Transcript PES Board Brief - National Naval Officers Association

Performance Evaluation System
(PES) MCO P1610.7F
Headquarters Marine Corps
Personnel Management Support Branch
Performance Evaluation Section (MMSB-30)
Quantico, Virginia
MASTER BRIEF SHEET
PAGE 1 OF 1
CREATED: 12 DEC 2005
******* ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION (ORIGINATES FROM MCTFS - CONTACT YOUR ADMIN SECTION FOR CORRECTIONS) *******
NAME
MARINE, JOHN S.
SSN
123456789
KEY DATE SUMMARY
GRADE
O4
RANK
MAJ
AWARDS
DEAF
19890702
TIS
PEBD
15yr. 11mo.
19890520
AFADBD
19890520
OSCD
ACC COMM
19950115
19890520
DOR COMM
DOR LDO
19890531
MM
NC
NA
1
2
1
DOR
19990501
TIG
5yr. 11mo.
CURRENT DUTY ASSIGNMENT
US Central Command
BILLET DESCRIPTION
J-3 Future Ops Officer
MILITARY OCCUPATIONAL SPECIALTIES
PMOS
AMOS1
AMOS2
AMOS3
0302
0602
Infantry Officer
Communications Officer
AMOS4
ACQ
JOINT
BMOS
9910
DCTB
20030717
TRAINING SUMMARY
RIFLE
PISTOL
PFT
MCMAP
Unrestricted Officer
E/340
M/340
A/289
TAN
LANGUAGES
19980915
19980915
20030922
20030815
1994
1990
French
Spanish
EDUCATION SUMMARY
CIVILIAN
1990
1986
1982
BA, Biology
Associates Deg
HS
DSG PILOT
DCADB
EAS
LCN
12345678
19890520
MILITARY
1993
1993
1987
1990
1990
1989
PME
Winter Mountain Leader
Summer Mountain Leader
Airborne
Assault Climbers
Infantry Officer (TBS)
Basic School
2002
1997
1995
1994
Command & Staff Non-Res
AWS Ph II
AWS Ph I
Warfighting Skills Prog
******* PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SUMMARY *******
ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY
Grade
OCC
From
BMOS
Type
To
Capt
GC 19980801
0302
N
Maj
CH 19990504
0302
C
Maj
19990503
Maj
TR 20000120
0302
N
Maj
Maj
9
3
6
3
12
X
CH 20010508
N
Maj
TR 20020703
9910
N
Commanding Officer
MCRS Pittsburg
14
Commanding Officer
MCRS Pittsburg
20020702
20030630
BN Executive Officer
1st Battalion 2d Marines
20000414
9910
Operations Officer
1st Battalion 2d Marines
20000119
20010507
Operations Officer
1st Battalion 2d Marines
CH 20000415
N
Company Commander
1st Battalion 2d Marines
X
CH 19990801
C
Billet Description
Com Adv Command
19990801
0302
9910
Months
12
X
Commanding Officer
MCRS Pittsburg
REPORTING SENIOR MARKINGS
Reporting Senior
Promote
Reports
LtCol Stickler
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
D
C
F
B
F
F
C
5 of 8
E
D
3.79
Lea
C
Co
PME
Dec
B
C
C
C
H
C
B
F
E
D
4.42
B
2.82
C
C
H
E
E
D
C
C
B
D
F
E
B
F
E
E
C
D
5.00
D
C
E
E
E
D
C
1
H
D
B
B
C
D
E
E
C
D
83.67
C
H
C
E
B
D
E
H
H
E
H
E
E
D
D
80.00
Concur
Col Spredlode
Yes
Col Spredlode
Suff
Yes
Col Fairmark
No
Col Fairmark
Suff
86.44
D
Obser
Suff
93.68
E
Reviewing Officer
Suff
N/A
83.87
D
Cum RV
81.89
93.68
E
Eval
89.76
N/A
E
Jud
96.00
83.70
1
D
B
89.76
1
5.86
D
B
1
5.57
E
H
B
94.60
2
2.30
E
B
1
6.38
B
C
1
3.50
5.33
D
REVIEWING OFFICER MARKINGS
Ens
RPT at High RV at Proc
5.12
E
Set
Rs High
2.30
F
Dev
RS Avg
5.95
5.14
C
Ini
2.93
5.21
E
Eff
2.25
2.30
F
7 of 12
B
4.46
21 of 21
Col Deesmost
C
2.88
B
Col Eeplus
Yes
C
1 of 1
Col Inflatorio
Cou
2.53
11 of 16
LtCol Solo
Yes
C
8 of 8
LtCol Highmark
Pro
RPT Avg
14 of 17
LtCol Smidgen
Yes
Per
Yes
BGen Lowbranch
Suff
No
BGen Toptree
Suff
Yes
BGen Panzer
Insuff
RO marks - same grade at processing
RO marks - same grade cumulative
0/1
0/2
1/3
3/4
0/1
1/2
9/3
12/4
1/6
0/7
0/8
23/5 11/6
2/5
1/7
0/8
0/1
0/2
1/3
2/4
2/5
0/1
0/2
2/3
7/4
7/5
2/6
0/7
0/8
5/6
2/7
0/8
0/1
0/2
1/3
3/4
2/5
1/1
1/2
2/3
4/4
1/6
0/7
0/8
17/5 12/6
7/7
1/8
0/1
1/2
1/3
3/4
1/1
1/2
2/3
4/4
1/6
0/7
0/8
17/5 12/6
7/7
1/8
1/1
0/2
3/3
3/4
18/5
20/6 12/7 0/8
2/1
0/2
5/3
7/4
24/5
26/6 16/7 1/8
0/1
1/2
0/3
7/4
38/5
17/6
4/7
0/8
0/1
1/2
0/3
9/4
46/5 19/6
5/7
1/8
3/5
Administrative Summary
ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY
Grade
OCC
From
BMOS
Type
To
Capt
GC
19980801
0302
N
19990503
CH
19990504
C
19990801
CH
19990801
C
20000119
TR
20000120
N
20000414
Maj
0302
Maj
0302
Maj
0302
https://www.mmsb.usmc.mil
Months
Com
Billet Description
Adv
9
Command
Company Commander
X
1st Battalion 2d Marines
3
Operations Officer
X
6
1st Battalion 2d Marines
Operations Officer
1st Battalion 2d Marines
3
BN Executive Officer
1st Battalion 2d Marines
3
Administrative Summary (cont)
ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY
Grade
OCC
From
BMOS
Type
To
Capt
GC
19980801
0302
N
19990503
CH
19990504
C
19990801
CH
19990801
C
20000119
TR
20000120
N
20000414
Maj
0302
Maj
0302
Maj
0302
https://www.mmsb.usmc.mil
Months
Com
Billet Description
Adv
9
Command
Company Commander
X
1st Battalion 2d Marines
3
Operations Officer
X
6
1st Battalion 2d Marines
Operations Officer
1st Battalion 2d Marines
3
BN Executive Officer
1st Battalion 2d Marines
4
What is Relative Value?
• RV is a numerical representation of how a single fitness report
compares to other reports written by the same RS on Marines
of the same grade
• RV= TOOL that displays RS’s marking philosophy
• RV should be used within the context of all other information
on the report
• RV=Common Language that translates the RS’s Marking
Philosophy (fitrep average ) by grade of Marine reported on
• RV Levels the playing field among RSs reporting on Marines
of the same grade
https://www.mmsb.usmc.mil
5
How does RV Work?
•
•
•
•
•
•
RS must process at least three reports on
Marines of the same grade before RV is
displayed on MBS
Standard curve scaled from 80 to 100
Each of 14 attributes has marking gradients
from A through H where:
(A=1, B=2 … G=7; H = 0)
Ave. of observed attributes=Fitrep Average
– i.e. a straight B report (28/14) = 2.0
Fitrep Average plugged into an algebraic
formula that gives the report a value on a
standard curve
REMEMBER: Approximately Half of all
observed fitreps (Sgt – LtCol) will be less
than 90 RV
2.0
RS Average = 3.5
3.0
4.0
5.0
80
90
100
Hypothetical distribution of 4 reports on a
standard curve
Below 90 RV
does NOT mean
Below Average Performance
https://www.mmsb.usmc.mil
6
Reporting Senior Markings
REPORTING SENIOR MARKINGS
Reporting Senior Per Pro Cou Eff Ini
Promote
Reports
LtCol Stickler
Yes
Yes
C
D
11 of 16
LtCol Solo
C
B
2.53
8 of 8
LtCol Highmark
Yes
C
14 of 17
LtCol Smidgen
Yes
RPT Avg
C
1 of 1
https://www.mmsb.usmc.mil
Cum RV
B
C
C
H
2.88
2.93
F
C
E
4.46
B
RS Avg RS High RPT at High RV at Proc
2.25
C
B
2.30
B
2.30
C
B
C
2.82
C
E
C
E
H
C
C
2.30
B
H
D
D
D
B
B
C
1
B
H
D
D
C
B
NA
C
H
89.76
E
83.70
B
H
96.00
89.76
2
B
B
94.60
1
6.38
B
C
1
3.50
5.95
C
Lea Dev Set Ens Co PME Dec Jud Eval
E
H
81.89
C
B
H
NA
7
Reporting Senior Markings (cont)
REPORTING SENIOR MARKINGS
Reporting Senior Per Pro Cou Eff Ini
Promote
Reports
LtCol Stickler
Yes
Yes
C
D
11 of 16
LtCol Solo
C
B
2.53
8 of 8
LtCol Highmark
Yes
C
14 of 17
LtCol Smidgen
Yes
RPT Avg
C
1 of 1
https://www.mmsb.usmc.mil
Cum RV
B
C
C
H
2.88
2.93
F
C
E
4.46
B
RS Avg RS High RPT at High RV at Proc
2.25
C
B
2.30
B
2.30
C
B
C
2.82
C
E
C
E
H
C
C
2.30
B
H
D
D
D
B
B
C
1
B
H
D
D
C
B
NA
C
H
89.76
E
83.70
B
H
96.00
89.76
2
B
B
94.60
1
6.38
B
C
1
3.50
5.95
C
Lea Dev Set Ens Co PME Dec Jud Eval
E
H
81.89
C
B
H
NA
8
Reporting Senior Markings (cont)
REPORTING SENIOR MARKINGS
Reporting Senior Per Pro Cou Eff Ini
Promote
Reports
LtCol Stickler
Yes
Yes
C
D
11 of 16
LtCol Solo
C
B
2.53
8 of 8
LtCol Highmark
Yes
C
14 of 17
LtCol Smidgen
Yes
RPT Avg
C
1 of 1
https://www.mmsb.usmc.mil
Cum RV
B
C
C
H
2.88
2.93
F
C
E
4.46
B
RS Avg RS High RPT at High RV at Proc
2.25
C
B
2.30
B
2.30
C
B
C
2.82
C
E
C
E
H
C
C
2.30
B
H
D
D
D
B
B
C
1
B
H
D
D
C
B
NA
C
H
89.76
E
83.70
B
H
96.00
89.76
2
B
B
94.60
1
6.38
B
C
1
3.50
5.95
C
Lea Dev Set Ens Co PME Dec Jud Eval
E
H
81.89
C
B
H
NA
9
Reporting Senior Markings (cont)
REPORTING SENIOR MARKINGS
Reporting Senior Per Pro Cou Eff Ini
Promote
Reports
LtCol Stickler
Yes
Yes
C
D
11 of 16
LtCol Solo
C
B
2.53
8 of 8
LtCol Highmark
Yes
C
14 of 17
LtCol Smidgen
Yes
RPT Avg
C
1 of 1
https://www.mmsb.usmc.mil
Cum RV
B
C
C
H
2.88
2.93
F
C
E
4.46
B
RS Avg RS High RPT at High RV at Proc
2.25
C
B
2.30
B
2.30
C
B
C
2.82
C
E
C
E
H
C
C
2.30
B
H
D
D
D
B
B
C
1
B
H
D
D
C
B
NA
C
H
89.76
E
83.70
B
H
96.00
89.76
2
B
B
94.60
1
6.38
B
C
1
3.50
5.95
C
Lea Dev Set Ens Co PME Dec Jud Eval
E
H
81.89
C
B
H
NA
10
Section K: Reviewing Officers Comparative Assessment
K. REVIEWING OFFICER COMMENTS
1. OBSERVATION:
X
Sufficient
Insufficient
2. EVALUATION:
X Concur
DESCRIPTION
3. COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT: Provide
a comparative assessment of potential by
placing an "X" in the appropriate box. In
marking the comparison, consider all
Marines of this grade whose professional
abilities are known to you personally.
Do Not Concur
COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT
0
THE EMINENTLY QUALIFIED MARINE
0
ONE OF THE FEW EXCEPTIONALLY QUALIFIED
MARINES
1
ONE OF THE MANY HIGHLY QUALIFIED
PROFESSIONALS WHO FORM THE MAJORITY OF
THIS GRADE
*NUMBERS ELECTRONICALLY OVERLAID AT
TIME OF PROCESSING (OCT 2001)
*INFORMATION EFFECTIVE AT TIME
PROCESSING AND WILL NOT CHANGE
*INFORMATION WILL SHOW UP ON
OMPF AND DIGITAL BOARDROOM
COPIES OF FITREP
X
2
3
1
A QUALIFIED MARINE
0
UNSATISFACTORY
0
NUMBERS INDICATE TOTAL ASSESSMENTS AND HOW MANY TIMES RO HAS MARKED
MARINES OF SAME GRADE ON THAT PORTION OF COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT TREE.
https://www.mmsb.usmc.mil
11
Reviewing Officer Markings
REVIEWING OFFICER MARKINGS
Reviewing Officer
Obser
Concur
Col Spreadlode (Capt GC)
Suff
Yes
Col Spreadlode (Maj AN)
Suff
Yes
Col Fairmark
Suff
No
Col Fairmark
Suff
Yes
https://www.mmsb.usmc.mil
RO marks - same grade at processing
RO marks - same grade cumulative
0/1
0/2
1/3
3/4
2/5
1/6
0/7
0/8
0/1
1/2
9/3
12/4
23/5
11/6
1/7
0/8
0/1
0/2
1/3
2/4
2/5
2/6
0/7
0/8
0/1
0/2
2/3
7/4
7/5
5/6
2/7
0/8
0/1
0/2
1/3
3/4
2/5
1/6
0/7
0/8
1/1
1/2
2/3
4/4
17/5
12/6
7/7
1/8
0/1
1/2
1/3
3/4
3/5
1/6
0/7
0/8
1/1
1/2
2/3
4/4
17/5
12/6
7/7
1/8
12
What do the numbers mean?
• Relative Value
– 90 RV is not the magic #
– RV broken down into thirds
• Upper: 93.34 to 100
• Middle: 86.67 to 93.33
• Lower: 80.00 to 86.66
• Comparative Assessment
– RO marks in relation to your peers
• Above: how many ranked above you.
• With: how many ranked with you.
• Below: how many ranked below you.
• It is paramount that the content of the entire report be
considered, not just the above numbers
https://www.mmsb.usmc.mil
13
https://www.mmsb.usmc.mil
14
Questions?