No Slide Title

Download Report

Transcript No Slide Title

QF-PCR stand-alone prenatal diagnosis:
the initial London experience.
Caroline Mackie Ogilvie
Cytogenetics Department
Guy’s Hospital
London
1
Guy’s QF-PCR data
2000 - 2007
Total samples tested: 23,311
CVS
6729 (28.9%)
AF
16582 (71.1%)
97% of samples receive a result within one
working day
2
Should we karyotype pregnancies at
risk of Down syndrome?
• 32,674 pregnant women having invasive PND in
London/South East
• 24,891 (76.2%) were referred for exclusion of Down
syndrome
• others at risk of single gene disorders or complex
chromosome abnormalities
3
• 24,891 pregnancies referred for exclusion of T21
• 118 sex chromosome abnormalities
• 153 other abnormalities
4
Abnormal karyotypes:
Good prognosis:
– balanced rearrangements
– variant regions
Uncertain prognosis:
– small marker chromosomes
– mosaic anomalies
Poor prognosis
– non-mosaic genomic imbalance
5
Trisomy risk referrals
n=24,891
140
120
100
n
80
60
40
20
0
Sex
GP
UP
PP
0.47%
0.39%
0.15%
0.07%
6
Poor Prognosis n = 18
 1 liveborn (10q del) minor facial dysmorphism
but normal development at 20 months
 2 miscarried
 4 outcome unknown, of which 1 = T16,
2 = 46,XX,del(18), 1=46,XX,add(9)
 11 TOP (61%)
7
8
Advantages of QF-PCR stand-alone
testing
• uncertain or harmless karyotypes not detected,
reducing anxiety and follow-up studies
• no residual anxiety while waiting for karyotype
results
• better use of resources
9
New service May 2007
All abnormal QF-PCR results followed up by
karyotype analysis
10
Criteria for karyotyping
Clinical indication, viz:
• structural abnormality on U/S
• 2 or more soft markers for trisomy 21
• nuchal measurement >3mm at below 14 weeks
gestation
• nuchals measurement >6mm for gestations >= 14 weeks
• family history of chromosome rearrangement
11
Data from 3 London labs
01/05/2007 – 30/11/2007
Consortium samples only
12
AF samples
n=1502
QF-PCR +
karyotype
21%
QF-PCR
79%
CVS samples
n=628
QF-PCR +
karyotype
45%
Karyotype
only
1%
QF-PCR
only
54%
13
AF abnormals
n=122
Abnormals
not
detected by
QF-PCR
11%
QF-PCR
abnormals
89%
CVS abnormals
n=135
Abnormals
not
detected by
QF-PCR
15%
QF-PCR
abnormals
85%
14
Abnormalities not detected by
QF-PCR
Detection rate in karyotyped AF
Detection rate in karyotyped CVS
3%
7%
No abnormal babies reported to date.
15
Abnormalities not detected by
QF-PCR
One pregnancy:
• QF-PCR only at CVS
• ultrasound showed severe IUGR and abnormal placenta
at 26 weeks
• follow-up amnio: mos tetraploidy
• pregnancy terminated
• fetal blood showed normal karyotype
Tetraploid cell line probably confined to placenta leading to
placental insufficiency
16
NT >3mm<4mm
“An alternative strategy whereby qf-PCR is the main method
of analysis and full karyotyping is reserved for those cases
with a minimum fetal NT thickness of 4 mm would require
full karyotyping in 10.1% of the cases, would identify 99.0%
of the significant abnormalities, and would cost 60% less
than full karyotyping for all.”
Chitty et al. (2006) BMJ 25;332(7539):452-5.
17
NT >3mm<4mm
abnormality not
detected by QFPCR
3%
normal/trisomy
97%
18
NT >3mm<4mm
2 abnormal karyotypes in this group
• 47,XY,+22
• 47,XX,+mar[19]/46,XX[28]
–
–
–
–
v small non-satellited marker, apparently all
heterochromatin
?CPM
follow-up amnio and parental bloods requested, but
not forthcoming
pregnancy terminated
19
Collaborators
Guy’s
Kathy Mann
Zoe Docherty
NEL Regional Cyto Lab
(GOSH)
NWT Regional Cyto Lab
(KGC)
Jonathan Waters
Melissa Holloway
Sandra Edwards
Deborah Morrogh
Richard Ellis
Janine Burbridge
20