Transcript Slide 1

The U.S.-Mexico Border
Issues and Dynamics
Presented by
Manuel F. Zamora, Ph.D.
Mark Pullin, Ph.D.
Assistant Professors
Homeland Security
Issues and Dynamics
Outline
Economic relations
Illegal Immigration
Illicit Trafficking
Drugs
Humans
Weapons
Border Crime Violence
Money Laundering
Kidnapping, extortion and bribery
Strategies
USBP Strategic Plan aligned with National Security Plan
National Border Strategy
Border Enforcement Security Task Forces (21)
Texas Homeland Security Alliance
U.S. – Mexico Economic Relations:
Trends, Issues, and Implications
Why is Mexico of interest to the U.S.?
•
•
•
•
•
•
Bilateral economic and trade relationship
Mexico’s close proximity to the U.S.
High level of imports and exports
Strong cultural and economic ties connect the two countries
The U.S. is the largest source of foreign direct investment (FDI) in Mexico
Leading U.S. imports from Mexico (2010)
Oil and gas
$29.3 B
Motor vehicles
$27.5 B
MV parts
$23.4 B
Audio/video
$16.5 B
Communications equipment
$14.0 B
•
Leading U.S. exports
MV parts
Petroleum/coal
$12.6 B
$11.9 B
Chemicals
$7.0 B
Resin/synthetic rubbers
$6.2 B
Top U.S. Trading Partners:
2013 July YTD (Billions)
U.S. TRADE
Exports
Imports
TOTAL
#1 Canada
150.6
166.1
316.7
#2 China
55.1
202.8
257.9
#3 Mexico
110.7
138.4
249.1
#4 Japan
32.2
68.7
100.9
#5 Germany
23.8
54.4
78.1
Trade data:
http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/highlights/top/top1306yr.html. retrieved August 7, 2013
Mexico-U.S. Bilateral
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)
FDI consists of investments in real estate, manufacturing plants, and
retail facilities in which the foreign investor owns 10% or more of the
entity.
 U.S. invested $90.3 billion in Mexico in 2010
 Mexico invested $12.6 billion in the U.S. in 2010
U.S. companies are able to locate their labor-intensive operations in
Mexico and lower labor costs in the overall production process.
Mexican border cities had the highest manufacturing activity
Palaeo Channels of Chicontepec, place Mexico 3rd in the world
for oil reserves; 7th in current production (3.0 B bbl/day);
behind Canada (3.3 B bbl/day; ahead of UAE (2.8 B bbl/day).
Foreign Investment in Mexico
Automakers
Yokohama-based Nissan ($400+ million)
Japan’s Mazda Motor Corp ($400+ million)
General Motors Corp. (Detroit, MI) ($400+ million)
Honda Motor Corp. (will build $800 million plant in Celaya)
Chemicals
DuPont (largest world producer of titanium-dioxide pigment)
$500 million to boost this ingredient for use in paints
Wilmington, DE based company will expand Altamira, MX plant
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-05/booming-mexico-u-s-trade-buoys-kansas-city-southernfreight.html, published January 4, 2012, retrieved April 15, 2012
Demographic Comparison,
2013
MEXICO
UNITED STATES
Population:
115 million (53.3 pov.)
313.8 million (46.2 pov.)
Median age:
27.4
37.1
Birthrate:
18.87/1,000
13.7/1,000
Death rate:
4.9/1,000
5.3/1,000
Urbanization:
78% of tot. pop.
82.0% of tot. pop.
Infant mortality: 16.77/1,000
6/1,000
Life expectancy at birth: Male:
73.84
Female: 79.63
76.05
81.05
Unemployment:
7.4% (Jul, 2013)**
5.09% (June, 2013)*
http://www.indexmundi.com/mexico/demographics_profile.html
http://www.indexmundi.com/united_states/demographics_profile.htm
* tradingeconomics.com ** data.bls.gov, also Centers for Disease Control (U.S. death rate)
Worker Remittances
to Mexico
Foreign currency in Mexico
#1 Oil
#2 Tourism
#3 U.S. worker remittances (239,000 immigrant Mexicans lost their
jobs, 2008; 100,000 in construction)
Remittances were $25.1 billion in 2008 as workers in the U.S. sent
money to family members, especially in regions of the country
experiencing economic crisis or natural disasters.
#3? DTO transactions and profits ($300 B Gross)
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL32934.pdf, published January 25, 2012, retrieved April 15, 2012 (InterAmerican Development Bank, The Multilateral Investment Fund.)
MX government channels to infrastructure and investment rather than consumption, although families use funds
for healthcare, food, clothing, and other household expenses.
Illegal Immigration:
The “magnet” is employment!
Why is the border an issue?
TOC/DTO create and maintain illicit corridors for border crossings that can
be employed by other secondary criminal or terrorist actors or organizations.
Public safety and national security concerns
Federal law violations; crimes (2% sex offenders; unknown fugitives)
Inflow of illegal drugs and other contraband; WMDs
Terrorists (FBI Terrorist Screening Center, PPD #6 1,500 nominations on list)
2007:
2010:
11.8 – 12.4 mil.
10.8 – 11.2 mil. (2011: 11.1 mil.)(6.8 mil.; 59% from Mexico)
300,000 unauthorized inflows per year
Apprehensions reached a 42-year low
Philosophical shift: “prevention through deterrence” to
“prevention through consequences”
Up to 40 concurrent detention hearings
No “catch and release;” Zero tolerance
U.S. Border Patrol Apprehensions of Deportable Aliens, FY1991FY2011)
DHS Office of Immigration Statistics, Statistical Yearbook; DHS Annual Financial Report FY2011
U.S. Border Patrol Apprehensions of Deportable Aliens, Southwest
Border by Selected Sectors (FY 1992-FY2011)
DHS Office of Immigration Statistics, Yearbook of Immigration Statistics FY2010; USBP Fiscal Year Apprehension
Statistics, 2011
Smuggling Fees Paid by Unauthorized Mexican Migrants, 19802009
Princeton University Mexican Migration Project & University of California, San Diego Mexican Migration Field
Research Program; adjusted to U.S. dollars using BLS CPI Research Series Using Current Methods (CPI-R-US)
Missing Information?
According to the DHS:
Documented immigrants with unexplained “overstays: 1 million
1,901 were labeled national security or public safety risks
The location of 266 is unknown (Washington Times, July 30, 2013)
Also:
Undocumented, illegal immigrants represent many countries that pose
a threat to U.S. national and homeland security:
The immigrants include extremist group members and members from
states with groups that pose a risk to the U.S.: Yemen, Syria,
Afghanistan, etc., and include some members of Designated Foreign
Terrorist Organizations
(Secretary of State, per Sec. 219, Immigration and Nationality Act).
War Without Borders Video
Fueling Mexico’s Drug Trade
Rafael Reyes, DEA Chief of Operations
Mexico and Central America
2009
Drug Cycle: Violence and Corruption
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/w
orld/2009-mexican-cartel/
U.S.-Mexico Border:
Trafficking Facts1
Trafficking: Routes are similar and crimes are closely related
Drugs
90% of illicit drugs in the U.S. enter through Mexico border
#1 drug use is marijuana
#2 is prescription drug abuse
U.S. is world’s largest importer of ecstasy (MDM; UNODC, 2010)
Humans
Weapons
200,000 – 300,000 illegal immigrants
Sexually exploited (80%); labor trafficked (18%)
Burden on U.S. social services; T and U visas for LEO assistance
87% of firearms seized by MX are traced to U.S. purchases
2008: U.S. #1 in all arms deliveries ($12.2 billion; 38.4%)
2008: U.S. arms deals totaled $56.3 billion
U.S. arms intercepted in China, Russia, Mexico, Philippines,
Somalia, Turkmenistan & Yemen (UNODC, 2010, Globalization of
Crime)
UNODC; US State Department; CRS Report 2011; 43% of border: federal & tribal land;
Agriculture/Interior
1
Immigrant and Transportation Routes1
1
McCaffrey & Scales (2011) Texas Border Security: A Strategic Military Assessment
Drug Trafficking Organizations
Strategic intent of Mexican cartels: “Seek to create a “sanitary
zone” inside the Texas border – one county deep – that will provide
sanctuary from Mexican law enforcement and . . . Enable cartels to
transform Texas’ border counties into narcotics transshipment
points for continued transport and distribution into the U.S.”
(McCaffrey & Scales, 2011, Executive Summary).
Texas DPS Safety Director Steven McCraw has testified that . . . six
of seven cartels have established command and control facilities
in Texas cities that rival even the most sophisticated battalion or
brigade level combat headquarters (p. 22).
U.S.-Mexico Border
Crime and Violence
Bribery, extortion, corruption
USBP
LEO, politicians, government officials
Assaults on federal officers
Violent crime (“spillover violence”)
Kidnappings for ransom (Mexico 49/day; Phoenix 359/year, 2009)
“Crime rates are lower in border cities than in other large cities,
and crime rates appear to have fallen faster in these border cities
than in other large cities during the period of enhanced border
enforcement since 1990” (CRJ, 2011, p. 32).
Fear (Farmers & ranchers confronted; armed confrontations; thefts)
Migrant deaths (1989-271; 2010-2011-360)
Key Strategies
Personnel Deployment
45 ports of entry (18 in TX)
2,000 miles; CA, NM, AZ, TX (1,200 miles)
20,000 USBP (over 5,000 to SW border)
DoD (Ch 18, Title X) National Guard (32 U.S.C. 502 (a)(f)
Tactical infrastructure
impede illicit cross-border activity, disrupt and restrict
smuggling operations, and establish a substantial
probability of apprehending terrorists seeking to enter U.S.
Fences, Roads, lighting, vehicle barriers1
Surveillance assets (remote and mobile to HQ)
Additional Assets: Office of Air and Marine (270 aircraft; 280 marine vessels)
UAS (Predator B systems and Guardians (NASOC)
Illegal Immigration Reform & Immigration Responsibility Act of 1996 (14 mi. SD); to Secure Fence Act of 2006
(layered; 3 segments SW border, 850 mi; HS Secretary authorized to construct reinforced fencing not less than 700 mi
SW border; additional physical barriers, roads, lighting, cameras, & sensors to gain operational control of SW border.
10-6-2011, 351 mi of pedestrian fencing; 299 mi of vehicle fencing; FY 2007 $1.5 B appropriated for fence & barriers
($400 M appropriated (FY2012)
1
U.S. Border Patrol Agents, Total and by Region, FY 1980-FY2011
Source:1980-1991 (Syracuse University Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse; USBP Congressional Affairs (1992-2011)
Tactical Infrastructure Appropriations & Miles of Border Fencing
(FY 1996-FY2012)
From INS, DHS, Congressional Budget Justification reports; In 2003, Immigration inspections from INS, customs inspections
from U.. Customs, and USBP merged to form Bureau of Customs and Border Protection within DHS (SD, El Centro, Tucson, El
Paso, Marfa
National Border Patrol
Strategy
 Establish greater probability of apprehending terrorists & weapons
 Deter illegal entries through improved enforcement
 Detect, apprehend, and deter smugglers of humans, drugs, and
other contraband
 Leverage “Smart Border” technology to multiply deterrent and
enforcement effect
 Reduce crime in border communities, improve QOL and economic
vitality
 Increase community engagement
 Use equipment technology, and tactical infrastructure such as
landing mat fencing, stadium lighting, and cameras and sensors to
deter and detect aliens
U.S. Strategy to Combat
Transnational Organized Crime
• Start at home: Take shared responsibility
• Enhance intelligence & info-sharing
• Protect financial system and strategic markets against TCOs
• Strengthen interdiction, investigations, and prosecutions
• Disrupt drug trafficking and its facilitation of other transnational
threats
• Build international capacity, cooperation, and partnerships
Contributions to DTO Success
 Mexico
 Former military
 Legitimate efforts



Education
Healthcare
Festivals
 Judges (Short sent.)
 Hire former government
officials
 Corrupt businesses
 Politicians
 Technology (comm.)
 United States
 Facilitators
 Fast and Furious
 U.S. drug consumption




#1 cocaine; 40%
#1 heroin/MJ Colombia
#1 methamphetamine MX
Precursor chemicals
 CBP (LEO) corruption
 Gang involvement



Street
Motorcycle
Prison gangs
The U.S.–Mexico Border:
Security Studies Issues
 Strategy: “We need a multi-agency, multi-jurisdictional,
multi-level effort, with industry, academia, and the
general public” (Chief Mike Fisher, USBP, March 7, 2012)
 Purpose: “The bilateral economic relationship with
Mexico is of key interest to the U.S. because of Mexico’s
proximity, the high volume of trade, and strong cultural
and economic ties between the two countries” (M. Angeles
Villareal, CRS Report for Congress, January 25, 2012).
 CSS Program: “Border security programs are designed to
address the full range of threats to the sovereignty of
America’s borders, [including] the problems along the
U.S.–Mexico border” (Director Robert S. Ehlers, Ph.D., CSS)
Conclusion
“The border remains broadly vulnerable to illegal entries.”
Princeton University & University of CA San
Diego study revealed a 99% and 92+%
success rate if crossing attempt exceeded
one, respectively)