Transcript Dublin Core Elements & Uses

Dublin Core
Elements & Uses
http://dublincore.org/
15 metadata elements for the
description of resources…
especially digital resources.
Jody DeRidder, Digital Libraries IS 565, Spring 2007
1) What’s a “resource”?
 A resource is anything that has identity. Familiar examples include
an electronic document, an image, a service (e.g., "today's weather
report for Los Angeles"), and a collection of other resources.
2) How do “elements” apply to “resources”?
 An Element is a characteristic that a resource may
“have”, such as a Title, Publisher, or Subject.
3) What if I have more than one
version of this resource?
 Then you have more than one “instantiation”,
and you will need more than one set of Dublin Core
elements.
What do you mean, I need another set of elements?
Four of the basic Dublin Core elements relate to the
“instantiation” of the resource:
Language: A language of the resource. Recommended best practice is to
use a controlled vocabulary such as ISO 639-2. Example: “eng” for English.
Identifier: An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context.
Recommended best practice is to identify the resource by means of a string
conforming to a formal identification system, such as an ISBN.
Date: A date associated with the creation or availability of the resource.
Recommended best practice is defined in a profile of ISO 8601 that includes
(among others) dates of the forms YYYY and YYYY-MM-DD.
Format: The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource.
Examples of dimensions include size and duration. Recommended best
practice is to use a controlled vocabulary such as the list of Internet Media
Types [MIME]. Example: image/jpeg.
So two instantiations of the same resource will require two different metadata records!!
Examples: you have a text in both French and English; or an image of a museum object
as well as a 3-D video of it… or two versions of a scanned photograph.
But what describes the content?
Title: The name given to the resource.
Description: An account of the content of the resource. Description may
include but is not limited to: an abstract, table of contents, reference to a
graphical representation of content or a free-text account of the content.
Subject: The topic of the content of the resource. Typically, a subject will be
expressed as keywords or key phrases or classification codes that
describe the topic of the resource.
Coverage: The extent or scope of the content of the resource. Coverage
will typically include spatial location (a place name or geographic coordinates), temporal period (a period label, date, or date range) or
jurisdiction (such as a named administrative entity).
Source: A reference to a resource from which the present resource is
derived. The present resource may be derived from the Source resource
in whole or part.
Type: The nature or genre of the content of the resource. Type includes
terms describing general categories, functions, genres, or aggregation
levels for content.
Relation: A reference to a related resource.
What about who made it?
That falls under “Intellectual Property”:
Creator: An entity primarily responsible for making the content of the
resource. Examples of a Creator include a person, an organization, or a
service.
Contributor: An entity responsible for making contributions to the content
of the resource. Examples of a Contributor include a person, an organization
or a service. Typically, the name of a Contributor should be used to indicate
the entity.
Publisher: The entity responsible for making the resource available.
Examples of a Publisher include a person, an organization, or a service.
Typically, the name of a Publisher should be used to indicate the entity.
Rights: Information about rights held in and over the resource. Typically a
Rights element will contain a rights management statement for the resource,
or reference a service providing such information. Rights information often
encompasses Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), Copyright, and various
Property Rights. If the rights element is absent, no assumptions can be
made about the status of these and other rights with respect to the resource.
All the 15 elements of Simple Dublin Core
Date
Title
Relation
Instantiation:
Format
Identifier
Language
Content:
Description
Coverage
Source
Subject
Type
Intellectual Property:
Contributor
Creator
Publisher
Rights
Any element may be used as many or as few times as needed; there is no order to
their use. You must refer to the schema in the namespace at the top of the file.
(The schema details what elements may be used and how.)
Example schema reference:
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
And if I want more?
 What are Dublin Core "Qualifiers"?
Terms that extend or refine the original 15 elements of the Dublin Core
Metadata Element Set. There are 2 classes:
1) Element Refinement:
A refined element shares the meaning of the unqualified element, but with a
more restricted scope.
2) Encoding Scheme:
An encoding scheme aids in the interpretation of the element value, by
referring the user to the controlled vocabulary, formal notation, or parsing
rules used.
Qualifiers must follow the "Dumb-Down" principle.
What’s the Dumb-Down Principle?
Qualification is therefore supposed only to refine, not extend the semantic
scope of an Element. They simply provide more specific information.
According to this rule, the client should be able to ignore any qualifier and use
the value as if it were unqualified.
This way, if the software application can’t support the qualifier terms, it ignores
the qualifier and uses the value in the tag as if it were in the more general
tag.
The value is still valid in the more general tag, and still is useful for discovery.
Example: “dcterms:temporal” refines “dc:coverage.”
<dcterms:temporal>The Great Depression, 1929-1939</dcterms:temporal>
becomes
<dc:coverage>The Great Depression, 1929-1939</dc:coverage>
There is nothing to indicate now that it is a time period…
but it’s still “coverage”.
Some example qualifiers…
Type of
Qualifier
Element
Example Qualifiers
Element
Refinement
Description
Abstract, tableOfContents
Coverage
Spatial, Temporal
Date
Available, Created, dateCopyrighted, dateAccepted,
dateSubmitted
Relation
hasPart, hasVersion, isPartOf, isReferencedBy,
isReplacedby, isVersionOf
Subject
DDC (Dewey Decimal Classification),
LCC (Library of Congress Classification),
LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings),
MESH (Medical Subject Headings)…
Language
ISO639-2 (such as eng, for English), RFC1766 (such as
en-us for US English)
Encoding
Schemes
Date
Type
W3CDTF (such as 1997-12-04 for 4 Dec. 1997)
DCMIType, such as: Collection, Dataset, Event, Image,
InteractiveResource, MovingImage, PhysicalObject,
Service, Software, Sound, StillImage, Text.
How do people use the DC element set?
They are used to create records for resources so that those resources can be
searched for and retrieved using the Dublin Core elements.
So you will see them as XML for computer processing, and as labels of fields to search
in an interface (the results of that processing).
 Web Feeds, such as RSS
<dc:title> Slashdot</dc:title>
<dcterms:alternative> News for nerds, stuff that matters<dcterms:/alternative>
<dc:identifier rdf:resource="http://slashdot.org" />
 HTML meta and link elements for web pages
<meta name = "DC.Title" content = "Crime and Punishment">
<meta name="DCTERMS.bibliographicCitation" content="Library and Information
Science Research 22(3), 311-338" />
<link rel="DC.relation" hreflang="de" href="http://www.example.org/de/" />
 RDF for semantic web applications
<rdf:Description>
<dc:title> Internet Ethics</dc:title>
<dc:creator> Duncan Langford</dc:creator>
<dc:identifier> ISBN 0333776267</dc:identifier>
</rdf:Description>
 They are used to create records for resources so they can be searched for and
retrieved…. Such as in digital libraries! (a terrific example: OAIster.)
Example xml record
Created by Melanie Feltner-Reichert for
the Arrowmont Project at UT Libraries
<record xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<dc:title> An Impression of the Pi Beta Phi Settlement School and its Vicinity</dc:title>
<dc:creator> Moorehead, Rosemary</dc:creator>
<dcterms:dateCreated> 1936-11-07</dcterms:dateCreated>
<dc:type> Mixed material</dc:type>
<dc:type> Scrapbook</dc:type>
<dc:format xsi:type="dcterms:IMT"> image/jpeg</dc:format>
<dc:description> Scrapbook on the Pi Beta Phi Settlement School and Gatlinburg area.
Compiled by Pi Beta Phi teacher Rosemary Moorehead. </dc:description>
<dc:subject> Student life</dc:subject>
<dc:subject> Settlement schools </dc:subject>
<dc:subject> Gatlinburg, Tennessee</dc:subject>
<dc:subject> Pi Beta Phi Settlement School</dc:subject>
<dc:subject> Expansion and Growth of Pi Beta Phi Settlement School, 1928-1943</dc:subject>
<dc:source> Great Smoky Mountains Regional Project, The University of Tennessee
Libraries. </dc:source>
<dc:rights> For rights relating to this resource, visit:
http://idserver.utk.edu/?id=200500000001941</dc:rights>
<dc:identifier> rms00000</dc:identifier>
<dc:relation> From Pi Beta Phi to Arrowmont:
http://idserver.utk.edu/?id=200500000001049</dc:relation>
<dc:language xsi:type="dcterms:ISO639-2"> eng</dc:language>
</record>
This record is currently viewable online here….
Example online represenatation
















Alvestrand, H. “Request For Comments: 1766: Tags for the Identification of Languages.” Network Working Group, March
1995. <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1766.html> (20 January 2007).
Apps, Ann. "Guidelines for Encoding Bibliographic Citation Information in Dublin Core Metadata.” Dublin Core Metadata
Initiative. 13 June 2005. <http://dublincore.org/documents/dc-citation-guidelines/> (15 January 2007).
Beckett, Dave, Eric Miller, and Dan Brickley. "Expressing Simple Dublin Core in RDF/XML.” Dublin Core Metadata
Initiative, 31 July 2002. <http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmes-xml/> (15 January 2007).
Beged-Dov, Gabe, Dan Brickley, Rael Dornfest, et.al. “RDF Site Summary 1.0 Modules: Dublin Core.” Web Resource
Organization, 20 December 2000. <http://web.resource.org/rss/1.0/modules/dc/> (20 January 2007).
DCMI Usage Board. “DCMI Type Vocabulary.” Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, 28 August 2006.
<http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-type-vocabulary/> (23 January 2007).
--- "Dublin Core Metadata Terms." Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, 18 December 2006.
<http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/> (15 January 2007).
Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. “DCMI Term Declarations Represented in XML Schema Language.” Dublin Core
Metadata Initiative, 10 April 2006. <http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/> (23 January 23, 2007).
Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. "Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, Version 1.1." Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, 18
December 2006. <http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/> (15 January 2007).
--- "Using Dublin Core - Dublin Core Qualifiers.” Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, 7 November 2005.
<http://dublincore.org/documents/usageguide/qualifiers.shtml> (15 January 2007).
Hillman, Diane. “Using Dublin Core.” Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, 12 April 2001.
<http://dublincore.org/documents/2001/04/12/usageguide/sectc.shtml> (15 January 2007).
ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee. "Codes for the Representation of Names of Languages.” Library of Congress, 6
October 2006. <http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php> (15 January 2007).
Lagoze, Carl and Herbert Van de Sompel, ed. “The Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting,” Version
2.0. The Open Archives Initiative, 14 June 2002, <http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/openarchivesprotocol.html> (23
January 2007).
Powell, Andy. "Expressing Dublin Core in HTML/XHTML Meta and Link Elements.” Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, 30
November 2003. <http://dublincore.org/documents/dcq-html/> (15 January 2007).
Powell, Andy and Pete Johnston. "Guidelines for implementing Dublin Core in XML.” Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, 2
April 2003. <http://dublincore.org/documents/dc-xml-guidelines/> (15 January 2007).
Wolf, Misha, and Charles Wicksteed. “Date and Time Formats.” World Wide Web Consortium, 27 August 1998.
<http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime> (20 January 2007).
Woodley, Mary, Gail Clement, and Pete Winn. "DCMI Glossary.” Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, 7 November
2005.<http://dublincore.org/documents/usageguide/glossary.shtml> (15 January 2007).
Bibliography