Alternate Approach to BCS Energy Measurement
Download
Report
Transcript Alternate Approach to BCS Energy Measurement
A Proposed Approach to
BCS Energy Regulation
AHAM PTI Proposal
April 9, 2008
1
Appliance Battery Charging Systems
This regulation establishes energy
efficiency requirements for appliance
battery charging systems
Appliance = a product where the primary
output is mechanical motion, light, the
movement of air, or production of heat, but
excluding products for the transportation
or conveyance of people or cargo.
2
Scope
Our products include integral and detachable
batteries:
Integral—battery is not removable and charged within
the appliance (e.g. cordless shaver, some power
tools)
Detachable—battery is a separate entity and is
removed from the appliance for charging. (e.g. power
tool with battery pack
We do not include batteries charged in the
product that may be removed with the power
source connected
We call “swappable” (e.g. laptop, cell phone)
3
EPS’s
Some BCS’s use external adapters.
Usually wall- mounts
CEC has stated that BCS’s regulated by
this standard would not also be regulated
as EPS’s
4
The effects of this scope definition
is to:
Integral and Detachable are included as
appliance BCS’s
Therefore adapters would NOT be regulated
as EPS
Adapter efficiency measured as part of
system efficiency
“Swappable” are not included
The adaptors for a “swappable” product could
be covered by the EPS regulations
5
Construction
Separate section of Title 20 for appliance
battery chargers
Corresponding definitions
Reference to the appropriate sections of
the test method for tests
Derive data from test method
Calculation and assessment of “efficiency”
within regulation
6
General Philosophy
Measure and save real energy
Sensitive to wide differences in product usage
Aggregate consumption in use
Focus on excess energy use
Not restrict design
Don’t separately regulate each contributing
element
7
Key differences from earlier
approaches
Inclusion of active mode
Cycle normalized to 168 hours
8
Key similarities
System Approach
Our products are really sold as systems
Focus on excess energy use
Maintenance and standby are already excess
Active includes retrievable energy of battery
Interest in active should be on excess
consumed in conversion losses, acceptance
losses, etc
9
Regulation Philosophy
Uses ER = Ea/Eb approach
Ea is the accumulated excess energy used by
the BCS
Eb is energy retrieved from battery
Consider excess energy as the energy not
retrievable from the battery
Ideal BCS would have zero excess energy
Retain as much of existing appliance methods
as practical
10
Differences
Include measurement of charging cycle (akaactive mode)
Use a few categories of Active, Maintenance,
Stand By times as characteristic
Normalize Ea to 168h (1 week) usage
Avoid having test engineer open up the battery
or appliance
Maintain safety of technician without compromising
design confidentiality
11
Test Procedure
Use Ecos test method for measurement of
active energy, no-battery mode energy,
and maintenance energy
With suggested simplifications
12
Calculation of Eb – Battery Energy
Manufacturer reports Wh on battery or integral
product using Ecos method
With modification for electronic cut-off
Consistent with IEC standards
Avoid conflict with UN/DOT for Li-ion
CEC require data submittal
13
Use of test method
Ec = E24-Eb
Pm = Pm
Ps
Detachable – Ps=Pnb using method 2
Integral
Wall adapter – Ps=Pnb using method 3
AC cord – Ps=0
14
Four BCS Categories
1. Infrequently charge –
e.g. shavers cord
Integral, cord connected or adapter
Charge once in two weeks or less, then
disconnected
2. Cradle based chargers –
e.g. Cordless Vacuums with Charging Base
Integral, cord connected or adapter
Charged once per week or less, then left connected
15
BCS Categories (tools)
3. Consumer (detachable)
e.g. “homeowner” power tools
three charges/week/battery
Remainder - mix of maintenance and standby
Product sold w/ one battery
4. Professional (detachable)
e.g. Professional or Industrial Cordless Tools
Five charges/week/battery
Remainder – mix of maintenance and standby
Product sold w/ two+ batteries
16
Categories
Approximate based on intended use
Does not require analysis of product to
categorize
17
Formulas
Title
Criteria
168 hrs per week
Formula
Cradlebased
charger
Integral pack with
cradle
Ea=Ec + 144Pm
Infrequently
charged
Integral pack with
connector, no
cradle
Ea = Ec (144h
disconnected)
Consumer
(detachable)
One 24 hr charge cycle + balance of
week in maint
One 24 hr charge cycle + balance
of week disconnected
Detachable, packed Ea = 3Ec+72Pm+24Ps
3 x 24hr energy+72 hrs of maint+24
w/ one battery
hrs of standby
Professional Detachable, packed Ea = 5Ec+36Pm+12Ps
(detachable)
w/2 batteries
18
Special cases
Medical products—regulated by FDA
Recommend exclusion
Have additional safety requirements
Low volume
Low voltage or inductively charged
Inherently less efficient—conversion
Safety issues
Less opportunity
19
Agreement
Can we arrive at agreement to regulate
appliance battery chargers differently?
Separate the energy savings info by
product type.
Recognize manufacturers need time.
Draw cutoff on graph using battery voltage
as X axis? Look at with data.
Special cases
20
21