The Power of Purposeful Feedback

Download Report

Transcript The Power of Purposeful Feedback

The Power of PURPOSEFUL FEEDBACK

L A U R A G R E E N S T E I N , E D . D .

LauraGreenstein, 2010 Examiner.com

TODAY’S GOALS

   Explore the research on the purpose and value of feedback Identify quality indicators of effective feedback Utilize feedback to inform and guide teaching and learning Q & A: What Are Yours?

THE TRUE VALUE OF FEEDBACK

Ruth Butler (1986) Students given only comments scored on average 30% higher. (Grades resulted in no gain, grades and comments cancelled the beneficial effects of comments.) Robert Marzano (2001) Providing feedback yields a 23 percentile gain John Hattie (2009) Feedback has an effect size of 1.13. The equivalent of one standard deviation Others: Susan Brookhart, Shirley Clarke, Helen Temperley, Dylan Wiliam, Anne Davies, Carol Dweck, Avraham Kluger and Angelo Denisi

THE FEEDBACK EXPERIENCE

You call this lunch!

tvguide.com

Q & A: What comes to mind when you hear the word “FEEDBACK”

clickaclass.com

FEEDBACK LOOP

 FEED UP: Where am I going; What’s the target; exemplars?

  FEEDBACK: How am I doing; descriptive, reflective?

FEED Forward: What’s the next step(s)?

Medals and Missions: Feedback

Evaluative Feedback

Judgment:

A+ work

Try harder next time

Good essay

Emerging skills

 

Descriptive Feedback

Focused on Targets:

• Accurate work in discussing the main points. What can you now expand on?

• Your hypothesis is a useful proposal. How can you rewrite it as an if…then…statement?

• Process was correctly followed but you made a simple mathematical error in step 2. Remember to check your work.

THE FOCI OF FEEDBACK

 

Types of Feedback: (Hattie and Timperley, 2007)

 Task/Performance  Process  Self-regulation

In the Context of

 Timing  Best Practice  Target Audience douglas.co.us

TASK/PERFORMANCE

Explain your chart I agree with your data, but consider alternative conclusions also.

PROCESS

underwhelmedcomic.com

Character needs development Describe what your character looked like and the way his clothes hung from his body

SELF REGULATION and DIRECTION

 Developing Next Steps http://assessment.tki.org.nz

Tundra.com

IT’S ALL IN THE TIMING

Wordpress.com

FEEDBACK TIMING

 Immediately in response to a question   Immediately to student misconceptions Sooner for process, slight delay is okay for task   Longer assignments: within 2 days with a review Expectancy of feedback raises achievement

BEST PRACTICE

Specific Under standable Best Practice Descrip tive Action able

SPECIFIC

Adequate amount and detail:  For the target  To the student

Incorrect strategy Awesome graphing but remember to label your axes.

DESCRIPTIVE

About the  Task   Process Self-regulation

Nice opening sentence Your opening sentence grabbed the reader with descriptive detail and introduced the mystery to be solved.

ACTIONABLE

Explains:  What to do  How to do it

It looks like you worked hard on your poster but it needs more detail You have a good start with your review of the main ideas in the center of your poster. It would help to use the side panels to provide supporting evidence.

UNDERSTANDABLE

Can be acted upon  Specific  Clear Cartoon Removed

Good presentation skills You engaged the listeners through your questioning strategy. Remember also, to make eye contact with your audience.

SORTING Thru FEEDBACK

Put the # of each example in the more or less effective column 1 . Feedback 2 weeks after the end of the unit. (example is below) 2.Rearrange your sentences in this sequence…then add more detail to each one.

3. B+ 4. I know you can do better with more effort 5. Your data is correct but these 2… are in the wrong category 6. Accurate content in your presentation. Next time think of ways to engage your audience perhaps with…

MORE EFFECTIVE LESS EFFECTIVE

1

SORTING Thru FEEDBACK

Put each example in the more or less effective column 1 . Feedback 2 weeks after the end of the unit.

2.Rearrange your sentences in this sequence…then add more detail to each one.

3. B+ 4. I know you can do better with more effort 5. Your data is correct but these 2… are in the wrong category 6. Accurate content in your presentation. Next time think of ways to engage your audience perhaps with…

MORE EFFECTIVE

2 5 6

LESS EFFECTIVE

1 3 4

Q & A: Now You Try It- Respond to this 5

th

history essay with one feedback statement.

grade

Pick one focus

Respond to content or style

Post 1 statement

Essay removed. Please respond to your own chosen student work.

EMERGING RESEARCH

 Questions yet to be answered: Is it more effective  In certain subject areas?

 At certain grade levels?

 With students from different backgrounds?

 For students with different aptitudes?

 With fixed vs. growth mindset?

 From teacher, self, or peers?

LOGICAL CONCLUSIONS

  How it is used to improve and guide teaching and learning is primary. Reasonable Recommendations  Use feedback as part of a spectrum of strategies   Use feedback selectively based on students and setting Use feedback responsively to inform instruction

TAKE-AWAYS

The mistake I was making was seeing feedback as something teachers provided to students… it was only when I discovered when it is from the student to the

teacher that I started to understand it better. (Hattie, p. 173)

Please leave behind: Two stars (what will take away?) and one wish (what else do you need?)

CONTACT INFORMATION

Laura Greenstein  [email protected]

 http://www.assessmentnetwork.net

What Teachers Really Need to Know About Formative Assessment

http://shop.ascd.org/productdisplay.

cfm?productid=110017

REFERENCES

 Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  Comments, and Grades on Intrinsic Motivation and Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 78 (3) pp. 210-216.

  Hodder and Stoughton.

  Brookhart, Susan (2008). How to Give Effective Feedback to Your Students. Butler, Ruth & Nisan, Mordecai (1986) Effects of No Feedback, Task-Related Clarke, Shirley (2003). Enriching Feedback in the Primary Classroom. London: Davies, Anne (2010). Making Classroom Assessment Work (2 nd Ed.) Connections   Hattie, John & Timperley, Helen (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research. 77, pp. 81-112. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&E RICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ782448&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&acc no=EJ782448

MORE REFERENCES

achievement. England: Routledge  dibQRMWbZG&sig=vqVQFaWbH-d0BNsqV17HwgaUGG0#v=onepage&q&f=false   Classrooms SPANZ Journal    Hattie, John (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=lh7SZNCabGQC&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&ots= Hawk, Kay & Hill, Jan (2001). The Challenge of Formative Assessment in Secondary Kluger, Avraham, & DeNisi, Angelo. (1996). The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review, a Meta-Analysis, and a Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory. Psychological Bulletin: 119 (2) pp 254-284.

http://www.tamu.edu/classes/payne/PA/Kluger%20&%20DeNisi%201996.pdf

      Marzano, Robert, Pickering, Debra, & Pollock, Jane (2001). Classroom Instruction That Works: Research-Based Strategies for Improving Student Achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Sadler, Royce (1989). Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–44.

Tunstall, Pat & Gipps, Caroline (1996). Teacher Feedback to Young Children in Formative Assessment: A Typology. British Educational Research Journal, 22 (4).