Business Models for the Interdependent Digital Collection

Download Report

Transcript Business Models for the Interdependent Digital Collection

HathiTrust’s Past, Present and Future

Short- and Long-term Functional Objectives

• • • • • • • •

Short-term

Page turner mechanism (and Mobile!) Branding (overall initiative; individual libraries) Format validation, migration and error-checking Development of APIs that will allow partner libraries to access information and integrate it into local systems individually Access mechanisms for persons with disabilities Public ‘Discovery’ Interface for HathiTrust Ability to publish virtual collections Mechanism for direct ingest of non-Google content • • • • •

Long-term

Compliance with required elements in the Trustworthy Repositories Audit and Certification (TRAC) criteria and checklist Robust discovery mechanisms like full-text cross-repository searching Development of an open service definition to make it possible for partner libraries to develop other secure access mechanisms and discovery tools Support for formats beyond books and journals Development of data mining tools for HathiTrust and use by HathiTrust of other analysis tools from other sources

mobile

Short- and Long-term Functional Objectives

• • • • • • • •

Short-term

Page turner mechanism Branding (overall initiative; individual libraries) Format validation, migration and error-checking Development of APIs that will allow partner libraries to access information and integrate it into local systems individually Access mechanisms for persons with disabilities Public ‘Discovery’ Interface for HathiTrust Ability to publish virtual collections Mechanism for direct ingest of non-Google content • • • • •

Long-term

Compliance with required elements in the Trustworthy Repositories Audit and Certification (TRAC) criteria and checklist Robust discovery mechanisms like full-text cross-repository searching Development of an open service definition to make it possible for partner libraries to develop other secure access mechanisms and discovery tools Support for formats beyond books and journals Development of data mining tools for HathiTrust and use by HathiTrust of other analysis tools from other sources

Governance Budget, Finances Decision-making Policy Planning e-Commerce Print on Demand Financial contributions of partners Enterprise Management Communication and Coordination with partner institutions Project management Content Ingest Transformation Validation Repository Administration Hardware configuration and maintenance Web and application server configuration and maintenance Security Permissions Logging Content Access PageTurner Collection Builder Large-scale Search Research Center Bibliographic Catalog APIs Repository Administration Data management (content storage, backup, integrity checks, deletion) Hardware selection and replacement Content and Metadata specifications Disaster Recovery Processes for ensuring content integrity Quality Assurance Quality Review Content Certification Rights Management Copyright determination Copyright review Copyright information management (database) Rightsholder permissions User Services Usability User support (helpdesk) HathiTrust Functional Framework Bibliographic Data Management Entity description (record-level) Object identification (item-level) Data availability Outreach Project website Monthly newsletter Papers and presentations Communication with potential partners Surveys, general inquiries Repository evaluation and audit (e.g., DRAMBORA, TRAC) Collection Development Digital • Expansion beyond books and journals (born-digital, images and maps, audio) • Selection of content (for non Google volume ingest and pilots projects) Print • Cloud Library (effect of digital on print) Legal Risk management (use of materials) Partner agreements Advocacy

60% 50% 40% A global change in the library environment

Academic print book collection already substantially duplicated in mass digitized book corpus

June 2010 Median duplication: 31%

30% 20% 10% 0%

0 20 40 60 80

Rank in 2008 ARL Investment Index

June 2009 Median duplication: 19% 100 120

60% 50% 40% A global change in the library environment

Academic print book collection already substantially duplicated in mass digitized book corpus

June 2010 Median duplication: 31%

30% 20% 10% 0%

0 20 40 60 80

Rank in 2008 ARL Investment Index

June 2009 Median duplication: 19% 100 120

For public domain volumes: (PD*X*C)/N For a given incopyright volume: IC=(C*X)/H

Public Domain Cost

PublicDomainCost

=

PD

*

X

*

C

= $10,332.31

N PD

=

X

=

PublicDomainWorks SurplusModifier

= 1.5

= 2, 620, 054

C

=

N

=

AveCostPerVolume

= $0.163

NumberOfMembers

= 62

IC Single-part Monographs

$80 000,00 $70 000,00 $60 000,00 $50 000,00 $40 000,00 $30 000,00 $20 000,00 $10 000,00 $0,00 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61

Member

IC Serials

$160 000,00 $140 000,00 $120 000,00 $100 000,00 $80 000,00 $60 000,00 $40 000,00 $20 000,00 $0,00 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61

Member

All Costs

$250 000,00 $200 000,00 $150 000,00 $100 000,00 $50 000,00 $0,00 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61

Member

mono serial PD

A “surprise” 1m volumes

PublicDomainCost

=

PD

*

X

*

C

= $3,943.55

N PD X

= =

PublicDomainWorks

= 1000000

SurplusModifier

= 1.5

C

=

N

=

AveCostPerVolume

= $0.163

NumberOfMembers

= 62

Publisher Relations and Publishing

• • • Making it possible for rights holders to open access to works Making it possible for publishers to deposit digital masters for archiving (and open access) Making it possible to publish directly into HathiTrust

Uses of in-copyright materials

• • • • Services for users with print disabilities Section 108-related work Orphan works … and of course other cases with permission of the rights holder

HathiTrust Content Growth

Changing the way we work

• • • Pooling resources to solve a common problem once Applying resources from our individual institutions to collectively attack a common problem Coordinated and collective action (e.g., best practices)

Thank you!