TPSS Leader & Teacher SLTs

2013-2014 School Year

The Teacher and Leader Evaluations work together to increase educator effectiveness and student outcomes.

Component Setting Goals Evaluation for Teachers

Teachers set two SLTs in collaboration with evaluator

Evaluation for School Leaders

Leaders set two SLTs in collaboration with evaluator

Focusing on Practice

Uses NIET / TAP Rubric to help prioritize instructional activities that will increase student outcomes and identify teacher strengths and areas for development Uses three domains that help prioritize leadership activities that will increase student outcomes and identify leaders strengths and areas for development Formal Feedback Cycles Minimum two observations

Evaluation Measures Final Evaluations

Weighted 50% Professional Practice and 50% Student Outcomes Based on five-point scale to be entered into CODE (converted to four point scale) Minimum two site visits Weighted 50% Professional Practice and 50% Student Outcomes Based on four-point scale to be entered into HCIS

Goals for school leaders should set a vision for what students should be able to accomplish by the year’s end.

Goals for school leaders should:

• • • • Tie into your district-wide goals Drive a leader’s daily work Align to teachers’ goals Help students be college and career ready

District Goals Based on 8 Critical Goals

Leader SLTs

• Grades 3 – 8 schools: – One must be based on percentage from chart of all tested grades and subjects.

• Example: On the Spring 2014 Leap and iLeap tests, 70% (210 of 300)the students will score proficient or above. – One must be based on moving at least 30%(60 of 200) students who score unsatisfactory or approaching basic up one level. • Example: On the Spring 2014 Leap and iLeap tests, 30% of the students that scored unsatisfactory or approaching basic on the previous year’s test will score one level higher.

Leader SLTs

• Grades 9 - 12 schools (examples for C school): – One must be based on percentage from chart of all EOC tested subjects.

• Example: On the Spring 2014 EOC tests, 64% of the students will score good or excellent. – One must be based on having a certain percentage of Juniors score 18 or higher on the March 2014 ACT assessment. • Example: On the March 2014 state-wide administration of the ACT test, 50% of the Juniors taking the test will score 18 or higher.

•

Leader SLTs

Grades K-2 schools (examples for C school): – One must be based on percentage from chart of all Dibels tested grades at the school.

• Example: On the End of the Year Dibels Next assessment, 64% of the students will be at benchmark. – For schools with a 2 nd grade, one must be based on the DBT: • Example: On the End of Year District Benchmark mathematics test in 2 nd grade, the school average will be 80%. – For schools without a 2 10%. • nd grade, leaders can choose to do a math goal using Aimsweb or another Dibels goal focusing on lowering the number of students intensive to below Example: On the End of Year Aimsweb math assessment, 80% of the students will score proficient.

School Leaders will set their Student Learning Target Goals using the State Averages for Schools in their Category or District Guidance when available.

See charts on upcoming slides

.

Average Percentage of Students Scoring Basic or Above on LEAP/iLEAP (2010-11) A Schools ELA Math Science Social Studies Totals B Schools ELA Math Science Social Studies Totals C Schools ELA Math Science Social Studies Totals D Schools ELA Math Science Social Studies Totals F Schools ELA Math Science Social Studies Totals

3rd 98 98 97 96 97 3rd 86 88 86 81 85 3rd 77 82 78 74 78 3rd 65 68 61 60 64 3rd 49 51 46 43 47 4th 100 100 97 98 99 4th 93 92 88 89 91 4th 86 84 79 79 82 4th 73 70 60 63 67 4th 50 52 41 44 47 5th 99 97 97 99 98 5th 87 87 85 86 86 5th 78 79 76 78 78 5th 66 65 55 60 62 5th 50 52 34 50 47 7th 100 100 100 99 100 7th 88 89 84 85 87 7th 79 79 75 76 77 7th 64 67 59 62 63 7th 45 49 39 44 44 6th 100 99 97 98 99 6th 88 89 86 86 87 6th 80 82 78 79 80 6th 64 67 59 59 62 6th 49 55 38 43 46 8th 100 99 98 100 99 8th 86 84 83 88 85 8th 81 77 76 80 79 8th 63 59 55 64 60 8th 41 41 28 39 37

Average EOC Proficiency (Good or Excellent) Rates (11-12) (English III and US History are estimates based on recent district performance) A Schools

Algebra I Geometry English II Biology English III 100 96 98 96 75 US History 70 Average of all 89

B Schools C Schools D Schools F Schools

Algebra I 80 Geometry English II 66 82 Biology English III 71 65 US History 60 Average of all 71 Algebra I 70 Geometry English II 58 73 Biology English III 62 55 US History 50 Average of All 61 Algebra I 60 Geometry English II 45 63 Biology English III 45 45 US History 40 Average of All 50 Algebra I 28 Geometry English II 25 41 Biology English III 25 35 US History 30 Average of All 31

District Goal 50

A Schools 70 B Schools C Schools D Schools F Schools 60 50 40 30

Dibels Next Goals % Benchmark on the EOY Dibels Test A Schools K 1st 2nd B Schools K 1st 2nd C Schools K 1st 2nd D or F Schools K 1st 2nd F Schools K 1st 2nd

90% 80% 80% 80% 70% 70% 70% 60% 60% 60% 50% 50% 50% 40% 40%

Scale for other non-tested grades and subjects

• • • • D or F schools: average of 70% C schools: average of 80% B schools: average of 90% A schools: average of 100% *based on the fact that A schools are expected to have 100% of their students proficient.

Formula for Achievement Ranges with 70% as the Goal

Insufficient Attainment

is any result below Partial Attainment. (1 point) Below 54%

Partial Attainment

is a range from 15% below the target to just below the actual SLT. (2 points) 54%-69% START HERE :

Full Attainment

is a range from the actual SLT up to 15% above the target. (3 points) 70% - 85%

Exceptional Attainment

points) is any result above the Full Attainment range. This range should represent more than a year’s worth of growth. (4 Above 85%

Example Scoring Range with 77% as the goal.

61% or less of students will score Basic or above 62% - 76% of students will score Basic or above -15% from goal 77% - 92% of students will score Basic or above +15% from goal 93% or more of students will score Basic or above

SLT Writing Process for Teachers

• • • • •

Step 1: The school leader sets goals and provides guidance to teachers regarding assessments and goals to use.

Goals must be set using Tier 1 assessments when available and/or using the same assessments that the leader used to set their goals. When Tier 1 assessments are not available or the leader goals do not include the content of the course (i.e. physical education), goals must be set using the most rigorous and reliable assessments available. A teacher made test should not be used as the posttest when other assessments are available (see assessment chart). When possible, one goal should be for all of the students a teacher teachers and the other goal should focus on moving lower performing students to proficient.

Student Learning Targets Due Dates

September 13: Directors, Supervisors, and Coordinators September 30: Principal Deadline October 31: Teacher Deadline

Resources

District SLT website (C&I Webpage): http://www.tangischools.org//site/Default.aspx?PageID=17531