Treatment of Ovarian Cancer 21st Century and Beyond

Download Report

Transcript Treatment of Ovarian Cancer 21st Century and Beyond

Treatment of Ovarian Cancer
21st Century and Beyond
Judith
Wolf
Judith
K. K.
Wolf,
MD
Professor
• Department of Gynecologic Oncology • University
Professor
of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center • Houston, TX
Gynecologic Oncology
Ovarian Cancer: 2010
• 1/71 lifetime risk1
• 5-year survival rates (by year of
diagnosis)2
– 1990-1992 42.5%
– 1993-1995 43.5%
– 1996-2003 45%
• Mortality relatively unchanged but
statistically significant improvement in
5-year survival rates
1. SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) Program Web site.
http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/ovary.html. Accessed April 22, 2007.
2. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2004/results_merged/sect_21_ovary.pdf. Accessed April 22, 2007.
Ovarian Cancer Staging
Stage I - Limited to ovaries
A. Unilateral ovary
B. Bilateral ovaries
C. Positive cytology
Stage II - Limited to pelvis
A. Extends to uterus or tubes
B. other pelvic organs
C. Positive cytology
Stage III – Spread to upper abdomen or regional lymph nodes
A. Microscopic spread
B. Macroscopic < 2 cm
C. Macroscopic > 2 cm
Stage IV - Spread outside peritoneum, pleura or parenchymal
liver metastases
Ovarian Cancer
FIGO Staging System
Stage
Description
Incidence
Survival
20%
73%
I
Confined to ovaries
II
Confined to pelvis
5%
45%
III
Confined to abdomen/ 58%
lymph nodes
21%
IV
Distant metastases
<5%
17%
Jelic S, et al. Program and abstracts of the 27th Congress of the European
Society for Medical Oncology; 2002; Nice, France.
Mocharnuk R. Medscape Web site.
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/444134. Accessed May 2, 2007.
FIGO = International
Federation of Gynecology
and Obstetrics
Ovarian Cancer Surgical
Debulking and Staging
Exploration
Biopsies
(Staging)
TAH/
BSO
Washings/
Ascites
(Staging)
TAH = total abdominal hysterectomy
BSO = bilateral salphingo-oophorectomy
Goals (Debulking)
• Assessment of extent of disease
• Optimal tumor reduction
First-line Therapy –
Standard Treatment Options
Surgery with maximum
cytoreduction effort <1cm
residual disease
Platinum + Taxane Chemotherapy
(Carboplatin + Paclitaxel)
Chemotherapy
• Standard front-line chemotherapy in the
US today is carboplatin, AUC 6 to 7.5,
paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 21 days for
6 cycles
• Result of several studies over last decade
– GOG 1111 and OV 102 - paclitaxel/cisplatin
vs cyclophosphamide/cisplatin
– GOG 1583 and AGO OVAR-34 - carboplatin
instead of cisplatin
1. McGuire WP, et al. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(1):1-6.
2. Piccart MJ, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(9):699-708.
3. Ozols RF, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(17):3194-3200.
4. du Bois AD, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95(17):1320-1329.
GOG = Gynecologic Oncology Group
AGO = Arbeitsgemeinschaft
Gynaekologische Onkologie
The Role of Paclitaxel in First-line
Therapy for Ovarian Carcinoma
Study
# Pts
377
GOG
1321 III suboptimal-IV
Median PFS
(mo)
Median OS
(mo)
Cisplatin/
Paclitaxel (24 h) x 6
14.1
26.3
Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 x 6
16.4
10.8
17.3
30.2
25.9
36.1
16.1
35.4
Regimen
Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 (24 h)*
ICON
32
2074
I-IV
*CR/PR rates on paclitaxel
monotherapy (42%) vs cisplatin
regimens (67%), P <.001
Carboplatin/
Paclitaxel (3 h)
Carboplatin or CAP
CAP = cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, cisplatin
GOG = Gynecologic Oncology Group
ICON = International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm Group
OS = overall survival
PFS = progression-free survival
1. Muggia FM, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(1):106-115.
2. International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm Group. Lancet. 2002;360(9332):505-515.
The Schedule of Paclitaxel in First-line
Therapy for Ovarian Carcinoma
Study
# Pts
GOG
1581
792
III optimal
Regimen
Median PFS (mo)
Median OS (mo)
Cisplatin 75 mg/m2
Paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 (24 h)
19.4
48.8
Carboplatin AUC 7.5
Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (3 h) *
20.7
56.7
* RR progression 0.88 (95% CI) and
RR death 0.86 (95% CI)
AGO2
798
IIB-IV
HR =0.86
(99% CI)
Cisplatin 75 mg/m2
Paclitaxel 185 mg/m2 (24 h)
19.1
44.1
Carboplatin AUC 6
Paclitaxel 185 mg/m2 (3 h)
17.2
43.3
HR = 1.050
(95% CI)
HR =1.045
(95% CI)
More toxicity with the cisplatin regimens
1. Bookman MA, et al. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003;13(s2):149–155.
2. du Bois AD, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95(17):1320-1329.
AGO = Arbeitsgemeinschaft
Gynaekologische Onkologie
CI = confidence interval
GOG = Gynecologic Oncology Group
HR = hazard ratio; OS = overall survival
PFS = progression-free survival
RR = relative risk
SCOTROC: Trial
• Ovarian cancer
stage Ic-IV
• Primary
peritoneal cancer
• N = 1077
R
A
N
D
O
M
I
Z
E
Carboplatin AUC 5,
+ docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (1 h)
Q3W x 6
Carboplatin AUC 5,
+ paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (3 h)
Q3W x 6
SCOTROC = Scottish Randomized Trial in Ovarian Cancer
Q3W = once every 3 weeks
Vasey PA, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(22):1682-1691.
SCOTROC: Results
Parameter
DC
PC
Response (standard)
59%
60%
Response (CA-125)
76%
77%
Progression-free survival
15 mos
14.8 mos
Overall survival at 24 months
64%
69%
DC = docetaxel-carboplatin
PC = paclitaxel-carboplatin
SCOTROC = Scottish Randomized Trial in Ovarian Cancer
Vasey PA, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(22):1682-1691.
SCOTROC: Conclusion
• PC vs DC: PC the Standard
–
Overall toxicity clearly favors paclitaxel regimen
for all except neurotoxicity and arthralgia/myalgia
–
Differences in neurotoxicity related to taxane in
each regimen should be reversible
–
Myelotoxicity worse with docetaxel and prevents
use of what may be optimal dose of carboplatin
–
Paclitaxel/carboplatin remains the standard of
care in order to maximize efficacy, minimize lifethreatening toxicity
Vasey PA, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(22):1682-1691.
DC = docetaxel-carboplatin
PC = paclitaxel-carboplatin
GOG 182-ICON5
International Study for Stage III/IV
Regimen I (control)
Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 IV (3 h)
Carboplatin AUC 6 IV
d1
d1
Regimen II (triplet A)
Paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 IV (3 h) d 1
Carboplatin AUC 5 IV
d1
Gemcitabine 800 mg/m2/d IV
d 1, 8
Randomization
• All patients
• Equal proportions on
each regimen
• Primary end points:
PFS, OS, RR
Regimen III (triplet B)
Paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 IV (3 h)
Carboplatin AUC 5 IV
Doxil 30 mg/m2 IV
Every other cycle
Regimens I, II, and III: 8 cycles,
21-d cycle interval
Regimens IV and V: 4 cycles,
21-d cycle interval
d1
d1
d1
Regimen IV (sequential module A)
Carboplatin AUC 5 IV
d3
Topotecan 1.25 mg/m2/d IV
d 1-3
Regimen IV (sequential module B)
Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 IV (3 h) d 1
Carboplatin AUC 6 IV
d1
Regimen V (sequential module A)
Carboplatin AUC 6 IV
d8
Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2/d IV d 1, 8
Regimen V (sequential module B)
Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 IV (3 h) d 1
Carboplatin AUC 6 IV
d1
Bookman MA. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(18S):Abstract 5002.
GOG = Gynecologic Oncology Group; ICON = International
Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm Group; OS = overall survival;
PFS = progression-free survival; RR = response rate
GOG0182-ICON5: Progression-Free
Survival
Median PFS and HR (95% CI)
16.1
16.4
16.4
15.3
15.4
1.000
0.990
0.998
1.094
1.052
(0.884-1.107)
(0.891-1.117)
(0.979-1.224)
(0.940-1.176)
Bookman MA. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(18S):Abstract 5002.
C = carboplatin
D = pegylated liposomal doxorubicin
G = gemcitabine
P = paclitaxel; PFS = progression-free survival
T = topotecan
GOG0182-ICON5: Overall Survival
Median OS and HR (95% CI)
40.0
40.4
42.8
39.1
40.2
Bookman MA. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(18S):Abstract 5002.
1.000
0.978
0.972
1.068
1.035
(0.838-1.141)
(0.832-1.136)
(0.918-1.244)
(0.888-1.206)
C = carboplatin
D = pegylated lipososomal doxorubicin
G = gemcitabine
P = paclitaxel; 0S = overall survival
T = topotecan
Current GOG Frontline Trial
GOG 218
> Microscopic residual
EOC, PPC cancer
Paclitaxel Paclitaxel
Paclitaxel
Carboplatin Carboplatin Carboplatin
Placebo Bevacizumab Bevacizumab
Placebo
Placebo Bevacizumab
×16 cycles ×16 cycles ×16 cycles
N = 2,000 patients
Survival, PFS primary endpoints
Biologic & QOL endpoints
EOC = epithelial ovarian cancer
FT = fallopian tube
GOG = Gynecologic Oncology Group
PFS = progression-free survival
PPC = primary peritoneal cancer
QOL = quality of life
EORTC-55971
Upfront Debulking Surgery vs
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Stage IIIc or IV Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma
Cytoreductive Surgery
+
3 Courses Platinum-Based
Chemotherapy
IDS Allowed
Repeat
Chemotherapy
SLS allowed
3 Courses Platinum-Based
Chemotherapy
IDS With
Response or
Stable Disease
Repeat
Chemotherapy
SLS allowed
The EORTC Groups Web site. Gynaecological Cancer Group Active
Study Protocols. http://groups.eortc.be/gcg/studyprotocols.htm#55971.
Accessed June 12, 2007.
EORTC = European Organisation for
Research and Treatment of Cancer
IDS = Interval Debulking Surgery
SLS = Second-Look Surgery
GC vs TC Induction Regimens Followed
by T Consolidation: Study Design
Histologic diagnosis and prior resection of
stage IC-IV epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal,
or fallopian tube carcinoma
Induction GC
Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 Days 1, 8
+ Carboplatin AUC 5 Day 1
x 6 cycles every 21 days
Induction TC
Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 Day 1
+ Carboplatin AUC 6 Day 1
x 6 cycles q 21 days
Clinical CR
Anything other than CR
(PR, SD, PD)
Anything other than CR
(PR, SD, PD)
Elective
T Consolidation Therapy
Paclitaxel 135 mg/m2
every 28 days for 12 cycles
Single-agent crossover
Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 Day 1
Gordon A, et al. ASCO 2008. Abstract 5536.
Single-agent crossover
Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 Days 1, 8
GC vs TC Induction Regimens Followed
by T Consolidation: Response Rates
CR*
Induction
GC
(n = 66)
30 (45.5)
Induction
TC
(n = 58)
26 (44.8)
PR
SD
PD
13 (19.7)
5 (7.6)
6 (9.1)
12 (20.7)
8 (13.8)
4 (6.9)
Data not available
ORR (CR + PR)
12 (18.2)
43 (65.2)
8 (13.8)
38 (65.5)
 .999
DCR (CR + PR + SD)
48 (72.7)
46 (79.3)
.410
Best response, n (%)
Gordon A, et al. ASCO 2008. Abstract 5536.
P
Value
*CR required a normalized CA-125.
GC vs TC Induction Regimens Followed
by T Consolidation: Pt-Based Toxicity
Induction
GC
(n = 219)
Induction
TC
(n = 220)
P Value
88 (40.2)
55 (25.1)
30 (13.6)
10 (4.5)
 .0001
G3/4 anemia
Nonhematologic
 G2 neuropathy
52 (23.7)
20 (9.1)
 .0001
24 (11.0)
43 (19.5)
.0165
G2 alopecia
Platelet transfusion
79 (36.1)
7 (3.2)
110 (50.0)
0 (0)
.0038
.0073
Toxicity, n (%)
Hematologic
G3/4
thrombocytopenia
Gordon A, et al. ASCO 2008. Abstract 5536.
Conventional vs Dose-Dense
TC (NOVEL): Study Design
Ovarian epithelial, primary peritoneal, or
fallopian tube cancer with
FIGO stage II-IV
Stratified by
residual disease ≤ 1 cm vs > 1 cm;
FIGO stage II vs III vs IV;
histology: clear cell/mucinous vs serous/others
Conventional TC (c-TC)
Paclitaxel 180 mg/m2 Day 1 +
Carboplatin AUC 6.0 Day 1
every 21 days for 6-9 cycles
Isonishi S, et al. ASCO 2008. Abstract 5506.
Dose-dense weekly TC (dd-TC)
Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 Days 1, 8, 15 +
Carboplatin AUC 6.0 Day 1
every 21 days for 6-9 cycles
Conventional vs Dose-Dense TC
(NOVEL): Clinical Responses
Patients, %
Measurable
Objective response
• CR
• PR
NC
PD
NE
c-TC
(n = 135)
53
dd-TC
(n = 147)
56
16
38
31
7
9
20
36
29
3
12
P = .72
Isonishi S, et al. ASCO 2008. Abstract 5506.
Evaluated by WHO criteria
Conventional vs Dose-Dense TC
(NOVEL): PFS
Isonishi S, et al. ASCO 2008. Abstract 5506.
Proportion Surviving
Progression Free
1.0
0.9
dd-TC
c-TC
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0
6
12
18
24
30
36
Mos From Randomization
n
Event
Median PFS,
mos
c-TC
319
200
17.2
dd-TC
312
160
28.0
Treatment
42
48
54
P Value
HR
95 %CI
.0015
0.714
0.581-0.879
Ovarian Carcinoma:
Clinical Course
Interval
Cytoreduction
Diagnosis
Symptoms
Chemotherapy #1
Second-Look
Secondary
Cytoreduction
Progression
Consolidation/
Maintenance
Chemo #2
Cure
Staging
Primary cytoreduction
Death
Chemo #3+
Supportive
Care
Goals of Treatment:
Relapsed Ovarian Cancer
• Prolong Survival
• Delay Time to Progression
• Control Disease-Related Symptoms
• Minimize Treatment-Related Symptoms
• Maintain or Improve Quality of Life
Issues Impacting Therapy for
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
• Treatment-free interval
– Impact of consolidation/maintenance therapy
• Number of prior regimens
– Response to prior therapy
• Toxicity from prior therapy
– Prior use of growth factors
– Transfusion requirements
– Neuropathy
• Volume and site(s) of disease
– Ascites/GI symptoms
– Performance status
Surveillance Options for Ovarian
Cancer Patients in Remission
• Second-look laparotomy
• Physical examination
– Include pelvic examination
• CA-125
• Imaging
– CT scan
– MRI?
– PET scan?
CT = computed tomography
MRI = magnetic resonance imaging
PET = positron emission tomography
Ovarian Cancer:
How is Relapse Defined?
• Continuous rise in CA-125
• CA-125 above 100
• Radiographic recurrence
• Symptomatic recurrence
• Physical examination findings
• Combination of above
When Does Ovarian Cancer Recur?
Population
Optimal St III
Study
Treatment
PFS
GOG 114
IV Carb & Pac, IP Cis
28 mos
GOG 172
IV Pac, IP Cis & Pac
24 mos
GOG 158
IV Pac & Carb
21 mos
GOG 114
IV Pac & Cis
22 mos
GOG 158
IV Pac & Cis
19 mos
GOG 172
IV Pac & Cis
18 mos
Suboptimal III & IV GOG 111
IV Pac & Cis
18 mos
GOG 162
IV Pac Cis
12 mos
GOG 152
IV Pac Cis
11 mos
Stage IC-IV
SCOTROC
Doc Carbo
15 mos
Stage IC-IV
SCOTROC
Pac Carbo
15 mos
All Stage III & IV
GOG 182
IV Pac/Carbo x 8
16 mos
Carb = carboplatin; Cis = cisplatin; Doc = docetaxel; pac = paclitaxel;
GOG = Gynecologic Oncology Group; IP = intraperitoneal; Pac = paclitaxel
Active Agents in Ovarian Cancer
FDA approved
Altretamine
Carboplatin
Cisplatin
Gemcitabine/
Carboplatin
Paclitaxel
Pegylated liposomal
doxorubicin
Topotecan
Not FDA approved, compendium listed
Chlorambucil
Cyclophosphamide
Docetaxel
Doxorubicin
Epirubicin
Etoposide
5-FU/LV
Gemcitabine
Ifosfamide
Irinotecan
Melphalan
Methotrexate
Thiotepa
Vinorelbine
Not FDA approved, not compendium listed
Aromatase inhibitors
Tamoxifen
Bevacizumab
Pemetrexed
Effect of Platinum-Free Interval
on Response Rate
% Response to Second-line
Platinum Therapy
Platinum-Free
Interval (mos)
Markman
Gore
0-6
Blackledge
10%
15%
29%
20%
63%
30%
94%
30%
17%
7-12
27%
13-18
33%
27%
19-24
>24
59%
57%
Markman M, et al. J Clin Oncol. 1991;9(3):389-393.
Gore ME, et al. Gynecol Oncol. 1990;36:207-211.
Blackledge G, et al. Br J Cancer. 1989;59:650-653.
Non-Platinum
Therapy
Ovarian Cancer at First Relapse
Definition of Sensitivity
P
R 0
3
I
M
A Refractory
R
Y
T
R
E
A
T
M
E
N
T
6
12
18
24
Months
Resistant
Sensitive
“Very Sensitive”
Defined as measurable recurrence, not biochemical (CA-125) recurrence
ICON 4 Schema
• Relapsed ovarian or
primary
• Peritoneal requiring
chemotherapy
• Previous platinum-based
chemotherapy
Prior chemotherapy
• Carboplatin (31%)
• Paclitaxel/platinum (40%)
• Other (30%)
R
A
N
D
O
M
I
Z
E
Conventional
platinum-based
chemotherapy
Paclitaxel plus
platinum
chemotherapy
TFI > 12 months for 75%
Parmar MK, et al. Lancet. 2003;361:2099-2106.
ICON = International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm Group
TFI = treatment-free interval
ICON 4 Response
CR or PR
Plat
(n = 128)
Pac-Plat
(n = 119)
54%
66%
(Difference of 12%; 95% CI -0.1% to 24%; p=0.06)
Parmar MK, et al. Lancet. 2003;361:2099-2106.
CR = complete response; ICON = International Collaborative
Ovarian Neoplasm Group; Pac = paclitaxel; Plat = platinum;
PR = partial response;
Ovarian Carcinoma:
ICON 4 Progression-Free Survival
Proportion alive and
progression-free
1.0
0.9
Hazard ratio = 0.76
(95% CI 0.66 - 0.89; p < 0.001)
Absolute difference at 1 year = 10%
(40% to 50%; 95% CI 4% to 15%)
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
Pac-Plat
Plat
0.1
0.0
0
1
2
3
4
Years from randomization
Patients at risk
Pac-Plat
392
Plat
410
179
157
Parmar MK, et al. Lancet. 2003;361:2099-2106.
52
45
25
17
17
7
ICON = International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm Group;
Pac = paclitaxel; Plat = platinum
ICON 4: Overall Survival
Hazard ratio = 0.82
(95% CI 0.69 - 0.97; p = 0.023)
Absolute difference 2 years = 7%
(50% to 57%; 95% CI 1% to 12%)
1.0
Proportion
alive
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
Pac-Plat
Plat
0.1
0.0
0
Patients at risk
Pac-Plat
392
410
Plat
1
2
3
4
Years from randomization
306
295
Parmar MK, et al. Lancet. 2003;361:2099-2106.
167
150
96
68
43
33
ICON = International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm Group;
Pac = paclitaxel; Plat = platinum
Gem/Carbo vs Carbo: Design
• Recurrent ovarian cancer
• 6+ months after platinum
• Strata
– PFI (6 - 12, >12 months)
– 1st-line therapy (platinum
± paclitaxel)
– Measurable vs evaluable
• Primary endpoint = PFS
Pfisterer J, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24:4699-4707.
R
A
N
D
O
M
I
Z
E
Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2
days 1 + 8 Plus
Carboplatin AUC 4 day 1
every 21 days × 6
Carboplatin AUC 5 day 1
every 21 days × 6
Carbo = carboplatin
Gem = gemcitabine
PFI = progression-free interval
PFS = progression-free survival
AGO OVAR 2.5 Primary Endpoint:
Progression-Free Survival
1.0
Progression-Free Probability
Log-rank p-value = 0.0038
Unadjusted HR = 0.72 (0.57 to 0.90)
0.8
Adjusted HR* = 0.71 (0.57 to 0.89)
0.6
GCb: median = 8.6 mo
Censoring: 12.4%
0.4
GCb Arm (N=178)
Cb Arm (N=178)
0.2
Cb: median = 5.8 mo
Censoring: 12.9%
0.0
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
21
24
27
30
33
36
Progression-Free Survival Time (mo)
* Adjusted for PFI, Tumor size
Pfisterer J, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4699-4707.
AGO = Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische
Onkologie; GCb = gemcitabine; Cb = carboplatin
39
AGO OVAR 2.5 Efficacy Results:
Overall Survival
Proportion Surviving
1.0
0.9
Median = 18.0 mo
Censoring: 18.5%
0.8
GCb Arm (N=178)
Cb Arm (N=178)
0.7
0.6
Log-rank p-value = 0.7349
0.5
Unadjusted HR = 0.96 (0.75 to 1.23)
0.4
Adjusted* HR = 0.92 (0.72 to 1.16)
Median = 17.3 mo
Censoring: 22.5%
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0
6
12
18
24
30
36
42
48
54
60
Months
* Adjusted for PFI, Tumor size and performance status
Pfisterer J, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4699-4707.
AGO = Arbeitsgemeinschaft
Gynaekologische Onkologie; GCb = gemcitabine;
Cb = carboplatin
GCIG CALYPSO Trial
Accrual Completed
(Target accrual 864 pts)
PFS 1° endpoint
Ovarian Cancer
Platinum Sens.
Stratify:
< 0.5 cm
> 0.5-2 cm
R
A
N
D
O
M
I
Z
E
PLD
30 mg/m2
Carboplatin AUC = 5
q 28 days x 6
Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2
Carboplatin AUC = 5
q 21 days x 6
GCIG = Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup
PFS = progression-free survival
PLD = pegylated liposomal doxorubicin
Farletuzumab (MORAb-003) in PlatinumSensitive EOC: Study Rationale
• FRA is overexpressed in most EOC; largely
absent from normal tissue
• Binding of MORAb-003 to FRA blocks
phosphorylation by Lyn kinase; mediates FRAexpressing tumor cell killing; suppresses tumor
growth in xenograft models
• Phase I study of single agent MORAb-003
demonstrated no significant adverse effects and
suggested efficacy in platinum-resistant EOC
MORAb-003 in Platinum-Sensitive
EOC: Phase II Study Design
Patients with platinum-sensitive EOC in first relapse
after first remission of 6-18 months duration
with evaluable disease by CA125
(Enrolled N = 58;
eligible n = 54)
Asymptomatic relapse
Single-agent Farletuzumab until
progression
(n = 28)
Symptomatic relapse
Original Carbo/Taxane regimen
+ Farletuzumab for 6 cycles
(n = 26)
Single-agent ORR
Combination ORR
Farletuzumab maintenance
Rx for responders
Compare lengths of first and
second remissions
Armstrong DK, et al. ASCO 2008. Abstract 5500.
MORAb-003-002 Phase II:
Treatment Arms
All arms
 MORAb-003: 100 mg/m2 weekly
– Run-in phase with 6 subjects at 37.5 and 6 at 62.5 mg/m2
Combination therapy arm every 21 days x 6 cycles
 Carboplatin: AUC 5-6
 Taxane
– Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 3 hours or
– Docetaxel 75 mg/m2
Armstrong DK, et al. ASCO 2008. Abstract 5500.
Comparison of First vs Second
Remission Length: n = 6
Subject
1st Remission,
Mos
2nd Remission,
Mos
Status
1
8.3
19.5+
Still in remission
2
10.8
19.1+
Still in
remission
3
10.1
15.8+
Still in
remission
4
9.5
9.6+
5
8.2
8.2
Still in
remission
Relapsing
6
6.5
7.8+
Armstrong DK, et al. ASCO 2008. Abstract 5500.
Still in
remission
Data as of May 5, 2008.
MORAb-003-002 Clinical Responses
by RECIST (Combination Therapy)
Best response
• CR: 7.4%
ORR: 70.3%
Patient benefit: 96.3%
• PR: 62.9%
• SD: 25.9%
• PD: 3.7%
• Based on all scans submitted as of December 3, 2007 (~
30%)
• By independent central reader
• MORAb-003 well tolerated; no increase observed in
toxicity profile in combination arm
Armstrong DK, et al. ASCO 2008. Abstract 5500.
Tumor Mass
Secondary
Cytoreduction
• Controversial
• Inconsistent definitions
• Benefit appears confined
to patients likely to
respond to additional
chemo:
• >12 month PFI
• Isolated site of
recurrence
• Disease
completely
resectable
PFI = progression-free interval
Vena Cava
Renal Vein
Kidney
Diaphragm
Kidney
Resected Liver
Ovarian Cancer Secondary
Cytoreduction:
Post-Surgery Survival
Author
Janicke
Segna
Zang
Gadducci
Eisenkop
Munkarah
Scarabelli
Tay
Total/Range
Year
1992
1993
2000
2000
2000
2001
2001
2002
N
30
100
60
30
114
25
148
46
553
Survival
Median
mos
16
16.6
13
21
16.8
26
13-26
TTP
mos
<12
<12
<12
<17.5
<12
<24
<12
<12
Survival
Median
mos
8
8.8
8
15
25
42
12
6
6-42
TTP
mos
>12
>12
>12
>17.5
>36
>24
12-24
>24
Survival
Median
mos (P)
29 (0.002)
22.9 (0.007)
12 (0.02)
25 (0.04)
56.8 (0.005)
57 (NS)
32 (0.001)
39 (0.001)
12-56
TTP = time to progression
GOG 213- PI Robert Coleman
Recurrent ovarian or peritoneal cancer
TFI >6 mos
Surgery
Randomize to
Chemotherapy
YES
No surgery
Surgical
Candidate
?
NO
Carboplatin + Paclitaxel
Carboplatin + Paclitaxel
+ Bevacizumab
+ Bevacizumab Maintenance
GOG = Gynecologic Oncology Group
TFI = treatment-free interval
Effect of Platinum-Free Interval
on Response Rate
% Response to Second-line
Platinum Therapy
Platinum-Free
Interval (mos)
Markman
Gore
0-6
Blackledge
10%
15%
29%
20%
63%
30%
94%
30%
17%
7-12
27%
13-18
33%
27%
19-24
>24
59%
57%
Markman M, et al. J Clin Oncol. 1991;9(3):389-393.
Gore ME, et al. Gynecol Oncol. 1990;36:207-211.
Blackledge G, et al. Br J Cancer. 1989;59:650-653.
Non-Platinum
Therapy
Recent Phase II GOG Studies in
Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer
Study
126-B
126-C
126-D
126-E
126-G
126-H
126-I
126-J
Agents
CDDP & Cyclosporine-A
Hexamethylmelamine
Pyrazoloacridine
PSC833 + paclitaxel
CI-958
Topotecan (24 h)
9-amino-camptothecin
Docetaxel
Bookman MA. Semin Oncol 2002;29(suppl 1):20-31.
Response/comm
3/23 (13%) Inactive
3/30 (10%) Inactive
2/24 (8.4%) Inactive
1/16 (6%) Inactive
1/25 (4%) Inactive
1/25 (4%) Inactive
8/58 (14%) Moderate
13/58 (22%) Active
(post-paclitaxel)
CDDP = c/s-diamminedichloroplatinum (cisplatin)
GOG = gynecologic oncology group
Recent Phase II GOG Studies in
Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer
Study
126-K
126-L
126-M
126-N
126-O
126-P
126-Q
126-R
Agents
Response/comm
Oxaliplatin
1/25 (4%) Inactive
Gemcitabine/CDDP 9/57 (16%) Moderate
Ixabepilone
7/50 (14%) Moderate
Paclitaxel weekly
10/48 (21%) Active
(post-paclitaxel)
Triapine-CDDP
Not Feasible
Paclitaxel & Celecoxib
Closed Early
Pemetrexed
10/48 (21%) Active
Abraxane
Accrual in Progress
Bookman MA. Semin Oncol 2002;29(suppl 1):20-31.
CDDP = c/s-diamminedichloroplatinum (cisplatin)
GOG = gynecologic oncology group
Pemetrexed in Platinum-Resistant
EOC: Phase II GOG Study Schema
Patients with persistent or recurrent platinum-resistant
EOC or primary peritoneal cancer who have failed on
higher priority treatment protocols
Pemetrexed 900 mg/m2 IV every 21 days for 1 cycle;
patients who have received previous radiotherapy will initiate
pemetrexed at level I reduction dose until disease progression or
adverse effect prohibits further therapy
Day
-7
Day Day
-6
-5
Folic Folic Stop
acid, acid NSAID
Vitamin
, folic
B12
acid
Days Day
Day
Day
Day
-4,-3
-2
-1
1
2
Folic Stop Dexamethasone, Chemotherapy, Dexamethasone
dexamethasone
,
acid NSAID,
folic acid
, folic acid
folic acid
folic
acid
Miller DS, et al. ASCO 2008. Abstract 5524.
Phase II GOG Study Evaluation of
Pemetrexed: Clinical Responses
Category
Response
• CR
No. of Cases
Pts, %
1
2.1
• PR
• SD
• Increasing
disease
9
17
18
18.8
35.4*
37.5
• Not evaluable
Total
3
48
6.3
100
Miller DS, et al. ASCO 2008. Abstract 5524.
*1 patient remains on therapy.
Cochrane Review of Tamoxifen for
Relapsed Ovarian Cancer
• 13 studies (11non-randomized series, 1 nonrandomized phase II and 1 randomized trial)
• 59 of 568 women (10.4%) treated with tamoxifen
achieved an objective response (RR)
– RR varied from 0% to 56%
– Stable disease, for variable periods of 4 weeks or
more, in 109 of 356 (30.6%) from 8 studies
– Not enough data to assess duration of RR, survival, or
the effect of tamoxifen on quality of life
• No reliable data from randomized controlled trials
Williams CJ. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD001034.
RR = response rate
GOG Experience
• GOG 160: Trastuzumab
• GOG 170
Human Interleukin-12 (170B)
Gefitinib (170C)
Bevacizumab (170D)
Imatinib (170E)
Bay 43-9006 (170F)
Lapatinib (170G)
Vorinostat (170H)
Temsirolimus (170I)
Enzastaurin (170J)
Mifepristone (170K)
Insufficiently Active
Too Early
Active
Ongoing GOG Phase II Effort
GOG = Gynecologic Oncology Group
Antiangiogenic Agents in Testing
for Treatment of Ovarian Cancer
Agent
Targets
Ligand binding:
Bevacizumab
VEGF-A
VEGF-Trap
VEGF-A, -B, -C, -D, -E, PIGF-1 and -2
Receptor binding:
Volociximab
51 integrin
IMC-1121B
VEGFR-2
Receptor tyrosine kinase inhibition:
Valatanib
VEGFR-1, -2, -3, PDGFR, and c-kit
Sunitinib
PDGFR, VEGFR-1, -2, -3, c-kit, Flt-3
AMG-706
VEGFR-1, -2, -3, PDGFR, and c-kit
Sorafenib
Raf, VEGFR-2, -3, Flt-3, c-kit, PDGFR- 
Non-receptor kinase inhibition:
EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor;
Temsirolimus, everolimus
mTOR
Mab = monoclonal antibody; mTOR =
Enzastaurin
PKC- 
mammalian target of rapamycin; PDGF-R =
Dasatinib
Src kinase platelet derived growth factor receptor;
PKC-b = protein kinase C-beta;
VEGF = vascular endothelial growth factor
Rationale for Targeting VEGF in
Treatment of Epithelial
Ovarian
Cancer
• Human tumors
– VEGF over-expressed in epithelial ovarian cancers,
associated with
• Ascites formation
• Malignant progression
• Poor prognosis
• Preclinical models of solid tumors
– Anti-VEGF therapy:
• Slowing of tumor progression
• Resolution of malignant effusions
• Synergy with cytotoxic agents
Han ES, et al. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2007;7(10):1339-1345.
Burger RA. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(20):2902-2908.
VEGF = vascular endothelial growth factor
Agents Targeting the VEGF
Pathway
Anti-VEGF
Antibodies
VEGF
Soluble
VEGFRs
(bevacizumab)
(VEGF-TRAP)
Anti-VEGFR
Antibodies
P
P
P
P
VEGFR-1
P
P
VEGFR-2
Endothelial Cell
Podar K, et al. Blood. 2005;105(4):1383-1395.
P
P
Small-Molecule Inhibitors
VEGF = vascular endothelial growth factor
VEGFR = VEGF receptor
Bevacizumab - Toxicity
• Proteinuria (usually G1 – G2)
• Muco-cutaneous hemorrhage
– Common – G1 epistaxis
– Rare (possibly life-threatening) G2-G4 tumor site hemorrhage
(primarily lung cancer trials)
• Arterial thromboembolism
– Uncommon (3% - 5%)
– Risk factors: age > 65, prior arterial TE
– Risk of venous thromboembolism not increased
• GI perforation – wound healing
– Perforation uncommon (2% - 4% in solid tumor population)
– Wound dehiscence rate 1%
Han ES, et al. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2007;7(10):1339-1345.
Burger RA. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(20):2902-2908.
G1, G2 = immunoglobulins
GI = gastrointestinal
TE = thromboembolism
Phase II Studies of Bevacizumab
in Ovarian Cancer
Cannistra
2007
Burger
2007
Garcia
2008
Number of Pts
44
62
70
Prior Regimens
2= 52%
3= 48%
1= 34%
2 = 66%
Median = 2
Range 1-3
Response Rate
16% (PRs)
18% (PRs)
3% (CRs)
24% (PRs)
GI Perforations
11%
0%
6%
Arterial
Thromboembolism
7%
0%
4%
Deaths
7%
0%
4%
Cannistra SA, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(33):5180-5186.
Burger RA, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(33):5165-5171.
Garcia AA, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(1):76-82.
CR = complete response
GI = gastrointestinal
PR = partial response
GI Perforations with Bevacizumab
in Ovarian Cancer
Study
GI (Gastrointestinal)
Perforations
Burger (GOG 170D)
0/62 (0)
Garcia (ASCO 2005)
2/29 (6.9)
Cannistra (ASCO 2006)
5/44 (11.4)
Wright (ASCO 2006)
4/62 (6.5)
Friberg (ASCO 2006)
2/13 (15.4)
Monk (Gyn Oncol 2006)
1/32 (3.1)
Wright (Cancer 2006)
2/23 (8.7)
Bidus (Gyn Oncol 2006)
0/3 (0)
Penson (ASCO 2006)
0/30
Total
16/298 (5.4%)
Han E, et al. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;105(1):3-6.
GI = gastrointestinal
NCI Registered Phase II Trials:
Anti-VEGF + Cytotoxic
Protocol
Drug
PI
Class
Status
MDA-2006-0329
AVE-0005 - Docetaxel
Receptor
Coleman
Active
NCT00129727*
Bev (+CT**)
MAb
Penson
Active
TEACO*
Bev + Ox/Docetaxel
MAb
Herzog
Active
MCC-105366c
Bev + Docetaxel
MAb
Wenham
Active
ALSSOPR0501
Bev + Paclitaxel ProteinBound
MAb
Schwartzberg
Active
NCT00343044
Bev + Topotecan
MAb
McGonigle
Active
NCT00267696
Bev + Carbo/Gem
MAb
Copeland
Active
AVF3953
Bev + IV Paclitaxel/IP 
Bev
MAb
McMeekin
Active
NCT00418093
Bev + Ox/Gem
MAb
Horowitz
Active
* Front Line
**Carboplatin and Paclitaxel
Bev = bevacizumab; Carbo = carboplatin
Gem = gemcitabine; IP = intraperitoneal
Mab = monoclonal antibody; Ox = Oxaliplatin;
VEGF = vascular endothelial growth factor
NCI Registered Phase II Trials:
VEGF + EGFR Inhibitors
Protocol
NCI
NCT00130520
NCT00520013
Drug
Class
Bev +Erlotinib
MAb
Bev +/Erlotinib
Consolidation
MAb
PI
Status
Friberg
Active
Alberts
Active
Campos
Active
Bev = bevacizumab
EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor
Mab = monoclonal antibody
VEGF = vascular endothelial growth factor
NCI Registered Phase II Trials:
Other Anti-Angiogenic Agents
Protocol
Drug
GOG 170-J
Enzastaurin
(TKI)
NCT00391118
CT +/[Enzastaurin 
Enzastaurin]
GOG 170-E
Target(s)
PKC -b
Imatinib (TKI)
PDGF-R
NCT00516841
Volociximab
(MAb)
51 Integrin
NCT00479817
AMG 386
(Peptibody)
Angiopoietins
NCT00039585
PI
Status
Usha
Suspended
(Not Listed)
Active
Schilder
Kohn
Completed
Multiple
Active
(Not Listed)
Active
CT = chemotherapy; GOG = gynecologic oncology group;
EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor; Mab = monoclonal antibody; PDGF-R = platelet derived
growth factor receptor; PKC-b = protein kinase C-beta; TKI = tyrosine kinase inhibitor
Bev + Topotecan in Platinum
Refractory Ovarian Cancer: Study
Design
 Single arm, 2-site phase II trial
PD as defined by
RECIST criteria
Platinum-refractory
OC; recurrence
< 6 mos of platinum
therapy; received
max of 2 previous
chemotherapy
regimens
Bevacizumab
10 mg/kg Days 1, 15
+ Topotecan
4 mg/m2
Days 1, 8, 15 for
28-day cycles
(N = 40)
Treatment
continued until
1 of the
following
events
Excessive toxicity
according to
prespecified criteria
Toxicity requiring
topotecan delay
> 2 weeks or
bevacizumab delay
> 2 months
Topotecan-related
toxicities requiring
> 2 dose reductions
McGonigle KF, et al. ASCO 2008. Abstract 5551.
Patients Surviving (%)
OS: Patients With PlatinumResistant Ovarian Cancer (N = 30)
1.0
Bev + Topotecan
.75
.50
.25
0.0
0
2
4
6
8
10
Time (Mos)
McGonigle KF, et al. ASCO 2008. Abstract 5551.
12
14
16
18
20
PFS in Patients Receiving Bev +
Topotecan by No. of Prior Regimens
Patients Without PD (%)
Patients with 1 previous therapy (n = 16)
1.0
Patients with 2 previous therapies (n = 14)
P = .040 by log rank test
.75
.50
.25
0.0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (Mos)
McGonigle KF, et al. ASCO 2008. Abstract 5551.
14
16
18
20
Best Response of Bev + Topotecan by
No. of Prior Regimens
No. of Previous
Regimens
Best Response (N =24)
PR or SD
PD
Total
5
9
14
8
2
10
13
11
24
1 previous
chemotherapy
2 previous
chemotherapies
Total
McGonigle KF, et al. ASCO 2008. Abstract 5551.
OS in Patients Receiving Bev +
Topotecan by No. of Prior Regimens
Patients Surviving (%)
1.0
.75
.50
Patients with 1
previous therapy (n = 16)
.25
Patients with 2 previous therapies (n = 14)
P = .043 by log-rank test
0.0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (Mos)
McGonigle KF, et al. ASCO 2008. Abstract 5551.
14
16
18
20
Ovarian Cancer at First Relapse
Definition of Sensitivity
P
R 0
3
I
M
A Refractory
R
Y
T
R
E
A
T
M
E
N
T
6
12
18
24
Months
Resistant
Sensitive
“Very Sensitive”
Defined as measurable recurrence, not biochemical (CA-125) recurrence
Platinum-Resistant Recurrence
• Drugs active in platinum-resistant disease
• Single agent regimens
• Treatment to progression, unacceptable
toxicity, or clinical complete remission
with each regimen
• Sequential use of agents with goal
of palliation