Sudanese Civil War and the Conflict in Darfur

Download Report

Transcript Sudanese Civil War and the Conflict in Darfur

Sudanese Civil War and the Conflict
in Darfur
IAFS 1000
Sudan at a Glance
• Was 10th largest state, largest in
Africa
• Red Sea coastline, Sahara
desert, tropical south
• Confluence of Blue Nile and
White Nile
• Capital: Khartoum
Sudanese Population
• Population:
– 41 million
– Concentrated in
Khartoum,
Darfur, South
• Density:
– 42/sq. mile
• Urbanization:
– 43%
The Distant Past
 Sudan was once home to
Nubia, a great empire of
black Africans that rivaled
the Egyptians.
 Nubia collapsed long ago
and black Africans were
pushed south by Arabs.
 Important to Southern
claims to Sudan.
“Land of Islam”
 Islam spread to the area of northern Sudan in the seventh
century.
 North Sudanese adopted Islam and reorganized politics
around Islam
 Proximate to Egypt, close relations with Middle East
“Land of Islam”
 Khartoum became an
important trading hub
 Slave traders were based in
the north and went south on
raids
 Ottomans conquered the area
in 1820s
“Land of War”
 Muslim jihadists failed to
spread Islam to the south.
 South Sudan called “Land of
War.”
 South raided for slaves, but
avoided occupation
Mahdi and Northern Nationalism
 The “Mahdi” led a resistance
against the Ottomans in the
late 19th century.
 Used Islamic propaganda to
unify Sudan
British Reconquest
 Britain helped Egypt defeat the Mahdiyah to return Sudan to
Egyptian rule.
 Colonial institutions established in the north.
 Rule through local leaders and Christian missionaries in the
south.
The Sudanese Civil War(s)
Independence
•
1954: Britain and Egypt sign accord that states a united Sudan will
become independent in 1956.
•
1955: Anticipating independence, southern military leaders mutiny,
initiate conflict against north.
•
1956: Sudan becomes a sovereign state, and joins Arab League same
month.
Rebel Leadership and
In-Group Policing
 Many peace accords failed because the rebels had no
authentic leader. No leader could maintain any peace
agreement.
 It was not until 1969 that Joseph Lagu was accepted as the
authentic leader of the south.
The “First Sudanese Civil War”
 1955 – 1969: Early Northern leaders pursued peace via
“Sudanization” (Islamization).
 1969: Military coup led by Nimeiri, who pursues
socialism rather than Islamization
 1972: Nimeiri offers South regional autonomy, allies
with the West and Egypt.
 500,000 killed (1955 – 1972).
Inter-War Years (1972 – 1983)
 1970s: Nimeiri survives
multiple attempted coups,
enjoys support of southern
leaders.
 1978: Chevron discovers oil
in the south.
Return to War
 The North responds to discovery of oil by withdrawing
autonomy granted to South and taking control of the oil
fields.
 Nimeiri’s most important ally, Egyptian leader Sadat dies
(1981).
 The regime weakens, Libya aids a coup that ousts Nimeiri in
1985.
There Will Be Blood

Oil fields (gray boxes)
concentrated in South.

Oil separated from
north by Nuba
Mountains.
Short-Lived “Democracy”
 Following the coup, an
election brings al-Mahdi
(grandson of Mahdi) to power.
 No votes cast in the south.
 1989: al-Bashir takes power in
coup
The SPLA
 The SPLA was formed by a group
of military officers led by John
Garang.
 Educated in Iowa, personal friend
of Ugandan President Museveni.
 Child Soldiers
1990s
 The SPLA held the south and
international support for SPLA
grew to include the United
States.
 Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda
relocate to Sudan in 1991.
 Sudan began exporting oil in
1999.
Comprehensive Peace Agreement
The CPA (2005)
 Created democracy with elections
every five years
 Grants power-sharing
 al-Bashir made President
 Garang made Vice President
 50/50 revenue-sharing
Causes of concern
 Garang dies in helicopter crash two
weeks after he is made VP.
 War in Darfur complicates peace
with South.
 Leaders have reneged on southern
autonomy in the past.
 South would vote to secede or
remain in Sudan in 2010/11.
 SPLA allowed to maintain army
until 2011
 Islamic law discontinued in South.
The War in Darfur
 Darfur is the western region of Sudan.
 Dry with arable land
 Extremely isolated
LAND OF THE FUR…
People of Darfur
Arab (40%)
Fur (25%)
Masalit (12%)
Zaghawa (9%)
Others (14%)
DIVERSITY AND SALIENCE IN DARFUR
 The people of Darfur, both Arab and non-Arab, are
predominantly Muslim.
 The most important difference between Arabs and non-Arabs
in Darfur:
 Arabs: Predominantly nomadic, use arable land for grazing
 Non-Arabs: Predominantly farmers, live permanently on arable land.
HISTORY OF DARFUR
 Independent Darfur
Sultanate until Egyptian
invasion in 1870s.
 Multi-ethnic feudal state.
 Major power in Sahara,
dominated trade
 Joined Mahdi movement
against Egypt in 1880s.
ANGLO-EGYPTIAN RULE
 After the Mahdi regime was defeated by the British and Egyptians
(1890s), the British decided Darfur was too isolated to be part of
Sudan.
 The British decided to include Darfur in Sudan in 1916.
 Like South Sudan, Darfur was ruled locally.
DARFUR AND INDEPENDENT SUDAN
 Darfur was a strong region for the Mahdi party that favored
isolationism and Islamist rule.
 Darfur distrusted Egypt and the Arabs running the country in
Khartoum.
 Impartial in South Sudanese civil war. Leaders from Darfur disliked
both sides.
DARFUR AND NIMEIRI
 Nimeiri came to power in 1969,
turned away from Islamization
 Darfur offered cross border
sanctuary for Islamists in Chad.
 Qaddafi supported an Islamist
movement against Nimeiri in
Darfur.
FAMINE AND FAILURE
Famine
 Famine, desertification
increase tension between
Arab herders and non-Arab
farmers.
Regime Failure
 al-Bashir, an Islamist, comes to
power in 1989.
 As government support for
 “Janjaweed” form, attack
farmers to claim land for
herders
janjaweed increases, rebel
groups form to defend
farmers.
JEM & SLM
Justice and Equality
Movement
Sudan Liberation
Movement
 Created by non-Arab
 Created by local Zaghawa
Islamists purged from alBashir’s regime.
and Fur leaders in Darfur.
 Divided into three major
 Founded by author of
“Black Book,” which used
government statistics to
show relative deprivation.
factions along ethnic lines.
The War Begins (2003)
•JEM/SLA attack
government
• Government responds by
giving janjaweed weapons,
air support.
•300K to 500k killed, most
Darfuri civilians
• 2.7 million refugees; 1/3
of Darfuris displaced
INTERNATIONAL INFLUENCE
 China continues to support
the al-Bashir regime with
investment, arms trades,
and support in the UN
Security Council.
 Genocide
 Bush Administration
 al-Bashir charged with war
crimes by ICC in 2009.
Countdown to Independence for South
Sudan – “The world’s newest nation”
 July 2009
 Both parties agree to allow The Hague to determine border
demarcation.
 April 2010
 First elections since CPA, Garang’s death
 January 2011
 The South votes to secede from Sudan
 Oil now accounts for 70% of Sudan’s export revenue
 Infrastructure remains undeveloped away from Khartoum, Port
Sudan
Independent South Sudan 2011
98.85 of citizens approved
independence by
referendum
 Salva Kiir Mayardit, a Dinka,
the first President of South
Sudan.
Civil War………Again 2014
Vice President and
now opposition
Leader, Dr. Riek
Machar, a Nuer
Lenses for Understanding these
Conflicts
The Resource Curse
 Used by Political Scientists, Economists, and Geographers
 minerals and fuels  less economic growth and worse
development outcomes
 What the …?
 Decline in the competitiveness of other sectors
 Volatility associated with market swings
 Government mismanagement of resources
 Weak/unstable political/economic institutions
Public Goods Distribution
 Used by Political Scientists and Economists
“Exporting Colonial Institutions”
 Used by Political Scientists, Geographers and Economists
 Should I stay or should I go?
 Colonizers weren’t fans of malaria…
 Exoticism of culture
 Colonial Legacy
 Extractive institutions
 Integrated institutions
Social Psychology Theories
 Intergroup Contact Theory
 Casual, impersonal contacts encourage hostile stereotyping
 Prolonged, personal contacts lessen discrimination
 Social Identity Theory
 Ingroup – outgroup comparisons
 Positive social distinctiveness for ingroup