Transcript Slide 1
CHAPTER 11 SOCIAL SECURITY McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Explicit Transfers Benefits for Dependents and Survivors (1939) Supplemental Security Income 11-2 600 6 500 5 400 4 300 3 200 2 100 1 0 0 1937 1942 1947 1952 1957 1962 1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 Expenditures as % of GDP Real Expenditures (2005 $ Billions) Figure 11.1: Social Security expenditures (1937-2005) 2002 Year Real Expenditures (2006 $ Billions) Expenditures as % of GDP Sources: Expenditure data from Social Security Trustees [2006]. CPI data from Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics. GDP data from Department of Commerce's Bureau of Economic Analysis. 11-3 Why Have Social Security? Economic Status of the Aged Consumption Smoothing Annuity Market Asymmetric Information Adverse Selection 11-4 Other Justifications Lack of Foresight Paternalism Moral Hazard Economize on Decision-Making and Administrative Costs Income Redistribution 11-5 Fully Funded Plan Each generation’s benefits based on deposits it made during working life plus accumulated interest Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 Period 4 The Greatest Generation Work Retire contribute benefits The Baby Boom Childhood Generation Generation X Unborn Work contribute Childhood Dead Still Dead Retire Dead benefits Work contribute Retire benefits 11-6 Pay As You Go (or Unfunded) System Each generation’s benefits come from tax payments made by current workers Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 Period 4 benefits The Greatest Generation Work Retire contribute benefits The Baby Boom Childhood Generation Unborn Generation X Work Dead Still Dead Retire Dead contribute benefits Childhood Work Retire contribute benefits 11-7 Today’s Partially Funded System Baby Boomers and Gen X are also contributing to their own retirement The Greatest Generation Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 Period 4 benefits Work Retire contribute benefits The Baby Boom Childhood Generation Unborn Generation X Work Dead Still Dead Retire Dead contribute benefits Childhood Work Retire contribute benefits 11-8 Calculating Benefits AIME (Average Indexed Monthly Earnings) average monthly earnings in 35 highest paid years Wages Indexed for Inflation Tax Ceiling on AIME 11-9 Benefit Structure If AIME < $656 PIA = .90*AIME If $656< AIME <$3955 PIA = .90*$656 + .32*(AIME - $656) If AIME > $3955 PIA = .90*$656 + .32*($3955-$656) + .15*(AIME $3955) 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 First Bend Point Second Bend Point 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 11-10 Adjustments Annual Inflation Adjustment Age Normal Retirement Age Early Retirement benefit reduced 5/9th of one percent a month for first 36 months preceding normal retirement age Late Retirement benefit increased 15/24th of one percent a month 11-11 Adjustments Family Status +50% for spouse or dependent child If covered worker dies spouse receives 100% of worker’s benefit or spouse’s benefit Divorced spouse married at least 10 years gets spouse benefit if not remarried while covered worker alive Earnings test and taxing benefits Benefits reduced $1 for every $2 earned above $12,480 Individuals losing benefits may have later benefits increased Up to 85% of benefits taxed for recipients with income above a base amount ($25,000 for single and $32,000 for married taxpayers.) 11-12 Financing FICA (Federal Insurance Contribution Act) 2006 Social Security Tax rates Employee 6.2% (OASI - 5.6%, DI - .6%) of first $94,200 of earnings on both employee and employer Self-employed 2006 Medicare Tax rates 12.4% 1.45% on both employer and employee with no earnings ceiling Why not fund Social Security through general tax revenues? 11-13 Distributional Issues Actuarially Fair Return Intergenerational Redistribution Total Benefits = Nb * B Total Taxes = t * Nw * w Nb * B = t * Nw * w B = t * (Nw/Nb) * w Ida Mae Fuller 11-14 Ida Mae Fuller 11-15 Social Security Wealth for Representative Individuals All values expressed in 2006 dollars. 400 400 200 200 0 Low Average -200 High Max -400 0 Low Average -200 High Max -400 -600 -600 -800 -800 19 40 19 60 19 80 20 00 20 20 20 40 20 60 See C. Eugene Stueuerle and Jon M. Bakija [1994] for original tables and methodology. Tw o-earner Couple Thousands of 2006 Dollars Source: Updated tables, furnished by C. Eugene Steuerle and Adam Carasso, 2006. Thousands of 2006 Dollars One-earner Couple Year Cohort Turns 65 Year Cohort Turns 65 11-16 Other Distributional Issues Redistribution within a generation Differences by earnings Differences by lifespan Differences by living arrangements Differences by number of earners in the family Normative evaluation 11-17 The Social Security Trust Fund Worker Trust Fund Retiree Social Security and National Saving Budget Treatment of Social Security Off budget Unified budget 11-18 Social Security and Savings Behavior Life-cycle theory of savings Wealth Substitution Effect Retirement Effect Bequest Effect 11-19 Empirical Evidence Martin Feldstein’s work CONS = f(DI, W, SSW, X) MPCssw = .028 60% reduction in personal saving Others Rosen: Social security has had a negative effect on saving, but magnitude of effect is unclear 11-20 Effects on Retirement and Labor Supply 1930 LFPR 65+ was 54% 2001 LFPR 65+ was 18% Effect of Social Security Income Effect – SS raises retirement income Substitution Effect – SS reduces the cost of retiring Earnings test Impact on Younger Workers? 11-21 Distribution of Wealth Bequeathable v Annuitized Wealth Effect of Social Security on Bequeathable Wealth Effect on Wealth Mobility 11-22 Future consumption (c1) Budget Constraint for Present and Future Consumption N At endowment point consumer neither saves nor borrows D (1+r)S I1 + (1+r) S B I1 (1+r)B F S I1 - (1+r) B M I0 - S I0 Present consumption (c0) 11-23 Future consumption (c1) Utility-maximizing Choice of Present and Future Consumption N c1* E1 A I1 Saving M c0* I0 Present consumption (c0) 11-24 Future consumption (c1) Crowding out of private saving due to Social Security N E1 c1* R A I1 Saving after Social Security Saving before Social Security (1+r)T T M c0* I0T I0 Present consumption (c0) 11-25 Other ways Social Security Affects Saving Retirement effect Bequest effect Empirical evidence 11-26 Retirement Decisions Social security wealth and the retirement decision Empirical evidence Diamond and Gruber [199] Gruber and Wise [2004] 11-27 Long-Term Stresses on Social Security Projected revenues and projected costs of Social Security as share of Gross Domestic Product Source: Social Security Trustees [2006] 11-28 Long-Term Stresses on Social Security B = t * (Nw/Nb) * w t = (Nw/Nb) * (B/w) Dependency Ratio Replacement Ratio 11-29 Social Security Reform Time horizon for solvency Sustainable solvency 11-30 Maintain the Current System Raise the payroll tax Raise the Maximum Taxable Earnings Level Raise the Retirement Age Reducing the Cost-of-Living Adjustment Change the Benefit Formula Comparing the Options 11-31 Privatize the System Personal Accounts Pros and cons of personal accounts Effect on Solvency Effect on Saving Carve-out accounts Add-on accounts Risk Administration Distribution 11-32 Policy Perspective: President Bush’s Social Security Reform Proposal Voluntary personal accounts Carve-outs Government management Portfolio limitations Benefit offsets Inheritability Achieving sustainable solvency Progressive indexing 11-33 Empirical Evidence: Does Social Security Reduce Saving? Time-series evidence Martin Feldstein (1974, 1996) v Leimer and Lesnoy (1982) Cross-section evidence Evidence from other countries Attanasio and Brugiavini (2003) and Italy 11-34