Transcript An Overview of the EQuIP Review Rubric

An Overview of the EQuIP
Rubric for Lessons & Units
Dana Cartier
ISBE Content Area Specialist
Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
Objectives
To use the EQuIP Rubric to
provide quality feedback
and adapt lessons to align
to the CCSSM.
Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
These Standards are not intended to be new
names for old ways of doing business. They are
a call to take the next step. It is time for states
to work together to build on lessons learned
from two decades of standards based reforms.
It is time to recognize that standards are not
just promises to our children, but promises we
intend to keep.
— CCSS (2010, p.5)
Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
EQuIP Rubric for Lessons &
Units
• EQuIP stands for Educators Evaluating Quality
Instructional Products
• Derived from the Tri-State Rubric
• Math and ELA Versions
• ISBE is participating on this multi-state effort
Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
The Rubric
Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
I. Alignment to the CCSS
The lesson aligns with the CCSS:
• Content standard(s)
• Standards for Mathematical Practice
• Balance of procedures and understanding.
Dimension I is non-negotiable.
Review only continues if Dimension I is rated a 2 or 3.
Quality Rubric created by the Tri-State Collaborative (Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island) –
facilitated by Achieve 2/21/2012
Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
II. Key Areas of Focus
• Focus
• Coherence
• Rigor
– Application
– Conceptual Understanding
– Procedural Skill and Fluency
Quality Rubric created by the Tri-State Collaborative (Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island) –
facilitated by Achieve 2/21/2012
Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
III. Instructional Support
Responsive to varied student learning needs,
including:
• Clear and sufficient guidance
• Precise and accurate mathematics
• Relevant, thought‐provoking questions
• Instructional Expectations
Quality Rubric created by the Tri-State Collaborative (Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island) –
facilitated by Achieve 2/21/2012
III. Instructional Support (cont.)
Differentiation:
• Diverse cultures
• Below grade level
• Above grade level
Quality Rubric created by the Tri-State Collaborative (Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island) –
facilitated by Achieve 2/21/2012
III. Instructional Support (cont.)
For a longer lesson/unit
•
•
•
•
Mix of instructional approaches
Gradual removal of supports
Effective sequence/progression
Procedural skill and fluency
Quality Rubric created by the Tri-State Collaborative (Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island) –
facilitated by Achieve 2/21/2012
Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
IV. Assessment
• Independently demonstrated, observable
evidence
• Accessible and unbiased methods
• Scoring guidelines
Quality Rubric created by the Tri-State Collaborative (Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island) –
facilitated by Achieve 2/21/2012
IV. Assessment
For a longer lesson/unit
• Use varied modes of assessment
–
–
–
–
Pre-assessment
Formative
Summative
Self-assessment
Quality Rubric created by the Tri-State Collaborative (Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island) –
facilitated by Achieve 2/21/2012
Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
Overall Rating Scale
E: Exemplar Lesson/Unit – Aligned and meets most to all of
the criteria in dimensions II, III, IV (total 11-12)
E/I: Exemplar if Improved – Aligned and needs some
improvement in one or more dimensions (total 8-10).
R: Needs Revision – Aligned partially and needs significant
revision in one or more dimensions (total 3-7).
N: Not Recommended – Not aligned and does not meet the
criteria (total 0-2).
Quality Rubric created by the Tri-State Collaborative (Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island) –
facilitated by Achieve 2/21/2012
How to Use the Rubric within
your School
• Consider what teachers already know
• Consider what faculty need to know before
they see the rubric.
• Consider the difficulties that a faculty
member may have looking at the rubric.
• Consider the resources that can be used
to help with the transition.
Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
Next Steps
• From today, what can you bring
back to your school?
• How will you use it to influence
future professional development?
• What is the implication on student
learning?
Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License