Transcript WORLD FOOD DAY CELEBRATIONS

National Agricultural Innovation Project
NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL
INNOVATION PROJECT
Dr. J.P. Mittal
National Coordinator (NAIP)
Telephone No. 25848709
Email: [email protected]
http://www.naip.icar.org.in
March 15, 2007
National Agricultural Innovation Project
BACKDROP
Less than half of the targeted growth
in agriculture during the 10th FYP
Farmers are in great distress
New strategy and re-orientation in
R&D in agriculture necessary to
support:
food & nutritional security
employment & income generation
poverty alleviation
2
National Agricultural Innovation Project
NAIP: Implementation Details
 Project period: 6 years
 Project Outlay: Rs. 1200 crores (US $
250 Million, credit: US $ 200 million)
 Project Launched on July 26, 2006
3
National Agricultural Innovation Project
NAIP: Approach & Methodology
Production to consumption system, end-to-end
approach involving concerned stakeholders in
consortium mode
Sponsored and competitive funding
Greater public-private sector partnership
Small number of big projects
Wide stakeholder
development
consultations
for
project
Strong emphasis on gender and social and
environmental auditing and impact assessment
4
National Agricultural Innovation Project
NAIP: Approach & Methodology
Emphasis on business development units,
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) management,
policy analysis and visioning
Ample attention to individual Learning &
Capacity Building but more attention to
institutional learning
Clear post-project synthesis and uptake planning
Clear-cut guidelines, decentralized rules and
procedures in place before launching the project
IT-based management information system
Focus on M&E and impact assessment
Stress on knowledge management, communication
and media strategy
5
+ private
sector
+development
community
National
Agricultural
Research
System
Scientific capacity
+ other science
providers
Guiding Model: NAIP pushes three frontiers
6
National Agricultural Innovation Project
ICAR as the Catalyzing Agent for Management of
Change in the Indian Agricultural Research System
Total allocation: Rs. 228 crores
Strengthening communication ability & information
capacity
Enhanced dialogue and interaction with public at large,
farming community, private sector and within ICAR
system between all key functionaries
Business development units and IPR management
System-wide institutionalization of organization and
management reforms like M&E and Financial management
Visioning, technology foresight and policy analysis
7
Emphasis on SAUs
National Agricultural Innovation Project
Production to Consumption Systems
Total allocation: Rs. 357 crores
About 15 Consortia with public organizations, private sector, farmer
organizations, NGOs and others from across the production to
consumption system
Jointly responsible for governance, design and implementation of
research programs and the application of the resulting innovations
Knowledge management activities, such as the organization of
conferences and innovation market places, networks and
communication strategies.
Selection through a competitive process
Support to investment, operational and some personnel costs of the
consortia
8
National Agricultural Innovation Project
Examples of Possible Value Chains
Category: Income Augmentation
and Employment Generation
Sorghum in SAT
Milk and Milk Products in Rainfed
Areas
Marine Fish
Category: Export Promotion
Fruits viz., Mango, Grapes,
Passion Fruit etc.
Spices and Value Added Products
High Value Fish (Tunas, Pomfrets,
Crabs) in Coastal/ Island Areas
and Mariculture
Category: Agro-processing
Potato
Buffalo Meat/ Fishes
High value Soya Products
Category: Resource use
efficiency
Conservation Agriculture
Water productivity (Multiple Use)
Bio-fuel
9
EXAMPLE: VALUE CHAIN ON MEAT AND MEAT PRODUCTS
Important Aspects
Most Critical Missing Links
Consumption
(Safety & Quality)
1. Identification and estimation of
pesticidal and antibiotic residues
2. Packaging of meat and meat
products
Marketing
1. Demand & supply (domestic &
global) analysis
2. Market intelligence
Processing
1. Slaughter house byproducts
utilization
2. Tenderization of spent animal’s
meat
Production
1. Research on Feed supplements
and micronutrients
2. Research on health cover
Potential
Consortium Partners
IVRI, NCL, IIP
NCAP, IEG, DMI, NCAER
NRC (Meat)/IVRI,
Vety.College, Tirupati,
CFTRI, DFRL, Hind
(Agro), Al-kabeer,
Allanasons
IVRI, TNVASU, BAIF
KVKs, E-chaupals,
ATMAs, FOs, PRIs,
VKCs, SHGs
10
Farmers
Processors
Traders/Exporters
Consumers
Government
National Agricultural Innovation Project
Sustainable Rural Livelihood Security
• Total allocation: Rs. 350 crores
• Focus on 150 disadvantaged districts selected by Planning
commission on the basis of index of backwardness
• About 20 regionally based consortia
• Emphasis on participatory approaches for defining and
implementing the agenda.
• Integration with the activities of rural development projects,
Agricultural Technology Management Agencies, other State
extension initiatives and NGO’s
• Invited as well as a competitive grants elements
• NRM, food and nutritional security, farming systems research
11
EXAMPLE: DROUGHT PRONE/RAINFED AGRICULTURE AREAS
NGOs,
Banks,
MOSW,
Insurance
Companies
Organize
into SHGs
Private
Sector, IITs,
Line Deptts.,
APMC,
Development
Banks
Agroprocessing
Vocational
Training;
Marketing
facilities
ICAR, SAUs,
ATMA, Line
Deptts.,
Private
Sector
Potential
Consortium
Partners
Resource
scarcity and
lack of self
mobilisation
risk
Under
employment
Trainings,
FLDs, HRD of
Extension
Functionariee
Web portal
Drought
prone
rainfed
agriculture
Interventions
SOCIO-ECONOMIC PART
Pooradoption of
appropriate
package of
practices
Insufficient and
inefficient
livelihood
support system
Only Field
crops, less
diversified
farms
Less
access to
knowledge/
information
In-situ soil moisture
conservation;
Drought proofing
technologies
Causes
Causes
Problem
Interventions
ICAR,
SAUs,
CGIAR,
MOEF
Technology
refinement,
demonstrations
in all
enterprises
including postharvest
processing
structures
KVKs,
ATMAs,
CAPART,
NGOs
Alternate land use;
Integrated farming
systems; Production to
Consumption system
with emphasis on
diversification;
Improvement of CPRs
Interventions
ICAR,
SAUs,
ATMAs
Potential
Consortium
Partners
12
BIO-PHYSICAL PART
Governance Structure for the National Agricultural Innovation Project
National Steering Committee
Project Management Committee
Research Programme Committee
O&M Programme Committee
O&M Advisory Group
TAG 2
TAG 3
TAG 4
Project Implementation Unit
National Director
Administration
Finance
Procurement
National
Co-ordinator
(O&M)
Component 1
National
Coordinator
(Value Chain)
Component 2
National
Coordinator
(LivelihoodImprovement)
Component 3
As in Component 2
Project 1
Project 2
TAG = Technical Advisory Group
National
Coordinator
(Basic & Strategic
Research)
Component 4
As in Component 2
Project N
CAC 1
CAC 2
CAC N
CIC 1
CIC 2
CIC N
CAC = Consortium Advisory Committee
Cons 1
CIC = Consortium Implementation Committee
Cons 2
Cons N
13
National Agricultural Innovation Project
14