Transcript Document

International Helicopter Safety Team
Briefing
Mark Liptak
IHST Program Director
FAA ASA-100
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
1
Today’s Objectives
Review key aspects of the IHST program
- International outreach initiatives
- Top level domestic program analysis results
- Marketing/Promotion
- Discuss how IHST and FAAST can work together
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
2
Worldwide Helicopter Accidents per Year
1991 to 2005
700
Accident Count
600
500
400
300
200
100
US Military
US Civil
05
04
03
02
01
00
99
98
97
96
95
94
93
92
91
0
Year
Non US Civil and Military
We have a problem!
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
3
Worldwide Helicopter Fleet Distribution
33598 aircraft
Brazil 1050 3%
IHST Partner
Australasia 1957 6%
Kick-off cpt
Canada 1887 6%
CIS 2000 6%
United States 14269 43%
Europe 6860 20%
GCC 250 1%
South Africa 577 2%
Others 3469 10%
Outreach efforts
continue, seeking
partnerships in the Mid
and Far East, CIS,
Mexico and S. Africa
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
Japan 786 2%
India 150 0.4%
Mexico 343 1%
updated Jan ‘09
Global outreach key to success
4
Recent Accident Counts by Region
IHST
500
450
400
Accidents
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
2001
North America
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
2002
Europe
2003
Asia
2004
Oceania
2005
South America
2006
Africa
2007
2008
Central America
5
Progressing Toward the 80% Goal
US Fleet Data
10
Trend projection if no action taken
Start – 9.1
Per 100K hours
9
~760
Accidents Avoided
~372
Fatalities/Serious
Injuries Avoided
US Accident Rate per 100,000 flight hours
8
7
6
source: Bell Worldwide Database
5
4
3
2
Goal – 1.8
Per 100K hours
1
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2001-2005
avg
0
Year
6
Progressing Toward the 80% Goal
Worldwide Fleet Data
Start – 9.5
10
Trend projection if no action taken
Per 100K hours
~1694
Accidents Avoided
~1132
Fatalities/Serious
Injuries Avoided
Worldwide Accident Rate per 100,000 flight hours
9
8
7
6
source: Bell Worldwide Database
5
4
3
2
Goal – 1.9
Per 100K hours
1
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2001-2005
avg
0
Year
7
IHST is following a proven model
IHST (CAST)
Charters Activity
JHSAT (JSAT)
Analyzes Data
Proposes most
effective interventions
JHSIT (JSIT)
Assesses feasibility of
interventions
works implementation
Continued data analysis,
measure intervention
effectiveness (JIMDAT)
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
8
IHST Organization Chart
Executive Committee
Government Co- Chair
Industry Co- Chair
FAA – Dennis Pratte
HAI – Matt Zuccaro
Secretariat
Program Director
AHS – M. Rhett Flater
FAA – Mark Liptak
Director
Director
Bell Helicopter – Somen Chowdhury
EHEST– Jean-Pierre Dedieu
Director
Director
Shell Aircraft – Robert Sheffield
NASA – Dr. Amy Pritchett
Director
Director
HAC – Fred Jones
EHA Representative – TBD
JHSAT Co-Chairs
JHSIT Co-Chairs
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
Regional Partners - Europe, Brazil, India, Australia, Canada, GCC, US
9
US JHSAT
JHSIT Stakeholders
U.S.
Safety and
Coordination
Program
Government
Industry
U.S. Safety Coordination Program
AHS
HAI
Bell
Sikorsky
Government
International Helicopter
Industry
Eurocopter
Safety Team
JHSAT
Turbomeca
AHS
(IHST)
Rolls Royce
HAI
AHS
GE
Bell
HAI
Schweizer
Sikorsky
Bell
Operators
Eurocopter Sikorsky
International
Helicopter FAA
Joint
JointHelicopter
Safety
Boeing
• Aircraft Certification
Turbomeca Eurocopter
ALEA
Safety
SafetyAnalysis
Team
Analysis
Teams
JHSIT
NASA
Rolls Royce Turbomeca
Pratt Whitney
CHC
Team
(JHSAT)
(IHST)
(JHSAT)
Schweizer Rolls Royce
HAC
GE
Bristow
Eurocopter
Air Methods Schweizer
Sikorsky
Operators
Silver State Helo LLC
FAA
PHI
Joint
Safety
Boeing
Joint Helicopter
• Aircraft Certification
NASA
Bristow
ALEA
Analysis
Teams
NASA
FAA
Safety
Implementation
Arkansas Child Hosp
Pratt Whitney
(JHSAT)
Team
(JHSIT)
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
AELA
ALEA
Silver State Helo LLC
Life Flight Maine
Bell
FAA
10
IHST Safety Initiative
Analysis, Implementation and Metrics Functional Structure
IHST
Executive
Committee
Recommendations Implemented
Accident Analyses
Performance
Metrics
JHSAT
Co-Chairs
Canada
JHSAT
India
JHSAT
EHSAT
Brazil
JHSAT
US
JHSAT
Others
JHSAT Accident Analysis
Recommendations
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
JHSIT
Co-Chairs
Refinement
Standardization
Accident Analysis
Recommendations
turned into
Implementation Actions
Canada
JHSIT
India
JHSIT
EHSIT
Brazil
JHSIT
US
JHSIT
Others
JHSIT
Implementation
Actions
11
2006
US
Europe
1 2
1
2008
2007
IHSS
Excom
Formed Formed
2009
2010
TBD
Program staffing, sales, marketing, management, communications, international outreach
3
5
2
6
4
2 3
1
Brazil
1
Australia
Mid East
5
4
1
2
2
8
7
3
Canada
India
Today
IHST Program - Regional Process Tracking
4
3
6
7
8
Metrics
6 7 8
5
4
5
6
3
4
7
8
Metrics
5 6 7 8
2 3
4 5 6 7 8
1
E
1
E
Far East
CIS
Metrics
E
2 3
4 5 6 7 8
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8
4 JHSAT Report Complete 7 JHSIT SEs complete
Key: 1 Regional Kickoff Meeting
2 JHSAT Team Formed
5 JHSIT Formed
8 JHSIT DIPs complete
3 Accident Dataset Established6 JHSIT Process Refined
E Regional “exploratory” mtg
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
12
Scorecard – US Fleet – 14,269 helicopters
JHSAT - 371 accidents analyzed
- year 2000, report complete
- year 2001, delivery at IHSS09 in Sept
- plan to analyze 2006 accidents for validation
JHSIT - seven IWG’s working SE’s and DIPs
- SMS, Training, Mx, S&E, Infrastructure,
Info, Regulatory
- Plan to deliver SEs and DIPs at IHSS ‘09 in Sept
- Looking for avenues to promote outputs
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
13
Technical Feasibility: The ability of the project to take advantage of the current state of technology in
pursuing further development.
3 - Off-the-shelf technology, no development required
2 - Some development required, not currently in public use
1 - Major technology development effort required
Financial Feasibility: Should consider the total cost of the implementation, including the planning
process. Financial feasibility also involves the capability of the participating organizations (FAA,
Manufacturers, and Airlines and Operators) to provide the appropriate funding needed to implement the
project.
3 - Relatively low cost to implement
2 - Relatively medium cost to implement
1 - Relatively high cost to implement
Operational Feasibility: Involves the “practicality” of the project within the context of the operating
environment, including NAS, ground operations, maintenance, inspection, etc. Considers which
organizations within the aviation system are impacted.
3 - Minimal change to entities within the operating environment
2 - Modest change to operating environment
1 - Major change to operating environment
Schedule Feasibility: Can the project to contribute to achieving the goal in a selected timeframe? Must
consider implementation schedule by project.
3 - Less than 2 years to full implementation
2 - Full implementation in 2-5 years
1 - Longer than 5 years to full implementation
Regulatory Feasibility: Should be evaluated against current rules and certification
process. Could be a deterrent due to a long approval process.
3 - No policy change
2 - Guidance change only (orders, handbooks, policy)
1 - Rule change
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
US JHSIT Ranking Criteria
14
A look at some of the IHST’s work in the US
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
15
US Accident Analysis Overview:
197 accidents analyzed; covered a wide spectrum of
helicopter operations – 15 basic mission types identified.
1200+ scored problem statements/intervention findings
developed
US JHSAT refined the problem statement/intervention
findings into:
7 foundational recommendation areas for the US fleet
125 specific recommendations for 15 mission types
2001 analysis almost complete, 174 additional accidents
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
16
Ranked US Fleet-wide Recommendations
1. Safety Management
2. Training
3. Systems and Equipment
4. Information
5. Maintenance
6. Regulatory Recommendations
7. Infrastructure
Detailed problem/solution info for 15 missions also developed
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
17
Missions: 2000 vs 2001
# 2000
# 2001
US Fleet– CY2000 Data
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
# 2000
# 2001
Aerial
appl
Aerial
obs
28
18
10
6
Air
Biz
Comm
Tours owned Ops
10
9
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
9
10
16
14
ENG
EMS
Extern
al load
Fire
fight
4
2
12
14
7
4
6
6
Law
Ins/Tra
Loggin Offsho Pers/p
enforc
Util ptrl
in
g
re
vt
e
37
29
13
10
5
4
9
7
27
38
4
3
18
t
Ju
dg
/A
ct
D
io
at
n
a
is
Sa
su
es
fe
ty
M
gm
t
Pi
G
l
o
ro
un t S
A
d
D
ut
M
ie
is
s
si
on
Pa
Ri
sk
rt
/S
ys
M
Fa
ai
Po
nt
il
en
st
-c
an
ra
ce
s
Co
h
S
m
ur
m
vi
un
v
ic
at
Re ion
Sa
s
gu
fe
la
ty
to
Sy
ry
s
&
In
Eq
fr
Pe
as
pt
rs
tr
on
uc
ne
tu
lre
no
nC
re
w
Pi
lo
Number
Accidents in which Problem Category was
Cited at least Once
180
160
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
2000
2001
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
19
NTSB Phase of Flight-2000 vs 2001
20%
18%
16%
14%
12%
%2000
10%
%2001
8%
6%
4%
2%
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
c
is
m
D
es
ce
nt
Ap
Em
pr
er
oa
g
ch
D
es
c/
Ln
Em
dg
er
g
Ln
dg
La
nd
in
g
of
f
Ta
ke
Ta
xi
se
ru
i
C
lim
b
C
St
an
di
ng
G
ro
un
d
0%
20
Light Conditions x IMC/VMC
VMC
Night/Dark
IMC
Night/Bright
Night
Dusk>Dawn
Daylight
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Number
2001 accident data
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
21
Intervention Categories (2000 vs 2001)
% of Interventions ID'ed
35.0
30.0
25.0
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
22
HAI
Member
Demographic
HAI
Survey
Data
300
Identifying the target audience
250
Number of Members
200
150
100
50
0
Number of Rororcraft Owned
The IHST challenge – reaching small and medium sized operators
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
23
Pathways to Influence Change
Trainers
ABC
Groups
Maintainers
Industry
Pubs
Accreditation
Progs
Insurance
FSDO
1 to 5 ship operators
We need to find high leverage means to influence the small ops community
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
24
Developing an IHST - FAAST relationship to improve
helicopter safety:
IHST and FAAST have mutual interests in improving helicopter
safety
FAAST has the one-on-one connections with operators
FAAST has SPANS db....useful to target our actions
IHST has accident data analyses and high payoff safety
recommendations
We need to integrate these resources to develop high
payoff safety deliverables tailored to targeted audiences
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
25
Conclusions:
IHST has the attention of influential pockets of the worldwide
helicopter industry, need to further ramp up awareness and
promotion
Significant progress made in analysis of worldwide data,
some hurdles to cross to get additional participation
IHST and the industry very appreciative of FAA resources, it
wouldn’t happen without us.
Good opportunity to promote a positive image for FAA,
proactive, data driven, non punitive
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
26
FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009
27