KinectFusion : Real-Time Dense Surface Mapping and Tracking
Download
Report
Transcript KinectFusion : Real-Time Dense Surface Mapping and Tracking
KinectFusion : Real-Time Dense
Surface Mapping and Tracking
IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality 2011
Science and Technology Proceedings (Best paper reward)
Target
Noisy data
Normal maps
Greyscales
Outline
•
•
•
•
•
•
Introduction
Motivation
Background
System diagram
Experiment results
Conclusion
Introduction
• Passive camera
• Simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM)
• Structure from motion (SFM)
– MonoSLAM [8] (ICCV 2003)
– Parallel Tracking and Mapping [17] (ISMAR 2007)
• Disparity
– Depth model [26] (2010)
• Pose of camera from Depth models [20] (ICCV 2011)
Motivation
• Active camera : Kinect sensor
• Pose estimation from depth information
• Real-time mapping
– GPU
Background- Camera sensor
• Kinect Sensor
– Infra-red light
• Input Information
– RGB image(1)
– Raw depth data
– Calibrated depth image(2)
(1)
(2)
Background – Pose estimation
• Depth maps from two views
• Iterative closest points (ICP) [7]
• Point-plane metric [5]
ICP
Background – Pose estimation
• Projective data association algorithm [4]
Background – Scene Representation
• Volume of space
• Signed distance function [7]
System Diagram
System Diagram
Pre-defined parameter
• Pose estimation with sensor camera
• Raw depth map Rk
Raw data
• Calibrated depth image Rk(u)
K
Rk
Rk(u)
where
and
Surface Measurement
• Reduce noise
• Bilateral filter
With bilateral filter
Without bilateral filter
Surface Measurement
• Vertex map
• Normal vector
Define camera pose
Camera frame k is transferred into the global
frame
System Diagram
Surface Reconstruction : Operate
environment
L
L
L3 voxel reconstruction
L
Surface Reconstruction
• Signed distance function
Truncated Signed Distance Function
-v
+v
Axis x
sensor
Surface
Fk(p)
+v
0
-v
Axis x
• Weighting running average
• Dynamic object motion
System Diagram
Surface Prediction from Ray Casting
• Store
• Ray casting marches from +v to zero-crossing
Corresponding ray
Surface Prediction from Ray Casting
• Speed-up
– Ray skipping
– Truncation distance
Axis x
sensor
Surface
System Diagram
Sensor Pose Estimation
•
•
•
•
Previous frame
Current frame
Assume small motion frame
Fast projective data association algorithm
– Initialized with previous frame pose
where
• Vertex correspondences
where
• Point-plane energy
• For z > 0
• Modified equation
where
Experiment Results
• Reconstruction resolution : 2563
• Test camera pose
• kinect camera rotates and captures 560 frame
over 19 seconds in turntable
Experiment Results
• Using every 8th frame
Experiment Results : Processing time
Pre-processing raw data, data-associations; pose optimisations; raycasting the
surface prediction and surface measurement integration
Demo
Conclusion
• Robust tracking of camera pose by all aligning
all depth points
• Parallel algorithms for both tracking and
mapping
Reference
[8] A. J. Davison. Real-time simultaneous localization and
mapping with a single camera. In Proceedings of the
International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2003.
[17] G. Klein and D. W. Murray. Parallel tracking and mapping for
small AR workspaces. In Proceedings of the International
Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 2007.
[26] J. Stuehmer, S. Gumhold, and D. Cremers. Real-time dense
geometry from a handheld camera. In Proceedings of the DAGM
Symposium on Pattern Recognition, 2010.
[20] R. A. Newcombe, S. J. Lovegrove, and A. J. Davison. DTAM:
Dense tracking and mapping in real-time. In Proceedings of the
International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2011
[7] B. Curless and M. Levoy. A volumetric method for building
complex models from range images. In ACM Transactions on
Graphics (SIGGRAPH), 1996.
[5] Y. Chen and G. Medioni. Object modeling by registration of
multiple range images. Image and Vision Computing (IVC),
10(3):145–155, 1992.
[4] G. Blais and M. D. Levine. Registering multiview range
data to create 3D computer objects. IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI),
17(8):820–824, 1995.