treatment attends to multiple needs of the individual, not just his or her drug abuse. 5. Remaining in treatment for an adequate period of time is critical. National Institute on Drug Addiction March 2011 www.drugabuse.gov Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment: A Research Based Guide Principles of Effective Treatment - Continued 6. 7. 8. 9. Counseling – individual and/or group – and other behavioral therapies are the most commonly used forms of drug abuse treatment. Medications are an important element of treatment for many patients, especially when combined with counseling and other behavioral therapies. An individual’s treatment and services plan must be assessed continually and modified as necessary to ensure that it meets his or her changing needs. Many drug-addicted individuals also have other mental disorders. National Institute on Drug Addiction March 2011 www.drugabuse.gov Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment: A Research Based Guide Principles of Effective Treatment - Continued 10. Medically assisted detoxification is only the first stage of addiction treatment and by itself does little to change longterm drug abuse. 11. Treatment does not need to be voluntary to be effective. 12. Drug use during treatment must be monitored continuously, as lapses during treatment do occur. 13. Treatment programs should assess patients for the presence of HIV/AIDS, hepatitis B and C, tuberculosis, and other infectious diseases as well as provide targeted risk-reduction counseling to help patients modify or change behaviors that place them at risk or contracting or spreading infectious diseases. National Institute on Drug Addiction March 2011 www.drugabuse.gov GOAL: • The Overall GOAL of this presentation is to explore the foundational aspects of the RSAT Therapeutic Community and discuss advanced application of Evidence-Based Practices. We introduce the framework/concept of an Evidence-Based Integrative Modified Therapeutic Community RSAT Program. OBJECTIVES: • Discuss the different theories of Addiction. • Provide an overview of the Therapeutic Community Model. • Discuss the application of the Essential and Key Elements of • • • • • the Therapeutic Community Examine Key Elements of Treatment Readiness, Responsivity, and Motivation for Change. Discuss Stages of Changes and Associated Features. Review components of Cognitive Behavioral Techniques. Review Twelve Steps Programs and Process Explore the integration of the model utilizing the Therapeutic Community as the foundation. The Mission of Correctional RSAT Programs To promote public safety by reducing recidivism through effective programming WHY RSAT IN CORRECTIONS? • More than 80% of inmates have substance abuse problems • Substance abuse is the largest contributing factor to recidivism -This directly contributes to overcrowding and increased costs • Common Mission -The Mission of Corrections and Treatment is to correct / change criminal behavior • Effective inmate management tool • Enhances staff morale WHY RSAT IN CORRECTIONS? • Overwhelming research evidence that treatment works Reduces recidivism from 10-50% Reduces direct corrections operational costs Reduces victim related costs Delaware/Crest Program (1999) BOTEC Barnstable County RSAT Program Correctional RSAT Program Core Conditions • The Program must use a consistent model of treatment • Staff and inmates must feel ownership in the treatment program • Treatment must be structured • The treatment program's rules must be clearly stated. Sanctions must be clearly defined and consistently applied • Inmates must be held accountable for their behaviors on and off the treatment unit • Treatment must involve the inmate's peer group • The treatment program must demonstrate a balance between support and confrontation • Staff as Role Models in RSAT Delaware/Crest Program: 3-Year Re-Arrest & Drug Use Rates WHAT IS A CORRECTIONAL RSAT PROGRAM? • Minimum of six months of program services • Highly structured schedule of behavior change strategies • Proven Criminal Justice / Corrections Habilitation Model for Pro Social Change • Based on Evidence Based Practices EXAMPLE OF AN RSAT CORRECTIONAL PROGRAM MODEL Accountability Training® Incorporates the integration of the 12-Step selfhelp philosophy, bio/psycho/social perspective on addiction, cognitive behavior change strategies, moral reasoning and character development principles Uses Standardized and evidence based assessment instruments to determine risk of reoffending and needs that may be addressed for change to occur Manual based curriculum targeting the learning of pro-social skills Results / Outcome Driven Model HOW DOES RSAT WORK? Structure, Discipline, Consistency - Critical for model to be successful (inmates and staff) • “Hymn Book Principle” Essential for uniform and non-uniform staff to be on the same page. Consistency is key. There is no “ I ” in TEAM! •The Therapeutic Community (TC) is the method for change, not the treatment specialist or the individual • Training is critical and on-going. HOW DOES RSAT WORK? • Staff as role models (examples developed by staff) Consistency – all staff follow consistent rules and schedules every day and every shift; orderly entrance to groups, chow, morning inspections, etc. Guidelines should be agreed upon and followed by all staff. For instance - How to schedule breakfast, showers, and time to prepare for inspection. Staff does not talk about their own current use. (“I got so drunk last night”) Staff model the behaviors that inmates are taught. They listen and respond respectively, even when holding an inmate accountable for unacceptable behaviors. Direct supervision training demanded this type of behavior of all staff. The Sheriff stated that he supports it and will not have any tolerance for staff not complying. Staff as role models (examples developed by staff) Staff will not intentionally “set up” an inmate. Staff will not refer to inmates sarcastically. (“Are you retarded?”) Staff will emphasize praise for positive efforts rather than punishment for mistakes. Address bad behavior as much as possible within the Unit as opposed to lugging / disciplining inmates out of the Unit. Treatment staff and Correctional Officers should combine efforts to address bad behavior. Avoid public humiliation. Confrontation should focus on negative behavior and attitudes, not on the individual. Staff will establish a base of respect. Staff are capable and willing to run a community meeting. Staff refrains from the use of coarse language and outbursts of anger. Core Components of Accountability Training® Correctional RSAT Program Bio / Psych / Social / Spiritual Perspective on Addiction Disease Model 12-Step Programs, other Self-Help Programs and Clinical Treatment Cognitive-Behavioral Change Strategies and Criminogenic Rick / Need / Principles Re-socialization and Peer Accountability (Therapeutic Community – TC) THE THERAPEUTIC COMMUNITY Evidence-Based Integrated Modified Therapeutic Community Programs in Corrections The Therapeutic Community Model* • As a Belief System - demands that practitioners / staff believe that this model works; that the individual CAN change and that it is the group, the community, that facilitates this change. • As a Scientific System- has theories, researched methods and measurable behaviors at work that yield predictable outcomes regardless of where the model is practiced. *Taken from Therapeutic Community: History and Overview video featuring David Deitch, Ph.D., 1998. The Therapeutic Community Model • Community as Method of Change TC members interact in structured and unstructured ways to influence attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors associated with drug use and criminal behaviors. • Hierarchy of Responsibility A hierarchy structure is utilized within the community to create responsibility for all community members using mentors and team leaders. • Accountability TC members learn to be accountable to themselves and peers through participation in community meetings, work details and learning experiences. Therapeutic Community • The term Therapeutic Community has come to represent a distinct approach that can be applied in almost any setting with almost any population. • Therapeutic Community model has been adapted for use with what populations? Almost any ethnic or special population. It is a cross-cultural model. Includes adolescents, geriatrics, adults, head injury, PSTD, women, PRISON, etc. • To maintain integrity as a TC, the basic components of the generic TC program and the eight essential concepts of using community as method must be preserved. Community As Method • The essential element of the TC is COMMUNITY. What distinguishes the TC from other treatment approaches is the purposive use of the community. • COMMUNITY is the primary method to bring about needed social and psychological change in the individual. • Every activity in a TC is designed to produce therapeutic and educational change in the individual participants. • It is the participants who are the mediators of these changes. The COMMUNITY is both teacher and healer. The Therapeutic Community Model • Community as Method • The Therapeutic Community Perspective View of the Disorder View of the Person View of Recovery View of Right Living • 8 Concepts • 14 Components Therapeutic Community Perspective • • • • View of the Disorder Substance abuse is viewed as a disorder of the whole person. View of the Person The person or individual is distinguished along dimensions of psychological and social dysfunction. View of Recovery The goal of treatment is a global change in lifestyle and identity. View of Right Living In the TC view of right living, certain beliefs and values are essential to recovery, personal growth and healthy living. Eight Concepts of Therapeutic Communities 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Use of Participant Roles Use of Membership Feedback Use of Membership as Role Models Use of Collective Formats for Guiding Individual Change Use of Shared Norms and Values Use of Structure and Systems Use of Open Communication Use of Relationships Fourteen Components of Therapeutic Communities 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Community Separateness Community Environment Community Activities Peers as Community Members Staff as Community Members A Structured Day Phase Format Work as Therapy and Education TC Concepts Peer Encounter Groups Awareness Training Emotional Growth Training Planned Duration of Treatment Continuance of Recovery ADDICTION Understanding Addiction as a Brain Disease Paradigm Shift “JUST SAY NO” vs. THE DISEASE MODEL OF ADDICTION The Disease Model Addiction is a chronic, progressive, relapse - prone illness that has the potential to be fatal if left untreated. Chronic - The World Health Organization defines chronic diseases as having: • A clearly defined onset • An identifiable and predictable set of symptoms • A responsiveness to treatment as evidenced by a decrease in symptoms • The ability to be arrested ( not cured) by appropriated treatment • A progressive nature without treatment Addiction is a chronic, progressive, relapseable illness that has the potential to be fatal if left untreated. Progressive diseases: • • Get worse, not better, over time. Tolerance develops. Relapse: • Relapse is a common aspect of all chronic diseases. But relapse is not pre-determined. Relapse, for some, can be avoided. Relapse, for many, is common and can be managed effectively. Fatality: • Chronic diseases can and do kill. Addiction is no different Symptoms of Addiction • Physiological Symptoms Withdrawal Tolerance • Psychological Symptoms Irritability and Craving Emotional Discomfort Social Avoidance Choosing the Drug over family, community, job, school, etc. Addiction impacts the physical, social, psychological, and spiritual aspects of the individual’s life. Symptoms –Areas Affected by Addiction • Physical • Psychological • Mental • Emotional • Behavioral • Spiritual • Social • Cultural • Environmental • Socio-Economic/Political Choice and Addiction Individuals do not choose the diseases that they suffer but they do choose how they treat them. Pleasure Unwoven Pleasure Unwoven: An Explanation of the Brain Disease of Addiction (2010) DVD Kevin McCauley (Director) Accountability Training® Recidivism Reduction Pyramid RECOVERY SERVICE SPIRITUALITY WE ARE WHAT WE THINK (COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL SKILLS) 12 STEPS/MUTUAL-HELP CONNECTIONS ADDICTION IS A BRAIN DISEASE RESPECT Others – Self - Authority © 2009 Dr. Steve Valle ASSESSMENT Standardized Assessment of Criminogenic Risks and Needs Overall Goals of Assessment in the Criminal Justice System • Determine level of supervision of clients in order to maximize and facilitate public safety and to determine the service needs of clients to prevent / reduce recidivism • Identify clients in the criminal justice system that need educational / vocational services, and treatment intervention for substance abuse and criminal conduct • Match client problems and level of severity with intervention and treatment services Multidimensional Assessment • Comprehensive Assessment of RSAT Participants will ideally include standardized, evidence-based assessment of the individual in each of the following areas: • Criminogenic Risk/Need • Substance Abuse • Motivation for Change/Treatment Readiness • More accurate and comprehensive assessment practices lead to more precise interventions. Structured Interview Assessments • Assessments that are administered by a trained correctional worker in an one-to-one format using an prepared “guide” to lead interview through a semistructured interview. • Benefits include the opportunity for a client to develop a cooperative working relationship with assessment administrator that can begin treatment experience in a positive light. Self-Report Assessments • Assessments that are completed by the client individually which can, in some cases, increase the veracity of response particularly in regards to areas of substance abuse. • When paired with structured assessment responses, results of both are generally more robust and meaningful for case planning and program placement. • Assessment in correctional settings involves predicting the likelihood that offenders will engage in criminal conduct in the future. Risk/Needs Assessment Instruments • Identifying offenders’ criminogenic needs and placing them in appropriate intervention programs can reduce recidivism. • Criminogenic needs are offender characteristics or traits that contribute to inappropriate behavior, negativistic attitudes and recidivism (Andrews & Bonta, 1994). • Criminogenic needs are risk factors that are capable of change. • When these needs are changed in treatment, they affect changes in the offender’s chances of recidivism Risk Principle The intensity of treatment services should be matched to the risk level of the offender. High-risk offenders require more intensive and extensive services while low-risk offenders require minimal or no intervention. “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!” Need Principle The need principle identifies two types of offender needs: criminogenic and non-criminogenic •To reduce criminal behavior, we have to focus treatment efforts and resources on those risk factors that have been shown to be most strongly linked to criminality and can change with interventions. •Criminogenic needs are those offender risk factors that when changed are associated with changes in recidivism. Responsivity • Current research documents that when a client’s strengths, motivational level, personality characteristics, learning style and particular bio-social characteristics are identified and taken into account when deciding upon appropriate programming, recidivism can be significantly reduced. (Kennedy, S., & Serin, R. C. 1997) • Specific responsivity considerations are becoming increasingly more important to include in effective offender assessment and treatment The Major Risk Factors - THE BIG FOUR 1. Antisocial supports - peers 2. Antisocial thinking - ways of perceiving that support criminal behaviors 3. Antisocial personality factors - poor social skills, impulsive, risk-taking 4. Criminal history The Mid-Range Risk Factors • Familial factors • Low levels of personal, educational, vocational, and financial achievement • Alcohol / Drug Abuse The Level of Service Inventory – Revised (LSI-R) Criminal History Education/Employment Financial Family/Marital Accommodations Leisure/Recreation Companions Alcohol/Drug Problem Emotional/Personal Attitudes/Orientation Research on Treatment Matching • High-risk offenders should be placed in intensive intervention and treatment programs • Low-risk offenders should be matched with low levels of intervention and treatment. • Placing low-risk offenders in intensive intervention or treatment programs is found to be counter productive and produces increased recidivism. Static and Dynamic Risk Factors • According to Andrews & Bonta (1994), predictors of recidivism include two types of risk factors: • Static risk factors involve aspects of the offender’s past (e.g., previous convictions) that are predictive of recidivism but do not change. • Dynamic risk factors are criminogenic needs (e.g., antisocial thinking, violence and substance abuse). • Risk / Need Assessment Instruments that include more dynamic criminogenic scoring items vs static items have been found to have much better in predicting recidivism and success in treatment. Criminogenic Risk/Needs Assessment Instruments • The following standardized assessment instruments are have been empirically validated and are appropriate for inclusion in evidence based programs: • Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI) • Level of Service/Risk Needs Responsivity (LS/RNR) • Ohio Risk Assessment System (ORAS) • Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions (COMPAS) Level of Service/Case Management Inventory • Combines Risk/Needs Assessment and Case Management into one Evidence-Based System • Can be used by any TRAINED professional, including parole, probation and correctional officers; caseworkers, and program facilitators. • Training in proper administration, scoring, and interpretation is essential to ensuring the validity of the instrument. LS/CMI Continued • Includes Assessment Form, Case Management Plan, Progress Reports, and Discharge Plan • Previous versions of the instrument (LSI and LSI-R) did not include the Case Management Component • The LS/CMI was normed on 157,947 North American youth and adult offenders - 60,156 US adult and youth offenders from 10 jurisdictions, and 97,791 Canadian community and institutionalized adult and youth offenders • Computerized versions available Level of Service/ Risk, Need, Responsivity (LS/RNR) • Designed for Public Safety Programs that already have a Case Management Component in place • The LS/RNR normative sample consisted of 157,947 North American youth and adult offenders - 60,156 American adult and youth offenders from 10 jurisdictions and 97,791 Canadian community and institutionalized adult and youth offenders • Assesses the: Rehabilitation Needs of Offenders Risk of Recidivism Responsivity, the most relevant factors related to supervision and programming LS/RNR Continued • General Risk/Need Factors Assessed: Criminal History Education/Employment Family/Marital Leisure/Recreation Companions, Alcohol/Drug Problems Pro-criminal Attitude/Orientation Antisocial Pattern. • Special Risk/Need Factors Assessed: Personal Problems with Criminogenic Potential History of Perpetration, including sexual and nonsexual assault and other forms of violence and anti-social behavior. • Special Responsivity Considerations are also included. Ohio Risk Assessment System (ORAS) • Five assessment instruments were created using items that were related to recidivism: • Pretrial Assessment Tool • Community Supervision Tool • Community Supervision Screening Tool • Prison Intake Tool • Reentry Tool ORAS Continued Designed to: 1. Separate offenders into risk groups based on their likelihood to recidivate 2. Identify dynamic risk factors that can be used to prioritize programmatic needs 3. Identify potential barriers to treatment. 4. Aid in decision-making regarding the allocation of financial, rehabilitation and supervision resources. Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions (COMPAS) There are four major risk assessment scales included in the COMPAS design: •Violence •Recidivism •Flight •Community Non-Compliance In addition to the assessment of an offender's appropriateness for community corrections, these scales can be used in decisions regarding release and case management supervision. COMPAS, continued Risk Assessments are based on a comprehensive set of over twenty well validated criminogenic factors including: criminal history violence history early onset of delinquency substance abuse criminal associates criminal attitudes criminal personality (impulsivity, low self-control) criminal opportunity (high risk lifestyle) Substance Abuse Assessment Research indicates that inmates with substance abuse problems are at higher risk for a number of problems and conditions that, left unidentified and unaddressed, can increase the probability of relapse and reincarceration. (Langevin, C.M., Moser, A.E., and Weekes, J.R. 1999) • Identify and verify the existence of a problem warranting intervention • Provide detail and shed light on the nature and seriousness of the client’s substance abuse problems • Identify the link with criminal behaviors • Guide decision-making in the placement of clients into appropriate programming and services Substance Abuse Assessment • While SCREENING for substance abuse is usually a one- time event, performed at intake, ASSESSMENT of substance abuse is an ongoing process. • Substance Abuse is a DYNAMIC criminogenic risk/need • Assessment of Thoughts, Beliefs and Attitudes about Substance Use are as Important as Assessment of Behavior (Use of the Substance) • Repeated assessment can identify progress and the risk of relapse over the course of treatment Substance Abuse Assessment, con’t. • There is research to support the notion that SELF- REPORT assessment instruments of Substance Abuse are more accurate and valid than their counter-parts (Beal, Weekes, Millson and Eno, 1996). Selected Valid, Evidence-Based Instruments: Adult Substance Use Survey-Revised (ASUS-R) Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory (SASSI) Addiction Severity Index (ASI) Texas Christian University Drug Screen (TCU-DS) Adult Substance Use Survey (ASUS-R) • The ASUS-R is a 96 item psychometric-based, adult self report survey comprised of 15 basic scales and three supplemental scales. It is appropriate for clients 18 years or older, and may be self or interview administered • Assesses Drug Use/Involvement in 10 Common Categories • Other Scales Include • Drug Benefit Scale • Mental Health Screen • Social Non-Conformity Scale • Legal Non-Conformity Scale • Disruption Caused by Drug Use ASUS-R Continued • Additional Information from the ASUS-R: • Motivation and Treatment Readiness • Defensiveness • Resistance to Self-Disclosure • The ASUS-R rater scale allows a comparison of the evaluator's perception of the client's drug use and abuse with the client's perception of that use. • Can be used to assess changes over time in treatment Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Index (SASSI) • Self-Report Screening Instrument for Substance Dependency • Especially Effective for Classification of Early-Stage Chemically Dependent Individuals who are either: 1. 2. In Denial or Attempting to Hide their Dependency Research Demonstrates Accuracy in Assessing Chemical Dependency but the SASSI has not been normed on the Criminal Population (unlike the ASUS-R) Addiction Severity Index (ASI) The ASI focuses on seven functional areas, or subscales, that have been widely shown to be affected by the substance abuse: •medical status •employment and support •drug use •alcohol use •legal status •family and social status •psychiatric status. •Each of these areas is examined individually by collecting information regarding the frequency, duration, and severity of symptoms of problems both historically over the course of the patient's lifetime and more recently during the thirty days prior to the interview ASI, Continued The Addiction Severity Index (ASI) provides a general overview of substance-abuse problems rather than a focus on one particular area (200 questions on 7 subscales). •The interview is based on the idea that addiction to drugs or alcohol is best considered in terms of the life events that preceded, occurred at the same time as, or resulted from the substance-abuse problem. The ASI focuses on seven functional areas, or subscales, that have been widely shown to be affected by the substance abuse •Excellent reliability and validity across a range of types of patients and treatment settings CRIMINAL THINKING Recognizing the thinking patterns that lead to substance use and criminal behavior Recognizing Thinking Patterns Thinking Behavior Style of Interaction Core Beliefs Attitudes Criminal Behavior is Preceded By Criminal Thoughts and Criminal Decisions • Most often, individuals who become involved in criminal conduct chose to do so. They make a conscious decision about who to victimize and how to victimize. • Once criminal conduct is engaged in, it sets off new cognitive reactions that reinforce the underlying criminal thinking. (Techniques of Neutralization) • Finally, the cognitive responses and reactions to the criminal conduct are reinforced which strengthens the criminal behavior itself. The Cycle of Criminal Thinking Core Beliefs and Psychology of Criminal Conduct Decisions to Engage in Criminal Conduct Reinforcing Techniques of Neutralization Neutralization • A technique, which allows the person to rationalize or justify a criminal act. There are five techniques of neutralization; denial of responsibility, denial of injury, denial of victim, condemnation of the condemners, and the appeal to higher loyalties. Denial of Responsibility “It was not my faulty because_____________________” Denial of Injury • “It was a private argument, it was between my gang and his” • “It wasn’t stealing, I was gonna pay it back” • “Nobody got hurt” Denial of Victim • The act doesn’t count as criminal because the person doesn’t count as a victim • Hate Crimes: “Gays aren’t even human” • Crimes Against Rivals: “Bloods don’t count” • Exaggerated “Robin hood” Philosophy: “They are so rich they probably won’t even know it’s gone” Condemnation of the Condemners • Displacement of anger and antisocial sentiments onto those in position of judgment/authority • “All the Judges are hypocrites” • “Every Cop is Corrupt” Appeal to Higher Loyalties • The crime against society (the large group) is warranted out of loyalty to the family/community/gang (the small group). • “The law that matters most is my family’s law” • In it’s extreme form, this type of neutralization is evident in terrorism Identifying Thinking Patterns • To help clients to change these attitudes, treatment professionals in the criminal justice fields must first help them identify those thinking patterns that lead them into high-risk situations and increase their chances of engaging in illegal and self-destructive behaviors. Selected Thinking Errors and Distortions • Power Thrust: Putting someone down so you can be in control. • Closed Channel: Seeing your way as the only way. • Victim Stance: Blaming others for what’s happening to you. • Pride and Superiority: You really feel superior to others and know it all; you feel the world owes you a living. • Lack of Empathy and Concern for how Others are Affected: not thinking how your actions affect others or the emotional / physical pain you cause others. Selected Thinking Errors and Distortions continued • Seeing trust as a one way street - can’t trust anybody: You demand people trust you but you do not trust others. • I can’t: You refuse to do something you don’t want to do. • Irresponsible commitment: You want what you want right now and will spend little time getting it; don’t follow through with commitments or complete the task, particularly if it doesn’t give you immediate reward. • Take what you Want from Others: I deserve it. • Rejection Dependency: You refuse to lean on someone, to depend on someone, to ask others for help because this is a sign of weakness. Yet you take from others which makes you dependent on others. Selected Thinking Errors and Distortions continued • Put off Doing what Should be Done: You put off things; you put off changing. You say “tomorrow I’ll quit”, or someday you will stop taking part in actions that make other people victims. • Rejecting obligations – I don’t have to do that: You may have enough money to get drunk but you delay paying the rent. • Concrete and rigid thinking: You have your ideas and will not change. • Either or, black or white thinking: one is either successful or not successful, pretty or ugly. There is no in-between, no shades of gray. • Mountains out of Molehills: This is catastrophizing. It is blowing up something out of proportion; treating something common as a catastrophe. Selected Thinking Errors and Distortions continued • Feeling Singled Out: Feeling that what is happening to you in unique; feeling picked on. • They Deserve It: If they hadn’t been so stupid and locked their doors, they wouldn’t have been robbed. • I Feel Screwed. • Selected Attention: Tuning out what one should hear; focus on one statement, one result. Hear the negative but tune out the positive. • Antisocial Thinking: You spend a long time thinking about criminal things and are busy planning doing unlawful things. • Lying or Exaggerating the Truth: You may lie so often that it becomes automatic; you exaggerated the truth to look important or big. (Source: “Criminal Conduct and Substance Abuse Treatment” by Wanberg, Kenneth W., and Milkman, Harvey B., Sage Publications, 1998.) The Cycle of Criminal Thinking Criminal Thinking/Core Beliefs Techniques of Neutralization Thinking Errors and Distortions What’s Next? • Teach the Client to Recognize these Thinking Errors by • Implementing Cognitive-Behavioral Techniques that • Illuminate the Pattern of Thinking that Leads to Criminal Acts Attitude + Behavior = Consequence MOTIVATION FOR CHANGE • Helping Offenders Change often involves increasing motivation • The incarcerated offender is often at a pre-pre- contemplative stage and requires specific interventions to shift along the change spectrum • IMTC programs can help the individual by increasing his awareness of the discrepancy between what he wants to achieve and what results his behavior usually generates. • TCs = ideal place to learn and rehearse new behavior MOTIVATION FOR CHANGE Assessing and Enhancing Offenders Motivation in the Treatment Process Readiness To Change-Motivation • Identifying a client’s stage in the change process helps placement into appropriate programming and services. • Motivation is a dynamic process that can be changed by internal and external factors. • Individuals may be in one stage of change regarding a particular issue in life (earning their GED) and another stage of change regarding another issue (discontinuing heroin use). The Stages of Change • Pre-contemplation • Contemplation • Preparation • Action • Maintenance Identifying what most motivates a client towards changing behaviors helps shape treatment / placement decisions and is the beginning of a “common goal” between service provider and client. Motivation • ANY motivation towards change is as step in the right direction. • Entering treatment programming “just” for the “good time” is alright. • Our job as facilitators is to increase the offender’s motivation to change in a variety of ways Selected Assessment Instruments • Prochaska and DiClemente’s Motivation for Change Scale • University of Rhode Island’s Change Assessment (URICA) • Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES) • All of these instruments measure where a client is in the stages of change and can be repeated over time. Offender Profile • Action Oriented • Poor reflective skills • Resistant to punishment • Defensive • Need to be right • Self-centered • Competitive • Sees self as victim •Unable to delay gratification. COGNITIVEBEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS Implementing Evidence-Based Treatment Services Thinking and Behavior How we think affects the ways we behave in the world. thus If we can change the way we think, we can change the ways we behave The Cognitive Cycle Situation Automatic Thoughts Consequences Beliefs Behaviors Feelings Four Steps of Cognitive Self Change 1. Recognize Your Thoughts and Feelings 2. Recognize When Your Thoughts and Feelings are destructive 3. Change the destructive thoughts 4. Practice the change Thinking Report Situation: Thoughts: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Feelings: Beliefs: Successful RSAT Program completion means an individual can demonstrate a change in behavior by: •Recognizing his high risk situations •Recognizing the thinking behind the choices in the high risk situation •Choosing a safe way to think •Put the new thinking into action ACCOUNTABILITY TRAINING PROGRAM® Core Concepts and Philosophy An Example of an Evidence-Based Integrated Modified Therapeutic Community RSAT Program (The following Accountability Training TC Training slides,were developed by Dr. Steve Valle, President, AdCare Criminal Justice Services, Inc. for Essex County Sheriff’s Office, Essex County MA, September 2008 and Barnstable County Sheriff’s Office, 2001 2004) Three Assumptions of Accountability Training® Programs: 1. Substance abuse offenders CAN change their behavior. 2. Implementation of EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICES (clean time, structure, firm, fair, and consistent) DOES result in positive outcomes. 3. Motivation to change is not required – “motivation myth” • Offenders are motivated – but not necessarily to change • “What’s in it for me”? – conditional buy-in is good enough • Commitment to “ACT AS IF” is key; velvet covered brick metaphor – AT brings motivation to clients by applying therapeutic leverage factors as motivators to participate (“the only failure is the failure to participate”). Elements of Behavior Change: Accountability Responsibility RESPECT FOR SELF & OTHERS Pro-social Thinking & Action Internalization Stages of Offender Change in ® Accountability Training (precedes pre-contemplation stage) Stage I: DEFIANCE Stage II: RESISTANCE ACCOUNTABILITY Stage IV: COOPERATION Stage III: COMPLIANCE Process of Offender Change 4 C’s of Applying Accountability Training in Criminal Justice Systems (CJS): 1. Customer (CJS) is the primary Client –not the offender 2. Commitment of staff to model Accountability and Respect is key 3. Continuity of resources from institutional to community based supervision, caregivers, & re-entry resources (safe housing, work, accountability) & supervision 4. Pro-Social Connections are essential Accountability Training® Recidivism Reduction Content Variables Addiction is a Brain Disease that effects behavior 12 Step/Mutual-Help Connections We Are What We Think Spirituality Service (Cognitive Behavioral Skills) Accountability Training® Recidivism Reduction Process Variables 1. Respect For Others – Self - Authority 2. Accountability Others – Self – Higher Power 3. Community Relationships & Pro-social Connections Safe, Drug Free Housing Meaningful Work ↓ “RECOVERY” The 3 R’s of the Accountability Training® Paradigm: Right Thinking Right Living Right Now 1. Right Thinking - historical origins “As a man think-eth, so he is” (The Holy Bible, Proverbs 23:7) We are shaped, created & led by our thoughts. (Teachings of the Buddha 500 B.C.E.) “Men are disturbed not by the things which happen, but by the opinions about the things.” (Epictetus - 2nd century A.D. philosopher) “I think, therefore I am.” (René Descartes -16th Century Philosopher) 1. Right Thinking -historical origins continued Man’s Search For Meaning — a philosophical reflection on his experience as a prisoner in a Nazi concentration camp — Victor Frankl wrote: “…everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms — to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way.” 1. Right Thinking -historical origins continued “You can if you think you can.” (Norman Vincent Peale) “I am convinced that a person's behavior springs from his ideas.” (Alfred Adler, Founder of the School of Individual Psychology) We are what we think; by changing the way we think, we can change our behavior. How you think, determines how you feel. (Modern Cognitive Behavioral Theorists & Practitioners- Beck, Ellis, etc.) 1. Right Thinking Continued ”As long as we remain unaware of our thinking, then actions will follow automatically. When we become aware of our thoughts, then we have the freedom to choose whether or not we want to act upon them.” (Dr. Dennis Humphrey, summarizing the teachings from Buddhism Literature) “We define who we are by consciously choosing our ways of thinking, the attitudes and beliefs that determine how we act and who we are. Choose how you will think, and be aware that you and you alone are doing the choosing. You and you alone are responsible for the person you will be.” (Jack Bush: Cognitive Self-Change, 2002) 2. Right Living Respect of others Accountability Responsibility Pro-Social life skills & Relationships Spirituality Service 3. Right Now “The past is history, tomorrow’s a mystery, TODAY is a gift… that’s why it’s called the present!” “It matters not what we’ve done, but who we can become.” (Mimi Silbert, Delancey Street Foundation) Steps for Learning Accountability Awareness that our behavior has an effect on others All behavior has Consequences for self and others Recognize that, with awareness, behavior is a Choice Acceptance – Owning one’s role in the behavior (Dr. Steve Valle, Essex County Sheriff’s Office TC Training, 2008)and in the consequences Accountability means taking empathic Action to change Core Standards of Care Expected of All Staff: Always show respect, for self and others Professionalism before personal preferences Practice ethical behavior and integrity Demonstrate compassion and empathy for clients and colleagues Be trustworthy and practice trustworthiness Consistently model ACCOUNTABILITY to colleagues and clients INTEGRATIVE ISSUES • Twelve-Step Programs • Spirituality • Co-Occurring Disorders • Trauma Informed Care • Gender Responsive Treatment • Cultural Proficiency 12 STEP PROGRAMS Understanding and Integrating 12 Step Programs with Professional Treatment Services TWELVE STEP, SELF-HELP, AND TREATMENT RESOURCES • The principles of AA/NA are incorporated into many substance abuse treatment programs but professionally provided treatment services are not AA/NA or self-help groups. • Clinically driven groups include the use of professional knowledge and technique in addition to the concepts of twelve step programs. • AA/NA and RSAT programs share many key values: Personal accountability Accountability to the group Honesty Placing “we” before “me” Spiritual recovery TWELVE STEP, SELF-HELP, AND TREATMENT RESOURCES • Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and the concept of powerlessness: The addict is powerless over the effect the drug has on him / her and the bio psychosocial aftermath. The addict who recognizes this powerless and surrender to a power greater than him / herself to cease using the substance opens the doors to recovery. • The Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions, the Fellowship of AA/NA, and the concept of anonymity are core components of twelve step programs. TWELVE STEP, SELF-HELP, AND TREATMENT RESOURCES • Religion and Spirituality are different. Religion is about an organized system of faith and worship practices while Spirituality is about a relationship. The innermost relationship we have with ourselves and a Higher Power, and as a result with all other people and things, is spirituality. • Addiction changes people’s values and distorts their spiritual nature and through recovery and a relationship with the Higher Power the individual is able to be “restored to sanity”. • Effective treatment programs include a spiritual (not religious) component. • How we think, how we feel, and how we act can reflect either disease or recovery. THE TWELVE STEPS OF ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS 1. We admitted we were powerless over alcohol—that our lives had become unmanageable. 2. Came to believe that a Power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity. 3. Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood Him. 4. Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves. 5. Admitted to God, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs. 6. Were entirely ready to have God remove all these defects of character. THE TWELVE STEPS OF ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS continued 7. Humbly asked Him to remove our shortcomings. 8. Made a list of all persons we had harmed, and became willing to make amends to them all. 9. Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would injure them or others. 10. Continued to take personal inventory and when we were wrong promptly admitted it. 11. Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with God, as we understood Him, praying only for knowledge of His will for us and the power to carry that out. 12. Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these Steps, we tried to carry this message to alcoholics, and to practice these principles in all our affairs. SPIRITUALITY Integrating Spirituality and Evidence-Based Treatment Spirituality and Religion • Much has been written about the distinction between spirituality and religion. In very simplistic terms: • Religion tends to focus on a specific dogma and specific sets of beliefs, traditions, and rules. • Spirituality is not focused on these alone but rather on the interconnectedness of all things and the awareness of that same interconnectedness. • Religion is a path to God. • Spirituality may be a path to God but God is not the desired endpoint. Spirituality and Religion • Spirituality rejects fear and focuses on love and inclusion • Religion often incorporates fear and, in some cases, integrates fear into dogma • Addicts often reject spirituality because they confuse it with religion OR because they do not know how to be present with themselves long enough to gain a sense of their own spiritual being. • Spirituality and religion do not have to be mutually exclusive –they can be integrated and many do Characteristics of Spirituality? • Belief that true happiness does not come from the material world but from a profound sense of contentment, centeredness, and peace with things just as they are. • Equanimity, a quality of being content and peaceful in the most stressful kinds of situations, can only be developed from the inner work of meditation, prayer, and 12-step type programs that emphasize internal change. • Addiction is the attempt to sustain a continual state of happiness or freedom from distress. It cannot last. “Everything is Linked” Sir Richard Branson • Interconnectedness with other people, nature, and a Higher Power is central to being human. • In active addiction, the addict often deludes himself that his actions only affect himself, and that he doesn’t need anyone. • In reality, addicts are dependent not only on their drug of choice but on the people who provide it and the people who enable a lifestyle of addiction. They are highly dependent but choosing to live as disconnected individuals. Everything is linked! We Are Not Alone • “When we think we are separate, we put ourselves in constant conflict, trying to get ours, always in fear of losing what we have, alienating others whom we use for our selfish purposes. This is the essence of the addict – self-centered, fearful, and isolated.” Dr. Dennis Humphrey “It is what it is” • Our control of both our external circumstances and our internal state is limited. • In active addiction, individuals seek to control their internal state through their use of the drug of choice • Spirituality results in a letting go of the need to control and an increased awareness, acceptance, and tolerance of changing emotional states. Embarking On A Spiritual Path • The first step on the path is creating the value that says that sacrificing immediate gratification for something more substantial is a worthy goal. • For addicts and offenders, this requires new ways of thinking and behaving that take time and practice. • Cognitive-Behavioral interventions which teach an offender to think about his thinking and to become aware of the thoughts and feelings that lead to his behaviors are also skills that are necessary for spiritual awareness. Sadah • Sadha is a tested faith, based on experience and wisdom, and not “blind faith”. • The wisdom of the 12 steps, and the reports of the many thousands of people who have followed the path to maintain their sobriety, is an example of sadha. • Sadha gives us the courage to take the next right action. It helps us to overcome the fears that our minds throw up in front of us at every juncture. • Faith – “belief system validated by one’s experience” (Valle 2011) Fear • Fear is one of the biggest barriers to change. We fear new behaviors, we fear new thoughts, we fear what we do not know. • Even when we know that what we know is not working, we are reluctant to change it. • Sadha, tested faith, moves us past fear. In the tradition of the 12 Steps, we rely on a Higher Power to move us past the blocks that we place in our own path. Twelve Steps and Spirituality • Step One emphasizes “powerlessness” over addiction. • Step Two logically follows in that we are dependent upon a “Higher Power” to restore us. • Step Three requires a “conscious decision” to trust in that Higher Power • Twelve Step Programs can become intertwined with specific religions but the program was designed specifically to be spiritual, not religious. Trauma Informed Care • In 2005 SAMHSA established the National Center for Trauma Informed Care • Estimates of the prevalence of various types vary but most data support the notion that nearly all incarcerated adults have experienced some type of significant trauma at some point in the lifespan. • Changes the question from “What’s WRONG with you?” to “What HAPPENED to you?” • Website with curriculum resources: • http://www.samhsa.gov/nctic/default.asp CO-OCCURRING DISORDERS Recognizing and Responding to Mental Health Issues in RSAT Programs Co-Occurring Disorders Taken from: http://coce.samhsa.gov/cod_resources/webinar/justice/.html Taken from: http://coce.samhsa.gov/cod_resources/webinar/justice/.html Taken from: http://coce.samhsa.gov/cod_resources/webinar/justice/.html Taken from: http://coce.samhsa.gov/cod_resources/webinar/justice/.html Taken from: http://coce.samhsa.gov/cod_resources/webinar/justice/.html Taken from: http://coce.samhsa.gov/cod_resources/webinar/justice/.html Taken from: http://coce.samhsa.gov/cod_resources/webinar/justice/.html Integration of MET, CBT, and Self Help Approaches Into the TC Model-Overview 1 • Our model is a recovery oriented, evidence-based, highly focused program. Using the social learning TC model as the foundation, and the stages of change as a major focus, we also integrate motivational enhancement therapy (MET), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), 12-Step and other self help approaches, in a treatment program to meet the needs of the specific treatment populations. (Valle & Vasquez, ACA 2010) Integration of MET, CBT, and Self Help Approaches Into the TC Model-Overview 2 • The basic model modifies the traditional TC approach to be uniquely suited for varied populations. In addition to focusing on Substance Abuse and Mental Health issues, the staff prepares the person for long-term stability, employment and right living by providing educational and vocational services, employment readiness training, and other needed life skills and/or services. • (Valle & Vasquez, ACA 2010) The Therapeutic Community Model Phased System Integration • The following format depicts the integration of the of the Stages of Changes, Motivational Enhancement Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Techniques and the Twelve Steps into the Therapeutic Community Model and Approach. Stephen K. Valle and Cecilia Velasquez, ACA 2011 Winter Conference Integration of MET, CBT and 12 Step Approaches into the TC Model TC Model – (40 years) Phases of Treatment MET and CBT (10 years) Activities/Groups 12 Step and Other Self Help (30 years) Phase I – Orientation Phase I – Orientation Goal: Assess person in terms of Stage of Change Phase I – Orientation Goal: Introduction To Self-Help (5 Sessions) Phase II – Primary/Intensive Goal: Identify and examine behavioral, relational, emotional, and cognitive patterns and risk factors and develop and implement a behaviorally oriented long term plan of change. Conform to TC Community norms, rules, etc. Begin to demonstrate behavior and attitude changing and right living Phase II – Primary/Intensive Phase II – Primary/Intensive Goal: Identify Cognitive distortions Goal: Exposure to Self- Help Meetings Phase III – Re-Entry Goal: Demonstrate recovery and readiness for community transition as a productive, recovering, crime-free person. Phase III – Re-Entry Goal: Demonstrated change positive thinking and behaving Phase III – Re-Entry Goal: Participation in Self- Help Meetings Phase IV – Continuing Care/Transition Goal: Sustain changes and address relapse prevention and transition issues (e.g., employment, education, family, etc.) as they arise. Phase IV – Continuing Care/Transition Phase IV – Continuing Care/Transition Goal: Internalization of positive thinking and behaving Goal: Emersion in Self-Help Program Goal: Orient person to the TC Treatment, structure, expectations, and assess motivation and readiness to change. Stephen K. Valle and Cecilia Velasquez, ACA 2011 Winter Conference TC Model – (40 years) Phases of Treatment CBT 12 Step and Other Self Help (25 years) CONTENT DIRECTED 1. Extent of compliance with rules: ¨ Support through evidence of use of House Tools 2. Completion of Individual Treatment Plan for Phase 1: 3. Degree of personal responsibility: ¨ a. Support through review of individual, group notes as well as willingness to use house tools? b. Have homework assignments been completed? 4. Has he/she demonstrated an understanding of the TC concepts and components, of Addiction, Stages of Change, and Cognitive Behavioral Concepts? 5. Has he/she demonstrated positive management of his/her identified self defeating behavior pattern? Have behavioral goals been met? 6. Has identified Stages of Change and appropriate plan to move forward? MET sessions focusing on Good and not-so-good things about use. A typical day involving use. Reasons to quit or change. Ideas about how change might occur. Explore Value system CBT Addiction Concepts (8 Sessions) (Criminal Thinking Overview (8 Sessions) (Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) Review Only Step 1 – Powerlessness (Life unmanageability) Step 2 – Insanity (acceptance of) Step 3 – Surrender (I can’t do it alone) 1. Extent of compliance with rules: - Support through evidence of use of House tools? - Has he/she modeled the use of the concepts of the TC community? 2. Completion of Individual Treatment Plan for Phase 2: 3. Degree of personal responsibility: - Level of sharing during community meetings - Level of sharing and disclosure during therapy group - - Practice of CBT Plan for AOD Groups - Practice of CBT Plan for Criminality 4. Degree of leadership role in Therapeutic Community: - Has there been successful mentoring role, i.e., Big Brother/Big Sister? - - Has there been positive crew leadership and positive initiative? 5. Has identified Stage of Change and appropriate plan to move forward? CBT Problem Solving (2x/week) CBT Skill Building (4x/week) ) * Unrealistic Expectations (8 Sessions) *Assertiveness (3 Sessions Commitment to Change (12 Sessions of Videos) * CBT Relapse Prevention (12 Sessions) Review Only Step 4 - Inventory – self Step 5 - Disclosure Step 6 – Defects (list of) Step 7 - Id Shortcomings God/Spirituality 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. CBT Skill Building CBT Relapse Prevention ( (6+ Sessions) Review Only Step 8- Reconciliation (List of persons we had harmed) Step 9- Make amends (going to person when possible) Step 10- Daily Practice Keep Check Extent of compliance with rules: Degree of personal responsibility: Completion of approved Aftercare Plan: Degree of willingness to follow Aftercare Plan: Degree of leadership role in Therapeutic Community: Degree of awareness of relapse setups: Completion of personal Relapse Prevention plans: Transition to the next level of care IOP/OP Services Continue group therapy with Phase 2 mentee Aftercare Outpatient Cognitive Groups Review Only Step 10- Daily Practice Keep Check Step 11 – Spirituality (conscious contact) Step 12 - Integration Having had a spiritual awakening. Carried message to other addicts MAT: Treatment Matters Kevin Fiscella, MD, MPH University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry How is opioid dependence treated? • Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT). • Methadone • Buprenorphine • Counseling – behavior change, new skills. • New ways of living (changing people, places and things). • New ways of coping • New ways of relating • Treatment of other health problems. • Mental health • Physical health What does MAT do? • Restores brain function – removes craving and prevents • • • • withdrawal. . Blocks “high” – no euphoria. Minimizes risk of overdose. Frees up brain for counseling. Provides a hook for continued treatment Methadone treatment Advantages • Gold standard • 40+ years of experience • Low cost of medication • May used during pregnancy • No dose limit Disadvantages • Stigma • Risk for overdose • Risk for diversion • Ingestion must be witnessed • Requires facility license Buprenorphine Treatment Advantages • Minimal sedation • Low risk for overdose • Less risk for diversion • Less stigma • Fewer ancillary expenses Disadvantages • Medication expense • May not fully control cravings in those dependent on high doses of opioids • Requires physician training and amended DEA license • Limited experience during pregnancy Does treatment work? There is overwhelming scientific evidence that treatment is effective. NIH Consensus Statement, 1997 Effective Medical Treatment of Opiate Addiction http://www.drugpolicy.org/docUploads/opiate_consensus.pdf National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIH), 2006 Principles of Drug Abuse Treatment for Criminal Justice Populations http://www.nida.nih.gov/PDF/PODAT_CJ/PODAT_CJ.pdf What are the benefits of treatment? • Elimination of opioid obsession/compulsion. • Improved health and reduced mortality. • Elimination of opioid use. • Reduction in HIV/HCV infection. • Improved employment. • Reduction in property crime. • Reduction in arrests/re-arrests. • Reduction in costs to state (Medicaid and criminal justice). MAT: Criminal Justice Matters Kevin Fiscella, MD, MPH University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry How prevalent is opioid abuse among criminal justice populations? About 14 million arrests are made annually In the United States - one million arrests involve persons who abuse opioids. 10% of jail and prison inmates report regular use of opioids. Rates differ widely between community. Long arm of justice - short arm of treatment • 7 million persons under jurisdiction in the US. • 2.1 million in jail or prison. • 60% - Black or Hispanic. • 45% of men and 54% of women have any substance disorder. • Less than one in ten are treated. What is the state of opioid treatment in criminal justice? • Rates of opioid treatment are low – both in community criminal justice populations and even worse among those incarcerated. Prison <1% Jail <2% Probation/Parole <1% • Many correctional facilities fail to provide even minimal standards for detoxification – much less ANY treatment. • High rates of death following release. Inadequate assessment and treatment is pervasive • Arrest/pretrial/probation. • Drug courts. • Jails/prisons. • Re-entry. Failing grades for treatment Failure to offer systematic assessment for opioid dependence throughout system. Failure to continue MAT during confinement. Failure to meet minimum standards for detoxification. Failure to offer MAT throughout system. Failure to refer to MAT upon release or during parole. Time for a change? • Neither threat of incarceration nor prolonged incarceration cures an opioid dependent brain – Zombie behavior persists. • Failing to assess and adequately treat opioid dependence results in a costly, wasteful revolving door for opioid dependent persons. Mindless system for a mindless disease What do you call a system that locks up people with opioid dependent brains - at considerable tax payer expense –fails to treat them, and releases them into the community in the same condition they came in, over, over, and over again? “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”